On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:20:02 -0400
songbird wrote:
Hello songbird,
> i always turn off the automatic reboot. i don't want
If this machine had that option, so would I. Meaning; once powered
down it requires user interaction to restart, it doesn't automatically
reboot after power is restored.
Brad Rogers wrote:
...
> During stormy weather, in the exposed rural area I live in, power can go
> off several times an hour. Although it's rarely longer than a few
> seconds at a time, it's enough to forcibly shut down computers, and
> would be rather annoying if said computer were to be shut
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
...
> Whatever it was that happened, I now tell my BIOS to NO, DO *NOT* keep
> trying to come back up if a power failure completely shuts it down at
> some point. That's from having seen the lights and thus power flicker
> on and off some 4, 5, 6, 7 times within a 2 or 3
Rick Macdonald wrote:
> I'm going to pose my question here at the top in case it can be answered
> without wading through all the details that follow:
>
> Now that I have removed unstable form sources.list and preferences
> (pinning), won't my packages from unstable eventually be upgraded from
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:40:04 PM UTC+5:30, Kaj Persson wrote:
> So I started reading on a support site for Firefox, and found a sentence
> saying that from version 53, you have to use PulseAudio for all sound in
> Firefox. It was like a stab into my back. So, what is this? I get a
>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:47 PM Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:14:19 +0200
> deloptes wrote:
>
> >why not use something more decent like ext3 or ext4? we are in 2018 ;-)
>
> (your smiley noted)
> Ken gave no indication of time-frame, other than in the past. Could've
> been last
On 18/07/18 05:20 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 02:45:32PM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
On 18/07/18 11:05 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:24:45AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
What terminal program are you using? Is the behavior the same if you
fire up slrn
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 15:34:04 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Richard Owlett:
> >
> > That leads to asking two related questions:
[...]
> > 2. What section of the installer installs packages tagged as required?
> > I assume the answer will, in part, be a referral to some developer
> >
On 7/19/18 4:27 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-07-19, Dave wrote:
after boot apache is not running,
if i run systemctl status apache2, i get the address bind error shown above
at the command line after boot if i run apache2 -k restart, no errors.
after boot if i start apache2 via
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 06:45:16PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Cheap is a relative term. It's only "cheap" if it's cheap enough for a
particular context to enjoy. Even if a HD was only a dollar a TB, it wouldn't be
cheap to someone with 0 dollars.
Well, you can't buy any storage with zero
On 19/07/18 12:19 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
This isn't absolutely awful; you can recover from this.
Here is the list of downgrades if I pin stable to 1001:
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
fonts-stix libevent-2.1-6 libhunspell-1.6-0 libjsoncpp1
deloptes composed on 2018-07-20 00:00 (UTC+0200):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> 1: /boot is functionally readonly except during kernel installation and
>> removal
> not really an argument - the system did not boot for this reason
>> 2: journals consume disk space
> not really an argument - the
Rick Macdonald:
>
> Now that I have removed unstable form sources.list and preferences
> (pinning), won't my packages from unstable eventually be upgraded from
> stable as the stable versions become newer than the unstable packages that I
> currently have installed?
Yes, "eventually". At some
Kaj Persson wrote:
> No, certainly you are right. So far my knowledge did not reach. Well, I
> followed your instruction and made a reboot. And now the timidity daemon
> was not there, at least according to the command "ps -ef | grep
> timidity". Before the reboot it was. But the only result of
Hi,
Running Testing, not sure how to report this particular issue as a
bug, so I'm seeking advice here.
I use virtualbox. As of right now in Testing, it depends on libcurl3.
However, many other packages (e. g. apache2, amanda*, feh) depend on
libcurl4, and they conflict, so you can't have both.
Felix Miata wrote:
> 1: /boot is functionally readonly except during kernel installation and
> removal
>
not really an argument - the system did not boot for this reason
> 2: journals consume disk space
not really an argument - the system did not boot for this reason and space
in MBs is cheap
Den 2018-07-18 kl. 07:07, wrote deloptes:
70147pers...@telia.com wrote:
Nothing else, I love Firefox, and appreciate really the work all these
volunteers are doing, but if I cannot get sound from that programme the
way I prefer, I feel I am forced to look for another browser.
Anyone who knows
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:43:51AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> I'm going to pose my question here at the top in case it can be answered
> without wading through all the details that follow:
>
> Now that I have removed unstable form sources.list and preferences
> (pinning), won't my packages
deloptes composed on 2018-07-19 18:14 (UTC+0200):
> why not use something more decent like ext3 or ext4? we are in 2018 ;-)
1: /boot is functionally readonly except during kernel installation and removal
2: journals consume disk space
I would be spending an enormous amount of time rescuing
I'm going to pose my question here at the top in case it can be answered
without wading through all the details that follow:
Now that I have removed unstable form sources.list and preferences
(pinning), won't my packages from unstable eventually be upgraded from
stable as the stable versions
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:14:19 +0200
deloptes wrote:
Hello deloptes,
>why not use something more decent like ext3 or ext4? we are in 2018 ;-)
(your smiley noted)
Ken gave no indication of time-frame, other than in the past. Could've
been last week, could've been twenty years ago.
--
Regards
On 07/19/2018 10:13 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 06:38:08 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 07/18/2018 09:06 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:44:13AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
First I'm looking comparison of required, important, standard,
optional, and
Kenneth Parker wrote:
> My worst, was kind of "mild", though scary: I had to rebuild /boot (on
> ext2), because the last action was placing a copy of the Linux Kernel on
> /boot.
why not use something more decent like ext3 or ext4? we are in 2018 ;-)
regards
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, David Wright wrote:
> While there are commands like aptitude search and aptitude why
> available for such purposes, these are really designed for routine
> maintenance. For your purposes, I think you need to develop a more
> intimate relationship with the files in
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 06:38:08 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 09:06 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:44:13AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>First I'm looking comparison of required, important, standard,
> >>optional, and extra as package labels [particularly
mercredi 18 juillet 2018, à 11:11:28 CEST, Pierre Chevalier a écrit :
> > N’étant pas matheux,
>
> Désolé. Ça peut s'arranger: il y a des formations pour ça, rien n'est
> jamais désespéré.
Encore faut-il en avoir le temps, et surtout l’envie. Je préfère me consacrer à
la musique et à la
On 07/19/2018 08:34 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Richard Owlett:
That leads to asking two related questions:
1. How can I get a list of packages tagged as required?
Aptitude is great for answering questions like this:
$ aptitude search '?priority(required) ?archive(stable)'
Exactly what I
On 07/19/2018 07:28 AM, Joe wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:04:37 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
My goal is not what you would term a true LFS system.
It is focused on what Beekmans writes in his preface stating "... but
also serve as an ideal learning opportunity for programmers and
system
Richard Owlett:
>
> That leads to asking two related questions:
> 1. How can I get a list of packages tagged as required?
Aptitude is great for answering questions like this:
$ aptitude search '?priority(required) ?archive(stable)'
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 8:09 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:56:34 -0400
> Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> Hello Kenneth,
>
> >My worst, was kind of "mild", though scary: I had to rebuild /boot (on
> >ext2), because the last action was placing a copy of the Linux Kernel on
> >/boot.
>
>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:04:37 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> My goal is not what you would term a true LFS system.
> It is focused on what Beekmans writes in his preface stating "... but
> also serve as an ideal learning opportunity for programmers and
> system administrators to enhance their
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:56:34 -0400
Kenneth Parker wrote:
Hello Kenneth,
>My worst, was kind of "mild", though scary: I had to rebuild /boot (on
>ext2), because the last action was placing a copy of the Linux Kernel on
>/boot.
It was the fear of such an issue (an inability to boot) that
On 07/18/2018 09:43 AM, Joe wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:10:25 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
I found [https://github.com/scottwilliambeasley/debian-from-scratch].
Is there recommended reading in addition to
[http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.9/] ?
This is the Holy Book of the
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 2:20 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> Worst I had happen as a result of power failure was that disk the
> journal couldn't recover everything required, such that sector errors
> were reported on every boot. A reformat got around that. Tiresome, but
> not fatal.
>
My worst,
On 07/18/2018 09:06 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:44:13AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
First I'm looking comparison of required, important, standard,
optional, and extra as package labels [particularly interested in
corner cases]. I've been looking at
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:10:44AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 17-07-18 om 12:19 schreef Wouter Verhelst:
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 01:38:50PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>
>
> >> O, leuk. Hier in NL heb je wat vaker een vast IP-adres dan in België
> >> denk ik. Maar hier rukt
On 7/19/2018 10:27 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-07-19, Dave wrote:
after boot apache is not running,
if i run systemctl status apache2, i get the address bind error shown above
at the command line after boot if i run apache2 -k restart, no errors.
after boot if i start apache2 via
On 2018-07-19, Dave wrote:
>
> after boot apache is not running,
> if i run systemctl status apache2, i get the address bind error shown above
>
> at the command line after boot if i run apache2 -k restart, no errors.
>
> after boot if i start apache2 via /etc/init.d/apache2 start or
>
Le 19/07/2018 à 04:31, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit :
> bonjour,
>
> la version 32 bit est abandonnée pour des raisons techniques et
> c'est pour simplement installer darktable sur du vieux matos
[...]
Peut-être est-ce moi qui suis stupide? Mais je ne comprends vraiment pas
la démarche
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:57:18 -0400
Dave wrote:
>
> after boot apache is not running,
> if i run systemctl status apache2, i get the address bind error shown
> above
>
> at the command line after boot if i run apache2 -k restart, no errors.
>
> after boot if i start apache2 via
On 2018-07-19 01:57, Dave wrote:
On 07/18/2018 04:41 PM, Dave wrote:
On 07/18/2018 10:12 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:36:14AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Sounds like the service may be disabled for some reason. What is
the
output of:
systemctl status apache2
If you
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:34:37 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Hello Cindy-Sue,
(I've removed references, so this should no longer thread with the USB
drive thread)
>reinstall... or something. I don't remember hardware getting fried,
>just [code]. Maybe it was even "that other" operating system
42 matches
Mail list logo
