Re: [SOLVED] Jessie wget: certificate not trusted, was: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On 10/04/21 at 11:54, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > mett wrote: > > the final solution is: > > -disable the certs with an ! before the cert name > > (vi /etc/ca-certificates.conf: !DST_Root_CA_X3.crt) > > -then, rebuild the cert directory (update-ca-certificates --fresh) > > Indeed this

[SOLVED] Jessie wget: certificate not trusted, was: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

Hi, mett wrote: > the final solution is: > -disable the certs with an ! before the cert name > (vi /etc/ca-certificates.conf: !DST_Root_CA_X3.crt) > -then, rebuild the cert directory (update-ca-certificates --fresh) Indeed this brought success with wget on the Debian 8 machine. $ wget

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On 2021年10月2日 1:32:21 JST, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >Hi, > >as tomas predicted it can be done by handwork. > >Tobias Diekershoff gave a good hint but i was not smart enough to make >use of it before i found out the clicky way. > >The solution was to import to iceweasel the ce

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 06:32:21PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > as tomas predicted it can be done by handwork. > > Tobias Diekershoff gave a good hint but i was not smart enough to make > use of it before i found out the clicky way. Tobias is almost always spot-on :) Cheers - t

[SOLVED] Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

Hi, as tomas predicted it can be done by handwork. Tobias Diekershoff gave a good hint but i was not smart enough to make use of it before i found out the clicky way. The solution was to import to iceweasel the certificate file /etc/ssl/certs/ISRG_Root_X1.pem

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On 2021-10-01, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i am confronted with an old Debian 8 "jessie" machine where since > (probably) yesterday the Iceweasel browser does not work any more > with many websites. E.g. > > This Connection is Untrusted > ... > list

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On Fri 01 Oct 2021 at 13:20:01 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I would prefer not to rely on an allow-list. > > So i currently ponder how to transplant the certificates from a Debian 10 > machine. > man update-ca-certificates talks of > /etc/ssl/certs > /etc/ca-certificates.conf >

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

Hey Thomas On Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:41:45 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > i am confronted with an old Debian 8 "jessie" machine where since > (probably) yesterday the Iceweasel browser does not work any more > with many websites. E.g. Are the untrusted certific

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:20:01PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [...] > So a brute force attempt would be to rename the two directories and > the file to other names and to then copy the Debian 10 stuff to the > original names. The new /etc/ssl/certs would start empty and be > populated by

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

Hi, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > I assume Thomas knows pretty well what he's doing. He'd know much > better than me, in any case :-) Regrettably my sysadmin skills are severely underdeveloped. I am qualified for the task only by being the guy who has Linux at home and by having made fun of upgrade

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:22:10PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Honestly - I'd suggest disconnecting the machine from the Internet until > > you are able to upgrade it - it's far enough out of support that it's now > > ELTS. > > I'd suggest that you consider

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

on changing the situation. Iceweasel is confined to no Javascript and the machine cannot (easily) be reached from outside. Nevertheless it should be able to reach out to some conservatively programmed web sites. > - what is the reason you cannot? Business, proprietary software, housebroken h

Re: Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:41:45AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i am confronted with an old Debian 8 "jessie" machine where since > (probably) yesterday the Iceweasel browser does not work any more > with many websites. E.g. > >

Jessie iceweasel: This Connection is Untrusted

Hi, i am confronted with an old Debian 8 "jessie" machine where since (probably) yesterday the Iceweasel browser does not work any more with many websites. E.g. This Connection is Untrusted ... lists.debian.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trust

Re: Iceweasel hangs

Tixy writes: > On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 19:56 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > [...] >> Debian Jessie is not supported even as LTS anymore. If I was you then I >> would try to use FireFox binaries provided by mozilla.org. > > I would second that, or upgrade to a newer version of Debian. >

Re: Iceweasel hangs

On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 19:56 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: [...] > Debian Jessie is not supported even as LTS anymore. If I was you then I > would try to use FireFox binaries provided by mozilla.org. I would second that, or upgrade to a newer version of Debian. Personally I wouldn't go anywhere

Re: Iceweasel hangs

On 10/16/20 6:21 PM, Mick Ab wrote: > Iceweasel has been running okay on a Debian Jessie desktop for a long time. > > Lately, it keeps hanging. It was noticed that the following message > appeared in an xterm window : > > ###!!![Parent][DispatchAsyncMessage] Error: &

Iceweasel hangs

Iceweasel has been running okay on a Debian Jessie desktop for a long time. Lately, it keeps hanging. It was noticed that the following message appeared in an xterm window : ###!!![Parent][DispatchAsyncMessage] Error: PLayerTransaction::Msg_ReleaseLayer Processing error: message was deserialized

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:27:13AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:58:13AM +, vitorhug...@hotmail.com wrote: > > Depois que adotaram o system-d as coisas ficaram meio estranhas pro Debian > > uma coisa não tem

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:30:46AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:45:07AM -0300, Linux - Junior Polegato wrote: > > Olá! > > > > Faz meses que o firefox-esr entrou no lugar do Iceweasel no Testing

Re: Re: Iceweasel woes

I went to the message you linked and then the site mentioned and downloaded a large /etc/hosts file that seems to send most of what was eating up cpu & memory to the bit bucket. Huge difference in FF response time, no hard drive grinding. Top now shows around 10% cpu usage and 80% memory. Thank

Re: Re: Iceweasel woes

Re: Iceweasel woes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:32PM -0800, cgi...@surfnaked.ca wrote: [...] > The Internet is like a big city - there are lots of bright lights > and excitement, but also dark alleys down which the unwary get > mugged. with the difference that on

Re: Iceweasel woes

Quoting deloptes : RRRoy BBBean wrote: Now, I have to temporarily enable between 20 and 200 domains every time I do anything. I can't imagine what the www will be like in another 10 years... indeed it changed negatively in the past 10-15y. it is now virtually impossible

Re: Iceweasel woes

On 11/7/17, RRRoy BBBean wrote: >> It has problems, especially with scripts. There are apparently simple >> pages which will eat a third of a CPU, continuously. > > In the past, I have foolishly let my computer sit overnight, with FF > open to a site which (it turned out,

Re: Iceweasel woes

RRRoy BBBean wrote: > Now, I have to temporarily enable between 20 and 200 domains every time > I do anything. I can't imagine what the www will be like in another 10 > years... indeed it changed negatively in the past 10-15y. it is now virtually impossible to find useful information - only

Re: Iceweasel woes

> It has problems, especially with scripts. There are apparently simple > pages which will eat a third of a CPU, continuously. In the past, I have foolishly let my computer sit overnight, with FF open to a site which (it turned out, on later examination) continuously cycled video ads. I noticed

Re: Iceweasel woes

On Tue 07 Nov 2017 at 08:34:44 (-0800), Mike McClain wrote: > I run an older PC, Pentium3 w/ 512M memory which does everything I > need but Iceweasel is killing me since the last couple of upgrades. > > It's become such a memory hog that it ties up the system for minutes > at a tim

Re: Iceweasel woes

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:34:44 -0800 Mike McClain <mike.junk...@att.net> wrote: > I run an older PC, Pentium3 w/ 512M memory which does everything I > need but Iceweasel is killing me since the last couple of upgrades. > > It's become such a memory hog that it ties up the

Re: Iceweasel woes

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:34:44AM -0800, Mike McClain wrote: > I run an older PC, Pentium3 w/ 512M memory which does everything I > need but Iceweasel is killing me since the last couple of upgrades. > > It's become such a memory hog that it ties up the system for minutes > at a

Iceweasel woes

I run an older PC, Pentium3 w/ 512M memory which does everything I need but Iceweasel is killing me since the last couple of upgrades. It's become such a memory hog that it ties up the system for minutes at a time. How can I backup to the version of a couple of months ago? Thanks, Mike McClain

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On Friday 07 October 2016 19:00:12 Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On Sunday 09 October 2016 12:28:03 Tony Baldwin wrote: > I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US > stat of  Minnesota). Except that it is Mongolia. Country TLDs have to be unique. Lisi

Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.)

Hi Andy, Thanks very much! It looks like quite a comprehensive answer (including links) that I'll surely have to read more than once to absorb. (At that point, I'll ask more questions if I feel the need.) regards, Randy Kramer On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:18:38 PM Andy Smith wrote: > On

Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.)

Hi rhkramer, On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:23:45PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) > OT, In that case it would be good to change the subject of the email. I've done so here. > but I am curious about how old inet4

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6 addresses interact. When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and an inet6 address assigned. Can anybody point

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

, Iceweasel, w3m, lynx and e-links all load the proper page/site. Chrome and dolphin on my android phone do fine, as well, but apparently chrome on iOS (what my brother was using when he found the problem), does not. I would try these : purge chromium and chrome. Install chromium and go to your

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Richard Hector writes: > > It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in > 2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all > the 'good' codes were presumably taken. I'd imagine .me would, like .tv (Tuvalo) be one that a small

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the way, how did you install them ? To resume : On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads only with chrome/chromium ? I would try these : purge chromium and chrome. Install chromium and go to your

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) Richard Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. Thanks, Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the >>> State of Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >>

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/09/2016 02:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of >>> Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >>

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of Maine. Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) Richard Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: > What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of > Maine. Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) Richard

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 10/09/2016 07:11 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: [...] > >Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press > >the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the > >url in your address bar. >

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

irected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (n

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

irected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (n

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

>>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landi

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), al

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), al

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

e web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicat

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

uot;, If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing),

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

other's media >> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spamm

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added t

url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

s chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing

Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

- Original Message - From: "Felix Miata" <mrma...@earthlink.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:26:23 PM Subject: Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-17 13:05 (UTC-0400): > I'll have to l

Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-17 13:05 (UTC-0400): During my experimentation with Iceweasel, described in another post, I have received warnings from the OS that /tmp was filling up. It seems that when running a video a buffer is opened in /tmp, and /tmp fills up rapidly. At the moment

Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

During my experimentation with Iceweasel, described in another post, I have received warnings from the OS that /tmp was filling up. It seems that when running a video a buffer is opened in /tmp, and /tmp fills up rapidly. At the moment, df /tmp tells me that 3% of /tmp is used. When I'm trying

Re: Aplication's Help cant find iceweasel

I don't know how to set this from any setting tool. On my system there is the file ".local/share/applications/mimeapps.list" containing the following lines [Default Applications] text/html=firefox.desktop text/xml=firefox.desktop x-scheme-handler/mailto=icedove.desktop

Re: Aplication's Help cant find iceweasel

On 08/06/2016 02:11 PM, humbert.olivie...@free.fr wrote: Hi Gary, I recently switched to Firefox-esr and removed iceweasel from my system. Some application help files now error out with: KDEInit could not launch '/usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel. As an example Rosegarden has the problem. How can I

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

> > > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel > > > > (Firefox) from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able > > > > to use a platform I use instead of skype :) > > > > > > What version of Debi

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

hendersonpark wrote: This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel (Firefox) from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able to use a platform I use instead of skype :) What version of Debian are you using? In jessie, I did: # aptitude install firefox and kept my

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

On Saturday 06 August 2016 23:23:22 Bob Holtzman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:24:43AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 04 August 2016 20:48:41 afamilyofbetatesters hendersonpark wrote: > > > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel >

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:24:43AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 04 August 2016 20:48:41 afamilyofbetatesters hendersonpark wrote: > > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel (Firefox) > > from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to

Re: Aplication's Help cant find iceweasel

Hi Gary, > I recently switched to Firefox-esr and removed iceweasel from my system. > Some application help files now error out with: KDEInit could not launch > '/usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel. As an example Rosegarden has the problem. > How can I fix this. su -c "update-alt

Aplication's Help cant find iceweasel

Hi all, Running Debian Stretch on KDE Desktop I recently switched to Firefox-esr and removed iceweasel from my system. Some application help files now error out with: KDEInit could not launch '/usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel. As an example Rosegarden has the problem. How can I fix this. Gary

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

On 2016-08-04, afamilyofbetatesters hendersonpark <afamilyofbetatest...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel (Firefox) > from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able to use a > platform I use instead of skype :)

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

Le 04/08/2016 à 21:48, afamilyofbetatesters hendersonpark a écrit : > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel > (Firefox) from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able to > use a platform I use instead of skype :) what you have and is available

Re: IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

On Thursday 04 August 2016 20:48:41 afamilyofbetatesters hendersonpark wrote: > This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel (Firefox) > from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able to use a > platform I use instead of skype :) What version of Debia

IceWeasel (Firefox) Update?

This may not even be possible, but how can I update the IceWeasel (Firefox) from 45 (old) to the current 47? I need it on 47 to be able to use a platform I use instead of skype :)

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

e a partir de então teria apenas o próprio Firefox e que eu deveria mudar meu source.list. Assim o fiz. E acabei ficando com o Firefox e o Icewaesel. Tentei desinstalar o Iceweasel, mas ia quebrar um monte de pacote e deixei ele lá parado (e fiquei usando normalmente o Firefox, não precise

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Agradeço o esclarecimento com fontes. É bom ver os atores decidindo de perto. O próprio pessoal da Mozilla tomou essa decisão, pelo que ficou evidenciado. Com existência do Icecat, o Iceweasel parece ter os dias contados. Em Sexta-feira, 17 de Junho de 2016 10:34, Sheldon Led <sheldon

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Em breve deve vir o ícone do Thunderbird também se for seguido o mesmo raciocínio... Jack Pogorelsky Junior Eng. Mecânico Tel: +55 (51) 9348-0140 Site: sulmail.com/pogorelsky E-mail: j...@sulmail.com

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

O que ocorreu na verdade é que, em 2006 a Mozilla não aceitava todas as mudanças que os desenvolvedores do Debian faziam no Firefox (e outros aplicativos da Mozilla), daí para aplicar tais mudanças, de acordo com a DFSG[1] nº 4, eles redistribuiram o Firefox (e outros aplicativos da Mozilla) sobre

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

2016-06-17 7:30 GMT-03:00 Antonio Terceiro : ... > essa política foi alterada, e aí o nome e o logo alternativos não são > mais necessários. mas eu já tinha me apegado à doninha...

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Artigo da PC World sobre IceWeasel http://www.pcworld.com/article/3036509/linux/iceweasel-will-be-renamed-firefox-as-relations-between-debian-and-mozilla-thaw.html Sent with MailTrack <https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature=en=luisg...@gmail.com=22> Luís Cláudio Alves Gama Fo

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

 Abraços! Em 17 de jun de 2016 7:31 AM, "Antonio Terceiro" <terce...@debian.org> escreveu: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:45:07AM -0300, Linux - Junior Polegato wrote: > > Olá! > > > > Faz meses que o firefox-esr entrou no lugar do Iceweasel no Testing,

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Terceiro, Grato pelas informações. Não conhecia essa matéria do Linux Weekly. Inteh Em 17/06/16, Antonio Terceiro<terce...@debian.org> escreveu: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:45:07AM -0300, Linux - Junior Polegato wrote: >> Olá! >> >> Faz meses que o firefox-esr e

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:45:07AM -0300, Linux - Junior Polegato wrote: > Olá! > > Faz meses que o firefox-esr entrou no lugar do Iceweasel no Testing, agora > está indo para as versões estáveis... > > O Iceweasel existia devido há divergências entre os mantenedores do Debian

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:58:13AM +, vitorhug...@hotmail.com wrote: > Depois que adotaram o system-d as coisas ficaram meio estranhas pro Debian uma coisa não tem absolutamente nada a ver com a outra. ninguém tem obrigação de saber o que está acontecendo no desenvolvimento do debian, mas

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Olá! Faz meses que o firefox-esr entrou no lugar do Iceweasel no Testing, agora está indo para as versões estáveis... O Iceweasel existia devido há divergências entre os mantenedores do Debian e a Mozilla, mas depois de 10 anos eles se entenderam e "formaram um time só". -- []

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Faz umas semanas que eu li que Debian deixará o Iceweasel em prol do Firefox. Confere? Dessa vez nada a ver com Systemd. Em Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:44:06 +0200 "G.Paulo" <linu...@terra.com.br> escreveu: > Saudações, colegas. > > O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? >

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Uso o Debian Jessie e tenho todas as atualizações para o mesmo e nem sinal da raposinha, aqui continua o Iceweasel. Em 16 de junho de 2016 22:44, G.Paulo <linu...@terra.com.br> escreveu: > Saudações, colegas. > > O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? > > Tenho Debian Wheezy (

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Em 16-06-2016 23:44, G.Paulo escreveu: Saudações, colegas. O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste laptop. Ontem, após fazer um dist-upgrade, notei que 1) no Gnome o Iceweasel foi substituido pelo Firefox (Firefox ESR 45.2.0), com o logo da raposinh

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Pois é, uso Jessie e aqui também apareceu um pacote chamado firefox-esr. Em 16-06-2016 23:44, G.Paulo escreveu: Saudações, colegas. O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste laptop. Ontem, após fazer um dist-upgrade, notei que 1) no Gnome o Iceweasel foi

Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Saudações, colegas. O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste laptop. Ontem, após fazer um dist-upgrade, notei que 1) no Gnome o Iceweasel foi substituido pelo Firefox (Firefox ESR 45.2.0), com o logo da raposinha e tudo mais. 2) No excelente Fluxbox, o item

Re: Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

f it is present on your system. I'm using release, so yes, it's present. >> Is there no clean way simply to keep iceweasel permanently 'kept back' >> without resorting to uninstalling it, as I really have no need for both >> the esr and release versions? > > You alread

Re: Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 18:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > That's because gnome-core in Wheezy depends on iceweasel.  Probably > the > dependencies of such metapackages won't be changed in Wheezy.  If you > really want to avoid having to install firefox-esr, you could build > your

Re: Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

On 2016-06-10 17:14 +, Curt wrote: > On 2016-06-10, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote: >> >>> In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra >>> package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when)

Re: Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

On 2016-06-10, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote: > >> In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra >> package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release. > > Yes. The switch fro

Re: Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote: > In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra > package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release. Yes. The switch from iceweasel to firefox-esr has been mentioned in the recent DSA 3600-1 security announ

Upgrading iceweasel on Wheezy LTS

Hello, In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release. Is this a dilemma? Can I run both firefox-esr and firefox-release? Unfortunately I'm in one of those situations in which if I wanted to take

Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

On 2016-05-11 12:10:25 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > This is happening only on local files? Perhaps FF is expecting that > brain damaged byte order mark to recognize the file as UTF-8? I reported a bug about that in the past: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071816 -- Vincent

Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

On 2016-05-11 11:55:33 +0200, Frédéric Marchal wrote: > On Wednesday 11 May 2016 11:23:56 err...@free.fr wrote: > > Why unicode like utf-8 is not default value in iceweasel ? > > > > (it's time, we are in 2016 now) > > Unicode is the default in firefox/iceweasel.

Re: [partially solved]Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

Hi there Michael Lange wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2016 18:43:50 +0200 Michael Lange wrote: According to this (yet probably dated ) page: http://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/intl/chardet.html universal_charset_detector might help if it were enabled by default.

Re: [partially solved]Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:55:31PM +0200, Michael Lange wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2016 18:43:50 +0200 > Michael Lange wrote: > > > According to this (yet probably dated ) page: > >

[partially solved]Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

On Wed, 11 May 2016 18:43:50 +0200 Michael Lange wrote: > According to this (yet probably dated ) page: >http://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/intl/chardet.html > universal_charset_detector might help if it were enabled by default. Just looked at the above page

Re: Iceweasel uses wrong charset

On Wed, 11 May 2016 16:28:03 +0200 wrote: > There's some hope. Have a look at the intl subcategory in about:config > [1] (especially at intl.locale.matchOS and/or general.useragent.locale), > but also intl.accept.charsets (it is a list, might be prioritized). > I never tested

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >