RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

Well, Darin - it may be relevant to look at the timeline. Example: 1. Declude is developed 2. Declude is purchased 3. Developer keeps source code and NOW starts to reuse it to develop DNSstuff.com vs. 1. Declude is developed 2. DNSstuff is developed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

author. Best Regards, Andy Schmidt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

these results are obtained in real-time, meaning that these are not cached results. These results are what DNS resolvers all over the world will see right now (unless they have cached information). - Original Message - From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issue

What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail? What did the NDR say? I could be a recipient trying to forward mail to another server, or an end-user trying to send email from home using their local ISP... etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail version 10

Who isn't? Yes, we've been running Imail 10 from the start, now 10.01 and are using it with Declude 4.4.16. Best Regards, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Moose Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 12:24 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@decl

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat

all_list.dat posted later today. David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 x 7007 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:17 AM To

[Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat

Hi, Rumors have it that there are NEWER versions of all_list.dat in the wild that the ancient one from 17 Mar 08. My customer service site still shows one that is 5 months old. What do regular customers have to do to get update files? Best Regards, Andy --- This E-mail came from the

[Declude.JunkMail] RE: [Declude.Virus] Interim Release 4.4.12

Dear Dave, Thank you for making this "transparent" for your customers. This is something we've been asking since Scott's time and he kept insisting that this couldn't be done. I very much do appreciate knowing what issues particular interim's were targeting! Best Regards, Andy -Original Mes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.4.00 Released

Well, actually the MOST sense would be mmdd, since it would result in SORT order. Or ddmm (in order of "magnitude"). MMDD is s pretty non-sensical format (I know it's the common U.S. format, but it doesn't make sense to force that jumbled up order onto the rest of the world). It would

[Declude.JunkMail] FW: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP Vulnerability Detected - for no apparent reason

Is Declude's support system working? I got a ticket number issued - but there never seems to be a FOLLOW-UP of any sorts? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP Vulnerability

[Declude.JunkMail] FW: Domain Forwarding in Imail Preview 3

Hi, I thought this group would like to know that the new Imail Domain Forwarding will support Declude. Best Regards, Andy -Original Message- From: Tom Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:14 AM To: 'Andy Schmidt' Subject: RE: Domain For

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

Or they are affected by cut cables to India? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:19 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go? Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them o

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

Right, immediately after you only get U.S. pennies to their EURO Ooops... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 1:08 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] RE: More Confusion -> Home page

Hi, Time for your web master to work on that home page. Either don't include any "news" items if there's no time to maintain them - or keep them current. (Nothing worse than a site that uses animations to prominently advertise how outdated it is.) Home Page rotating "alerts" announce "update to a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP, Declude stoped functioning

I believe they have instructions for "urgent" support, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not sure if I remember it right). I would definitely call and leave a message for support with return number! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Baranowski Sen

[Declude.JunkMail] Knowledgebase Article has broken link

http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=29 &KBSearchID=10088 The link to the lookup page is BROKEN. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send

[Declude.JunkMail] Imail QueueMgr.exe consumes all Paged Pool

Sorry for cross-posting. I'm not sure whether Declude and/or Sniffer still rely on the Paged Pool - and whether their usage would be reported under the Imail QueueMgr.exe or under some other .exes? So I have 3 possible culprits. The symptom started as a Webmail problem because customers noticed th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail License Available

Hi, After consolidating servers I have an Imail Unlimited User License (normal cost $2,995) available. One would have to upgrade it from 8.2 to 2006.21 - for $995 to make it current. If anyone's interest, feel free to contact me off-list. Best Regards, Andy --- This E-mail came fro

[Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Reverse DNS not detected?

Hi, Am I mistaken, or didn't Declude used to detect (and report) BOGUS reverse DNS? I was shocked today when I realized that an email from this address did NOT trigger "REVDNS": 63.138.145.66 While that IP address does have some PTR record to host 63-138-145-66.customer.static.ip.pa

[Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Reverse DNS

Hi, Am I mistaken, or didn't Declude used to detect (and report) BOGUS reverse DNS? I was shocked today when I realized that an email from this address did NOT trigger "REVDNS": 63.138.145.66 While that IP address does have some PTR record to host 63-138-145-66.customer.static.ip.pa

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Software for copying files with permissions

Hi, If this is part of a Domain, you should be able to use XCOPY or ROBOCOPY (depending on the Windows Server version you have), with the appropriate command line switches and copy the various folders and their content INCLUDING permissions, owners, system/hidden flags etc. After the files are co

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

SmarterMail and do not miss all the denials when reporting bugs that IPSwitch would throw out. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:34 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:34 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup Sensitivity: Personal Hi, Does anyone have any comment on the attached email (p

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

to be filling up queues. The couldn't because TCP/IP would not let any inbound connections go through. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:03 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup S

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

d the new one is 2006.2, is it safe to move the registery and folders? are the formats the same? and all i have to do is run the conversion on the contact/address book? John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

The user and alias information is in the registry. Mailing lists, address books and mailbox content is in the \Imail\[domain name]\ folder on your server. I would start by updating the DNS MX record(s) to a very low refresh ahead of time. You export the appropriate Registry section for that doma

[Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

Hi, What are the symptoms related to Winsock Cleanup? After running fine for 2 months or so (except for occasional reboots for Hotfixes), the mail server stopped working on the TCP/IP level. It didn't respond to Ping from the outside. You could log into the console and Ping to itself. T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:17 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Hi Karl: It sounds as if you are looking

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

Hi Karl: It sounds as if you are looking for a way to read messages items in your Outlook folders. You can accomplish this relatively easily by writing a small Visual Basic for Appliations "Outlook Macro". If you move the suspect messages (at least temporarily) into some "work" subfolder in Outloo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible bug after upgrading to 4.3.46

case, I am seeing more spam get through because of filters using HELO were made ineffective AND more false positives do to white filters using HELO became ineffective. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 6:55 AM To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible bug after upgrading to 4.3.46

Thanks John - so the most likely effect would be that more SPAM will get through if we a) have HELO based filters b) have DNSBL lookups based on HELO strings ? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3:28

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: "DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS SCANNING UPDATE"

) and I sincerely apologize for the inconvience. David Barker Director of Product Management Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Se

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: "DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS SCANNING UPDATE"

John, I think the point Dave is making is: They did notify all clients individually about the availability of the new version, urging them to act immediately! However, when they managed to release an incomplete install, they did NOT send out a second notice to that exact same group to warn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Vulnerability in RPC on Windows DNS Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

Hi Darrell: It does NOT effect the DNS port - ONLY RPC connections. So, if someone has infiltrated your local network ALREADY, then they can issue remote procedure calls (which is what the DNSadmin uses to manage your DNS server from your workstation) to also gain access to your DNS server syst

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Help

Hi, Then you should set up an IP Bypass or that IP address. This will Declude will NOT to count that first header as the source, but rather look at the SECOND header to see who SENT to your backup mail server. Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AVG Questions

PS: restarting DecludeProc did not pull any new update. So if you're right that would imply that AVG has not produced an update in almost 25 hours. Ouch! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AVG Questions

4.3.23. McAfee's last beta update was 9:02 AM today! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Asaro Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 11:54

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Taiwan earthquake

Odd, I was just observing that this morning! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 01:16 AM To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cosmetic Bug or Buffer Overrun?

eives the email << How would the POP3 or IMAP4 email client do it - the client has no knowledge what the SMTP MAIL FROM was? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D

[Declude.JunkMail] Cosmetic Bug or Buffer Overrun?

e 0xf from mailing.speedinfo.fr [81.200.33.58] X-Declude: Triggered [0] None X-Countries: FRANCE->destination Return-Path: X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: X-UIDL: 466622842 X-IMail-ThreadID: 813901dbdae6 Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Registry Repair

to be understood." Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Registry Repa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Registry Repair

n this part of the registry is if the bad guys are trying to retain control of a 'bot. Andrew 8) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Monday, December

[Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Registry Repair

egistry "index" somehow so that I can just reimport the rest of the parent key? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: [spf-announce] Website relaunch / Increasing SPF deployment and software support / The 2007 council elections

create SPF records that cover either their own sender domains and/or servers. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, December 14

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Security Suite 4.3.23 Released

r back to your old configuration if you ever should need to. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:43

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Security Suite 4.3.23 Released

Hi, I've been running since the pre-release came out for testing and I have not encountered any new issues, but it certainly did address the old problems that I've had. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message

[Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Returncode Variable

with 255 lines to do it "by name". Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Configuring sniffer for declude...

Correct, you can leave it as is. Sniffer is only called once, only the return code is compared as many times as you have lines. No, it's not worth changing it unless you have all your weights set the same. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.

Blitzedall is dead. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 02:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow

Hi Matt, great work. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 09:35 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow

d there. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 07:54 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMai

[Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow

Is it me - or should MXRate-Allow be treated as a "spam source" list? I don't know how many times I've looked at Spam that made it through and the IP is on their whitelist, such as "campaigner". Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Bus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

e added so that this circumvention won't be necessary any more. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 08:53 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

I'm familiar with MAXWEIGHT and I'm using it. It doesn't address this particular application. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

logic of the second part anyways, to add weight for test4 and test5 IF test1 and test2 failed? John T eServices For You "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

ive, then inspect each one to see if by chance any one of them might have any effect. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, Novembe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

quot;fail"? Am I reading it wrong? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 01:05 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sub

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

ght if test3 triggered TESTSFAILED STOP CONTAINS test3 # these weights will only be added if test3 did not trigger TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test4 TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS test5 etc etc Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Messa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

demonstrate how MAXWEIGHT or STOPATFIRSTHIT would do this in a single filter? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

t it's not counting the test as triggered - but in September 2004 users apparently found out that instead it was made worse by resetting the weight as well. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

Hi Craig, no actually, that you CAN accomplish with the SKIPIFWEIGHT 20 MAXWEIGHT 9 directives at the beginning of the filter. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

nner. This is a huge gotcha! Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

7;s only logical. If you WANTED a filter to return 0, then you would simply place the 'END' lines at the BEGINNING of the Filter! If you place the 'END' line behind other lines that accumulated weight, then it clearly is the intention that the weights be COUNTED and that only any

[Declude.JunkMail] RE: Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

CONTENT:-2 SPFPASS:-2 DYNAMIC-IP:6 OPEN-RELAY:5 . Total weight = 13. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 _ From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:00 AM To: 'declude.junkmail

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes WEIGHT?

nd/or URIBL and will return the proper weights around 7 through 9. However, if it hits the END statement is appears as if it always returns ZERO. In other words, it loses the weight that had been accumulated up to that point. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)

[Declude.JunkMail] Documentation

Hi: Two suggestions: a) Try the Release Notes link, it is still a 404 (bad link)! b) The list of 4.0.8. topics deserves a chapter on Filters and its various commands. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 --- This E-mail came

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus

n.com * 20 0 Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 05:35 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subjec

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] delete mails before processing / 100% CPU

that machine, instead of tying up Imail with that. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of netsolution webmaster Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 09:59 AM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] delete mails before processing / 100% CPU / per domain config

it's meant to reduce work hours spent by end users reading/handling spam message. If your current box can't handle the load, than the ultimate solution is more processing power - either by upgrading the box, or by delegating some of the work to a gateway. Best Regards Andy Schmid

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

nto a zip file and upload it somewhere, we all could collaborate - in the same way that we collaborated in the past when defining/devising new rules, filters, etc. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAI

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

ith Ipswitch. Unfortunately, so far, I have yet to encounter one (but that may just be a function of the type of mail I receive and/or which messages I'm blocking/deleting outright, etc.) Without any files to document the problem to Ipswitch, I don't feel I can approach the other vendor. Bes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

-Countries: %COUNTRYCHAIN% XINHEADER Return-Path: <%MAILFROM%> Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Wednesday, November 08

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

em, in my opinion. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 04:37 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

Absolutely,   WHITELIST  REVDNS  .declude.com   You can also can create your own RDNSBL zone in your DNS server (that's what I did) and create one for SPF domains that spammers set up to reliably reject mail based on reverse DNS (thank you for them adhering to SPF!). Then you set up a Whit

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

ermine the header vs. content and then subject the header and content to appropriate "analysis". If a message is found to be malformed, then Declude can make it fail a "Test" so that the mail admin can decide to accept or reject those messages - but it's not Declude's j

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Can someone help?

roblems (e.g., failed attempts to update web site files by the application) and was able to fix things for them before they even realized that there WAS a problem with their web site. >> Second, auditing can produce a lot of data, even if configured very narrowly << Yes, "success&quo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Can someone help?

TP status codes displayed as part of the message etc. Also, I assume you did already check the application and system logs to see if your action generated any entries? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Can someone help?

failures. (I personally also audit successful account management and audit policy changes). After doing this, any access rejection will appear in the security event log. I don't know how anyone manages any server (or workstation) without having that information at your finger tips. Best Regards A

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Can someone help?

w if there is some permission problem. Now, I remember I didn't do anything special. I installed a new Win 2003 SP1 system, set up a new IIS site and then installed Imail. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

have a customer base in the first place. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:02 AM To: declude.junkm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF in Imail

Until IPswitch offers SPF checking during the connection (where it really belongs), I can't see any benefit of doing that in Imail.   Might as well let Declude handle it all and make it part of your weighting scheme.   Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax:    +

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Fix List - One More Item to Add: SPAMROUTING false positive

4-3414 x20 (Business)Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 _ From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:31:30 -0500To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Why SPAMROUTING ?Hi,For some time I have noticed that occasionally messages fail the SPAMROUTINGtest, code 211f, for n

[Declude.JunkMail] KB Entry has bad link

Article Information Article ID: 29 Author: David Barker Created: 6/22/2005 Modified: 6/18/2006 Views: 331   Even though it was revised on 6/18, this entry is useless, because the link to the badheaders lookup page is broken. Be

[Declude.JunkMail] RE: Declude's To-Do List

Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:36 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: SPAM-WAR

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

end-of-message. In other words, they should be able to concentrate on handling single LF or CF characters in the SMTP and MIME headers. Inside the attachments, Unix style LF characters are pefectly fine and valid. The fact that attachments are scanned is just a "secondary" problem of the u

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

s to proper CRLF if it so desires. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:27 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subje

[Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

recognized as such, virus can't be hidden in none-standard line feeds and Declude doesn't attach headers behind the body of the message. I'm certain that we are looking at one cause why obvious spam is currently slipping past Declude in the current releases. Best Regards Andy Schmid

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3.14 - Issues

Hi,   I'm running my first few tests.   ISSUE 1 - Mail Headers   My mail headers now include   X-Declude-RefID:   I never requested that header in my config file!     ISSUE 2 - Log Files   LOGLEVEL MID and HIGH is no longer recording messages in the DEC*.log. (The message was a whitelist

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude4.3.14 appends header BEHIND email

ed its own headers at the bottom (scroll down to the bottom of the enclosed message to see them). So, if Imail can do it right, there clearly is a way to correct this. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- Received: from

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude4.3.14 appends header BEHIND email

ed its own headers at the bottom (scroll down to the bottom of the enclosed message to see them). So, if Imail can do it right, there clearly is a way to correct this. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- Received: from

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3.14 - Issues

Hi,   I'm running my first few tests.   ISSUE 1 - Mail Headers   My mail headers now include   X-Declude-RefID:   I never requested that header in my config file!     ISSUE 2 - Log Files   LOGLEVEL MID and HIGH is no longer recording messages in the DEC*.log. (The message was a whitelist

[Declude.JunkMail] Support

Hi,   I've been trying to be good and follow all the instructions:   - Try to open a case as suggested one the support page by logging into customer page -> there is no such "open a case" function   - Send and email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yesterday. Got a "ticket number" assigned. It's 4:30 -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Support Request -> Host Name Transition (Temporary Parallel Use)

Title: Message Hm - so may be they should tell their own WEBMASTER!?   I recall having read about this months ago - and their site has not been fixed? Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROT

[Declude.JunkMail] Support Request -> Host Name Transition (Temporary Parallel Use)

Hi,   I went to: http://www.declude.com/site/support.htm and it instructs me to: "Log into your Declude account and submit a case."   Fine, so I log into my Declude account, which gets me to http://shopping.declude.com/myaccount.asp and shows me my two Declude licenses for MAYWOOD-IS-0002.W

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: IIS 4 Advisory

For those of you still running NT 4.0 SP1 with IIS 4 -Original Message- From: VeriSign Customer Support Department [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 07:28 AM Subject: Important Service Notice about your Secure Site Certificate Dear VeriSign SSL Customer: In keepi

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files -> Microsoft confirms KB920958 bug!

le which system configurations will cause data loss (who cares if it's not permanent if you can't use your data for a few months). Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Warning -- August Security Hotfix KB920958 is suspect

Hi, Removing the hotfix seems to have done the trick for everyone I know of. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Warning -- August Security Hotfix KB920958 is suspect

Hi Dean, So far I have neither experienced not heard from anyone else that Win 2003 is effected. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Warning -- August Security Hotfix KB920958 is suspect

gards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 01:17 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files -> KB920958 may be bad!

ut that disk back in service. Please contribute to the thread in the Microsoft newsgroup: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/dgbrowser/en-us/defaul t.mspx?dg=microsoft.public.win2000.file_system&mid=d826afe9-2ab1-4b2f-ae11-c c27702f574a Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 20

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >