Hi,
On 09/05/2017 10:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
For some reason the CD building process is omitting several packages
that should be included. I have not yet figured out what the problem
is. Still investigating.
Many thanks for your hard work on this.
In the meantime I
On 09/08/2017 11:32 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I have generated an updated set of debian-installer images for
Debian Ports which also now includes alpha [1].
I have fixed the installation issues on hppa and sparc64, in
both cases the bootloader installer was missing.
I have
On 09/11/2017 11:23 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 09/10/2017 07:42 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/10/2017 06:32 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I yesterday tested the image from [1] (SHA256:
b07736dfa5bd167352d8f17f1d9bfc62fa9762f5496d0d134801b91f80bfb6b4) on
an Ultra 10. Sadly the boot
On 09/10/2017 07:42 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/10/2017 06:32 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I yesterday tested the image from [1] (SHA256:
b07736dfa5bd167352d8f17f1d9bfc62fa9762f5496d0d134801b91f80bfb6b4) on an Ultra
10. Sadly the boot loader
installation still didn't work
On 09/06/2017 09:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I have found the issue and the new images are ready. I'm currently
waiting to get write permissions to upload them here:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/
Thanks, I already grabbed a copy for testing.
[...]
I
On 09/06/2017 12:22 PM, James Clarke wrote:
I only made a couple of minor changes; the edit you want is [0] by Alex
McWhirter.
James
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Sparc64?action=diff=25=26
Thanks for the pointer, I'll contact him directly.
On 09/06/2017 12:36 PM, Fedor Konstantinov wrote:
Hi,
there's no "Install SILO boot loader" option in the installer menu in
the latest (06.09.2017) debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso image. Despite
of that SILO is installed.
Regards,
Fedor
I can confirm this. But at least the boot loader
On 09/06/2017 05:21 PM, Fedor Konstantinov wrote:
I'm creating mirrored system disk.
For example I make partitions on two disks like the following:
1. 500MB for /boot - boot partition
2. 2GB for swap - swap
3. Whole disk - sun's whole disk
4. 31,6GB for / - rest for the root fs
Then I create
Hi Adrian,
On 09/08/2017 04:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
Will recreate the images in the evening. Sorry for that.
I yesterday tested the image from [1] (SHA256:
b07736dfa5bd167352d8f17f1d9bfc62fa9762f5496d0d134801b91f80bfb6b4) on an
Ultra 10. Sadly the boot loader
Hi Adrian,
I just today tested the current sparc64 installer image ([1]) on my
SunFire V245.
[1]:
https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-cd/2017-09-03/debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
The installation went through without an issue:
* network interfaces are named `enp9s4f0` (0),
Hi
On 09/30/2017 10:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Some users of Linux on sparc64 have noticed that the serial console is not
working
directly after installation. This is because systemd does not enable the serial
console by default.
[...]
Does anyone have a suggestion for a patch?
On 09/30/2017 08:17 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/30/2017 07:19 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Not sure, but [1] says that it should be sufficient to add all console devices
to the kernel command line for systemd to detect and activate them, e.g.
`console=ttyS0,9600n8` - which includes
On 09/30/2017 10:47 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
We might not need to adjust the baud rate as systemd calls agetty with:
ExecStart=-/sbin/agetty --keep-baud 115200,38400,9600 %I $TERM
and from the agetty manpage:
baud_rate,...
A comma-separated list of one or
Hi all,
On 05/13/2018 07:21 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 05/13/2018 01:11 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 2018-05-13 18:05, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Can you try the netboot image contained in this tarball [1]?
Hrmm .. new problem. I think that the firmware on ye older Sun Netra
type units
On 05/14/2018 08:27 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
But as the GRUB2 part alone is already useful for people that are
familiar with the supporting service infrastructure, I just finished
up this part and put it into the Debian wiki. I will add more
information later if need be - I have to check the
On 05/14/2018 09:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
It may be worth testing an M3000 unit that has a Fujitsu SPARC-VII+
processor in it.
I have one :
$ psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 8 virtual processors (0-7)
SPARC64-VII+ (portid 1024 impl 0x7 ver 0xa1 clock 2860 MHz)
>
So if the cpu
On 05/14/2018 08:37 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Looking at https://wiki.debian.org/Sparc64#Network_booting it says :
"If you already have a working installation of Debian GNU/Linux
Sid for sparc64"
nope.
So this is chicken and egg here.
But I also later ([1]) wrote that you can
On 05/19/2018 10:03 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/18/2018 10:16 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Ok, thank you.
Ok, after testing I can confirm that at least on my T5220 a separate partition
for `/boot` is not needed. I'll try to check what my oldest UltraSPARC machines
make out
On 05/19/2018 09:49 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
In the meantime I found a way to extract the initrd from the TILO image. But
trying an installation with it and the CDROM kernel (which I assume is
identical to
the kernel inside of the TILO image) showed some issues (missing Debian
Hi Rick, hi Tom,
On 05/17/2018 03:09 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
Tom, Frans
Yes, perhaps it is fixed. However there are not many eyes on this
problem, so maybe it's not fixed.
There was a suggestion that this driver would only fail during
installation, but would be fine if you had booted from some
Hi,
On 05/16/2018 01:29 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I have been testing the installation of GRUB in debian-installer on disks
with GPT labels. Unfortunately, that doesn't work as grub-install
complains it cannot find the filesystem for /dev/vdiska1.
Looking at the partition table
On 05/16/2018 03:03 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Adding those recipes for partman-auto will resolve the issue.
Should we add additional recipes or better modify the existing sparc recipe?
However, we
should probably add a warning like we had for SILO which reminds users
they have to
On 05/16/2018 05:23 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
```
10 10 10 free
$iflabel{ gpt }
$reusemethod{ }
method{ biosgrub } .
```
Did you test whether this becomes a no-op one systems with Sun-label?
I don't remember, but I'd say no, because I wrote "[...] if the
On 05/16/2018 07:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'll give it a try on my T5220 with kernel and initrd from the image you
provided today and report back.
Thanks. We should definitely test this before committing those changes.
Unfortunately booting the CDROM kernel and initrd via
On 05/16/2018 08:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/16/2018 08:15 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Unfortunately booting the CDROM kernel and initrd via GRUB2 over the network
did not work as expected by me:
After the installer started it wants to load its components from the
non
On 05/16/2018 10:44 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
1. Can you test whether we can drop the /boot partition on Sun
partition tables?
I actually don't remember if I tested such a configuration. At least
d-i/grub-installer should support this now. I'll check that on my T5220 and
On 05/16/2018 09:16 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Ok, I just successfully tested this change.
Two questions left:
1. Can you test whether we can drop the /boot partition on Sun
partition tables?
I actually don't remember if I tested such a configuration. At least
Hi,
On 05/29/2018 04:34 PM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
and indeed , http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/dists/ does not
have buster subdirectory.
Doesn't it work to continue and then choose "sid" as release?
Cheers,
Frank
Hi Adrian, hi Eric,
thanks for getting GRUB2 with support for sparc64 into Debian Ports.
Looks very good so far. :-D
On 12/08/2017 01:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
root@andi:~#
7. Report back to the list and include your hardware and partition setup
I had some spare time
Hi,
On 12/29/2017 12:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I just updated of the Sun Fire T2000 we have in Debian from 4.14.2 to 4.14.7
which
apparently introduced a regression:
Segmentation fault
Same here for a T1000 (of course, but already with v4.14.2 as I just
found out, output
On 01/13/2018 05:50 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 01/13/2018 05:32 PM, James Clarke wrote:
Due to [0], I uploaded a fixed version of src:klibc for sparc64 to
unreleased,
which doesn't show up on packages.debian.org, and removes the lower
version
from unstable at the same time.
James
[0
Hi all,
I today wanted to check if a new libklibc package is available for
sparc64 that includes the fixes by James. I'd like to get my SPARC
machines into a working state again. :-)
But unfortunately the libklibc and klibc-utils packages are no longer
available for sparc64 as per
On 01/13/2018 05:32 PM, James Clarke wrote:
Due to [0], I uploaded a fixed version of src:klibc for sparc64 to unreleased,
which doesn't show up on packages.debian.org, and removes the lower version
from unstable at the same time.
James
[0]
Hi all,
since some recent package upgrades, login via serial console no longer
works for me on my T1000 (and also T5220, with same disk). Logins via
SSH are possible though (on T1000, the T5220 is still missing the
correct network configuration in `/etc/network/interfaces`, so no luck
there
On 02/04/2018 04:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/04/2018 04:22 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Thanks Adrian, tried that, but didn't help. After a restart, segfaults still
happen when trying to login via serial console. But in the process of `apt -f
install` also libc-bin, libc-dev-bin
On 02/04/2018 01:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Most likely a fallout of the binutils bug which generated broken code.
Try:
# wget
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-sparc64/main/g/gcc-7/libstdc++6_7.3.0-1+b1_sparc64.deb
On 02/04/2018 05:09 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Did you regenerate the initrd after the dist upgrades?
Yes, this was triggered automatically. And I also did that manually
during my first downgrades in the morning if it wasn't triggered.
Some systemd packages are in the initrd and
On 02/04/2018 05:47 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Downgrading binutils doesn’t make any sense unless you are building something
yourself.
Try generating a backtrace or at least find the package which is responsible.
We haven’t seen your segfault anywhere so far, that’s why I don’t know
On 02/05/2018 09:23 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/04/2018 09:58 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
* libcc1-0 (8-20180130-1 => 7.3.0-1+b1)
* libgcc1 (1:8-20180130-1 => 1:7.3.0-1+b1)
* libstdc++6 (8-20180130-1 => 7.3.0-1+b1)
...to see if this makes a difference and after r
On 02/07/2018 08:38 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/07/2018 11:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, I forgot to bump the kernel version inside debian-installer. This is an
easy fix.
I will do that later today and then rebuild the installer images.
New images are up -
On 02/08/2018 10:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/08/2018 10:22 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Thanks, I tried this one this evening, but although the kernel modules are
there now, the base installation fails due to a dependency problem of the
vim-tiny
editor:
(...)> What can we
Dear Adrian,
I just tried the latest sparc64 installer ISO from 2018-02-06 19:28h
(from [1]) on my T5220 and shortly after starting the "normal"
installation mode I get the following message:
```
No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch
between the kernel used by this
Hi Jerome,
On 02/22/2018 01:23 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
Frank,
Could you try the following in obp:
cd /pci@1f,0/ebus@c/eeprom@1,0
fff4bfd0 30 dump
and tell me the numbers in fff4bfd8 and fff4bfd9, I would like to know
if it's 01 80 or 01 83
That must be the "(real) machine type" (the second
On 02/18/2018 10:48 PM, James Clarke wrote:
Having said that if there are unaligned
accesses reported on alpha then those are likely to also happen on sparc64 and
be the critters we're looking for.
Why do these only trap to software on alpha and not on sparc64? Is that
due to a compiler
On 12/08/2017 01:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
We're in the process of migrating Debian for sparc64 from SILO to GRUB
as GRUB upstream is adding support for modern SPARC machines thanks to
the work of Eric Snowberg from Oracle.
In order to make sure GRUB works on all machines
On 02/19/2018 08:44 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/18/2018 10:40 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
, it's just that
the tool you are using is apparently producing unaligned accesses.
What you emphasized is from the AlphaServer DS25, do you assume that unaligned
accesses lead to bus
On 02/18/2018 10:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
IP-Config: no response after 3 s[ 7.950191] ipconfig(196): unaligned trap at
000120003868: 00011ffcf3af 28 2
[ 8.058589] ipconfig(196): unaligned trap at 000120003868:
00011ffcf3af 28 2
Hi,
I'm currently working on creating a useful configuration for network
boot with GRUB2 on sparc64. But I'm experiencing problems during IP
auto-configuration. This is done by using the `ip=[...]` kernel command
line option and the `ipconfig` tool ([1]) included in the initramfs
which
Hi,
On 02/19/2018 02:37 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Installing it **and** using the mentioned `grub-install` command to
install it on the `/boot` partition over the previous version
(2.02-2+sparc64.3) breaks booting with GRUB2:
Yes, this is something I don't have any control over.
On 02/05/2018 09:49 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Sorry, but my tests this morning after I again upgraded to the *8-*
versions of the above libs plus rebuilding initramfs again and reboot
showed segfaults when trying to login via serial console.
So I think I have to revert my conclusion from
Hi Jerome,
On 02/21/2018 08:39 PM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
* Is there a chance that your local DHCP setup is not working properly?
I highly doubt it, as it works well for another operating system on
this blade, although after the dhcp client failure from the installer,
I chose the option to setup
Hi Jerome,
On 02/21/2018 04:00 AM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
The same behavior is observed using
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
Timestamped "2018-02-07 20:35" (md5=be24e824141daf81e8ca3640a1f59f9a)
Hope this helps.
I fetched my Blade 100 (should be close
On 07/28/2018 06:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/18/2018 10:15 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
BTW although this ISO ([1]) already has d-i/silo-installer removed, the
d-i/grub-installer on it does not yet include the patch you committed on May
15th. But
one can fix that during
On 08/06/2018 10:39 PM, Fred wrote:
On 08/06/2018 11:20 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> [...]
The CDROM drive in my Ultra 10 is attached to IDE channel #2 (the IDE
port farer away from the CPU) and configured as Master device.
And I just now tested with the ISO in question (from 20180516
On 08/07/2018 05:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 08/07/2018 05:51 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Frank!
On 08/07/2018 05:41 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I'm no expert in these matters, but as per e.g. [1] it looks like the target
"a.out-sunos-big" is not
On 08/07/2018 02:56 AM, Fred wrote:
[...]
Out of frustration I changed the cdrom drive and the installation
proceeded with only one problem. The network has to be configured
manually but either the installer didn't provide this option or I missed
it.
It's there.
When you hit "Continue" in
On 08/07/2018 11:02 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Fred wrote:
[...] DVD drive [...]
Frank Scheiner wrote:
if a specific CDROM drive and
the assumed "compatible" driver don't work together, this results in a
situation like yours
Oh, sorry for my ignorance, as my Ultra 10 has a C
On 08/07/2018 09:45 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 08/06/2018 10:39 PM, Fred wrote:
On 08/06/2018 11:20 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> [...]
The CDROM drive in my Ultra 10 is attached to IDE channel #2 (the IDE
port farer away from the CPU) and configured as Master device.
And I ju
Hi Adrian,
On 08/07/2018 11:53 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
In case anyone wonders, here's a list of top priority bugs on
sparc64 that need to be worked on:
[...]
grub2: FTBTS (no bug report yet)
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=grub2=sparc64=2.02%2Bdfsg1-5=1533001924=0
On 08/06/2018 05:01 PM, Fred wrote:
On 08/06/2018 02:18 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Dear Gregor,
[...]
Cheers,
Frank
Hi,
I am the original poster for this thread.
Yes I know, but up to the point, where I asked Gregor to provide more
details about the problems he experienced, you didn't
On 08/06/2018 07:34 PM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
Could you be also more specific about which instructions you followed to make
it work for you?
The specific problem I had was due to the sparc64 installation requiring
unstable repositories, which is apparently not very well supported in the
Debian
Dear Gregor,
On 08/06/2018 10:40 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
The latest net install image I have found is dated 18 May 2018. Is that the
latest version? Will that install on an Ultra 10 without problems?
I wasn't able to install with the netinst ISO on my Ultra 10 without problems,
Are you
On 04/14/2018 06:11 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:>> FWIW, we also have
several machines with hypervisor support (sun4v).
I was thinking Oracle M-class gear and the late generation Fujitsu gear.
I have successfully tested GRUB on a PRIMEPOWER 250 with SPARC64 V+ (see
[1]). The problem is that
On 04/14/2018 08:53 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 04/14/2018 08:26 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I have successfully tested GRUB on a PRIMEPOWER 250 with SPARC64 V+
(see [1]). The problem is that the Linux kernel doesn't work on any
Fujitsu SPARC64 gear currently, not even on newer M-class machines
Hi Adrian,
On 04/14/2018 08:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Frank!
On 04/14/2018 08:26 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I have successfully tested GRUB on a PRIMEPOWER 250 with SPARC64 V+
(see [1]). The problem is that the Linux kernel doesn't work on any
Fujitsu SPARC64 gear currently
36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b5856a3..2c44fdf 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+grub-installer (1.154) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Frank Scheiner ]
+ * Add support for GPT partitioned disks on sparc/s
ex c5d2208..0ea969f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+partman-auto (145) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Frank Scheiner ]
+ * Add specific recipes for GPT partitioning on sparc/sparc64.
+
+ -- Frank Scheiner <frank.schei...@web.de> Mon, 05 Mar 201
Hi Adrian,
On 02/27/2018 11:42 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/26/2018 05:55 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Thanks for the upload. The new version works like version
2.02-2+sparc64.3 for me.
Frank, if you like, you can help improving grub-installer for sparc64.
Sure! :-) I had a first
On 03/02/2018 10:10 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Well, debian-installer normally does not allow you to choose the partition
table type.
I remember I had a problem - which must be due to that behaviour in
hindsight - when I used a GPT partitioned disk from an rx2620 in a
rp3440.
On 02/23/2018 11:38 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/23/2018 11:37 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I just uploaded "2.02+dfsg1-1+sparc64.1" which fixes the problem.
Just wait some hours until it shows up on the regular FTP servers or
fetch it from
On 1/6/19 21:40, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Switching list for GRUB on SPARC.
On 1/6/19 9:35 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
I think I will work on GRUB on SPARC next to address the build issues there.
Before re-enabling COFF for GRUB, we could look into GRUB as ELF on sparc64,
because
On 1/7/19 16:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/7/19 4:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I have done this now:
glaubitz@kyoto:~/grub-debian/test$ find /usr/lib/grub/sparc64-ieee1275/ -name
"*.img" -exec file {} \;
/usr/lib/grub/sparc64-ieee1275/diskboot.img: data
Hi Adrian,
On 1/6/19 21:43, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 1/6/19 21:40, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/6/19 9:35 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
If an ELF
version of GRUB can be provided by someone, I have a lot of sparc64
gear to test on - though not as many as OpenBSD supports ;-).
I do
On 1/7/19 16:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/7/19 4:31 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I tried to install GRUB using a ELF boot image:
root@debian:~/grub2# grub-install /dev/vdiska
Installing for sparc64-ieee1275 platform.
grub-install: error: the size of
On 1/7/19 21:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Jan 7, 2019, at 9:07 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 1/7/19 16:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/7/19 4:31 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I tried to install GRUB using a ELF boot image:
root@debian:~/grub2# grub-install /dev
On 1/27/19 19:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/27/19 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Although, oddly enough, I didn't see this issue on sparc64, so it
might be that I have just forgotten to add the package for powerpc
after it moved from release to ports.
That guess was
On 1/27/19 20:11, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 1/27/19 2:08 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 1/27/19 19:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/27/19 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Although, oddly enough, I didn't see this issue on sparc64, so it
might be that I have just forgotten to add
On 1/27/19 21:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/27/19 8:20 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Although I don't have much of a preference for 32bit sparc userland, as
there is no kernel support for old SPARC gear, but anything substantial
on why not, Dennis?
My last information
Hi,
On 6/1/19 04:52, Sonnie Hook wrote:
I have installed Debian/SPARC port from ISO image of 2019-05-24. At
first, I just followed the default "Use entire disk" to partition the
whole disk into
/dev/sda1 grub-boot
/dev/sda2 /
/dev/sda3 swap
GRUB was installed without any error message. But when
Hi all,
On 5/10/19 07:00, Meelis Roos wrote:
Hello Meelis,
Perhaps of interest ... i was being hit with the qla2xxx driver panics
as well on my v880.
I unplugged the second FCAL loop to the backplane, and this fixed it.
Perhaps this is something you could try?
I have not tried on my V880
Hi Adrian,
On 5/9/19 18:24, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I just uploaded updated installation images 2019-05-09 for the
following Debian Ports architectures:
[...]
* sparc64
I uploaded both CD images [1] as well as netboot images [2].
Please test those images and report back over the
On 5/9/19 20:01, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I tried to breath life into an old Netra which was just too old for
the task. Are you aware of any issues with the M3000 type machine?
Or even M4000 ?
I'm starting to wonder if my mails about ...
No I am not ignoring you.
I simply didn't recall over my
Hi Dennis,
On 5/9/19 18:29, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 5/9/19 12:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hello!
I just uploaded updated installation images 2019-05-09 for the
following Debian Ports architectures:
* alpha
* hppa
* ia64
* m68k
* powerpc
* ppc64
* sh4
* sparc64
I
On 5/9/19 19:42, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 5/9/19 1:35 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On 5/9/19 18:29, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 5/9/19 12:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hello!
I just uploaded updated installation images 2019-05-09 for the
following Debian Ports architectures
changing lists...
On 5/2/19 11:23, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Slightly off topic but I really need to do some SPARC testing as I am
swimming in that stuff. There just is no way to keep Solaris running
anymore on anything older than eight or nine years ago and so testing
my fav Linux distro seems
On 4/24/19 22:07, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 4/24/19 9:46 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> For reference the CHRP bootinfo.txt isn't a configuration file, but is
>> actually
>> parsed by CHRP-compliant open firmwares directly - SPARC firmwares, including
>> OpenBIOS don't support them.
On 22.06.20 18:30, Gregor Riepl wrote:
Rethinking that, I assume if an UltraSPARC machine boots from a CDROM
drive attached to the built-in ATA controller and the installer later
can find the disc to start the installation, it should also work with
HDDs on that controller, though maybe not with
Hi Mike, all on the list,
On 22.06.20 02:06, Mike Tremaine wrote:
[...]
Can you try replacing the IDE cable or try a different disk?
Adrian
[...]
Sadly no good outcome. Different cables made no difference, I tried a
PDC20269 Card (which uses pata_pdc2027x
On 21.06.20 19:21, Mike Tremaine wrote:
I spent a few hours trying different things on this but no luck.
Hardware: Sun Ultra 5 - 333mhz / 512MB - Promise 100 PCI card as IDE
interface..
Install Image:2020-05-30/debian-10.0.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
Boots CDROM and finds disks no problem.
On 22.06.20 16:58, Mike Tremaine wrote:
[...] Worth checking, I’ll have look at the drive code and see if I
can make sense of it. A follow up question might be does anyone have
ATA based install other than the Ultra 5/10 running? Example does
anyone have SunFire v100 running debian 9 or 10? I
On 22.06.20 17:17, Gregor Riepl wrote:
@all:
Are there any users that had success with Promise based ATA controllers
on UltraSPARC?
As a matter of fact, I do. I had a software RAID running on 2 SATA disks
on a Promise SATA300 TX4 controller and even built a custom mounting
bracket for my old
On 22.06.20 17:37, Connor McLaughlan wrote:
Can you by any chance tell me how i could obtain a list of all PCI
cards that are possibly supported and might work on debian sparc?
Sorry, no idea. I avoid disks in my machines wherever possible.
Even the list from OpenBSD ([1]) for PCI IDE
Hi Robin,
On 17.05.21 12:36, Robin Cremer wrote:
[...]
On a not entirely unrelated note:
Are there any news on functioning netboot images? The last post I could
find points to images from April '17 on your webspace, which were,
according to the ML, not bootable because of the size.
At least I
Hi,
On 22.03.21 22:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 3/22/21 10:30 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Riccardo Mottola first recognized a problem with 5.10.x kernels on his
Sun T2000 with UltraSPARC T1 (details in [this thread]). I could verify
the problem also on my Sun T1000 and it looks like
Dear all,
Riccardo Mottola first recognized a problem with 5.10.x kernels on his
Sun T2000 with UltraSPARC T1 (details in [this thread]). I could verify
the problem also on my Sun T1000 and it looks like this specific issue
breaks the mounting of the root FS or maybe mounting file systems at
On 24.03.21 09:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:17:41PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
028abd9222df0cf5855dab5014a5ebaf06f90565
...is broken on my T1000.
As I don't know how big attachments can be on this list, I put the logs
on pastebin.
A log for 028abd9222df is here
On 24.03.21 14:24, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:19 PM Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 24.03.21 14:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 3/24/21 2:09 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:> Kernel sources are not available on
the T1000.
If need be, where do they need to exist and
On 24.03.21 09:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:17:41PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
028abd9222df0cf5855dab5014a5ebaf06f90565
...is broken on my T1000.
As I don't know how big attachments can be on this list, I put the logs
on pastebin.
A log for 028abd9222df is here
On 24.03.21 14:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 3/24/21 2:09 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:> Kernel sources are not available on
the T1000.
If need be, where do they need to exist and how should the directory be
named - `/usr/src/[...]`?
Try installing "linux-source"
On 24.03.21 09:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:17:41PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
028abd9222df0cf5855dab5014a5ebaf06f90565
...is broken on my T1000.
As I don't know how big attachments can be on this list, I put the logs
on pastebin.
A log for 028abd9222df
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
