20080208 093248 127.0.0.1 SMTP (67690b10f043) 221 2.0.0
IMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net comcast closing connection.
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
407-322-8654
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I placed on a test machine and then trial on a production IMail server. I
really want this thing to work, but as I train and set-up, found that the
SMTP service stops and will not restart and getting a cannot find DLL and
SMTP. Sandy - have you experienced anything along this line?
-Don
We too use Black Ice with great success (except Windows 2003R2 will not
install and run). The replacement is IMP Proventia and very expensive at
about $700 per server. We are also looking for a more cost-effective
replacement.
-Don
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Schreiner
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:23 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AntiVirus Recommendations
We have been using F-Prot for several years with great success. Their new
mail server licensing
We have been using F-Prot for several years with great success. Their new mail
server licensing change is too expensive. We tried the free Clam AV, but with
heavy volume CPU was reaching 100%. I know Declude has built-in Virus Scanner,
but we have always run F-Prot in addition. It seems
I am looking for the best approach to stop notifications to both sender and
recipients of virus detection (to reduce what I call back scatter). However,
if one of our own customers sends an e-mail and whereas a virus is detected,
I certainly want them to receive a notification about same so they
postmaster.eml, sender.eml and recipient.eml bounces entirely
even if they take care to try to keep up with forging virus names. When
over 99% of it is forging, it makes no sense to be bouncing any of it when
it is detected as a virus.
Matt
Don Schreiner wrote:
I am looking for the best approach
Remember this post I made back on November 10, 2006 (see below)? A lot of
list members have since e-mailed asking if I ever found someone and how it
was coming along. In follow-up to those same folks on the list we finally
completed upgrade to our Declude installs from 1.82 to 4.3.23. Once again
detection and tar-pitting
dictionary attacks)
-The old Spam Review to ID False Positives
I hope some folks here are interested and no problem reimbursing
for same. Again, please contact me off list if interested. Thanks.
-Don
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.CompBiz.net
407-322-8654
, Reseller, Semi Managed and Fully Managed Windows 2003
Hosting Solutions
Tel: 877-70 HANDY x882 | Fax: 888-300-2FAX
www.handynetworks.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Schreiner
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 6:37 AM
Does anyone know if Declude has been configured to work with
other E-mail Servers other than IMail and SmarterMail? I thought to remember someone
discussing this after Scott left and the new ownership was ramping up. Perhaps
I am thinking of Message Sniffer?
We are not comfortable
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Email Servers and Declude
That would be Declude's gateway product. Since it
works as a gateway, it's not tied to any one mail server.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner
-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [65.57.241.194]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D49115a80012c6c22.SMD
X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
Organization: Abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Schreiner
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006
6:27 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Yahoo.com Resources temporarily unavailable
We handle some small bulk mails for our clients on occasion.
Has anyone seen the following response
, however our router at the data center replies
vacant.compbiz.net. According to DNSReport.com, the reverse DNS passes. Does
anyone know if our set-up for this customer should be changed in anyway to
avoid these types of issues?
Thanks.
-Don
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.CompBiz.net
407
and still
using Virtual domain name for holisticmoms.org under IMail? Thanks.
-Don
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.CompBiz.net
407-322-8654
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:33 PM
To: William
SpiderHost is our Data Center co-locator (Level3 facility). Below is beyond
my DNS expertise. What would I have them do? Thanks.
-Don
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.CompBiz.net
407-322-8654
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
If you delete, you should delete based on achieving a minimum weight
accumulated. Sniffer on occasion may detect something as a false positive.
For example, it may misinterpret a legitimate e-mail as Spam with an
attachment based on conversion of the attachment to characters and a series
I also strongly recommend Sniffer. We have used for a couple of years. As
spam patterns and variants change daily, it's rule base also changes and is
updated. It significantly reduced the time we spent managing Spam.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:02 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied
While the AOL filter is fixed, I am now getting 554 Denied on some servers
(see below). I am also getting unsolicited bulk
I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning on
BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my
BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at
the top of EML file? I am just guessing based on feature to use
or not they are found to be 'bogus'.
Matt
Don Schreiner wrote:
I am getting a lot of postmaster rejects from bad addresses after turning
on
BANEXT for COM attachments. I would like to exclude notifications on my
BANnotify.EML file. Can I do this by inserting SKIPIFBANEXTNAMEHAS COM at
the top
We sent a bulk mailing this morning for a client to 532 addresses. We use
Group Mail and authenticate from our office dedicated IP to our IMAIL server
via the clients account virtual domain. However, the e-mail was rejected to
any AOL address stating that URLs are improperly formatted. We have
] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a
Client
Check your left-hand nav...you have some bad links there...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:29 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help
, for example...
http://www.holisticmoms.org/index.cfm/about
See what I mean? There are three links like this in the nav that AOL is
complaining about since they don't end with the filename...the path keeps
going.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Help with AOL Filtering Bulk Mail for a
Client
Darin,
Got it now. The link is valid to the directory not ending with the index
file which is as follows
Matt/Darin/John/Andrew,
Inserting the trailing / on the URLs ending with a directory - did the trick
and passed the AOL filter. I learned something again today. Thanks for your
help! This list is the best!
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
While the AOL filter is fixed, I am now getting 554 Denied on some servers
(see below). I am also getting unsolicited bulk mail undeliverable.
I am using Group Mail in our office on dedicated IP authenticating SMTP to
their virtual domain on our IMail server. Do I need to make an additional
DNS
Well I just made a post, and this is the post I was expecting/looking for.
Thanks Scott!
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 3:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
We are up-to-date with our support agreements way into 2005 and I am
awaiting a fix. I am not sure I understand the talk here about forced
license upgrade unless a customer support agreement has expired? I also
agree it would have been nice to have a warning announcement about the Spam
Header test
It did affect us throwing weight higher on emails that would not have
otherwise failed the Spam Header Filter. We hold on a relatively low weight
of 13 compared to other configs I have seen posted with weights of 100, 200,
etc. The bottom line is if I did not stroll in here on New Years and catch
-d
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com mailto:Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 7:01 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Smarter Mail and ODBC
I cannot find where Smarter Mail
I cannot find where Smarter Mail supports ODBC? Our IMail set-up is with SQL
database for usernames and passwords integrated with our Cold Fusion
applications. Does anyone know if Smarter Mail will work with database?
Thanks.
-Don
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
these rules have been set by Scott years ago.
- Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Email being released today - Advance
Notice
to Standard, does NOT include any extension in Service
Agreement.
Both these rules have been set by Scott years ago.
- Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
So $264 for Declude AV/JM regardless if Pro or Standard, or multiple
SA's?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Service
Are there any new strategies for blocking dictionary attacks with Declude?
Our log files are growing and mostly due to the following stacking up it
seems a zillion times over...
ERR MAIL.DOMAIN.NET invalid user
We have used BlackIce for years and helps a lot for those that try X number
SMTP
I posted this to Declude.Virus, but apparently no longer subscribed and
wanted to give folks a heads up here.
Yesterday upgraded to most recent version of F-Prot Windows (fp-win_316_m)
and this morning by chance I checked my declude virus log and noticed a
bunch of Your virus scanner DOES NOT
3.16 Update Missing
F-Prot.exe
Don't you want to be using fpcmd anyway? That's the recommended scanner to
use with Declude.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:49 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot
attackers who cache your MX records won't be able to continue to hit it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:20 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking Dictionary Attacks
Are there any new strategies
(fpcmd.exe) should be
used instead of the DOS scanner.
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:49 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot Windows 3.16 Update Missing F-Prot.exe
I posted this to Declude.Virus
We are probably leaning this way too but still unsure because of sign-up
applications we run require we store email account user info into SQL.
-Don
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re[2]:
Holding off on SmarterMail here too and again need SQL DB with email account
info for our integrated member applications. Do you have a link to MailMax?
I am just as upset as others about IMail recent policies and been using
since version 4.0. Today I saw a post you can renew unlimted version
Declude Folks,
I need some help figuring out why we are receiving e-mails from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Line: Client TOS Notification, and the Sent To address
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure if these are coming back to
me in our abuse or postmaster account? There is nothing in the body of the
these feedback
loop messages.
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/tools/fbl.html
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7
] On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client TOS Notifications from AOL
Kami John,
Thanks a ton guys! That was me that registered on the AOL
feedback loop using our abuse addy, but going back months ago
different client situations. If you have something similar and need help,
hit me and be glad to share. Thanks. -Don
- Original Message -
From: Don Schreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 9:10 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Text Record Help Needed
I need help understanding the correct SPF text record for a customer domain
. I have read the archives, been to the pobox site and read and still not
absolutely certain. We allow some customers to SMTP relay from their
dedicated IP and also from their e-mail Contact Form via their web site - we
.
Something similar to this automation with Declude would seem helpful.
Thanks.
-Don
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.compbiz.net
407-322-8654
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Are these zombie machines also not trying to spread the same virus allowing
them to exploit smtp to other machines? This was my understanding this
occurred and my previous reference to using similar strategy with BlackIce
blocking IP's for 24 hours with detected signatures. Thus also blocking Spam
If I end up with a negative wait, how do I configure to ignore and pass
e-mail along. Is the following correct?
Global.cfg
NEGWEIGHT weightrange x x 0 -100
Default.JunkMail
NEGWEIGHT IGNORE
Thanks.
-Don
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Thanks for reply and yes this is how I use weights, but what I failed to mention is
that I end up with a negative value often (i.e. -7, -1, etc.) depending on certain
mail and it gets held. You are saying it should not get held. OK I must have a hold on
a certain test that is failing even
Bill,
Also running BI as of few weeks ago and tinkering with firewal.ini.
Would you mind sharing the .ini changes you made. You can e-mail me off
list. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Don Schreiner
CompBiz, Inc.
www.compbiz.net
407-322-8654
800-408-3688
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
This
is great for sharing and thank you.Is anyoneinterested in
sharingtheir global.cfgand white/black list files and strategies
that are working well for them. I feel overwhelmed these days keeping up the
spam battle as mail server admin and all the other daily chores I am
Kami,
Very nice and thanks for sharing. We also use Tom's list - but I see how
this can really augment what we are doing with our declude from file
rules.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003
Scott,
In response to additional info and questions please see below. When
could we anticipate an ETA?
Snippet Is this something that others would find useful? It
definitely would be
easier for us to implement.
***Regarding end user spam control via e-mail subscribe method. This
would be a
Wow Fritz that's impressive! Good job and Tom thanks for the info on
the upgrade.
-Don S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frederick P.
Squib, Jr.
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
Scott,
I vote yes. Our users would love it! If you or another does not create
it - we would eventually work on something for our customers based on
repeat requests. It's either I pay my guys, another, or you.
Several months ago another Decluder here shared files they developed of
end user filter
I agree with what you are saying and especially no need for GUI for
Declude administrator. Not sure I read Scott's original post correctly?
I was thinking he meant end user on/off/select/remove filters tool.
Filters set-up, defined, and made available for selection by the Declude
administrator.
Tom and other Kill List folks. Thought I would share as I usually do not
get to run stats at end of day before clock strikes 12am. Amazing that
at least 58% of email processed for the day was garbage. If I were to
include the manual deletes and emails that got through our lenient
filters, it would
Errr I second that response as I spend my daily morning hour
cleaning Spam from the servers. Tom has a great service with his list
and while an occasional address mistakenly listed - it is incredible how
the addresses are near the same as the addresses we add to our list when
running Read ID
Received: from w0.xxxletter.com [208.202.133.101] by
email.catholicweb.com
with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id AFB03E4600B8; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:33:52 -0500
This one failed the HELOBOGUS test because the remote mailserver
identified
itself as w0.xxxletter.com, but that host doesn't exist (if you
Hello fellow Decluder's,
I am seeing a lot of these (see header below) whereas the From address
is the same as the To address of one of our domains (is this spoofing
the domain?). I am catching them (barely in this case) based on weight
of other tests, but not sure I understand why these are not
Got to love this right off their site...
In order to stay within federal laws so that you are bulk emailing and
not spamming you must;
1.) Use a Valid Return Address
2.) Offer and Honor a means of removal from your mailings.
3.) Make no attempts to forge or remove the headers from your emails.
Tom et al,
I really like this approach on the rules.ima. Also been trying to spec
out a way to give the end user some control over some simple Spam
management. It would be great if a host administrator (and even the end
user) could determine which Declude Spam tests we make available from a
list
Can anyone bring up DNSReport.com and DNSStuff.com? Are they down?
Anyone experiencing regional connectivity errors?
-Don S.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
Anyone have a link or information on the most recent news about ORBZ and
Battle Creek? I see on some of the posts at the Battle Creek guest book
that apparently the charges may have been dropped. The most I have
enjoyed reading such a poorly written guest book application in ages.
Some of the
I followed suit and also sent a copy of my post on their guestbook to
him, as well as, the city commissioners over there. They probably don't
even understand what the hell is going on. Anyway, their e-mails can
all be found at
http://ci.battle-creek.mi.us/Government/High/Biographies.htm#Squires.
I am posting the following reply here to an active thread in the regular
IMail Discussion list (Scott I hope you don't mind), because for
whatever reason my posts there do not get distributed?? (I have finally
asked IPSwitch to investigate because I cannot post nor do I ever
receive original
Another way to look at things would be to check out the court cases
where
Corporations have sued their employees for misuse of e-mail.
Do you know where there are any of these cases that I can review online?
If not, thanks anyway. I will try and free up some time to perform some
research and
Hey Tom,
Good job! I set CPU to med3 on the same machine I referenced previous
and now down from 99% to average 45% CPU usage. Process took about 3
minutes vs. 1-2 minutes on 1349 message count. For the larger volume
guys (I know we are small fry), if you inserted the total time to
process in
Love having the statistics on the failed Spam tests. Great idea and very
helpful!
Couple of comments:
1. Definitely CPU intensive. Had our server (600mhz Intel) pegged 99%
while running. Our server usually idles around 2-3%. My typical log file
scanned contains 1300+ messages each, and my
-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Schreiner
| Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:51 PM
| To: Declude List
| Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with SpamReview Software
|
|
| Is anyone having problems with Tom's newly released Spam Review
| software
I must have missed this in the documentation? Where can I learn more
about the FREEMAIL test and freemail.lst?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Does anyone have the link to the Article about reporting SPAM to the
government?
-Don
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I am trying to figure out why this SPAM (see below) and just this
morning several similar SPAM's got through our Declude JunkMail???
Failed every test in the book it seems. We have a weight of 10 to warn
and a weight of 20 to Hold. Below is the header from one of the SPAM's
which is
Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded??
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4
Hold
I second this requested feature about adding to the Kill List. Great
Idea!
Also, I like the idea of sending to Spam Cop vs. the sender because will
surely have a lot of bounces.
Also, I think this is great you wrote the app and will not mind sending
a donation to you. Keep up the great job.
Tom,
I would want 2 separate button options.
1. Button to the delete Kill list.
2. Button to the Delete folder only.
Not 100% for sure but a warning in the documentation about having the
%MAILFROM% variable in your header as Scott was stating in a previous
post. Does this address the
79 matches
Mail list logo
