Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

Karen Lewellen wrote: > Clearly sent privately by mistake. you are stupid asshole - I explicitly said I post in private

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Disregarding someone's request for privacy is rather disrespectful. > > When that happens for me, I reply with something that says, ~"keep it on > the list, please" Thank you

Re: Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:46:38PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > I can't think of an easy way if you don't have backups. If you have > another system you could get a list of all its permissions like so: > > # find /usr -xdev -printf '%p %m\0' | sort -z > good-perms > > Then on your suspect machine:

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 08:00:27 PM Karen Lewellen wrote: > For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's I am sorry to hear that.

Re: Linux kernel 5.10 (or 5.4) with Debian Buster

> > > Just wondering, is it safe to use kernel 5.4 or 5.10 with Debian Buster > packages? > > Kernel has stable userland ABI. Any user program (like bash or nginx) should be compatible with any future kernel release. But kernel doesn't guarantee kernel modules ABI (even API is not stable). So,

Re: Linux kernel 5.10 (or 5.4) with Debian Buster

Hi On 2021-05-18 8:25 p.m., Brendan Simon (eTRIX) wrote: > I'm currently using Debian Buster on an embedded system (ARM) and am > currently using an older 4.4 kernel. > > I need to upgrade to later version to support a new Ethernet Phy device > (KSZ9131). > > Kernel 4.19 is the default for

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

On Tue, 18 May 2021, Siard wrote: I wrote: You can simply download Seamonkey deb's from here: https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Correction: those are .tar.bz2 packages. Getting older. Age takes its toll, I guess. Understood. I'm so old I just noticed your two posts to the

Linux kernel 5.10 (or 5.4) with Debian Buster

I'm currently using Debian Buster on an embedded system (ARM) and am currently using an older 4.4 kernel. I need to upgrade to later version to support a new Ethernet Phy device (KSZ9131). Kernel 4.19 is the default for Buster, but it doesn't seem to have the KSZ9131 support.  I have

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

Hi ! On 2021-05-18 6:28 p.m., George Shuklin wrote: > Well, there are two answers to the questions on support Linux. > > One is full support of hardware by drivers and hardware. Often many > small things are missing, like mice off indicator on x220, or incorrect > support for Fn-based shortcuts.

Re: Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

Steve Dondley wrote: > I goofed up and accidentally moved my /usr directory while trying to > make room on a full drive. I was able to recover, but I'm finding that > services are not working because the sticky bits for many files > /usr/bin/* were lost. For example, I can't send email with

Re: Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 08:26, Steve Dondley wrote: > I goofed up and accidentally moved my /usr directory while trying to > make room on a full drive. I was able to recover, but I'm finding that > services are not working because the sticky bits for many files > /usr/bin/* were lost. For

Re: Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

>> are not working because the sticky bits for many files /usr/bin/* were lost. >> For example, I can't send email with exim because of this error: >> >> Failed to create spool file /var/spool/exim4//input//1lj87g-0002tS-5J-D: >> Permission denied > > I'm guessing you actually mean

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

Oh I can respect your stance, even if I do not fully resonate. If one wants privacy, best to say so, at the top, not several pages down. For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's not to insure my request not to be contacted off list gets ignored, even if I am the only

Re: Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

Hello, On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:26:18PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote: > I goofed up and accidentally moved my /usr directory while trying to make > room on a full drive. I was able to recover, but I'm finding that services > are not working because the sticky bits for many files /usr/bin/* were

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 05:53:19 PM Karen Lewellen wrote: > Clearly sent privately by mistake. ... > > I send this in private, because of my private opinion here. I would > > prefer we discuss this in private and perhaps you can convince me that > > it is worth the effort. I do not know this

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

On Wed, 19 May 2021, Bret Busby wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/Seamonkey Bingo. A very recently updated page with instructions for adding a (EEK!) third party repo to one's sources.list. Thanks! -- RSB

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

Well, there are two answers to the questions on support Linux. One is full support of hardware by drivers and hardware. Often many small things are missing, like mice off indicator on x220, or incorrect support for Fn-based shortcuts. But there is a more important topic. It's support by main

Restoring sticky bits after accidentally moving /usr directory

I goofed up and accidentally moved my /usr directory while trying to make room on a full drive. I was able to recover, but I'm finding that services are not working because the sticky bits for many files /usr/bin/* were lost. For example, I can't send email with exim because of this error:

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

On 19/5/21 4:08 am, Bob Bernstein wrote: '$ sudo apt-cache search seamonkey' does not turn up the browser/email "suite." My spidey sense suggests that the Subject: question, probably as a consequence of the internal logic (for lack of a better term) of the unixen "package" situation, is at

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

Clearly sent privately by mistake. In context a bit. On Tue, 18 May 2021, deloptes wrote: No - they start and run it until government=tax payers money flows in Really? Can you please point me to governmental funded Linux projects for any disability population? I will share your list with

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

I wrote: > You can simply download Seamonkey deb's from here: > > https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ Correction: those are .tar.bz2 packages. Getting older. Age takes its toll, I guess.

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

The Wanderer [about Seamonkey]: > It's also possible that some third parties may have already packaged it > into .deb form, albeit not necessarily in a way that'll work with any > particular Debian release; if you want to search for such a thing, and > risk creating a FrankenDebian to some degree

Re: No deb for seamonkey?

On 2021-05-18 at 16:08, Bob Bernstein wrote: > '$ sudo apt-cache search seamonkey' does not turn up the > browser/email "suite." > > My spidey sense suggests that the Subject: question, probably as a > consequence of the internal logic (for lack of a better term) of the > unixen "package"

No deb for seamonkey?

'$ sudo apt-cache search seamonkey' does not turn up the browser/email "suite." My spidey sense suggests that the Subject: question, probably as a consequence of the internal logic (for lack of a better term) of the unixen "package" situation, is at best moot, and at worst, confused. Pls.

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

Hi ! I've had good experiences with HP EliteBook. I'm not sure what you mean by Linux support. Most laptop today will be supported in Linux, some tweak maybe necessary but they are quite easy. In my case it was the screen that was "turning around" by itself caused by the motion sensor in the

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars [SOLVED]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:38 Steve Dondley wrote: > On 2021-05-18 12:23 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:08 Steve Dondley wrote: > >> On 2021-05-18 10:25 AM, Tom Browder wrote: >> >> I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and >> can see and

Debian-friendly laptop

I'm trying to choose between Purism and System76, and, as far as I understand they both supports linux very well, but.. Which one is better? Or, may me I missed and there are other coreboot (no ME) vendors with high-grade Linux support? I have a negative experience with XPS13 DE (which is

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE wrote: > To noboy in particular: > Yes, that is so and for whatever reasons there might be, it is extremely > confusing causing frustration, despair and eventually anger. > It is especially exasperating if one works with several DE which, > contrary to the underlying

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 13:04:00 -04 hdv@gmail wrote: > On 2021-05-18 18:37, IL Ka wrote: > > Thanks all. I looked at my config files (which go back at least > > 15 > > years) and found lots of explicitly setting both LC_ALL=C and > > LC_LANG=C. > > > > Should I remove all,

Re: help ask microsoft to make eloquance tts open source.

Hi again, While your point about publicly funded efforts may be a fine one, locating those owners now presents a challenge. On the one hand companies behind solid speech synthesis, like digital equipment corporation who branded the superior dec-talk speech have themselves sold items to

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:24:39AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > Thanks all. I looked at my config files (which go back at least 15 years) > and found lots of explicitly setting both LC_ALL=C and LC_LANG=C. > > Should I remove all, or just remove the LC_ALL? LC_LANG isn't even a variable that

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On 2021-05-18 18:37, IL Ka wrote: Thanks all. I looked at my config files (which go back at least 15 years) and found lots of explicitly setting both LC_ALL=C and LC_LANG=C. Should I remove all, or just remove the LC_ALL? > Using LC_ALL is strongly discouraged as it overrides

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On 2021-05-18 12:23 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:08 Steve Dondley wrote: > > On 2021-05-18 10:25 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > > I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and can > see and enter Unicode chars. > > But in the same terminal, when

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

> > > Thanks all. I looked at my config files (which go back at least 15 years) > and found lots of explicitly setting both LC_ALL=C and LC_LANG=C. > > Should I remove all, or just remove the LC_ALL? > > Using LC_ALL is strongly discouraged as it overrides everything. Please use it only when

Re: Debmirror

Hi ! Answer follow. On 2021-05-18 12:17 p.m., Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > On 5/18/21, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >> Hi ! >> I can't seem to get the debian security updates repository using debmirror. >> It did work for me to get the standard repository, with both amd64 and >> i386 plus

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:25 Tom Browder wrote: > I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and > can see and enter Unicode chars. > ... Thanks all. I looked at my config files (which go back at least 15 years) and found lots of explicitly setting both LC_ALL=C and

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:08 Steve Dondley wrote: > On 2021-05-18 10:25 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > > I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and > can see and enter Unicode chars. > > But in the same terminal, when I run vim, I have trouble editing or seeing > most

Re: Debmirror

On 5/18/21, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi ! > I can't seem to get the debian security updates repository using debmirror. > It did work for me to get the standard repository, with both amd64 and > i386 plus the sources. > But I can't do it with security.debian.org > It just wait for

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On 2021-05-18 10:25 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and can > see and enter Unicode chars. > > But in the same terminal, when I run vim, I have trouble editing or seeing > most Unicode chars above ASCII. Type ":set fileencoding?"

Debmirror

Hi ! I can't seem to get the debian security updates repository using debmirror. It did work for me to get the standard repository, with both amd64 and i386 plus the sources. But I can't do it with security.debian.org It just wait for ever and will fail. Got any hint ? Here's my command name

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:25 Tom Browder wrote: ... > I show the LANG env var set to 'en-US.UTF-8'. When I execute 'locale' I get: > > LANG=en-US.UTF-8 > Sorry, typo, should be: 'en_US.UTF-8' # underscore, not hyphen -Tom

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:32:26PM +0300, IL Ka wrote: > > > > LC_CTYPE="C" > > > > this may be a problem. > > Try > $ LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 vim $YOUR_FILE That may not be enough. The "C" being in quotes in the output of locale for this variable means it's implicitly defined from another

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I show the LANG env var set to 'en-US.UTF-8'. When I execute 'locale' I get: > > LANG=en-US.UTF-8 > LANGUAGE= > LC_CTYPE="C" > # all intermediate keys: LC_X="C" > LC_ALL=C Somewhere, you have placed LC_ALL=C in

Re: vim not seeing many Unicode chars

> > LC_CTYPE="C" > > this may be a problem. Try $ LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 vim $YOUR_FILE make sure fileenconfig is utf-8 in vim: : set fileencoding=utf-8 More info about LC_ vars: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xbd/envvar.html >

vim not seeing many Unicode chars

I'm running Debian Buster. Inside a terminal window I can use Emacs and can see and enter Unicode chars. But in the same terminal, when I run vim, I have trouble editing or seeing most Unicode chars above ASCII. I show the LANG env var set to 'en-US.UTF-8'. When I execute 'locale' I get:

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

On 5/18/21, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> That implementation could be included as a debian package. > It's in Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/c-icap > It's orphaned though. OK, great! What do you need for me to do to officially "adopt" that package at its maintainer? I am currently

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:34:02AM -0400, Albretch Mueller wrote: > On 5/18/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/bitz-server > > On 5/18/21, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > Hello Albretch, > > bitz-server has 4 RC-Bugs[1], which could not be fixed by me. > > No fixes came

Re: télécharger une image iso debian à l'aide d'un script shell

Bernard Schoenacker writes: > wget -c -O ~/Images-Iso/$i > http://ftp.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/debian-cd/amd64/iso-cd/$i > done > grep xfce ~/Images-Iso/SHA512SUMS > ~/Images-Iso/$i.sha512 > sha512sum ~/Images-Iso/$i |tee ~/Images-Iso/$i.sha512 > cat ~/Images-Iso/$i.sha512 > > mon souhait serait

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:34:02AM -0400, Albretch Mueller wrote: > On 5/18/21, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > Hello Albretch, > > bitz-server has 4 RC-Bugs[1], which could not be fixed by me. > > No fixes came from the upstream either. > > Therefore the package had to be removed from testing and

télécharger une image iso debian à l'aide d'un script shell

Bonjour, je recherche à figer un script qui facilite le téléchargement d'une image iso à partir d'un miroir, voici la base qui serait à amender : sudo apt install -y pv curl unhtml mkdir -p ~/Images-Iso for i in SHA512SUMS $(curl

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

On 5/18/21, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/bitz-server On 5/18/21, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Hello Albretch, > bitz-server has 4 RC-Bugs[1], which could not be fixed by me. > No fixes came from the upstream either. > Therefore the package had to be removed from testing

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

Unsure whether the below message was intended for bitz-server or another project. For bitz-server, the source repo can be found at https://github.com/uditha-atukorala/bitz-server . Happy to assist in any way I can. u. > On 18 May 2021, at

Re: bitz-server: package is not in any development repository ...

Hello Albretch, bitz-server has 4 RC-Bugs[1], which could not be fixed by me. No fixes came from the upstream either. Therefore the package had to be removed from testing and unstable. CU Jörg [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=1;src=bitz- server -- New: GPG