Hi,
With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant
levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think
I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of my mailserver which
filters the most blatant spam mail purly based on
Our office will be closed on Wednesday, Feb.10th due to inclement weather. We
will reopen on Thursday, Feb. 11th. I will have access to emails and will
respond as soon as I possibly can.
Thank you!
Troy Hilton
Serveon, Inc.
1401 Silverside Road
Wilmington, DE 19810
302-529-8640
Try IMgate ( postfix like MTA ).
Len's page is a good 'starting point'
Andres.-
--
Ing. Andrs E.
Gallo
Cotel Ltda.
((02255)-46-1600
2 (02255)-46-0014
+ aga...@cotel.com.ar
B7165 - Villa Gesell
Bs. As. - Argentina
http://www.gesell.com.ar
I use Alligate
Thank you
Harry Vanderzand
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else
Hi,
I use Declude with build-in Sniffer and InvURIbl. Other then that mostly the
default tests.
Using the new 4.10.42 version.
I would like Declude to examine the points scored so far before launching
Sniffer or InvURIbl as those are body tests and need more cpu.
I hold at 20 and delete at 30.
Hi Bonno,
You can alter the InvURIBL and Sniffer test definitions in your config to use
Pete McNeil's WeightGate utility to conditionally run those tests.
An example InvURIBL line is
INV-URIBL external weight C:\IMail\Declude\WeightGate\WeightGate.exe -100
%WEIGHT% 500
According to my notes:
RBL Tests Run 1st!
Declude base tests Run 2nd
External Tests Run 3rd
Fromfile and ipfiles run 4th
Filters Run last.
Invuribl has a built in skip process when you add the weight to the command
line:
D:\IMAIL\DECLUDE\INVURIBL\INVURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% %REMOTEIP%
A second vote for Alligate.
My Alligate Overall rejection rate for Feb 2010: 95%
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE:
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching
consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster
mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server
in front of my mailserver which filters the most blatant spam
Alligate Alligate Alligate
At 12:28 PM 2/10/2010 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of
And, besides, Postfix is FREE.
I'm running 2.6 version, with Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Postgrey,
together with BindDNS, and SQUID on a cheap machine -P4, 2 Gb RAM, 80 Gb
HDD- under FreeBSD. In fact, 2 of them sharing loads.
Just my 2 cents.
Andres.-
Pete McNeil escribió:
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
I'm another Alligate fan on the Windows platform. It is a very smart and
effective product.
I have conservative settings that stick close to the defaults and my
configuration rejects 80% of the inbound connections.Before I
implemented Alligate, my Declude was hurting because of my large filter
It's definitely Alligate for this purpose.
Instead of using something like Postfix or IMgate which will mostly
replicate functionality found in Declude, Alligate will end up blocking
things using unique functionality and it runs on Windows and uses very
little CPU.
The two main features of
13 matches
Mail list logo
