RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tests Used for Deleting?

2004-01-19 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
However, after a few years of tinkering, I did realize that (at least based on messages received by my mix of business clients) *I* was able to use some tests to outright delete 13% of all incoming mail (an additional 50% gets deleted by weight): BLITZEDALL DELETE NJABLPROXIES DELETE

[Declude.JunkMail] The WEIGHT System...

2004-01-19 Thread Brent Brashear
I'm new to the antispam administration. Regarding the WEIGHT system can someone just keep lowering the number to keep tightening it? I've never seen anyone use a weight lower than 10, does this mean it can't be done? To avoid redundancy, is there a FAQ page for other questions that people

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The WEIGHT System...

2004-01-19 Thread Markus Gufler
Regarding the WEIGHT system can someone just keep lowering the number to keep tightening it? I've never seen anyone use a weight lower than 10, does this mean it can't be done? You can use also the HOLD action with a weight of 1. If you hold on 10 points this mean that you can assign to

[Declude.JunkMail] Address for DNSStuff.com / DNSReport.com

2004-01-19 Thread Paul Fuhrmeister
What is the address we can use for DNSStuff.com and DNSReport.com? I know this has been on the list a few time, but I didn't save those emails and can't find it in the archives. These two domain names are not working for me. server ns1.easydns.com Default Server: ns1.easydns.com Address:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit on Virtumundo

2004-01-19 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I received some of these Papal scams from a Bondedsender. Should I forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fred - Original Message - From: Cyan Callihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address for DNSStuff.com / DNSReport.com

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
What is the address we can use for DNSStuff.com and DNSReport.com? http://www.DNSstuff.com and http://www.DNSreport.com . There have been some sporadic issues since Friday, with the site hanging. If the main sites are not reachable, you can use http://backup.DNSstuff.com or

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude references wanted...

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Occasionally, we have requests from potential customers that are looking to speak with someone who is already using Declude JunkMail or Declude Virus. We are currently looking for a few customers who would be interested in doing this. If you are interested, please let me know (off-list).

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude references wanted...

2004-01-19 Thread interactiveaustria
Scott, if I may help you, i would like to... if these customers are german speaking, they may contact me. +--+ | interactiveaustria | | Michael Tobisch EDV-Dienstleistungen | | Wiesengasse 12, A-8160 Weiz | | Tel +43 3172 4930

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enabling control to customers

2004-01-19 Thread Brent Brashear
I'd like to setup an FTP site with individual '$default$.JunkMail' files accessible for each domain that's setup with AntiSpam Will this overwrite some of the settings from Global.CFG? -If so, that's okay. I'm hoping to type up documentation for the customers (but I'm having a time

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enabling control to customers

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'd like to setup an FTP site with individual '$default$.JunkMail' files accessible for each domain that's setup with AntiSpam Will this overwrite some of the settings from Global.CFG? -If so, that's okay. No, it would not overwrite the global.cfg file (assuming that the FTP site doesn't

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude references wanted...

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Occasionally, we have requests from potential customers that are looking to speak with someone who is already using Declude JunkMail or Declude Virus. We are currently looking for a few customers who would be interested in doing this. If you are interested, please let me know (off-list).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enabling control to customers

2004-01-19 Thread Brent Brashear
Scott, Thank you VERY much for your reply. From what I understand (in your message), I'm wasting my time by making the $default$.JunkMail file available (FTP was just the method I was using to access the file) -since the Global.CFG file overwrites it anyway. The file structure is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enabling control to customers

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thank you VERY much for your reply. From what I understand (in your message), I'm wasting my time by making the $default$.JunkMail file available (FTP was just the method I was using to access the file) -since the Global.CFG file overwrites it anyway. Not quite. The WHITELIST command only goes

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Odd Imail behavior?

2004-01-19 Thread Dave Doherty
I have also noticed the same effect from time to time also on RTF files. Sometimes, the same message goes through succcessfully on a subsequent attempt. We have never seen it with PDFs, BMPs, JPGs, or other common file types. Only with server-generated RTFs and Word DOCs, and only with Imail.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enabling control to customers

2004-01-19 Thread Marc Catuogno
If your users could handle going to the web interface and adding people they would like whitelisted to their address book there, all you would need do then is add AUTOWHITELIST ON to your one global config file. This way they could whitelist anyone's e-mail address that they wished. Next

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test Recommendation: User Matches Helo

2004-01-19 Thread Matt
Dan, Probably very spammy, but there's a caveat to this one. The HELO can be the computer name, and unless you are whitelisting SMTP AUTH, it would likely trip sometimes, and maybe very often depending on naming standards within a company. In the very least, this would not be a good

[Declude.JunkMail] SMTP processes hanging

2004-01-19 Thread Doug McKee
I am running Imail 6.06. Declude 1.75i2. Lately I have been having to kill 10-15 smtp32.exe processes about three times a day to keep the server running. The processes don't terminate and eventually the server stalls out. Killing the processes returns functionality. Is it possible that the newer

[Declude.JunkMail] Odd Imail behavior?

2004-01-19 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Odd Imail behavior? One of our business partners attempted to send us a MS word doc. We are using IMAIL 7.15 When trying to open it, the error message, from MS Word was: The document name or path is not valid. Try these suggestions. *check the file permissions for the document

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Odd Imail behavior?

2004-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
One of our business partners attempted to send us a MS word doc. We are using IMAIL 7.15 When trying to open it, the error message, from MS Word was: The document name or path is not valid. Try these suggestions. *check the file permissions for the document or drive. *Use the File Open dialog

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Odd Imail behavior?

2004-01-19 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Neither Declude JunkMail nor Declude Virus will alter any attachments, nor will IMail (as far as I know). Given that it is only a problem in Word format and not .ZIP, I would suggest looking to see if you have a firewall that may be interfering. What's even odder is that this doesn't affect