On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:45:35AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Are those SCSI disks or IDE disks that are being accessed via SCSI
emulation?
They're sata, on a sil3114.
--
Tom Vier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:05 -0200, Bruno Diniz wrote:
Hi all,
I have a system with two S-ATA hard disks and I configured raid0 with
them using mdadm. Each HD has 200GB of capacity. What is weird is that
after configuring the raid, the newly created device (/dev/md0) is
slower than each
slower than earlier 2.6 kernels. raid0 performance used to bevery good. raid1 has always sucked (reads no faster than a single drive)./dev/md0:Timing buffered disk reads:322 MB in
3.01 seconds = 107.06 MB/sec/dev/sda:Timing buffered disk reads:216 MB in3.03 seconds =71.37 MB/sec/dev/sdb:Timing buffered
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:57:31PM -0200, Bruno Diniz wrote:
I´m running kernel 2.6.8 from stable. After trying a lot of possible
solutions, I faced (possibly) the solution. This machine has four memory
slots and is able to deal with 4GB. When I use the four 1GB memory chips, I
get the system
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How is that? The RAID1 on my system read at nearly 2x the speed of a
single drive.
raid1 is mrirror .. same data on both disks ... so you should expect
to read 2x faster
raid0 is stripping ... just making two 40GB disks looking like one
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:53 -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
How is that? The RAID1 on my system read at nearly 2x the speed of a
single drive.
raid1 is mrirror .. same data on both disks ... so you should expect
to read 2x faster
raid0
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
Sure you will. If you are dealing with large bits of data,
writing to it will be N times faster because the computer writes
chunks of data to the disks in parallel.
yup.. if you read/write data from the the 2 spindles
can the ide drivers be told to
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:31 -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
Sure you will. If you are dealing with large bits of data,
writing to it will be N times faster because the computer writes
chunks of data to the disks in parallel.
yup.. if you read/write
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
That's why I qualified my statement with large bits of data.
:-)
same for 100GB files .. to split it into 2x 50GB each
on each spindle
should be a fun driver to write(if needed), config and test
Doesn't the md driver do that? It
Bonjour,
J essaye de monter une partition windows xp sous debian sarge 3.1 pour
lire musique et films mais ca ne fonctionne pas.
Pour info j utilise debian sur un disque ata et windows sur 2 disques
sata en raid0. J ai bien sûr installé en dur toutes les options du noyau
necessaires à lire
Le lundi 10 Octobre 2005 23:47, Raphael a écrit :
Bonjour,
J essaye de monter une partition windobe xp sous debian sarge 3.1 pour
lire musique et films mais ca ne fonctionne pas.
[...]
/dev/sda1 /mnt/windobentfs
umask=0,user,uid=1000,gid=6,nls=iso8859-15,ro,exec,noauto 0
essaye d'aller ss windows et de lancer la vérification de disque (ça
doit être ça le chkdsk) avec toutes les corrections d'erreur
possibles...après correction reviens ss ta debian et vala.
bonne chance
Bonjour,
J essaye de monter une partition windobe xp sous debian sarge 3.1 pour
lire musique et films mais ca ne fonctionne pas.
Pour info j utilise debian sur un disque ata et windobe sur 2 disques
sata en raid0. J ai bien sûr installé en dur toutes les options du noyau
necessaires à lire
Raphael a écrit :
Je ne sais pas à quoi sert chkdsk mais je nepeux pas le lancer. Peut
etre faut il l installer...
Voila vous savez a peu pres tout. Je n ai jamais reussi a monter ma
partition windobe que ce soit avec knoppix, woody, mandrake, ou fedora.
Je ne sais plus quoi faire je crois
yesterday I tried installing Debian onto a raid0 array using this
guide http://tnt.aufbix.org/linux/raid/, but it quickly became too
overwhelming for me, so I quit the installation and went through an
installation like I always have (netinstall from woody floppies).
everything installs fine
Quoting Mike Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
yesterday I tried installing Debian onto a raid0 array using this
guide http://tnt.aufbix.org/linux/raid/, but it quickly became too
overwhelming for me, so I quit the installation and went through an
installation like I always have (netinstall from woody
Estou tentando implementar raid0 via software.
Primeiramente tentei na própria instalação configurar raid, mas sem
sucesso, depois de instalado e reiniciado, ele não reconhece mais o
raid.
Então resolvi fazer isso editando o /etc/raidtab e instalando os
pacotes: raidtools2 e mdadm, e usar o
Estou tentando implementar raid0 via software.
Primeiramente tentei na própria instalação configurar raid, mas sem
sucesso, depois de instalado e reiniciado, ele não reconhece mais o
raid.
Então resolvi fazer isso editando o /etc/raidtab e instalando os
pacotes: raidtools2 e mdadm, e usar o
existe uma forma de configurar raid0 via software logo na instalação
do debian??? estou com o atual cd net-inst, mas após concluída a
instalação ele simplismente ignora a partição destinada para raid.
Será que configurei alguma partição errada, alguém que já conseguiu
instalar tem alguma receita?
- /boot
sdb1 - pusta
md0: sda2, sdb2 (/)
md1: sda3, sdb3 (swap)
md2: sda4, sdb4 (/home)
Jajko skompilowane, moduly do raid0 w modulach, ale zgrane do
initrd.
Wydaje mi sie ze problem polega na odejsciu w testing z raidtool
do mdadm. Wydaje mi sie, ze mkraid tworzylo takie macierze ktore
byly
Pessoal consegui resolver este problema com a seguinte linha:
mdadm --build /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/hdd5 /dev/hdd6
mas agora, gostaria de quando eu ligar o computador identificase o raid, e nao
estou conseguindo, alguem poode me dar uma luz...
coloquei no fstab nao adianta...
Eu tento criar
mkraid /dev/md0
e da a seguinte msg:
cannot determine md version: no MD device file in /dev.
Estou usando os seguintes pacotes:
raidtools2_1.00.3-12.2_i386.
mdadm (1.9.0-2.1)
Alguem poderia me ajudar.
Obrigado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
escollint raid0 ( en el teu cas ) i
seleccionaràs les dos particions que constituiran la matriu del primer
dispositiu / /dev/hda5 /dev/hdb5 , el qemu no volia pitar amb /dev/hdc
que seria més lògic ) i així successivament fins enllestir amb
l'emparellament i clicar a finalitzar, posteriorment a la
Merci Lluís,
En qualsevol cas comentar que les particions són del tipus FD i que han de
ser iguals, formatar-les amb el sistema de fitxers que vulguis...
Quin és el tipus FD?
No ho tinc gaire clar, encara. Al Debian Installer tinc el següent
(secció Partition Disks)
raid0 ( en el teu cas ) i
seleccionaràs les dos particions que constituiran la matriu del primer
dispositiu / /dev/hda5 /dev/hdb5 , el qemu no volia pitar amb /dev/hdc
que seria més lògic ) i així successivament fins enllestir amb
l'emparellament i clicar a finalitzar, posteriorment a la pàgina
software.
El lun, 07-02-2005 a las 15:39 +0100, Santiago Castro escribió:
Como se instala debian sarge en un sata raid 0? Tengo dos hd maxtor,
en una controladora silicon image 3112A (integrada en la placa ASUS
A7N8X Deluxe) y monte el raid0 pero el instalador de debian me
Santiago Castro escribi:
Como se instala debian sarge en un sata raid 0? Tengo dos hd maxtor,
en una controladora silicon image 3112A (integrada en la placa ASUS
A7N8X Deluxe) y monte el raid0 pero el instalador de debian me
reconoce los hd por separado.
No sera que primero debas agrupar los
software.
El lun, 07-02-2005 a las 15:39 +0100, Santiago Castro escribió:
Como se instala debian sarge en un sata raid 0? Tengo dos hd maxtor,
en una controladora silicon image 3112A (integrada en la placa ASUS
A7N8X Deluxe) y monte el raid0 pero el instalador de debian me
reconoce
hello,
If the following problem is already solved, sorry - I didn't found any
helpfull advice..
Configuration: Asus P4C800E Deluxe
Promise Fastrack 378
2 SATA HDDs Seagate 160GB 7200rpm on proprietary promise
hw/sw RAID0
I have W2K on Raid0 array and I
hello,
If the following problem is already solved, sorry - I didn't found any
helpfull advice..
Configuration: Asus P4C800E Deluxe
Promise Fastrack 378
2 SATA HDDs Seagate 160GB 7200rpm on proprietary promise
hw/sw RAID0
I have W2K on Raid0 array and I
Witam
Chodze od kilku dni po necie i czytam na temat RAID0. I nie moge znaleźć
odpowiedzi. Otoz chce postawic serwer plikow oparty na sambie w linuxue
(oczywiscie Debian 3.0 jajko 2.4.20) Na tym serwerze plików ma byc 4 dyski IDE
kazdy po 250 MB polaczonych w RADI0 (inetersuje mnie jak
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:54:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chodze od kilku dni po necie i czytam na temat RAID0. I nie moge
znaleźć odpowiedzi. Otoz chce postawic serwer plikow oparty na sambie
w linuxue (oczywiscie Debian 3.0 jajko 2.4.20) Na tym serwerze plików
ma byc 4 dyski IDE
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:49:09 +0100, Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:54:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chodze od kilku dni po necie i czytam na temat RAID0. I nie moge
znaleźć odpowiedzi. Otoz chce postawic serwer plikow oparty na sambie
w linuxue
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:35:29 +0930, David Purton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopelessly offtopic queston, but oh well, someone here is bound to have
more clue than me.
We have a Dell 600SC server with IDE Raid0 (two disks). This morning it
was making load beeping noises and claimed that one
Hopelessly offtopic queston, but oh well, someone here is bound to have
more clue than me.
We have a Dell 600SC server with IDE Raid0 (two disks). This morning it
was making load beeping noises and claimed that one of its disks had
failed.
Just to see what would happen, we forced the failed
zufrieden.
nur ein kleines Problem ist noch geblieben. Unter suse hab ich ein raid0 verwendet
das ich auch gerne unter meinem neuen debian wieder verwenden möchte.
beim installieren wurde das notwendige raid md0 für die root partition auch richtig
erkannt
und wird beim booten aktiviert
Liebe Liste,
ich bin vor kurzem von SuSE zu Debian Sarge gewechselt und soweit auch
sehr zufrieden.
nur ein kleines Problem ist noch geblieben. Unter suse hab ich ein raid0 verwendet
das ich auch gerne unter meinem neuen debian wieder verwenden möchte.
beim installieren wurde das notwendige
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 07:24:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to install debian on asus p4p800,
with e1000, and ichr5 chipset raid0 on sata.
I have tried two weeks ago.
I installed with kernel-2.4.23 and patchs iswraid,libata.
(sorry, I don't remember version's patchs
I want to install debian on asus p4p800,
with e1000, and ichr5 chipset raid0 on sata.
I have tried two weeks ago.
I installed with kernel-2.4.23 and patchs iswraid,libata.
(sorry, I don't remember version's patchs).
But the system fall down, when I run on XP, Linux fall donw.
I'm
this is my fist time installing raid0 on a machine that is not a
new install. /dev/hda has gobs of good data i don't want to lose.
/dev/hdc is newly partitioned and formatted before installing the
raid tools.
kernel version is 2.4.18-k7
i installed raidtools2 and mdadm.
i created a new file
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 07:53, Harland Christofferson wrote:
this is my fist time installing raid0 on a machine that is not a
new install. /dev/hda has gobs of good data i don't want to lose.
/dev/hdc is newly partitioned and formatted before installing the
raid tools.
kernel version
At Tuesday, 15 June 2004, you wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 07:53, Harland Christofferson wrote:
this is my fist time installing raid0 on a machine that is not a
new install. /dev/hda has gobs of good data i don't want to lose.
/dev/hdc is newly partitioned and formatted before installing
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 08:56, Harland Christofferson wrote:
*snip*
What is the partition type on /dev/hda1 and /dev/hdc1? If they
are not both
FD (Linux raid autodetect), your raid array won't work.
the partition type? okay ... new territory for me. they are ext2
w/ ID of 83. they are
* snip *
It sounds simple, but if you get into trouble, you might want to
search the
archives for problems other people have had, or you might want to
check out
this link:
http://rootraiddoc.alioth.debian.org/
It's quite complete, very recent, and a good resource. I recommend
reading
it,
varv i minuten ostörda på varsin kanal?
Jag tycker att du skall våga OM du tycker att det går för långsamt med
som det är! Gissningsvis går det nog tillräckligt fort... -Om du pillade
med videoredigering elelr något annat hårddiskintensivt så kan ibland
raid0 vara enda vägen.
Jag har aldrig
Hej..
Har köpt ny maskin som jag tänkte ha för spel och allmänt nöje. Har två nya
IDE ATA133 diskar på 120gig var.
På Asuskortet (P4B800Deluxe) så finns ju ett raid-chip och undrar nu om
någon har erfarenhet av att strip'a diskarna (Raid noll)?
Har hört både det ena och det andra att det
At 13:30 2003-10-17, Niclas Söderlund wrote:
Hej..
Har köpt ny maskin som jag tänkte ha för spel och allmänt nöje. Har två
nya IDE ATA133 diskar på 120gig var.
På Asuskortet (P4B800Deluxe) så finns ju ett raid-chip och undrar nu om
någon har erfarenhet av att strip'a diskarna (Raid noll)?
Olá senhores,
Já tentei de tudo e não consigo, pois é, não consigo instalar o
Debian e deixa-lo funcionando com RAID0.
Usando os discos do blade eu consigo criar um /dev/md0 usando
raid0 e até instalar o sistema nela... mas na hora de bootar a
máquina, afe!
Será que alguem já passou por estas
... Nem mesmo no site do Debian.
Jozeph Brasil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olá senhores,
Ola Jozeph,
Já tentei de tudo e não consigo, pois é, não consigo instalar o
Debian e deixa-lo funcionando com RAID0.
humm...
Usando os discos do blade eu consigo criar um /dev/md0 usando
raid0 e até
Jozeph Brasil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olá senhores,
Ola Jozeph,
Já tentei de tudo e não consigo, pois é, não consigo instalar o
Debian e deixa-lo funcionando com RAID0.
humm...
Usando os discos do blade eu consigo criar um /dev/md0 usando
raid0 e até instalar o sistema nela... mas na
Opa,
Valeu por responder! :D
Vamos aos passos:
Bom. Voce quer raid via software ou hardware?
RAID via Software, Hardware é muito dindin! :(
Pelo que vi, voce colocou o kernel separado porem nao vi se o / tambem
estah. Se voce deseja usar o / no raid, provavelmente voce precise de
initrd.
Jozeph Brasil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
E o que eu faço para conseguir instalar o Debian nesta máquina?
Já tentei colocar o RAID[0-5], LVM, etc. no Kernel (BUILT-IN) mas
também não consegui bootar a máquina. O lilo reclama que só pode
dar boot com RAID1.
Bom. Voce quer raid via software ou
Opa,
http://tnt.aufbix.org/linux/raid/ = receita de bolo.
Eu já tinha visitado este site mas nao me ajudou muito. Primeiro
que o exemplo dele é com RAID1... outra que tentei fazer mais ou
menos o que ele disse e não adiantou.
Outra, no mesmo site tem um raid0 by daniel... também não ajudou
Jozeph Brasil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Opa,
Valeu por responder! :D
Sem problema ;-)
Vamos aos passos:
Bom. Voce quer raid via software ou hardware?
RAID via Software, Hardware é muito dindin! :(
Ok
Pelo que vi, voce colocou o kernel separado porem nao vi se o / tambem
estah. Se
Adrian Zaugg schrieb:
md2 RAID0 über vier Platten (sda - sdd) Erstellung ok!
md3 RAID0 über vier Platten (sde - sdh) Erstellung ok!
md0 RAID1 über md2 und md3
iihh - krank. Was soll das Ziel sein?
Geschwindigkeit? - Hardware-RAID
In Punkto Verfügbarkeit
Liebe Liste
Wenn ich eine RAID Definition wie folgt erstelle:
md2 RAID0 über vier Platten (sda - sdd) Erstellung ok!
md3 RAID0 über vier Platten (sde - sdh) Erstellung ok!
und
md0 RAID1 über md2 und md3
kommt die Fehlermeldung:
ente:~# mkraid
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 01:49:39PM +0200, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
Liebe Liste
Wenn ich eine RAID Definition wie folgt erstelle:
md2 RAID0 über vier Platten (sda - sdd) Erstellung ok!
md3 RAID0 über vier Platten (sde - sdh) Erstellung ok!
und
md0 RAID1
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:13:49 +0200
Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vielleicht solltest Du beim mkraid für's RAID1 mal testhalber
persistent-superblock 0
einsetzen.
Dann lässt es sich tatsächlich leicht kreieren... nach dem Formatieren
mit mke2fs kann das RAID aber
pensado en usar raid0. Se nota mucho el aumento de rendimiento en
comparacion con un sistema normal no raid?
No vas a aumentar en rendimiento, lo cierto es que es todo lo contrario, ya
que montarias un raid0 por software, lo que implica ciclos de reloj para
salvar los datos en ambos discos
El Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:27:26 +0200
Pablo Giménez Pizarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
|...
|
|Pablo Vamos a ver la polémica esta en el asunto de las lecturas en
|paralelo, Pablo esto esta perfectamente soportado en raids por hrdware
|pero NO en raid Pablo por software, por lo menos en la rama 2.4
El lun, 21 de 04 de 2003 a las 12:34, Pablo Giménez Pizarro escribió:
Angel Martin wrote:
No se por que pero me parece que has confundido raid0 con raid 1, me
he asustado mucho con tu mensaje :), me gustaria citaras algun sitio
donde comenten este tema de rendimientos, ya que uso raid
de particin se
puede realizar un RAID 0 para tener un disco de 160 Gb, y luego particionar y
aplicar RAID 5 sobre las particiones como se puede hacer un Cluster.
Atendiendo al rendimiento el RAID0 es el ms rapido en escritura, el RAID1 en
lectura, y entre el el 3, 4 y 5, el ms rapido es el 4 en
. Habria bajones de rendimiento? Seria mejor particionarlo en
trozos mas pequeños?
Si usas raid0 sí hay bajones de rendimiento, ni se te ocurra poner los
dos discos en el mismo canal IDE.
Tampoco te olvides de activar el DMA.
b) Si al final opto por los 160 GB. Que sistema de archivos
que mi / fuera de 160 GB ?. Sinceramente me parece un
poco bestia. Habria bajones de rendimiento? Seria mejor particionarlo en
trozos mas pequeños?
Si usas raid0 sí hay bajones de rendimiento, ni se te ocurra poner los
dos discos en el mismo canal IDE.
Tampoco te olvides de activar el DMA
rendimiento? Seria mejor particionarlo en
trozos mas pequeños?
b) Si al final opto por los 160 GB. Que sistema de archivos seria el
más apropiado?
Uso debian sid/sarge y me encanta experimentar, asi que cualquier
sugerencia es bienvenida.
Habia pensado en usar raid0. Se nota
I've got two identical 45 GB drives, but unfortunately I can only use
one at the moment since I've got 3 other IDE devices already connected.
I'd like to get a good RAID board and just set them up as RAID0. Any
suggestions on a good (preferably not too expensive) board? I'm running
a constantly
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 10:28, Alex Malinovich wrote:
I've got two identical 45 GB drives, but unfortunately I can only use
one at the moment since I've got 3 other IDE devices already connected.
I'd like to get a good RAID board and just set them up as RAID0. Any
suggestions on a good
Moin,
in einem Anfall von Trotteligkeit habe ich doch glatt meinen LILO
übergesemmelt (Das übliche, Windows installiert... ;-). Jetzt kann ich nicht mehr mein
Linuxsystem booten (Debian woody, Kernel 2.4.18, Software-RAID0
[autodetect]).
Ich hatte weder mit den Debian potato cd's, noch Mandrake
Has anyone used RAID on a fresh woody install recently and would be
willing to share their thoughts on the process?
I just bought the Gigabyte GA-7VRXP motherboard (VIA KT333 chipset
with Promise PDC20276 RAID controller) naively thinking I could set up
RAID0 on the motherboard (on two
#include hallo.h
Bill Wohler wrote on Thu May 23, 2002 um 09:17:18AM:
According to RAID Solutions for Linux [1], I'll need the drivers for
this controller. Do I? The ATA RAID HOWTO [2] speaks about an ft
controller that I can obtain, but can I use that with a fresh Debian
install? In
and how often your disk dies and how you recover from disk
crashes
- i need large disk partitions .. ( raid0 is required for me )
- i do mirroring periodically via scripts
have fun
alvin
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Bill Wohler wrote:
Has anyone used RAID on a fresh woody install
Promise Raid0 pdc20265 mit Kernel 2.4.17 doesn't boot
Board: ASUS A7V266-E
Promise Raid pdc20265 on Board
CPU: Athlon 1,4 GHz
At the normal IDE controllers: 2 HDDs, each 40GB with Woddy and Windows2000.
At the Raid controller: 2 HDDs, each 2 GB, building a Raid0 Array. Under
Windows there's
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Jan Trukenmüller wrote:
I compiled a new kernel what should be able to work with the Raid
controller, but it doesn't boot without writing anything to the syslog. The
Promise raid is utter crap. Apply the newest patches from linux-ide.org, and
use linux software raid. It
I'm having trouble setting up raid0 on a debian box running 2.4.4 kernal with
raid support, for the first time. I'd appreciate some help working out how to
get it going.
[1]
installed raidtools and raidtools2. device /dev/md0 was created successfully.
[2]
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities
I wonder why I can't get RAID0 aka striping work with 2.2.13. It only
runs with 2.0.36.
# mdadd -ar
/dev/sdc2: No such device
/dev/sdd2: No such device
/dev/sde2: No such device
/dev/md0: No such device
The appropriate SCSI driver is included, /dev/sda1 can be mounted without
a problem. As you
[ Saturday, March 4, 2000 ] Martin Schulze wrote:
I wonder why I can't get RAID0 aka striping work with 2.2.13. It only
runs with 2.0.36.
old-style raid is no longer supported. You may wish to read the
s/w raid howto at http://ostenfeld.dk/~jakob/Software-RAID.HOWTO/
specifically
hello, everybody
i'm using a 2.2.13ac3 kernel with hpt366 patches on an Abit BP6-board
i have my raid0 (pub, 34GB) exported, sometimes when i access the raid via
nfs (knfs 1.4.7 client) i get following message:
Feb 27 22:29:00 mind kernel: find_fh_dentry: 08:03/116774 dir/116815 not found
Hola a todos
Sabeis si ha cambiado algo en el soporte para raid en el /dev/md* ?
Es que tengo un raid 0 como particion raiz que uso sin problemas con los
kernels = 2.2.12 y con este no se logra montar.
--
Deica logo
I just compiled a 2.0.32 kernel with raid/linear support because I would
like to strip 2 - 2 GB partitions. I downloaded md035.tar.gz from
ftp://linux.nrao.edu/pub/linux/packages/MD-driver/, however I could
not get it to compile. Here is the tail of my errors.
In file included from
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, dpk wrote:
Try package mdutils, in section admin. Works for me on hamm, I've also
used the bo version without trouble.
HTH
: I just compiled a 2.0.32 kernel with raid/linear support because I would
: like to strip 2 - 2 GB partitions. I downloaded md035.tar.gz from
:
symlinking /usr/include/linux to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux, you might have forgotten to symlink
/usr/include/asm to /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386.
Besides that, you might want to note that if you just want to do
raid0, then you don't need this driver. I'm quite happily running
raid0 across 3
101 - 181 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
