Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-28 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi Marc, On 20/05/24 at 14:35, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: 3. grub BOOT FAILS IF ANY LV HAS dm-integrity, EVEN IF NOT LINKED TO / if I reboot now, grub2 complains about rimage issues, clear the screen and then I am at the grub2 prompt. Booting is only possible with Debian rescue, disabling the

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-23 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hello, On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 05:03:34PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Hmm... I've been using a "plain old partition" for /boot (with > everything else in LVM) for "ever", originally because the boot loader > was not able to read LVM, and later out of habit. I was thinking of > finally moving

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Stefan Monnier
> I found this [1], quoting: "I'd also like to share an issue I've > discovered: if /boot's partition is a LV, then there must not be a > raidintegrity LV anywhere before that LV inside the same VG. Otherwise, > update-grub will show an error (disk `lvmid/.../...' not found) and GRUB > cannot

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hello, On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:13:06AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > metadata tags to some PVs prevented grub from assembling them, grub is indeed very fragile if you use dm-integrity anywhere on any of your LVs on the same VG where /boot is (or at least if in the list of LVs, the dm-integrity

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > I will try this work-around and report back here. As I said, I can > live with /boot on RAID without dm-integrity, as long as the rest can be > dm-integrity+raid protected. I'm interested in how you get on. I don't (yet)

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hello, On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > I will try this work-around and report back here. As I said, I can > live with /boot on RAID without dm-integrity, as long as the rest can be > dm-integrity+raid protected. So, enable dm-integrity on all LVs, including /,

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Additional info: On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 08:49:56AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > Having /boot on a LVM non enabled dm-integrity logical volume does not > work either, as soon as there is ANY LVM dm-integrity enabled logical > volume anywhere (even not linked to booting), grub2 complains (at boot

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-22 Thread Marc SCHAEFER
Hello, On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:41:58PM +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > I can only recommend you to read carefully the Wiki: > https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Dm-integrity I did, and it looks it does not seem to document anything pertaining to my issue: 1) I don't use integritysetup

Re: Debian bookwork / grub2 / LVM / RAID / dm-integrity fails to boot

2024-05-21 Thread Franco Martelli
On 20/05/24 at 14:35, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: Any idea what could be the problem? Any way to just make grub2 ignore the rimage (sub)volumes at setup and boot time? (I could live with / aka vg1/root not using dm-integrity, as long as the data/docker/etc volumes are integrity-protected) ? Or how

Re: Debian, fail2ban, Version?

2024-05-20 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 20 May 2024 07:00 -0400, from d...@randomstring.org (Dan Ritter): >> # fail2ban-server -V >> >> 0.11.2 > > Bullseye became stable in August of 2021. It's also perhaps worth noting that there seem to have been only two interim releases. https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/releases lists

Re: Debian, fail2ban, Version?

2024-05-20 Thread Dan Ritter
Maurizio Caloro wrote: > Hello > > Please why on Debian Bullseye, 11.9 is a pretty old version available in the > repository? > > # fail2ban-server -V > > 0.11.2 Bullseye became stable in August of 2021. "Stable" means that packages don't change except to fix serious bugs, especially

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-10 Thread 冨澤守治
Hi Updated and upgraded,autoremoved. This matter has been fixed. The problem is currently resolved. Nice follow up! I appreciate it. Best wishes -- Moliharu Tomizawa

Re: Debian no es tan fácil como dicen

2024-05-10 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:45:25AM -0400, Carlos Garcia Elmis wrote: > Hola equipo Debian, soy nuevo en Linux/GNU y en si no es una correo de > queja si no de ampliar Debian, no solo instale Debian si no también un > montón de sus derivados, y en todos menos en una fue que me facilito la > vida y

Re: Debian no es tan fácil como dicen

2024-05-10 Thread tomas
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:45:25AM -0400, Carlos Garcia Elmis wrote: > Hola equipo Debian, soy nuevo en Linux/GNU y en si no es una correo de > queja si no de ampliar Debian, no solo instale Debian si no también un > montón de sus derivados, y en todos menos en una fue que me facilito la > vida y

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-09 Thread Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ
On Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2024 08:48:03 -04 Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2024 10:06:29 + > Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > >However, I seem to have had a similar issue even after upgrading to > >the first regression-fixed glib2.0 packages on

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-09 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 9 May 2024 10:06:29 + Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: Hello Michael, >However, I seem to have had a similar issue even after upgrading to >the first regression-fixed glib2.0 packages on Bookworm. Specifically, >dead keys no longer working with the Swedish keyboard

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-09 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 9 May 2024 09:14 +0200, from f.rou...@free.fr (Florent Rougon): >> Last night (JST) I did some apt update && apt upgade. >> But all of sudden I can't input kana and even print any editer or calc cell. >> (Roman alphabet has no problem on printing.) > > This may be due to a recent glib2.0

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-09 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, Le 09/05/2024, 冨澤守治 a écrit: > Hellow! > > Thanks you for your supprting everyday. > > Last night (JST) I did some apt update && apt upgade. > But all of sudden I can't input kana and even print any editer or calc cell. > (Roman alphabet has no problem on printing.) This may be due to a

Re: debian bookworm japanese kana input disabled

2024-05-09 Thread Richard
/var/log/apt/history will tell you what apt also has been showing you during that process. Never just mindlessly agree to what apt tells you it's about to do, especially pay attention to the app list for "remove" and "auto-remove". Things can always go wrong. So if apt told you it will remove some

Re: Debian does not load zfs automatically at boot and strange messages displayed on the screen...

2024-04-30 Thread DdB
Am 30.04.2024 um 16:48 schrieb Mario Marietto: > Probably this is not the proper method to do it ? Done it in vm's and on bare metal many times. Never ran into your kind of problems. :-( Here is the guide, i suggest:

Re: Debian 12.5 i386 sudo returns "Illegal instruction"

2024-04-25 Thread Marco Moock
Am 25.04.2024 schrieb Vic tor : > On a fresh installation of Debian 12.5, i386 I receive "Illegal > instruction" when executing sudo. Is there any way to debug and > workaround this; should I take this to another list as a bug? Here it is described with gdb:

Re: Debian 12.5 i386 sudo returns "Illegal instruction"

2024-04-25 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:54:17AM -0400, Vic tor wrote: > On a fresh installation of Debian 12.5, i386 I receive "Illegal instruction" > when executing sudo. Is there any way to debug and workaround this; should I > take this to another list as a bug? > > This is on a Soekris net5501 powered by

Re: Debian@IBMx3550

2024-04-25 Thread mindaugasceliesius
В Вт, 23/04/2024 в 15:14 -0700, David Christensen пишет: > On 4/23/24 14:35, Greg wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I got refurb IBM x3550 M3 7944 server and I'm a bit lost. Is there > > any > > Linux/Debian software (some gui would be nice) to monitor fan > > speed, > > temperatures, voltages,

Re: Debian, Postfix, Dovecot, MySQL, and argon2 password hashing scheme?

2024-04-25 Thread Marco Moock
Am 25.04.2024 schrieb David Mehler : > Since changing systems to Debian 12.5 I can't send, though checking > the password with a manual login to Dovecot works fine. Sending mails is SMTP and therefore postfix on your machine. It can use PAM for auth. Do you use PAM?

Re: Debian@IBMx3550

2024-04-23 Thread Timothy M Butterworth
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:35 PM Greg wrote: > Hi there, > > I got refurb IBM x3550 M3 7944 server and I'm a bit lost. Is there any > Linux/Debian software (some gui would be nice) to monitor fan speed, > temperatures, voltages, disks.. ? > KDE has a bunch of monitoring widgets. Do you have a

Re: Debian@IBMx3550

2024-04-23 Thread David Christensen
On 4/23/24 14:35, Greg wrote: Hi there, I got refurb IBM x3550 M3 7944 server and I'm a bit lost. Is there any Linux/Debian software (some gui would be nice) to monitor fan speed, temperatures, voltages, disks.. ? Thanks in advance for any help Greg If you installed the Xfce desktop,

Re: Debian@IBMx3550

2024-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:35 PM Greg wrote: > Hi there, > > I got refurb IBM x3550 M3 7944 server and I'm a bit lost. Is there any > Linux/Debian software (some gui would be nice) to monitor fan speed, > temperatures, voltages, disks.. ? > I believe the package you are looking for is

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-23 Thread Larry Martell
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Curt wrote: > > On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote: > > > > I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude. > > I'm Curt. Let's be serious. You be Frank and I'll be Earnest.

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-23 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote: > > I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude. I'm Curt.

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:02:09PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact? > >> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html > >> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`? > > but perhaps without all the

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact? >> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html >> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`? > but perhaps without all the deception crap, unless you really mean > to impugn the developers' motives.

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Reid
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > That's probably a bug in Calamares. I checked with one of the live cd > maintainers on this. As has been pointed out, the live cd is really > intended more for checking than for major use but it does need some work. > If you found the non-free components - where were

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Reid
- Original message - From: Curt > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote: > >> How can you be taken seriously when you can't even wrap your lines >> according to our venerable guidelines? >> Get a popular setting going, buddy. >> >> And, though it's true I extolled Proust recently, being

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:31:03AM -0700, Reid wrote: > Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org > website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very > Free Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience, > and the reasons

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-22, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > I endure this on many other mailing lists unrelated to Debian, > particularly from groups.io that have a Web interface. It's a violation of Debian mailing list posting rules, guidelines, and tips. It irks me that in certain cases these guidelines are

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2024 22 Apr 09:39 -0500, Curt wrote: > On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote: > > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of > > release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is > > not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy",

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-22, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote: > >> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote: >>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of >>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is >>> not what the

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread fxkl47BF
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote: > On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote: >> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of >> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is >> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote: > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of > release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is > not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We > Are / What We Do" pages are

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun Apr 21, 2024 at 9:58 PM BST, Reid wrote: > If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the choice to opt-in > or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned > promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading > users. I'm sure the Debian WWW team

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-22 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 21 Apr 2024 13:58 -0700, from reid...@proinbox.com (Reid): > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX > pages of release notes and guides in order to learn that what > they're installing is not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", > "Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread David Wright
On Sun 21 Apr 2024 at 21:59:21 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact? > > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html > > Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`? but perhaps without all the deception crap,

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact? > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`? Stefan

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread Reid
Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact? Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html - Original message - From: fxkl4...@protonmail.com Date: Sunday, April 21, 2024 3:52 PM do you think the debian gods are listening On Sun, 21

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread fxkl47BF
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If Debian is going to continue promoting itself with those "Our Philosophy" >> and "Why Debian" pages, there should at least be opt-ins during the >> installation process of every Debian download, as well as prominent warnings >> of the new policy on

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> If Debian is going to continue promoting itself with those "Our Philosophy" > and "Why Debian" pages, there should at least be opt-ins during the > installation process of every Debian download, as well as prominent warnings > of the new policy on the download pages. Agreed. It should be easy

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread Reid
You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are / What We Do" pages are currently promoting Debian as. That's not

Re: Debian non-free-firmware policy making OS misleading and Free Software unfriendly

2024-04-21 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 21 Apr 2024 11:31 -0700, from reid...@proinbox.com (Reid): > I'm a 10+ year Debian user, and a longtime Free Software supporter. > Two weeks ago I was shocked to discover 29 non-free components in > the Debian desktop I'd been using for the last couple months. There > hadn't been any opt-in or

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-21 Thread Gareth Evans
> On 20 Apr 2024, at 16:49, David Christensen wrote: > > On 4/14/24 05:29, David Christensen wrote: >> debian-user: >> I have a Dell Latitude E6520: >> 2024-04-14 04:28:39 dpchrist@laalaa ~ >> $ cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a >> 11.9 >> Linux laalaa 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-20 Thread David Christensen
On 4/14/24 05:29, David Christensen wrote: debian-user: I have a Dell Latitude E6520: 2024-04-14 04:28:39 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $ cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a 11.9 Linux laalaa 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) x86_64 GNU/Linux 2024-04-14 04:34:40 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-18 Thread David Christensen
On 4/17/24 12:07, Charles Curley wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:24 -0700 David Christensen wrote: My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable to find if and where any error message is reported. My instance of nm-applet does run, and I see this as part of the boot

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-17 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:24 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable > to find if and where any error message is reported. My instance of nm-applet does run, and I see this as part of the boot process: root@hawk:~# journalctl -b |

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-16 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-16, John Crawley wrote: > > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application > that supports IMAP. > Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever. >>> >>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail >>> submission of

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-16 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-16, Max Nikulin wrote: > > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application > that supports IMAP. Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever. >>> >>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail >>> submission of

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-15 Thread David Wright
On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 18:52:33 (-), Curt wrote: > On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote: > > On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote: > >> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: > >> > > >> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application > >> > that supports IMAP.

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-15 Thread Max Nikulin
On 16/04/2024 01:52, Curt wrote: On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote: On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote: On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application that supports IMAP. Gmail supports IMAP since more or less

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-15 Thread John Crawley
On 16/04/2024 03:52, Curt wrote: On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote: On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote: On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application that supports IMAP. Gmail supports IMAP since more or less

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-15 Thread David Christensen
On 4/15/24 09:21, Gareth Evans wrote: On Sun 14/04/2024 at 13:29, David Christensen wrote: ... I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years. Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!). ... Hi David, I can't speak for XFCE, but certainly for Mate there was a time when

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-15 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote: >> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: >> > >> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application >> > that supports IMAP. >> > >> >> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever. > >

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-15 Thread David Wright
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote: > On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: > > > > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application > > that supports IMAP. > > > > Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever. AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading

Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared

2024-04-15 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 14/04/2024 at 13:29, David Christensen wrote: > debian-user: > > I have a Dell Latitude E6520: > > 2024-04-14 04:28:39 dpchrist@laalaa ~ > $ cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a > 11.9 > Linux laalaa 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > 2024-04-14

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-14 Thread Curt
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote: > > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application > that supports IMAP. > Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-11 Thread SomLinux.cat
Ara sí!! moltes gràcies!! ➜dpkg -L coreutils | grep -e '/ca/' /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/coreutils.mo /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_TIME /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_TIME/coreutils.mo ❯df -h S. fitxers  Mida En ús Lliure  %Ús Muntat a ➜mkdir mkdir: manca un

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-11 Thread Narcis Garcia
Prova: $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get --reinstall install coreutils I mira el què portava el paquet: $ dpkg -L coreutils | grep -e '/ca/' El 11/4/24 a les 9:50, sup...@somlinux.cat ha escrit: Coreutils està, entenc que per defecte a Debian. I tinc molts coreutils d'altres idiomes, pero

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-11 Thread suport
Coreutils està, entenc que per defecte a Debian. I tinc molts coreutils d'altres idiomes, pero a /ca/ no. jordan@somtic / ❯ dpkg -S coreutils coreutils: /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/coreutils.mo coreutils: /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/coreutils.mo coreutils:

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-11 Thread Narcis Garcia
Hi ha programes que utilitzen la variable LANG i d'altres que utilitzen la variable LANGUAGE per a determinar l'idioma d'usuari. Per això convé tenir configurades ambdues. Veig que, si tens instal·lat el paquet coreutils, aleshores has de tenir el fitxer de traduccions:

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-10 Thread SomLinux.cat
Bones, Quan poso LANGUAGE=ca:es:en_US hi ha coses que m'apareixen en català, però poques. Les dates d'arxius. Sí, a dpkg-reconfigure locales vaig triar sols ca_ES.UTF-8 . He provat també de posar el valencià, a veure si sonava la flauta, però res. L'he tret. Doncs en aquest directori

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-10 Thread Xavier Drudis Ferran
El Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:04:17PM +0200, Narcis Garcia deia: > > > > He fet l'export $LANGUAGE=ca_ES i ara ho tinc així > > Sense $ però ja ho saps. > > ➜ echo $LANGUAGE > > es:ca:en_US > > > > ➜ locale > > LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8 > > LANGUAGE=es:ca:en_US > > LC_CTYPE="ca_ES.UTF-8" > >

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-10 Thread Narcis Garcia
Sobre les pàgines de manual, veig que hi ha el paquet manpages-es però no el manpages-ca Sobre les eines de gestió de paquets, només veig el aptitude que estigui traduït al català. Prova: $ aptitude show aptitude El 10/4/24 a les 10:17, SomLinux.cat ha escrit: Bon dia Narcís, No tenia el

Re: Debian 12 al català

2024-04-10 Thread Narcis Garcia
Bon dia Jordán, Assegura't que tens instal·lat aquest paquet: $ sudo apt install task-catalan També que la variable d'entorn LANGUAGE té el mateix idioma que la LANG: $ echo $LANGUAGE El 8/4/24 a les 1:05, SomLinux.cat ha escrit: Hola, Faig servir Debian 12 He intentat que m'apareguin els

Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio archivador

2024-04-09 Thread Simeón Ignacio Martirén
Gracias Raúl Armenta El mar, 9 abr 2024 a las 15:58, Raúl Armenta () escribió: > > > -- Forwarded message - > De: Simeón Ignacio Martirén > Date: mar, 9 abr 2024 a las 16:42 > Subject: Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio > archiv

Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio archivador

2024-04-09 Thread Simeón Ignacio Martirén
Y algo del equipo: root@debian:/home/ign# uname -a Linux debian 4.19.0-23-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.269-1 (2022-12-20) x86_64 GNU/Linux El mar, 9 abr 2024 a las 12:02, Simeón Ignacio Martirén (< simarti...@gmail.com>) escribió: > y mis repositorios son estos: > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio archivador

2024-04-09 Thread Simeón Ignacio Martirén
y mis repositorios son estos: # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.4.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 NETINST 20200509$ # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.4.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 NETINST 20200509$ deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/

Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio archivador

2024-04-09 Thread Simeón Ignacio Martirén
Hola, soy usuario no experto, respecto de Buster quiero saber si debo hacer algún cambio para continuar usándolo ya que mi equipo ya es algo viejo. No entiendo si debo necesariamente cambiar los repositorios o no, según lo que aquí han publicado. Gracias El mié, 3 abr 2024 a las 14:17, Camaleón

Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC?

2024-04-08 Thread Jean-François Bachelet
"Marco Moock" To debian-user@lists.debian.org Date 08/04/2024 13:25:26 Subject Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC? Am 08.04.2024 um 07:52:34 Uhr schrieb David Mehler:  This is to any users running Debian 12 as a mail server. I am  wondering if you have some, most, all, or none of thes

Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC?

2024-04-08 Thread Henning Follmann
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:52:34AM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > This is to any users running Debian 12 as a mail server. I am wondering if > you have some, most, all, or none of these packages installed, Pyzor, Razor, > DCC? If so how did you get them going and how did you get them to

Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC?

2024-04-08 Thread Marco Moock
Am 08.04.2024 um 07:52:34 Uhr schrieb David Mehler: > This is to any users running Debian 12 as a mail server. I am > wondering if you have some, most, all, or none of these packages > installed, Pyzor, Razor, DCC? If so how did you get them going and > how did you get them to start? No, I

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-04-03 Thread Max Nikulin
On 31/03/2024 22:35, David Wright wrote: On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote: But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing files off my USB stick. I've no answer for that, particularly in view of Max's reply to my previous post. I've always copied

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick

2024-04-03 Thread David Christensen
On 4/3/24 05:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, i read from bytes 2085412 to 2085479: "Info rrmation Syste rm VolumeSYSTEM~" which is similar to the alterations of one of the USB sticks shown in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056998#35 The web knows about a Microsoft

Re: Debian 10 «Buster» (old old stable) se mueve al repositorio archivador

2024-04-03 Thread Camaleón
El 2024-04-03 a las 12:45 +, Eduardo A. Riquelme escribió: (mando también a la lista) >> Hola, >> >> Pues eso, mando la noticia para quien quiera instalar (o usar) esta >> versión y no la encuentre en las réplicas habituales: >> >> Debian 10 "buster" moved to archive.debian.org >>

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick

2024-04-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i read from bytes 2085412 to 2085479: "Info rrmation Syste rm VolumeSYSTEM~" which is similar to the alterations of one of the USB sticks shown in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056998#35 The web knows about a Microsoft folder named "System Volume Information".

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick

2024-04-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, David Christensen wrote: > # cmp --verbose debian-11.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso /dev/sdb I got my copy from https://get.debian.org/images/archive/11.3.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso SHA256 matches: 7892981e1da216e79fb3a1536ce5ebab157afdd20048fe458f2ae34fbc26c19b In a further

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick, was: SOLVED

2024-04-03 Thread David Christensen
On 4/3/24 03:36, David Christensen wrote: On 4/3/24 00:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: It's a relatively simple experiment to confirm that a USB flash drive with d-i changes after the first boot. This could still be   

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick, was: SOLVED

2024-04-03 Thread David Christensen
On 4/3/24 00:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: It's a relatively simple experiment to confirm that a USB flash drive with d-i changes after the first boot. This could still be https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056998 where Lenovo BIOS and/or

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-03 Thread Jonathan Chung
Hi, I think that the core problem which led to this also was on GRPCs side. They should not tell users to compile their library but rather point them to install it from their distros' packet manager (https://grpc.io/docs/languages/cpp/quickstart/#install-grpc) if possible. I will try to do the

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Chung Jonathan wrote: > Yes, I think the local fix is the way to go. I wrote: > > (You forgot to Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org. > > Consider to send your mail to the list address, too. I too would then > > resend my following reply to the list.) Since my "following reply" is quoted in

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:34:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:24 PM Chung Jonathan wrote: > > > > Dear Franco Martelli, dear Thomas Schmitt, > > > > Sorry for the potential duplication. This mail should now also go to the > > list. > > > > I believe I found the

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:24 PM Chung Jonathan wrote: > > Dear Franco Martelli, dear Thomas Schmitt, > > Sorry for the potential duplication. This mail should now also go to the list. > > I believe I found the problem which was on my side. I do have libz.so.1.3, > since I manually compiled grpc

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Chung Jonathan
Dear Franco Martelli, dear Thomas Schmitt, Sorry for the potential duplication. This mail should now also go to the list. I believe I found the problem which was on my side. I do have libz.so.1.3, since I manually compiled grpc on my machine and this also uses a newer version of zlib

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Chung Jonathan
Dear Thomas Schmitt, Yes, I think the local fix is the way to go. Probably even getting rid of the source of this, my manual GRPC install and replacing it with libgrpc++-dev. But that’s outside of this issue. Yours, Jonathan Chung Am 02.04.2024 um 23:34 schrieb Thomas Schmitt : Hi, (You

Re: Debian ISOs on USB stick, was: SOLVED

2024-04-02 Thread David Christensen
On 4/2/24 08:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: the Debian installer modifies the contents of the USB flash drive when it runs. Do you mean inside the range of the ISO image or outside by creating a new partition ? songbird wrote: if it is an iso image copied to the

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Chung Jonathan
Dear Franco Martelli, dear Thomas Schmitt, Yes, /etc/debian_version reports 12.5. However, as I have the docker sources as external repository those might have introduced an update to zlib. I will try to narrow it down and then open a subsequent bug report - possibly on a clean VM too. The

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Franco Martelli
On 02/04/24 at 10:27, Jonathan Chung wrote: Dear sir or madam, I'm new with Debian bug reporting and thus need some help with that. pigz 2.6-1 on Debian 12.5 fails to execute due to a fixed bug on upstream https://github.com/madler/pigz/issues/111 Installing the version from sid resolves the

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:27:33 +0200 Jonathan Chung wrote: > I'm new with Debian bug reporting and thus need some help with that. > pigz 2.6-1 on Debian 12.5 fails to execute due to a fixed bug on > upstream https://github.com/madler/pigz/issues/111 Are you sure this is a bug and not a problem

Re: Debian 12.5: pigz 2.6-1 fails with error message (Upstream issue 111)

2024-04-02 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Jonathan Chung wrote: > > pigz 2.6-1 on Debian 12.5 fails to execute due to a fixed bug on > > upstream https://github.com/madler/pigz/issues/111 > > Installing the version from sid resolves the issue which is clearly not > > optimal. I think the fix should be backported. > > Can someone help

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-03-31 Thread Antti-Pekka Känsälä
I filed bug report 1068122. I feel fine, despite my concern over my data. Heartfelt thanks for all the advice!

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-03-31 Thread David Wright
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote: > I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop. > Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory, > as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing >

Re: Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-03-31 Thread Antti-Pekka Känsälä
I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop. Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory, as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing files off my USB stick.

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-03-31 Thread Max Nikulin
On 31/03/2024 11:46, David Wright wrote: Double-clicking on the directory mounts it and displays the files in it. Opening a text file displays it. At least for a small file, FF does not hold the file open, so I can immediately unmount the stick. Gmail may do something more fancy -

Re: Debian 12.5 up-to-date Xfce, Firefox clings to USB stick

2024-03-30 Thread David Wright
On Sat 30 Mar 2024 at 21:06:27 (+0200), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote: > I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox, > attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. Did you mount the stick yourself as a user (ie there's an fstab entry for it), or as root, or does an

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >