On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 15:47:15 +0200, Gijs Hillenius wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-12
> Severity: important
>
> Running linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 garbles the screen of this laptop,
> both inside and outside of X. It makes the kernel unusable.
>
What version were you using before
reassign 579858 linux-2.6 2.6.32-11
retitle 579858 xen + nouveau → fail (page fault related)
kthxbye
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 23:50:59 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
> Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-3
> Severity: normal
>
> This is awesome. ON the non
reassign 579017 linux-2.6 2.6.32-9
kthxbye
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 15:27:11 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
> Version: 1.2.2-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Without giving the explicit options (commented out in my xorg.conf
> below) the touchpad gets configured
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 14:15:51 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> >If this is reproducible with
> >linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (version 2.6.32-12)
>
> Where can I get 2.6.32-5?
>
Should be on the mirrors since earlier today, I think.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Cheers,
Juli
reassign 580026 linux-2.6 2.6.32-11
retitle 580026 [drm/i915] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP in i915_gem_execbuffer
kthxbye
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:25:46 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.5+5
> Severity: normal
>
> The crash happened while switching tabs in the
reassign 551256 linux-2.6
close 551256 2.6.32-10
kthxbye
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 15:25:23 -0400, John Lindgren wrote:
> Upstream report has it that the flicker is fixed by upgrading the kernel
> to 2.6.33. I don't have the hardware to test with any more.
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bu
tag 577541 - experimental
kthxbye
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 17:18:11 +0200, Örjan Askhult wrote:
> After update I can't get the previous used screen resolution 1280x1024,
> only 1024x768.
>
> ** Kernel log:
> [ 1472.410429] [drm:i915_add_request], 14101
> [ 1472.410487] [drm:i915_add_request], 141
reassign 575226 xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
retitle 575226 radeonhd broken with KMS
severity 575226 serious
tag 575226 sid
kthxbye
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 14:18:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 575226 firmware-linux-non
this.
> Le mercredi 24 mars 2010, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:40:36 +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Regarding X, only xserver-xorg-core, xserver-xorg,
> > > xserver-xorg-video-radeon was recently upgraded.
> >
> > The latest xs
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:40:36 +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Regarding X, only xserver-xorg-core, xserver-xorg,
> xserver-xorg-video-radeon was recently upgraded.
The latest xserver-xorg-video-radeon package enables kernel mode
setting. This is incompatible with the radeonhd X driver. You shoul
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: serious
Due to some old bug in udev, my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules
had a number of duplicate rules (timestamp on the file suggests it might
have been #374539). This leads to an error in linux-base.postinst:
Modification of non-creata
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 04:03:15 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:50 +0100, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> > Package: linux-libc-dev
> > Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > When trying to install linux-libc-dev from experimental, dpkg shows the
> >
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 09:31:52 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 26 February 2010 17:23, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:54:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:56:53 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >>
> >&
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 23:20:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Fedora has been backporting drm (and nouveau) for a long time but it's
> not so clear what means for RHEL.
>
> I think this is something we will also consider doing in Debian. A year
> from now I expect nv to be dead and radeon UMS t
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:58:54 +0100, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> Feb 24 12:34:40 psytux kernel: [0.548357] vesafb: framebuffer at
> 0x8000, mapped to 0xc9001098, using 5120k, total 5120k
> Feb 24 12:34:40 psytux kernel: [0.548360] vesafb: mode is 1280x1024x32,
> linelength=512
Ben,
any chance you could try the kernel branch Dave points to in the message
below?
Thanks,
Julien
- Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org -
From: bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:55:47 GMT
To: dri-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:56:53 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When kms is enabled the radeon module cannot be unloaded. rmmod
> complains that the module is busy while the X server is not running.
>
> This is different from my experience with intel KMS and quite annoying.
>
err, it's exactly
reassign 570125 linux-2.6
retitle 570125 [drm/i915] suspend/resume only works once with kms
tag 570125 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 13:40:17 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Jérémie Bouttier wrote:
> > Haha, I think I have the culprit : xserver-xorg-video-intel.
> >
> > It added a file
reassign 569892 linux-2.6
retitle 569892 [drm/i915] doesn't fall back to native backlight method without
a platform driver
kthxbye
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 20:28:30 +0100, Robert Joop wrote:
> xbacklight has stopped working after some sid upgrade a couple of weeks ago.
>
> (I've read about a see
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 00:02:14 -0500, Ben Wong wrote:
> Debian/stable (2.6.26): DRI works perfectly.
> Ubuntu/karmic (2.6.31): DRI works perfectly
> Debian/testing (2.6.32): DRI destroys file system
> Debian/testing using karmic's radeon driver: DRI destroys file system
>
Is that all with the s
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 17:31:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 26 janvier 2010 à 16:19 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit :
> > > True, but this one is trivial to exploit and is also fairly easy to
> > > prevent so
> > > why stick with it?
> > I can only agree here. procps should at least
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 20:02:31 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> >
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
> unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
> from migrating for the time being?
>
The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't can
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 00:27:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
> etc? Did you see any problem with that?
>
Dropping those and udev's blacklist would be fine as far
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:34:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 12, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Marco, what do you think of switching to this, or at least using its fb
> > part?
> I do not mind explicitly blacklisting each fb driver, but I would like
> to hav
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:06:52 +0100, tom schorpp wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-2
> Severity: normal
>
> At least tvtime works in indirect mode only, high CPU.
>
> Does not look like missing Firmware, no FW err messages in dmesg or syslog:
>
> --- /var/log/Xorg.0.log 200
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:29:45 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to report that I have never be able to use
> xserver-xorg-video-intel with 2.6.32 from Debian. Lurking around on the
> web, I tried to boot since yesterday with mem=3500M (I have 4Go or Ram)
> and it is worki
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:30:04 -0800, Svend Sorensen wrote:
> I think this is the upstream bug report:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14781
>
That one says 965GM in summary. Not sure it's the same thing.
Then again, bugs with different people reporting different issues on
diff
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:30:18 -0800, Ben Wong wrote:
> > When you say it 'only affect systems that use the radeon/R200_cp.bin
> > firmware' do you mean that you tested systems with other Radeon GPU
> > versions and they were not affected, or that this problem appeared after
> > the firmware was
reassign 564807 linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
kthxbye
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:41:59 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 06:44:39PM +0000, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 18:39:03 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:30:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 00:36:49 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 00:31:53 +0000, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > I tried to look at how other distributions handle this, and this
> > /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf file seems to be a Debianism. From what
>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 00:31:53 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I tried to look at how other distributions handle this, and this
> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf file seems to be a Debianism. From what
> I can tell (looking at the ubuntu archive and a fedora 10 box) other
> distros
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 18:24:56 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> One issue that showed up is that i915 isn't getting loaded by udev,
> because /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf contains:
>
> # This directive blacklists all devices which are members of the display
> class.
> #
Hi,
Dave Airlie spotted some bugs in the radeon dri driver in mesa, that
might explain the memory (and filesystem) corruption you have been
seeing.
Packages including his fixes for these bugs are available in
experimental, could you please install libgl1-mesa-dri and
libgl1-mesa-glx from there (v
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 00:07:40 +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +0000, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Looks like we have a pretty nasty bug in radeon drm…
> >
> > I chatted a bit with Dave Airlie o
reassign 560126 linux-2.6 2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1
found 550977 2.6.30-8
tag 560126 - unreproducible
merge 550977 560126
affects 550977 xserver-xorg-video-radeon
forwarded 550977 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14535
kthxbye
Looks like we have a pretty nasty bug in radeon drm…
I cha
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 15:44:54 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> It's worth noting that Fedora 12 already ships Nouveau, with 2.6.31 kernel.
>
It's worth noting that RH has a number of people working on their
graphics stack which is quite different from ours. And that fedora is
hardly comparabl
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 20:33:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 16:50:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > > > The X packages will be able to use modprobe
> > > > config files to enable KMS at run time as required.
> >
>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 14:44:01 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Can you try booting
> 24etch1 in an effort to bisect the failure? In case you can't find the
> deb (I couldn't) I've built one that you can find in my home directory
> on zelenka.debian.org.
>
http://stabile.debian.org:5001/package/lin
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 17:39:59 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 05:39:08PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
> > Version: 2.6.30-8
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > wireless
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 16:50:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The X packages will be able to use modprobe
> > > config files to enable KMS at run time as required.
>
> This is not for the kernel team to do.
>
FWIW, this is done for intel in experimental, probably soon in unstable.
For radeo
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-1
Severity: important
Hi,
Daniel Vetter ported video overlay support for intel chips to kernel
mode setting, his patches are in drm-intel-next, queued up for 2.6.33.
He provided a backport of that to 2.6.32 at
http://gitorious.org/daniel-s-linux-stuff/linux-kern
Hey,
[sorry for the cross-post. please don't reply to all lists]
I've sent the attached mail to debian-qa, and would be interested to
have the opinion of maintainers of other big (sets of) packages.
Cheers,
Julien
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
First a bit of background: I spent yesterday going thr
reassign 550977 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
retitle 550977 filesystem corruption (drm related?) on thinkpad t40
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 22:25:46 +0100, ender wrote:
>
> > Did this filesystem corruption happen only once, or more than that?
>
> It did happen every time I tried, with one exception.
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
wireless connection suddenly disconnected, dmesg shows:
[432878.569664] wlan0: disassociating by local choice (reason=3)
[432878.573647] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:24:97:89:f5:70 try 1
[432878.928058] wlan0: deauthentic
Your ISP rejects my mail, so trying again...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 20:17:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:32:26 -0400, Dominique Brazziel wrote:
>
> > The previous information was from a successful (X starts w/1152x864)
> > run. Below is the rele
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 20:15:42 +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> : host snetmx3.prodigy.net[207.115.20.24] said: 553 5.3.0
> flpd124 - n9EIFfZx003955, DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 91.121.16.100
> >_is_blocked.__For_information_see_http://att.net/blocks (in reply to MAIL
> FROM command)
sigh
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:32:26 -0400, Dominique Brazziel wrote:
> The previous information was from a successful (X starts w/1152x864)
> run. Below is the relevant DRM info from the unsuccessful (1024x768)
> run, with complete dmesg and X log info attached:
>
Thanks for this. Could you test w
reassign 525896 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.3.2-2+lenny6
kthxbye
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:16:48 +0200, Pierre Bauduin wrote:
> Hi and thanks for your interest...
>
> Here's the /var/log/Xorg.log when I boot a Debian Live system based on
> Debian 5.0 (not 5.0.1) based on linux-image-2.6.26-1-6
reassign 549335 linux-2.6 2.6.30-6
close 549335 2.6.30-7
kthxbye
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 13:31:36 -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
> [ 59.363422] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> [ 59.400604] [drm] Initialized r128 2.5.0 20030725 for :00:10.0 on
> minor 0
> [ 59.484082] agpgart-uni
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 19:15:52 +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
>
>
> Hi Vincent,
> I would be delighted, no overjoyed to give you all the information you
> want. Please tell me what you need and I'll do my best to supply that
> information.
>
> I did try to use the UUID in the grub root paramet
clone 546714 -1
submitter -1 Fredrik Häll
reassign -1 linux-2.6 2.6.30-6
tag -1 - moreinfo
retitle -1 [agpgart-sis] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
kthxbye
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 17:32:16 +0200, Fredrik Häll wrote:
> [0.00] Linux version 2.6.30-1-686 (Debian 2.6.30
reassign 541307 src:linux-2.6 2.6.30-1
retitle 541307 agp/intel: gpu lockups on 865G
tag 541307 upstream patch
kthxbye
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:27:39 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Excerpts from Brice Goglin's message of Thu Aug 20 00:07:26 -0700 2009:
> > 865G support is severely broken unfortunat
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
> work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
> Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
> (with many many suspend-resume c
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +02
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When
> should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (mean
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 18:25:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> The problem is that the standard severities cannot be mapped 1:1 on
> the kernel package. Since the kernel is the core component of 99%
> of all Debian systems, it's in the nature of the beast that any
> problem which makes a syst
reassign 529939 linux-2.6
kthxbye
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 14:45:11 +0200, Petr Malat wrote:
> When intel driver is active, the atheros driver functionality is crippled.
> I've measured this with ping - if I have
> only xterm running, average RTT is about 100ms. With complete KDE RTT is over
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 17:55:17 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When running with kernel modesetting, the resolution of the
> console is set to 1024x768 although the native resolution is
> 1280x800.
>
> The X ser
reassign 532434 linux-2.6
retitle 532434 [drm/radeon] kernel oops
kthxbye
an oops is a kernel bug, reassigning.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 18:18:52 +0700, Alexey Salmin wrote:
> Hello!
> When I tried to close GoogleEarth program screen
> freezed. I tried to restart Xorg or reload radeon
> module vi
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 13:41:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
> > > "f
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:10:48PM +0200, Pierre Bauduin wrote:
> I am using Debian Live on USB memory sticks.
> When the kernel that comes with Debian 5.0 was linux-image-2.6.26-1-686, I
> could flawlessly boot Debian Live in GUI mode (X.org) on a Hewlett Packard
> (HP) DC7100 machine.
> Now that
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25:59 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Regarding turning on CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ELANTECH...
>
> According the kernel help text,
>
>Note that if you enable this driver you will need an updated
>X.org Synaptics driver that does not require ABS_PRESSURE
>
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
> > > "fbdev"
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
> > "fbdev" as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a
> > b
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
> "fbdev" as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a
> better fix for Xorg.
We can probably do that for r1.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
reassign 495673 linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
retitle 495673 linux-2.6: synaptics touchpad not detected (worked with 2.6.22-3)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.28-1~experimental.1~snapshot.12651
Severity: serious
Justification: undeclared file conflict
Hi,
the kernel started installing drm headers which previously came with
libdrm-dev. If we decide to do things this way for squeeze,
linux-libc-dev will need to Repla
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
> > Even if the revert is the o
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
>
Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in
lenny?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:47:48 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The kernel patch is now in mainline, commit id
> 82e14a6215cbc9804ecc35281e973c6c8ce22fe7 (attached).
>
Doesn't apply as-is because 2.6.26 is missing 'intel_agp: official na
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 00:44:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 00:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm going to post a series of patches that aim to fix the RC bugs
> > relating to sourceless firmware.
>
> Unfortunately, a quick search suggests that there is still more lef
tag 502387 patch
clone 502387 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6
retitle -1 [intel agp] stolen memory counting broken on G4X
kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 13:45:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 08:48:12 +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> > Since some days, may
severity 502387 important
retitle 502387 [G4X] complete system hang
kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 08:48:12 +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Since some days, maybe since the upgrade from xserver-xorg-core
> from 2:1.4.2-6 to 2:1.4.2-7, the system has a total hangup when
> I specify to use the in
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
>
> I'd say a NEWS entry.
>
If the package doesn't exist anymore, it can't have a NEWS file. And
spamming
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so
> first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this
> is more up to you and RM team then me. My preference would be:
>
> - upload to experim
Package: libpciaccess,linux-2.6
Severity: important
the pci_device_map_range() function from libpciaccess which is used by
the X drivers to map pci BARs is implemented on linux using sysfs
resourceN files, which the kernel only creates on architectures where
HAVE_PCI_MMAP is defined. This is not
unmerge 475852
close 461760 2:1.4.1~git20080131-4
reassign 475852 linux-2.6
kthxbye
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 08:35:04 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> I've just upgraded my system and this wasn't fixed. I believe that this is a
> kernel problem though, but I don't know which package I sh
reassign 456007 linux-2.6
tag 456007 fixed-upstream
kthxbye
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 19:28:03 +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:48:35PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:37:10AM +0300, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> > > I have 965GM and in my situ
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:10:17 +0100, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > drivers/media/video/dabfirmware.h
>
> ...
>
> > drivers/net/tokenring/3c359_microcode.h
>
> > In other words, *all* of the above drivers.
>
> Wrong!
>
> Those are not the *drivers* they are the sourc
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 14:37:03 +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi
>
> The linux/compiler.h file was in the linux-kernel-headers package, which got
> removed from unstable. The file as available for all archs, although afaik
> the code is not absoluteley arch-indep. The best way would probably
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:04:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This looks similar to #426738, i'll try to test with 2.6.22-rc3 in a few
> days and report back.
>
The BUG() doesn't seem to happen with linux-image-2.6.22-rc3-686 version
2.6.22~rc3-1~experimental.1
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 00:09:23 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> ** Kernel log:
> [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30
> [] acpi_processor_idle+0x235/0x40a [processor]
> [] cpu_idle+0xb5/0xd6
> ===
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
> [] soft
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.21-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
since the upgrade to 2.6.21, I get the messages shown below in dmesg
(the machine is an intel core duo-based laptop).
Cheers,
Julien
-- Package-specific info:
** Version: Linux version 2.6.21-1-686 (Debian 2.6.21-4) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
severity 410956 important
reassign 410956 linux-2.6
thanks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 22:13:11 +0100, Arjen Bax wrote:
> Package: xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-11
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> From time to time, especially when using "big" applications (e.g., Gimp)
On Sat, Jan 6, 2007 at 12:42:56 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> What I meant is that a name change for the source package to
> "linux-2.6.18" means that any packages that now have a (build) dep on
> "linux-2.6" will need to change that dependency (and again when, after the
> release the kernel team sw
severity 394690 grave
thanks
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 16:25:34 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Same problem here on thinkpads T43 and R52, with 2.6.17, 2.6.18 and
> 2.6.19-rc2. Even sysrq does not work after the freeze. Might be
> kernel related. Cloning to linux-2.6.
>
My system freezes too using
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I need the sx module on one of my machines, but the 686 kernel image is
built without CONFIG_SX. Please consider adding this module to the
configuration (it's already enabled for the 486 flavour, and I don't
know of any reason to have a
301 - 389 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
