Josip Rodin wrote:
When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the
old installation.
It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway.
Set the debconf level to critical and you'll only get the most important
questions.
May I know how/ what/
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:08AM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the
old installation.
It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway.
Maybe for you...
Set the debconf level to critical
| However,
| - may I know what happened during the slink-potato switch period?
I had a slink box that upgraded to potato just fine.
| - was there a sufficient grace period before slink was deleted
| from the mirrors?
IIRC, potato will be moved to archive.debian.org and remain there like other
-get dist-upgrade
?
However,
- may I know what happened during the slink-potato switch period?
- was there a sufficient grace period before slink was deleted
from the mirrors?
- may I know where to get information about potato to woody switch
plan? what will happen on May 1st ?
- what
- besides very slow, it was not straight forward since many
packages were deleted, but some replacements were not
installed (e.g. sawmill -- sawfish).
Fortunately, it was just a test system, and not a production one.
However,
- may I know what happened during the slink-potato switch period
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:23:14PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
- what is better: to use potato or stable in the production
systems' sources.list?
isn't potato = stable?
Sure it is. Today.
Next month, though, if all goes as planned, stable will point to
woody. potato will, of course,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable
is changed from potato to woody. I guess that that process
will be relatively slower since it has to delete/ replace
the old packages first before installing the
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from
potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since
it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before installing the
deleted, but some replacements were not
installed (e.g. sawmill -- sawfish).
Fortunately, it was just a test system, and not a production one.
However,
- may I know what happened during the slink-potato switch period?
- was there a sufficient grace period before slink was deleted
from
Anyone using an Adaptec 1542 with slink/potato?
CD work OK?
Thanks,
John
--
John ConoverTel. 408.370.2688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
631 Lamont Ct. Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com/
Campbell, CA 95008 Cel. 408.772.7733
--- John Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-09-15 11:50):
Anyone using an Adaptec 1542 with slink/potato?
CD work OK?
I have that card in my firewall machine, running potato, and it works
fine. I used the boot floppies to install from though (I installed
from the net because my potato CD 1 has
I have slink installed and want to upgrade to potato, but I'm
relatively new to Debian (and Linux). I read two explanations on
upgrading, but still have a few newbie type questions:
Is apt-get upgrade sufficient, and what does apt-get dist-upgrade
do?
I read that I should make sure all packages
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 07:00:18AM +0200, Marcus wrote:
I have slink installed and want to upgrade to potato, but I'm
relatively new to Debian (and Linux). I read two explanations on
upgrading, but still have a few newbie type questions:
Is apt-get upgrade sufficient, and what does apt-get
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 07:00:18AM +0200, Marcus wrote:
I have slink installed and want to upgrade to potato, but I'm
relatively new to Debian (and Linux). I read two explanations on
upgrading, but still have a few newbie type questions:
Is apt-get upgrade sufficient, and what does apt-get
On Saturday 23 June 2001 08:44, Joost Kooij wrote:
Performing large scale upgrades can be attempted using only apt-get, is in
most cases asking for trouble. This is not a shortcoming in apt-get, it
just doesn't have all the needed user interfaces to dependends management
that dselect does.
Marcus wrote:
Is apt-get upgrade sufficient, and what does apt-get dist-upgrade
do?
From the apt-get man page:
dist-upgrade
dist-upgrade, in addition to performing the func
tion of upgrade, also intelligently handles chang
ing dependencies
On 23.06.01 at 15:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use dselect, and configure it to use apt as its access method...
Thanks Joost for that detailed mail. I've printed it out and I'm off to
familiarise myself further with dselect. I was quite surprised though
because a debian book I looked at online
Hi list,
i did upgrate from slink to potato. Apt-get announced that modutils_2.1* are
upgraded to
modutils_2.3.11* and thatpath[fs] should be changed to:
/lib/modules/2.0.36/fs.
After reboot my system was complaining a lot about modules..
Where should i apply the change of path[fs]
Gracias a todos por vuestra ayuda...gracias a vosotros finalizé mi
actualización con exito... pero... al final me puse a jugar con el
dselect y no me di cuenta que la mayoría de los paquetes estaban puestos
como eliminar (¿POR QUE? ¿Es un bug?¿que tendría que haber hecho?) y de
repente me encontre
El Dom 04 Mar 2001 22:47, Ignacio J. Alonso escribió:
Bueno por fin me decidí a actualizar... [...]
Por otra parte, a pesar de haber hecho update-modules force me ha
dejado de funcionar la tarjeta de sonido(SB AWE 64) y no se si algo más
¿ideas?
Por si te sirve de ayuda, a mí me pasó lo
Bueno por fin me decidí a actualizar... el problema de libpam0g que os
comentaba en un correo anterior lo solucioné con la orden:
apt-get -o apt::force-loopbreak=1 --fix-broken --show-upgrade dist-upgrade
aparte de algún que otro aviso de perl sobre los locales, todo va bien hasta
que llega al
I NEED HELP!!!
Each time I try to update Debian Slink, the process is terminated
because of some problems with the perl packages. The update of perl
fails because perl-base is not configured.
It doesn't matter how I update the system. It's the same problem with
'apt-get dist-upgrade',
Hi Berthold:
Since no experts have spoken yet, I'll throw some
ideas out. If its' always perl-base giving the
trouble, can you try upgrading or downloading
this first? Sometimes when installing or up-grading
I've had to dpkg -i several times to get everything
working. hth Dean
Berthold
-Mensaje original-
De: Gerardo Aburruzaga Garca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes 18 de septiembre de 2000 11:40
Para: Lista de Debian GNU/Linux
Asunto: Actualizacion slink-potato desde CD-ROM: imposible
(omito tu mensaje por no alargar...)
Hola,
Te envío aquí un mensaje
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Gerardo Aburruzaga García wrote:
Hola. Qué poco tráfico tiene esta lista.
Tras más de año y medio de espera y de sufrir con la slink y el nuevo
hardware sin soporte, aquí llegó por fin la potato. La he instalado en un par
de máquinas y bien. He actualizado 3 ó 4 máquinas
El mar, 19 sep 2000, Antonio Castro escribió:
Yo continuo con la Slink. La última actualización de Debian me dió
más trabajo de lo que yo esperaba y estoy indeciso. No puedo permitirme
estar sin máquina ni un solo día. Lo que quiero decir es que a pesar de
no poder ayudarte comprendo tu reacción
El Mon, Sep 18, 2000,
Gerardo Aburruzaga García...
Hola. Qué poco tráfico tiene esta lista.
¡Y que dure!
:-)
Endispués con apt-cdrom add le endiño los 4 CDs para que
los registre. Más aluego le doy el apt-get update y se lo
traga todo. La hora de la verdad: apt-get dist-upgrade. Voy
a
-Mensaje original-
De: Gerardo Aburruzaga García [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Lista de Debian GNU/Linux debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Fecha: lunes 18 de septiembre de 2000 12:08
Asunto: Actualizacion slink-potato desde CD-ROM: imposible
[...]
Endispués con apt-cdrom add le endiño los
Hola. Qué poco tráfico tiene esta lista.
Tras más de año y medio de espera y de sufrir con la slink y el nuevo
hardware sin soporte, aquí llegó por fin la potato. La he instalado en un par
de máquinas y bien. He actualizado 3 ó 4 máquinas por red, y sin mayor
problema. Pero... para mi casa y
Hallo!
I have a weird problem with Debian 2.2:
Since I updated my system from Debian 2.1 to Debian 2.2, sound doesn't
work anymore.
- Debian 2.1: Sound is fully functional with kernel 2.0.x and kernel
2.2.x (I tested one of my backups to make sure).
- Update to Debian 2.2: Sound through
On 22 Aug 2000, paul tanner wrote:
After the upgrade I can't use the extra
stuff that I had in
/usr/local/lib/texmf. After examining a
copy of my old slink installation I
found the ``local'' link in texmf/ and
in /usr/share/texmf I added:
ln -s /usr/local/share/texmf local
and moved my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul tanner) writes:
After the upgrade I can't use the extra
stuff that I had in
/usr/local/lib/texmf. After examining a
copy of my old slink installation I
found the ``local'' link in texmf/ and
in /usr/share/texmf I added:
ln -s /usr/local/share/texmf local
and
After the upgrade I can't use the extra
stuff that I had in
/usr/local/lib/texmf. After examining a
copy of my old slink installation I
found the ``local'' link in texmf/ and
in /usr/share/texmf I added:
ln -s /usr/local/share/texmf local
and moved my local stuff to:
/usr/local/share/texmf
and did
I seem to be missing the man pages for apt-get on my slink box so I
wondered for all intents and purposes what's the actual difference
between doing apt-get dist-upgrade and just using dselect on a box
where all the sources use the term 'stable' instead of 'slink' after potato
has gone
Hi!
I'm using applixware 4 on a Debian Potato system. I have an old Pentium
100 with 64Mb RAM only. It looks fine, can read files coming from MS
office, and very fast. It takes only few seconds to startup om my machine.
So I don't know any good reason to upgrade it, or change it to another
office
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Pap Tibor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using applixware 4 on a Debian Potato system. I have an old
Pentium 100 with 64Mb RAM only. It looks fine, can read files coming
from MS office, and very fast. It takes only few seconds to startup
om my machine. So I
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Stefan Bellon wrote:
A friend of mine runs Applixware 4.4.1 on his Debian system (mixture of
potato and woody). But he says that it's quite buggy and looks
outdated. But otherwise it performs quite well. For the installation he
took the RPMs and alienated them to deb
Aplixware 5.0 runs well for me under Potato. No problems at all with the
installation.
--
Pedro
Hi all!
A friend of mine runs Applixware 4.4.1 on his Debian system (mixture of
potato and woody). But he says that it's quite buggy and looks
outdated. But otherwise it performs quite well. For the installation he
took the RPMs and alienated them to deb packages. Then he make a link
from /opt to
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Stefan Bellon wrote:
sbello Now I'd like to know whether anybody has experience with the later
sbello Applixware 5 on Debian systems. Does it install without problems?
installs flawlessly, runs like crap though. for some reason it takes about
5 minutes to load on a p3-500
In early July, when Anthony first asked the question below, I sort of
kept my eye out for an answer or two on it:
John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
Out of sheerest curiosity, since I'm not having any problems with woody beyond
the X/gpm mouse grabbing and X-fb corruption, is there a way to
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Nathan E Norman wrote:
The wd module was there on the list, but install failed.
The latest set of boot disks is missing the 8390 module which is
loaded before the wd module. That should be fixed soon.
I installed debian 'slink' and got it working. I did not have to
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:08, virtanen wrote:
The wd module was there on the list, but install failed.
The latest set of boot disks is missing the 8390 module which is
loaded before the wd module. That should be fixed soon.
I installed debian 'slink' and got it working. I did not
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bob Nielsen wrote:
It's a kernel problem, not a distribution problem. Your kernel, as
compiled, probably does not have the wd.o module.
Try recompiling the kernel and select Western Digital/SMC cards
in 'make menuconfig', either 'y' or 'm'.
That doesn't admit wd
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 08:39:20AM +0300, virtanen wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bob Nielsen wrote:
It's a kernel problem, not a distribution problem. Your kernel, as
compiled, probably does not have the wd.o module.
Try recompiling the kernel and select Western Digital/SMC cards
in
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Nathan E Norman wrote:
The wd module was there on the list, but install failed.
The latest set of boot disks is missing the 8390 module which is
loaded before the wd module. That should be fixed soon.
Meanwhile, what could I do?
What kind of packet to install to get
Hola, he de disponer la siguiente configuración de red de Potato:
$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth1 inet dhcp
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.7
network 192.168.0.0
netmask 255.255.0.0
broadcast 192.168.255.255
En una máquina que corre
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Yup, the card is there. That's good ...
Tried two things:
1) tried to install 'Potato'. (I used 'slink' earlier)
That doesn't admit wd module at all. So the network didn't start working.
2) Tried to install 'Corel 1.1'.
Did not make network
It's a kernel problem, not a distribution problem. Your kernel, as
compiled, probably does not have the wd.o module.
Try recompiling the kernel and select Western Digital/SMC cards
in 'make menuconfig', either 'y' or 'm'.
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:30:41PM +0300, virtanen wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul
Out of sheerest curiosity, since I'm not having any problems with woody beyond
the X/gpm mouse grabbing and X-fb corruption, is there a way to downgrade from
woody to potato, from woody to slink, and from potato to slink? I would assume a
forced apt-get dist-upgrade with appropriate lines in
Hi all,
I'm trying to model a circuit, actually a high powered inverter and I'm
trying to find a simulation program to do it. All the W9x programs I've found
so far are demos, not able to handle all the components. Does anyone have any
idea as to where I can find sims for Linux and their
hi ya bill
donno if any of these works etc.etc...
spice comes from berkeleydonno the url...
here some collections...
http://ftp.egr.msu.edu/debian/dists/potato/main/source/electronics/
http://www.staticfreesoft.com/ ( aka ElectricEditor )
http://www.kegel.com/linuxeda/
have fun linuxing
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Bill wrote:
B Hi all,
B I'm trying to model a circuit, actually a high powered inverter and I'm
B trying to find a simulation program to do it. All the W9x programs I've
found
B so far are demos, not able to handle all the components. Does anyone have
any
B idea as
Hi,
I just upgraded our office fileserver to potato, running samba 2.0.7-2,
lprng 3.6.12-6 and an HP LaserJet 4050 TN connected to the LAN. Everything
worked fine until the upgrade from slink to potato.
The following (very) weird thing happens now:
- when I lpr a file from the Linux box
On http://debian.schlittermann.de/, I read that there is
no easy upgrade path from slink to potato.
Is this still true?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 01:19:04PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On http://debian.schlittermann.de/, I read that there is
no easy upgrade path from slink to potato.
Is this still true?
I would answer no to your question. I've done two slink to potato
upgrades and it went very well. Of
Try again in a little while. This sometimes happens. Make sure to run
apt-get update again first.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 09:36:12AM -0500, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
I tried to do a slink-potato upgrade,
I put the potato debian site in /etc/apt/sources.list, and let go with
atp-get update
I tried to do a slink-potato
upgrade,
I put the potato debian site in /etc/apt/sources.list, and let go with
atp-get update -- works
fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
Each time I would only get a few files, but after 15-20 tries, I seem to
have almost everything;
almost
atp-get update-- works fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
Each time I would only get a few files, but after 15-20 tries, I seem to
have almost everything;
almost..
Run update again if that fails find out if you are behind one of those
defective HTTP proxies :|
Jason
I tried to do a slink-potato
upgrade,
I put the potato debian site in /etc/apt/sources.list, and let go with
atp-get update -- works
fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
but, (see below) it looks like I get only a few fiels, adn many many
errors which seem server related
I just upgraded from slink to potato. Well, actually
the upgrade was from rain (Storm Linux 2000) to potato.
Aside from learning the hard way to never run apt-get
dist upgrade from an xterm, things went pretty smoothly.
After several days of reconstructing my XF86Config
(Storm's installer
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:12:03PM -0500, Lee Malatesta wrote:
1. kdm won't start on boot. I get an error on the console:
Checking for valid XFree86 configurationUnable to check.
Not starting X display manager.
after loggin in, startx works just fine.
2. I can't start a terminal
I'm trying to finish migrating from Slink to Potato. It's been mostly
successful, but after a 50mb download I am now getting odd errors from apt.
Here's what's been done so far:
1) Installed Slink from bootable CD-ROM up to the first reboot.
2) After the reboot, said no to choosing a group of
Hi,
I'm trying to do something here which is probably a bit
wacko. I'm running slink and have not upgraded to potato
due to a lack of hdd space, but need php3.0.15 and that
version is not available for slink. In an act of senseless
desperation I went ahead and changed my sources.list
to use
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Mark Symonds wrote:
So my question is, what do I do to get ssl back?
Am I going to need to get the mod_ssl tarball?
auric{root}/usr/lib/cgi-bin#apt-cache search apache.*ssl
apache-ssl - Versatile, high-performance HTTP server with SSL support
apache-common - Support files
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Symonds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, March 03, 2000 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: apache, ssl, slink, potato and apt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Mark Symonds wrote:
So my question is, what
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Mark Symonds wrote:
# deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
# deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian frozen main contrib non-free
I did the apt-get update ... why wouldn't it show up?
I need to move on to the 2.2.x kernel and glibc 2.1.
Is there anywhere look for some guidelines/problems if I upgrade now?
The list of 271 release-critical bugs is a bit scary...
...RickM...
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:01:44PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
I think Wouter meant to download one package at a time, then install
it, then go fetch the next and so on. This way you could do with _a
lot_ less free space for keeping the debs before installing them...
I think a wrapper script
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 06:43:08PM -0800, Nick Jennings wrote:
This brings up a question that i've had for sometime, but haven't
yet asked anyone.
Why the hell does Debian insist on putting some very disk space
consuming directories in /var ?? such as:
/var/ftp
/var/cache
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 08:06:16PM -0500, Edward Kear wrote:
One way to get around that problem would be to do this:
rmdir /var/lib/dpkg/methods/some-method/debian
mkdir /home/debian
ln -s /home/debian /var/lib/dpkg/methods/some-method/debian
before you start upgrading. That will
At 05:05 PM 1/20/00 -0600, Phil Brutsche wrote:
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi,
My box running slink here would like to do the
potato upgrade but I'm concerned that it might run
out of disk space:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:01:27PM -0600, Phil Brutsche wrote:
No it's not safe for you to upgrade - not enough disk space. When I
downloaded everything it was 155MB. You need to delete quite a few files
from your root file system.
I had this problem too. Why isn't there an option for apt to
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Why isn't there an option for apt to let it
download the deb for a package only just before installing it?
That way, upgrading small systems would be a lot easier.
AOL! Have you already sent in a wishlist bug report?
try apt-get -d
that tells apt to download ONLY and not to install.
nate
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
hanegr On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:01:27PM -0600, Phil Brutsche wrote:
hanegr No it's not safe for you to upgrade - not enough disk space. When I
hanegr downloaded
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:37:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Why isn't there an option for apt to let it
download the deb for a package only just before installing it?
That way, upgrading small systems would be a lot easier.
AOL!
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:34:18 PST, Eric G . Miller writes:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:37:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Why isn't there an option for apt to let it
download the deb for a package only just before installing it?
That way,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:34:18 PST, Eric G . Miller writes:
$ apt-get -d upgrade
Only downloads the debs.! No wishlist bug report required.
I think Wouter meant to download one package at a time, then
install it, then go fetch the next and so on.
Hi,
My box running slink here would like to do the
potato upgrade but I'm concerned that it might run
out of disk space:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/hda1 296633 24881332500 88% /
/dev/hda3 675175 343296
Hi,
My box running slink here would like to do the
potato upgrade but I'm concerned that it might run
out of disk space:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/hda1 296633 24881332500 88% /
/dev/hda3 675175
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi,
My box running slink here would like to do the
potato upgrade but I'm concerned that it might run
out of disk space:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/hda1 296633
Hi,
I finally took the plunge and started upgrading some packages to potato. I
am now suffering from the much talked about problem of dhelp complaining
about documentation in /usr/doc
Here is an example from running apt-get install libcgi-perl
Setting up libcgi-perl (2.76-13) ...
cannot open
Steve Lamb wrote:
Does anyone have an experience with Debian on an SMP machine? Is it
stable? How well does it perform?
---
As you can see we have no probs with them :-))
--
AdVance-Computing Systems
We sell fine quality servers and
Does anyone have an experience with Debian on an SMP machine? Is it
stable? How well does it perform?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
I use it and it works great. The distribution really isn't a factor when
you're talking about performance. It's a really minor thing. The kernel
is what gives you the performance for the most part, and I run 2.2.13 with
no problems at all. Well, aside from a hardware issue, but that's being
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
morphe Does anyone have an experience with Debian on an SMP machine? Is it
morphe stable? How well does it perform?
I've been running linux 2.0.36+securelinux with slink since april on a
dual p2-233 and it runs great..i can't really judge performance
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 12:36:37 PM, aphro wrote:
i also run a BP6 with dual celeron 466 at home with slink and linux 2.2.10
and it runs good(not taking into account the unstable mainboard)
What is wrong with the BP6? That was the board I am considering to use.
--
Steve C.
To avoid typing out a couple pages to show what i do..
read this thread i started on bp6.com :
http://www.bp6.com/discus/messages/2/272.html?FridayDecember1719991046pm
and take a look at my case..
http://www.firetrail.com/~aphro/camera/inside-the-beast.jpg
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:34:26 PM, aphro wrote:
and take a look at my case..
http://www.firetrail.com/~aphro/camera/inside-the-beast.jpg
http://www.firetrail.com/~aphro/camera/the-outside.jpg
Well, no offense, but did you really expect decent cooling in that small
of a case?
cooling in my case is *excellent*, like i said the cpu never gets to 35C,
and i got a high quality power supply, high RPM fans, overtemp
alarm..etc..by contrast when i first got the machine(before i added all
the extras) CPUs routinely exceeded 52C.
in terms of SMP i'd reccomend an ASUS
also, i forgot to mention that because of the smaller case the airflow is
QUITE swift, with ~75CFM worht of fans in the back and 35CFM fan in the
front
nate
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
morphe Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:34:26 PM, aphro wrote:
morphe and take a look at my case..
Hello,
Having installed slink (twice) and upgraded to potato (twice) I'm
wondering if somebody can give pointers to the appropriate tools/files
to change for configuring different utilities. I have been running
redhat since 5.0 to 6.1+ with rawhide. For rpm-based distributions I
am rather
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Personally I think you should separate installation from configuration
into different parts. The configuration could be made mandatory, but
not until you have a bootable base system (HD and floppy) up and
running.
Actually, i
On 12/05/99, Svante Signell addressed Q: Where to configure things in
slink/potato:
Having installed slink (twice) and upgraded to potato (twice) I'm
wondering if somebody can give pointers to the appropriate tools/files
to change for configuring different utilities.
Most everything
Thanks for the reply John. Below are details from my log files.
pointers to what I should be reading or exploring further are most
welcome.
Graham Williams wrote to debian-user on 22 Nov 1999 08:02:22 +1100:
Graham I just used apt-get dist-upgrade to move from a slink to
Graham a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ron Farrer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg: error processing libsane_1.0.1-1999-10-21-3_alpha.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/sane/libsane-apple.la', which is also in
package sane
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered
I just used apt-get dist-upgrade to move from a slink to a potato
distribution on my Laptop (Dell Latitude CPi D300Xt). Had a minor
problem with configuring some packages because of perl. I manually
dpkg --install perl* and then got apt-get going again. Almost
succeeded, failing in the end on
Graham writes:
Issuing pon or pppd directly,...
What do you mean by pppd directly?
I get (in the plog file)
chat[...]: Can't get terminal parameters: Input/output error.
Please post the complete set of messages.
I believe pppd is working okay, since if I mimic the modem on my
Joost Witteveen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Did you try --force-overwrite ?
Thanks, that fixed that probem. Now:
Setting up xonix (1.4-13) ...
Use of uninitialized value at /usr/sbin/suidregister line 92.
suidregister: bartw: no such user
dpkg: error processing xonix (--configure):
subprocess
I'm trying to upgrade from slink to potato. Most of the packages are
upgraded, but there is about 190MB worth of stuff that gets hung up. I
tried doing 'dpkg -i' on the package it fails on to see what the problem
is and here is what I get:
mustang:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
