" to me.
Here are some translations:
Backup folder cannot be included.
Backup-mappe kan ikke inkluderes.
Backup sub-folder cannot be included.
Backup-undermappe kan ikke inkluderes.
Host/User/Profile-ID must not be empty.
Maskine/Bruger/Profil-ID kan ikke være tom.
Destination filesystem for
Hello,
I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
using rsync in the back.
I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the Danish
translation of that application. The current state of translation is at
28%. Without improvement I need
Bonsoir,
Alex PADOLY a écrit :
> Je recherche donc un outil qui privilégie, la fiabilité de la
> sauvegarde, la simplicité, la prise en charge du MBR et donc de GRUB
> et bien entendu la restauration.
Ayant lu cette phrase, je vais me permettre de ne pas répondre à la
question et d'interroger le
Le mardi 5 décembre 2023 à 18:18, jafiv a écrit :
> TimeShift, idem en graphique
J'utilise TimeShift, pour mon usage personnel, c'est super facile et j'ai déjà
eu besoin de restaurer mon système, ça s'est très bien passé !
Benoit
>
effectuer un backup de mon système
pour pouvoir le restaurer à l'identique en cas de problème ou si
un paquet pose des problèmes.
Il existe beaucoup de logiciels, mais je souhaite me reposer sur
vos expériences personnelles et professionnelles.
CLONEZILLA ne m'a pas donné de
t :
>
> Bonsoir à tous,
>
>
> Sous Debian, j'ai installé et configuré un serveur LTSP, j'ai appris
> beaucoup de choses.
>
> Cela n'a pas été facile, c'est pour cette raison que je souhaite effectuer
> un backup de mon système
>
> pour pouvoir le restaurer à l'identiq
Le 05/12/2023 à 16:39, Klaus Becker a écrit :
Fsarchiver ? Très simple et fiable, en ligne de commande.
Bye
Klaus
TimeShift, idem en graphique
Mes 2 cts
Fsarchiver ? Très simple et fiable, en ligne de commande.
Bye
Klaus
Bonsoir à tous,
Sous Debian, j'ai installé et configuré un serveur LTSP, j'ai appris
beaucoup de choses.
Cela n'a pas été facile, c'est pour cette raison que je souhaite
effectuer un backup de mon système
pour pouvoir le restaurer à l'identique en cas de problème ou si un
paquet pose des
On 11/23/23 18:18, Curt wrote:
On 2023-11-21, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using following command to backup:
rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
and get the following:
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one
On 2023-11-21, Greg wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using following command to backup:
>
> rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
>
> and get the following:
>
> WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
> start using the ne
Greg (12023-11-21):
> I'm using following command to backup:
>
> rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
>
> and get the following:
>
> WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear, start
> using the new one as desc
Hi there,
I'm using following command to backup:
rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
and get the following:
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
Unfortunately I'm unable
even want to have in the history.
But you aren't going to use that in a Git backup with gigabytes
of data, believe me :-)
But you definitely want to run tests on real data before you decide
that deleting old data saves your anything, particularly with respect
to time.
If git is so efficient
ut you aren't going to use that in a Git backup with gigabytes
of data, believe me :-)
> But you definitely want to run tests on real data before you decide
> that deleting old data saves your anything, particularly with respect
> to time.
>
> If git is so efficient at storing this ki
Something I played with recently was
https://packages.debian.org/stable/vcs/git-filter-repo
But you definitely want to run tests on real data before you decide
that deleting old data saves your anything, particularly with respect
to time.
If git is so efficient at storing this kind of data, then
requently and as a low-priority background task.
A good reason why you usually don't want to run it frequently, is that
due to the sharing ("deduplication"), there's usually not that much
garbage to collect.
[ IOW, often a thousand backups (of the same machine) don't take up
much more space t
Stefan Monnier (12023-10-06):
> `git gc` does delete the old data (if it's not reachable any more).
And it is very expensive. My point exactly.
> BTW, if you want to (ab)use a Git repository to do backups, you should
> definitely look at `bup`.
Thanks, it might be exactly what I am looking for.
> Have you tried? The very principle of Git makes it necessary, to remove
> or update old data, to rewrite the whole subsequent history.
> Furthermore, it is done by creating a new branch, the original data is
> not actually deleted.
`git gc` does delete the old data (if it's not reachable any
john doe (12023-10-06):
> Please elaborate on why Git is so bad at removing data from a single
> repository?
Have you tried? The very principle of Git makes it necessary, to remove
or update old data, to rewrite the whole subsequent history.
Furthermore, it is done by creating a new branch, the
On 10/6/23 13:26, Nicolas George wrote:
john doe (12023-10-06):
I do not understand why you would want multiple repos, to me this looks
like this would fit the bill for a Git branching workflow.
Please elaborate. How do you work around the fact that Git is terrible
at removing data with a
Max Nikulin (12023-10-06):
> I have no idea if it is possible to do it in place, but "git clone" and "git
> fetch" have the --depth option. So you can specify how many last commits you
> would like to have in the cloned repository. Using "git rebase
I know. They only allow to keep the last
john doe (12023-10-06):
> I do not understand why you would want multiple repos, to me this looks
> like this would fit the bill for a Git branching workflow.
Please elaborate. How do you work around the fact that Git is terrible
at removing data with a single repository?
Regards,
--
Nicolas
On 10/6/23 11:14, Nicolas George wrote:
Hi.
There is a project I have that requires some scripting, but I am
wondering if somebody already did something similar and there is a
package that I can just apt-get install.
The idea is to use Git to store backups of text files that change rather
On 06/10/2023 16:14, Nicolas George wrote:
Unfortunately, Git is very bad at removing old data
I have no idea if it is possible to do it in place, but "git clone" and
"git fetch" have the --depth option. So you can specify how many last
commits you would like to have in the cloned
Hi.
There is a project I have that requires some scripting, but I am
wondering if somebody already did something similar and there is a
package that I can just apt-get install.
The idea is to use Git to store backups of text files that change rather
rarely or not a lot, because Git is very
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:10 PM Paynalton wrote:
> Hace unos anyos hice una pequenya infraestructura. Con ansible entraba
> a los equipos desde un servidor para sacar respaldos de forma
> periodica y automatizada. Estos archivos eran transferidos a un NAS
> con un repositorio GIT para versionar
El 14/9/23 a las 13:15, Luciano Andino escribió:
> ¡Buenas! Bueno resulta que los ransomware están a full y parece que no
> respetan ningún sistema operativo. Mi consulta es: ¿conocen una solución
> libre (o de última no tan costosa) para poder realizar backups que sean
> inmutables?
Hola:
Yo
El 14/9/23 a las 13:01, Camaleón escribió:
El 2023-09-14 a las 08:15 -0300, Luciano Andino escribió:
¡Buenas! Bueno resulta que los ransomware están a full y parece que no
respetan ningún sistema operativo. Mi consulta es: ¿conocen una solución
libre (o de última no tan costosa) para poder
Hace unos anyos hice una pequenya infraestructura. Con ansible entraba
a los equipos desde un servidor para sacar respaldos de forma
periodica y automatizada. Estos archivos eran transferidos a un NAS
con un repositorio GIT para versionar los cambios. Un worker tomaba
esos respaldos y cada semana
Los respaldos Off-Site son una alternativa, en el caso del que comentan,
en muchas ocasiones la infeccion esta latente, pero no activa por mucho
tiempo previo, por lo que la mayoria de los respaldos se encuentran
contaminados
Saludos
El 2023-09-14 10:01, Camaleón escribió:
El 2023-09-14 a
El 2023-09-14 a las 08:15 -0300, Luciano Andino escribió:
> ¡Buenas! Bueno resulta que los ransomware están a full y parece que no
> respetan ningún sistema operativo. Mi consulta es: ¿conocen una solución
> libre (o de última no tan costosa) para poder realizar backups que sean
> inmutables?
bien a que te referís con inmutable ¿o sea como hacer una
copia para archivar y no cambie nunca? pues volvería a algún medio de
solo lectura, tipo cdr o dvdr.
No se que tan práctico sea pero si están almacenados correctamente
deberían durar mucho, o al menos lo suficiente para que sea un backup
¡Buenas! Bueno resulta que los ransomware están a full y parece que no
respetan ningún sistema operativo. Mi consulta es: ¿conocen una solución
libre (o de última no tan costosa) para poder realizar backups que sean
inmutables?
--
Luciano Andino
On 9/5/23 07:34, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 4 Sep 2023 13:57 -0700, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
* I am using zfs-auto-snapshot(8) for snapsnots. Are you using rsnapshot(1)
for snapshots?
No. I'm using ZFS snapshots on the source, but not for backup
purposes. (I have
On 4 Sep 2023 13:57 -0700, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
> * I am using zfs-auto-snapsnot(8) for snapsnots. Are you using rsnapsnot(1)
> for snapshots?
No. I'm using ZFS snapshots on the source, but not for backup
purposes. (I have contemplated doing that, but it
lly stored data.
"Hot" is perhaps better referred to as the "current" data set; since
snapshots (and earlier backups) can include data which has since been
deleted, and is thus no longer current but still exists on disk.
What partitioning scheme, volume manager, file system,
On 3 Sep 2023 14:20 -0700, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
>> 8.07 TiB physically stored on one backup drive holding 174 backups;
>> 11.4 TiB total logical (excluding effects of compression) data on the
>> source; 7.83 TiB hot current logical data on the
On 9/3/23 03:02, Michael Kjörling wrote:
8.07 TiB physically stored on one backup drive holding 174 backups;
11.4 TiB total logical (excluding effects of compression) data on the
source; 7.83 TiB hot current logical data on the source (excluding
things like ZFS snapshots and compression).
Which
On 2 Sep 2023 14:49 -0700, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
> So, 693 GB backup size, 98 backups, 67 TB apparent total backup storage, and
> 777 GB actual total backup storage. So, a savings of about 88:1.
>
> What statistics are other readers seeing for simil
On 9/2/23 15:26, Michel Verdier wrote:
On 2023-09-02, David Christensen wrote:
What statistics are other readers seeing for similar use-cases and
their backup solutions?
I have 83 backups resulting to 130% of data. So a ratio of 63:1.
Nice.
But because of performance limitation I don't
On 9/2/23 12:15, Michel Verdier wrote:
On 2023-09-02, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I switched to Bup a few years ago and saw a significant reduction in the
size of my backups that is partly due to the deduplication *between*
machines (I backup several Debian machines to the same backup
repository
> More accurately, rsnapshot (which is basically a frontend to rsync)
> tells rsync to do that; IIRC by passing --link-dest pointing at the
> previous backup target directory.
I've used a similar (tho hand-cooked) script running `rsync`.
I switched to Bup a few years ago and saw a si
From: "Thomas Schmitt"
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 00:08:23 +0200
> You would have to load each session and inquire it:
OK, thanks.
> Having an id for the backup script makes it possible to ensure that the
> script is not applied to the medium of a different backup sc
the loaded session is in reach:
$ xorriso -indev /dev/sr0 -pvd_info
...
Creation Time: 2023081220110500
...
You would have to load each session and inquire it:
$ xorriso -load session 1 -indev /dev/sr0 -pvd_info
...
Creation Time: 2023072920104300
...
I encode the time in the volume id tog
Hello again,
Here a session of a backup archive is written to a DVD.
xorriso -for_backup -dev /dev/sr0 \
-update_r . / \
-commit \
-toc -check_md5 failure -- \
-eject all
This command gives the contents of a DVD.
xorriso -dev /dev/sr0 -toc
TOC layout : Idx , sbsector , Size
On Sun, 6 Aug 2023 10:49:12 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/5/23 17:27, Charles Curley wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> >
> > The first thing I wonder is whether you are going to overload your
> > power supply by adding all these peripherals. Do the math.
> >
> There are no power hungry
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 10:54:27AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/5/23 17:47, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Do bear in mind that SSDs are not designed for long term unpowered
> > data storage, unlike conventional HDDs, so that could be a
> > consideration if you're intending to use these SSDs
disaster 15+
years ago when I last tried it.
I could, since amanda is quite versatile, set it up as two separate
vtape drives. So I'm open to a pro/con discussion. Thanks all.
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
I agree with other readers that using two SSD's in RAID1 as Amanda
backup media seems
On 8/5/23 17:47, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 03:03:54PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
What doc should I follow to bring these 2 drives into one volume managed
partition for amanda's use as a vtape device? I'd assume the volume
management works by now, but it was a data losing
On 8/5/23 17:27, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 15:03:54 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
I've an asus mobo with 6 sata ports, 5 are busy.
I also have another 6 port with 4 ports tied up serving a raid 10 for
/home. That leaves 2 ports empty on that controller.
I have a handful of 2T
available, I would consider using an SSD
as a spool drive and a big spinning disk on the other port as
the 'tape'. But maybe you aren't going to need more than 4 TB of
backup storage; I dunno.
-dsr-
.
And I credited Greg for this msg, thank you Dan. As I said, when
spinning rust dies SSD's replace them
available, I would consider using an SSD
as a spool drive and a big spinning disk on the other port as
the 'tape'. But maybe you aren't going to need more than 4 TB of
backup storage; I dunno.
I'm already set with a 500G SSD as spool, amazing how fast it works, but
Greg, I'd had it with spinning rust
isaster 15+ years ago
> > when I last tried it.
> >
> I agree with other readers that using two SSD's in RAID1 as Amanda backup
> media seems unusual, but ZFS can easily accomplish this:
Gene is asking for RAID0, I believe, which is why I advised
against it.
Amanda is perfectly ca
could, since amanda is quite versatile, set it up as two separate
vtape drives. So I'm open to a pro/con discussion. Thanks all.
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
I agree with other readers that using two SSD's in RAID1 as Amanda
backup media seems unusual, but ZFS can easily accomplish
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 03:03:54PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> What doc should I follow to bring these 2 drives into one volume managed
> partition for amanda's use as a vtape device? I'd assume the volume
> management works by now, but it was a data losing disaster 15+ years ago
> when I
On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 15:03:54 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> I've an asus mobo with 6 sata ports, 5 are busy.
>
> I also have another 6 port with 4 ports tied up serving a raid 10 for
> /home. That leaves 2 ports empty on that controller.
>
> I have a handful of 2T SSD's. If I can find another 4
vantages.
If you have the money available, I would consider using an SSD
as a spool drive and a big spinning disk on the other port as
the 'tape'. But maybe you aren't going to need more than 4 TB of
backup storage; I dunno.
-dsr-
I've an asus mobo with 6 sata ports, 5 are busy.
I also have another 6 port with 4 ports tied up serving a raid 10 for
/home. That leaves 2 ports empty on that controller.
I have a handful of 2T SSD's. If I can find another 4 pin empty pigtail
on the psu, I'll plug 2 of these 2T's into that
ire une
> restauration système, créer une sauvegarde donnes perso, restaurer ces
> données perso, tout ça sous Windows, tu peux consulter le support
> Microsoft, quand on creuse un peu, y a pas que support premier niveau, y
> a aussi des articles assez détaillés:
> https://support.
Le 15/06/23 à 10:40, Hugues Larrive a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Pour récupérer la clé de windows OEM depuis linux, pas besoin de sauvegarde,
> depuis qu'elle
> n'est plus sur le sticker de licence elle est inscrite dans une mémoire de la
> carte-mère :
> strings /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/MSDM
Le 15/06/2023 à 12:03, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit :
[...]
Mais je vais voir, avec un peu de chance c'est une licence qui permet une
réinstallation
standard si on a la clé d'activation (dans ce cas j'ai que cette clé à
conserver, avec une
iso d'install windows10 éventuellement au cas où MS
2023 à 12:03, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit
:
>
>
> Le 15/06/23 à 11:32, "ajh-valmer" ajh.val...@free.fr a écrit :
>
> > On Thursday 15 June 2023 11:08:01 Daniel Caillibaud wrote:
> >
> > > Avant d'installer debian sur un PC je voudrais faire un back
Le 15/06/2023 à 11:08, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit :
Bonjour,
Avant d'installer debian sur un PC je voudrais faire un backup du windows qui
est dessus, pour
le remettre "comme il était avant" si besoin.
Je sais pas encore s'il n'a qu'une partition système ou plusieurs (je pense à
une
Le 15/06/23 à 11:32, "ajh-valmer" a écrit :
> On Thursday 15 June 2023 11:08:01 Daniel Caillibaud wrote:
> > Avant d'installer debian sur un PC je voudrais faire un backup
> > du windows qui est dessus, pour le remettre "comme il était
> > avant" si b
On Thursday 15 June 2023 11:08:01 Daniel Caillibaud wrote:
> Avant d'installer debian sur un PC je voudrais faire un backup
> du windows qui est dessus, pour le remettre "comme il était
> avant" si besoin.
Attention, si on réinstalle Windows à partir de son backup,
il ne red
Bonjour,
Avant d'installer debian sur un PC je voudrais faire un backup du windows qui
est dessus, pour
le remettre "comme il était avant" si besoin.
Je sais pas encore s'il n'a qu'une partition système ou plusieurs (je pense à
une partition de
restauration), en plus de la par
On 5/27/23 07:42, mick.crane wrote:
On 2023-05-27 10:33, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 26 May 2023 11:47:04 CEST, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
(And as mick.crane already noticed, it is a bit awkward to create an
extended partiton 2 only to fill it nearly up with logical partition 5.
I wonder what entity
> Back in the (DOS/w95) days, you would usually create one primary and one
> extended, and populate the extended with as many partitions as you want.
IIRC the reason why there was still that one primary was that you could
only boot to a primary partition.
BTW, I don't use extended partitions any
On 26 May 2023 11:47, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
mick.crane wrote:
root@pumpkin:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 223.57 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors
...
Disklabel type: dos
...
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 466862079
mick.crane wrote:
>
> I just installed bookworm on another SSD disk.
> The installer said it was going to partition the disk one for the / and
> another for swap
> After the installation the extended partition was there.
> Is this some attribute of pre formatted SSDs
Nah, this is just the
On 2023-05-27 10:33, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 26 May 2023 11:47:04 CEST, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
(And as mick.crane already noticed, it is a bit awkward to create an
extended partiton 2 only to fill it nearly up with logical partition
5.
I wonder what entity decided to do so.)
on my debian
On Friday, 26 May 2023 11:47:04 CEST, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
(And as mick.crane already noticed, it is a bit awkward to create an
extended partiton 2 only to fill it nearly up with logical partition 5.
I wonder what entity decided to do so.)
on my debian 11 test vm with default installation it
elf to find out, if it was possible to change partitioning to
GPT and booting to use EFI. - Yes, i did not need to backup/restore the
partition contents, just carefully moving it to make room for EFISYS
partition and such, and installing the EFI support was enough and the
machine is working hap
endian number.
The position of the GPT header is always 512-byte block 1 for the primary
partition table and the last valid block address of the device for the
backup table.
Specs for GPT are part of the UEFI specs. Current is:
https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/05_GUID_Partition_Table_Format.html
(I
zero your drive prior to installing Debian? Perhaps there
> > is a leftover GPT secondary partition table on disk. See below.
> on a disk with a gpt partition table, yes.
> maybe i am missing something. if so, please enlighten me!
A remnant backup GPT is a typical risk of repartitioning
On Thu, 18 May 2023 15:13:46 +0800
Jeremy Ardley wrote:
...
> This may not be an issue for entry level Debian users, but anyone who does
> anything serious will want to compile from package source.
They will?
--
Celejar
On 17/5/23 15:36, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Not many. An "apt-file search /usr/local" turns up exactly three packages.
And I'd venture the guess that those three are doing this by mistake.
I did a very brief search and many well known packages default to /usr/local.
It's just the packagers at
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:56:32PM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
> writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:53:36AM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
>
> >> It's an odd claim. I typically don't have anything in /usr/local except
> >> what I put there myself [...]
>
> > Not many. An "apt-file search
writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:53:36AM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
>> It's an odd claim. I typically don't have anything in /usr/local except
>> what I put there myself [...]
> Not many. An "apt-file search /usr/local" turns up exactly three packages.
> And I'd venture the guess that those
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:53:36AM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Tue, 16 May 2023 09:52:07 +0800
> > Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 16/5/23 09:11, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> >> > I'd suggest backing up /etc, since that's where your system settings
> >> >
On 17/5/23 14:53, Anssi Saari wrote:
It's an odd claim. I typically don't have anything in /usr/local except
what I put there myself. Some Debian packages do create a directory in
/usr/local/share but leave it empty. So what goes in /usr/local is
mostly software I've compiled myself and maybe
Celejar writes:
> On Tue, 16 May 2023 09:52:07 +0800
> Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16/5/23 09:11, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
>> > I'd suggest backing up /etc, since that's where your system settings
>> > are. I also back up /var, since that's typically where your logs and
>> > mail
Am 16.05.2023 um 02:17 schrieb Maureen L Thomas:
> I have everything I need including a third HDD. There are so many
> backup programs I have to wonder which one will work for my needs. I
> just need to make a backup of my home directory so if I do something
> stupid like play with /
On Tue, 16 May 2023 09:52:07 +0800
Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>
> On 16/5/23 09:11, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> > I'd suggest backing up /etc, since that's where your system settings
> > are. I also back up /var, since that's typically where your logs and
> > mail are.
>
> There is a lot
Maureen L Thomas writes:
> I have everything I need including a third HDD. There are so many backup
> programs I have to wonder which one will work for my needs. I
> just need to make a backup of my home directory so if I do something stupid
> like play with /var and have no ide
On 5/15/23 17:17, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I have everything I need including a third HDD. There are so many
backup programs I have to wonder which one will work for my needs. I
just need to make a backup of my home directory so if I do something
stupid like play with /var and have no idea
When you have things going your way, why not just image the whole disc and
sleep well.
I have used this for years. It is proprietary yes, and runs on an old
version of Linux.
https://www.terabyteunlimited.com/image-for-linux/
I have no interest in these people, I don't get a commission for
On 16/5/23 09:11, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
I'd suggest backing up /etc, since that's where your system settings
are. I also back up /var, since that's typically where your logs and
mail are.
There is a lot relevant of stuff in /usr/local
For instance some programs use /usr/local/etc
On Mon, 15 May 2023 20:17:48 -0400
Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> I have everything I need including a third HDD. There are so many
> backup programs I have to wonder which one will work for my needs. I
> just need to make a backup of my home directory so if I do something
> stup
I have everything I need including a third HDD. There are so many
backup programs I have to wonder which one will work for my needs. I
just need to make a backup of my home directory so if I do something
stupid like play with /var and have no idea how to fix it. Is there
something else I
ernet. De buenas a
> primeras los backup full de un cliente local falla y lanza mensajes de error
> del tipo:
>
> JobId 9387: Error: bsock.c:429 Write error sending 11068 bytes to Storage
> daemon:X:9103: ERR=Connection reset by peer
> JobId 9387: Fatal error: backup.c:12
Tengo un sistema Debian 10 que tiene el servicio Bacula cumpliendo su función
desde hace años, los clientes pueden ser máquinas físicas o virtuales de tipo
Centos o Ubuntu o Debian, uno de los clientes está en internet. De buenas a
primeras los backup full de un cliente local falla y lanza
ve been lax in doing
> > > > proper
> > > > backups. I currently run a RAID1 mirroring across three disks (plus a
> > > > hot
> > > > spare). On top of that is LUKS, and on top of that is LVM. I keep
> > > > meaning
> > > > to ma
(plus a hot
spare). On top of that is LUKS, and on top of that is LVM. I keep meaning
to manually fail a disk then store it in a safe deposit box or something as
a backup, but I have not gotten around to it.
It sounds to me like adding an iSCSI volume (e.g. from AWS) to the RAID as
an additional
; > spare). On top of that is LUKS, and on top of that is LVM. I keep meaning
> > to manually fail a disk then store it in a safe deposit box or something as
> > a backup, but I have not gotten around to it.
> >
> > It sounds to me like adding an iSCSI volume (e.g. from AWS)
On 3/17/23 12:36, Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
PS There's that old saying, "RAID is not a substitute for a backup".
What you're trying to do sounds suspiciously similar to an old "RAID
split-mirror" backup te
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> [...]
> > PS There's that old saying, "RAID is not a substitute for a backup".
> > What you're trying to do sounds suspiciously similar to an old "RAID
> > spli
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
> PS There's that old saying, "RAID is not a substitute for a backup".
> What you're trying to do sounds suspiciously similar to an old "RAID
> split-mirror" backup technique. Just saying.
This thread has
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022, Flemming Bjerke wrote:
Mit spørgsmål var i virkeligheden: Hvor længe gemmer I backups, efter hvilket
skema? Og hvor tit laver I full backup, og hvor tit incrementel?
Det kommer nok helt an på hvad det er for nogle data og hvilke regler, man
er underlagt.
Er der ikke
1 - 100 of 5641 matches
Mail list logo
