FSDEXT2, mounting linux partitions under windows 95 read-only (was Re: Linux on top of win95)

1998-02-21 Thread Sen Nagata
at some point around Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:18:54 +0100 (CET) Fredrik Ax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Peter van Sebille has written ext2 drivers for Win95. The driver is called FSDEXT2 and is at the present available in the incoming folders of sunsites e.g.

Re: FSDEXT2, mounting linux partitions under windows 95 read-only (was Re: Linux on top of win95)

1998-02-21 Thread John Spence
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 11:46:17AM +0900, Sen Nagata wrote: p.s. has anyone had any luck unounting mounted linux partitions using fsdext2? i tried what was in the included faq (/u option) but to no avail (option is not recognized). perhaps this option is not in version 0.16? I've been

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-20 Thread Fredrik Ax
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Sen Nagata wrote: [SNIP] does anyone know whether there is something that can be used under w95 or dos that will allow access to linux partitions? Peter van Sebille has written ext2 drivers for Win95. The driver is called FSDEXT2 and is at the present available in the

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 04:39:26PM +, C.J.LAWSON wrote: At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask (1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember 16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if you are runnig X ..) Is any amount of

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-19 Thread Mike Barker
Michael Barker Technician ATL Systems -Original Message- From: C.J.LAWSON [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 1998 1:29 AM To: Mike Barker Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Linux on top of win95 On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Barker wrote

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-19 Thread Sen Nagata
at some point around Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:40:53 + (GMT) David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I don't see where UMSDOS comes into this. i was giving a reference for an alternative way to get linux running alongside w95 -- using loadlin. i should probably have worded my message better

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-19 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
I believe that you really should have a swap partion This is not true. To begin with, you don't need swap space if you have enough memory. For linux, swap is just an extra bunch of (slow) memory that can be used if need be. If it is not there, and enough RAM is available, that is not a

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-19 Thread Hogland, Thomas E.
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 9:58 PM To: David Wright Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Linux on top of win95 at some point around Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:40:53 + (GMT) David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I don't see where

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread Asher Haig
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/17/98 7:47 PM I know Linux can be installed ontop of a dos partition. Can it be installed on top of Win 95 or NT. I need to know this because although I run linux at home my office is NT and 95. I would like to be able to boot to linux in the office in

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread Mike Barker
If you have NT, you can use a utility such as bootpart to add a line to the boot.ini which lets you boot to linux from the NT boot loader. I would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and server 5), and

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread Sen Nagata
at some point around Tue, 17 Feb 98 20:07:11 -0600 Asher Haig [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: If you set up LILO when you install it, and then tell LILO how to find the Windows partition, you can easily do a dual boot. Superior to doing

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread C.J.LAWSON
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Barker wrote: would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap?? J. Michael Barker Technician ATL Systems

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread Ralph Winslow
C.J.LAWSON wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Barker wrote: would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap?? A separate drive certainly isn't

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread C.J.LAWSON
At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask (1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember 16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if you are runnig X ..) (2) would a seperate drive be faster than a swap file on the same disk? ... This

Re: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread David Wright
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Sen Nagata wrote: at some point around Tue, 17 Feb 98 20:07:11 -0600 Asher Haig [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: If you set up LILO when you install it, and then tell LILO how to find the Windows partition, you can easily do a dual boot. Superior to doing

RE: Linux on top of win95

1998-02-18 Thread Hogland, Thomas E.
A simpler way may be to use linload95 - it's a package I downloaded that allows you to boot Win95, then click an icon and load Linux. I used Alta Vista to search for Linux Load Win95 and found it on sunsite.unc.edu... Works well! (And leaves your PC config alone...) -- From: