>> good 'ole BIND hung again <<
Nah - that can't be. Everyone here is beating up on MS DNS and tells us
that only BIND is suitable for production use by any sane person because it
is infallible?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-ma
Nope,
The original link still works:
http://www.paypal.com/verification/%?6488820019=20
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent
Title: Message
Of
course - it could be that law enforcement asked them to MAINTAIN the site so
that they can collect evidence.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
ssed to an alias!?
- Does the Imail/NT/AD integration support (multiple) virtual domains
(ip-less) - or will it only create users for the AD domain name?
Accordingly, how will it know that two mailboxes and/or aliases by the same
name, but on two different mail domains, should be kept as two different
entitie
Title: Message
Matt:
>> gatewayed
E-mail accounts. Since IMail doesn't offer any way to validate gatewayed
addresses or fending off dictionary attacks <<
With "gateway" you mean
that you are hosting the "public" MX for them (primary and possibly backup MX),
but you are NOT hosting their
but on two different mail domains, should be kept as two different
entities in AD?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Soft
n IMAIL/LDAP
lookup event sink as it would help my SMTP server to "disconnect" on
dictionary attacks.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-92
Title: Message
Matt:
One
more angle to that.
Am I
mistaken, or does the LDAP lookup only work for "IP based" mail domains?
In other words, if I host a few hundred mail domains sharing the SAME IP
address, then it appears as if Imail's LDAP feature ONLY connects to the ONE
mail domain t
p event sink as it would help my SMTP server to "disconnect" on
dictionary attacks.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-920
Rick,
I read the "BlackIce" User Guide and various other manuals to see if I want
to pursue this software. Which feature/setting blocks Dictionary SMTP
attacks? I can't seem to find any setting specific to this?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 E
Hi George,
>> is there any type of Challenge Response tools available for Imail that
you are aware of <<
Unfortunately - not.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just se
pool and include
the parameterized URL in my bounce messages... If I only had the time...)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://ww
previous suggestion had been to expand the summary line to include a
"reason" code, e.g., BADHEADER(80001004), SPAMFILTER(37), WHITELIST(IP) for
BADHEADER reason code or SPAMFILTER line number or WHITELIST reason.
The goal should be to make MID level logging LESS VERBOSE - but NOT less
inf
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
Actually, those two
log files may actually be desirable IF we could specify which address blocks
we're interested in.
E.g., if the log
files would only show MY IP ranges, then I could quickly look at a fairly small
SPF.NONE and find out, which DNS records I stil
Title: Message
Scott:
Any good idea why
several emails within the same minute from <> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the exact same IP address sometimes PASS SPF an sometimes do
not?
01/25/2004 00:17:23 Q5162108b00b436cc
WEB-O-TRUST:-2 nNOLEGITCONTENT:-3 WEIGHTFILTER:3 . Total weight =
-2.0
Hi,
This was an excerpt from Dlanalyzer.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
Title: Message
Hi:
I noted the
following on the SPF site:
"In either case an
MTA should reject messages from null senders that have more than one
recipient."
Imail only allows to
either permit or deny null senders. But, the above statement sounds obvious
- an automated bounce message
Hi,
May be I'm must lucky - but yesterday I had:
HABEAS..50.04%
HIL...1961.57%
5 messages with HABEAS headers - but 195 mails that failed HABEAS' infringer
list.
Best Regards
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http:
Hi Scott:
Any progress on the fix for the syntax
a:host.domain.name/nn
?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsub
I counter-balance Habeas with their own hil blacklist.
Right now - 95% of all "habeas" mail is actually coming from a blacklisted
server.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 20
Title: Message
>> SpamCop
has a very serious and obvious problem, and I think it might be the result of a
bug or something because clearly this wasn't always the case. Imperfect as
they may be, SpamCop could fix this problem and greatly improve on their present
reliability. <<
Sorry
for
. Having SpamCop FP on such a mail server though
causes me great pause.
Matt
Andy Schmidt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Well, I simply use SPF PASS to assign a negative weight. Since AOL
>implemented SPF, that automatically reduces any "SpamCop" effect to a
>tolerable level, e.g.,
do use the AHBL EXEMPT for counterweight (which also helps with AOL):
AHBLEXEMPT ip4rexemptions.ahbl.org * -8
0
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
e-Date: 01/12/2004 22:27:52 [0]
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 353600159
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://
Title: Message
Hm:
"In the past 772.9 days, it has been listed 19 times for a
total of 3.1 days"
Sound's like it works as designed - because of the volume of legit mail,
it is only listed for a few hours each time. A total of THREE days out of
roughly 800?
Again
- why not use a weight
other tests in a weighting scheme, I would be surprised if
anyone would actually hold or delete legit mail!?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S
Scott:
>> the de facto standard is to have a space after the colon in all
Internet headers. <<
There IS space after the colon - do you mean a space after between the
quote and the less-than symbol?
From: "GOERING iSeries Solutions"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Be
Title: Message
Hi Scott:
this email failed
"This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100f]."? Does Declude want a
space after the quote?
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de
[212.227.126.189] by hm-software.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id
A8AB2470013E; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:1
If you implement SPF for your own domain, you can safely use it now and benefit.
Your own outgoing mail will benefit as it will be less likely to be confused with SPAM.
Inbound, you can choose to add a negative weight for any site where SPF passes (at
least the domain was not likely spoofed).
A
Title: Message
I
guess this goes towards where one chooses to draw the line - spammers vs.
"organizations supporting spammers". Someone who knowingly gets involved with a
spammer, should probably expect that their email will not longer be delivered
reliably.
Similar to blocking an infected
Confirmed:
X-Declude: Version 1.77i16; D2edc073800b6a083.SMD from
corner-office.usa.hm-software.com [63.107.174.136]
Scott - I assume this does not yet fix the SPF bug that I reported (Just
asking because it was not acknowledged in any way.)
Best Regards
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for vi
Same here - downloaded this morning after the announcement and my headers
still read:
X-Declude: Version 1.77i15; D1bad042a01feaf36.SMD from
chris.usa.hm-software.com [63.107.174.138]
Best Regards
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
on. (I'm using ORF from VAMSOFT to do exactly that on my
backup MX running MS SMTP (IIS), as lots of spam now gets directed against
the backup MXs).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Argos Networks
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-9411 x20 (Bu
Hi Scott:
Okay - that's fair enough.
So one should think of the line labeled "Tests failed:" as a line that
really contains "Actions taken:"
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Title: Message
Hi Scott:
I believe I found a
bug in your SPF implementation.
http://www.infinitepenguins.net/SPF/check.php?action="" PROTECTED]
will "PASS", because
195.127.133.117 matches "a:roedermark.hm-software.com/25"
Yet, Declude (and
DNSStuff) FAILS the same combination:
http:/
and should be
complete. HIDETESTS should only be applied against information that is
shown "publicly" (e.g., in headers, in bounce/warn messages, and the like).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
[This E-mail was scanned for vir
Yes, I'm still using LogLevel=MID.
Never changed it - unless someone tells me that LOW or HIGH are more
appopriate.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
01/12/2004 17:40:55 Q226b2eb1017c0bfd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 63.170.102.99 ID:
01/12/2004 17:40:55 Q226b2eb1017c0bfd Tests failed [weight=0]:
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-18
nged implicitly by inheriting all changes made to LOGLEVEL LOW"
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004
>> the one-line summary is going to start with "Tests failed
[weight=WEIGHT]: " <<
Thanks. That's what I was hoping/waiting for. If I interpret correctly,
this is NOT yet available. (That's fine, just wanted to make sure that I was
not "behind".)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Decl
EL HIGH, and [2] To add a one-line summary to
LOGLEVEL LOW. No other changes were made. LOGLEVEL MID is not involved"
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
string constant" so
that they could easily detect it.
I'm confused as to what changes you made after 1.77i12 to Loglevel MID as
your answer refers to HIGH and LOW and leaves out MID?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-O
;t have to download a new Interim.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 08:15 AM
To: [EMA
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
any
news on this matter?
Dito -
any news with respect to the log entries in medium mode?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From: Andy Schmidt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent
cantly. Of course, with
the i12 bug that would be broken - because suddenly email would be penalized
even though the sender only used one SINGLE Email address in the "To" field.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original M
ed should not be counted against the
email, when assessing it for "spamminess" (e.g., bypassing the whitelist).
Otherwise, it would render the entire SWITCHRECIP feature useless (and I
know that there was a good reason, why I have this turned on.)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1
Hi,
Yes, SWITCHRECIP=ON.
However, the problem stated with i12, we reproduced the problem at will
until we went back to i8 - and then tne problem went away.
So, something is wrong with SWITCHRECIP=ON and BYPASSMULTIRECP combination
in i12.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
here is the info you
asked. Enclosed is a text file with
- IMail Log (showing
ONE recipient)
- Declude Log
(showing 12 recipients)
- Declude skipping
the whitelisting: "Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=15 (17) and
at least 4 recipients (12)."
-
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
I just went back to
i8. Somewhere between i8 and i12, the handling of aliases
broke.
Situation:
a) User sends a
single email to a single alias: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
b) The alias
distributes to 12 mailboxes
c) Declude (with
Interim I12) counts it as 12 recipients
n't want
them "solidified" by eventually appearing in search engines, etc. None of
their DNS zones are erroneous by anyone's definition, except for
DNSreport.com.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
Title: Message
Hi,
one of my customer's
domains came back with:
ERROR: I couldn't find any A records for www.CPBAKER.COM. But I did find a
referral to ns1.webhost.hm-software.com. (and maybe others). If you want a
website at www.CPBAKER.COM, you will need an A record for www.CPBAKER.COM.
Time for someone to contact the tech-press...
"New Outlook Bug Increases Spam"
Because ISPs have to whitelist mail that appears to originate from Outlook,
questionable messages will now start to appear in mailboxes across the
Internet...
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 93
Okay - so if it fails every Outlook 2003 user, it can only be used with a
minimum weight.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent
or IP based tests, e.g.:
SBL[127.0.0.2]=IGNORE,XBL[127.0.0.4]=IGNORE,...
Or, stick THAT information in the weight line:
BADHEADERS[n]:5 HELOBOGUS:3 SPAMHEADERS[n]:3
SBL[127.0.0.2]:8
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:
and three different sending domains (valid
ones) were being tagged.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of System
Administrator
Sent: Wednesday, January 07,
est. The "IP" based stuff is easy to reconstruct from other sources -
but the badheaders/spamheaders "reason codes" were helpful when
investigating false-positive reports.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original
ct: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RBL - which DNS Server
Any one using this yet, and is it helping?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
> Sen
>> Thus, the DNS server used would need to be the Imail server itself. <<
Well - since Declude replaces/intercepts a process of the Imail Server, I
think it qualifies as "SMTPd" in the context of their specs.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Busine
ify, which of your two conflicting answers are
ultimately correct. Yes - I'm hoping that those lookups are performed
through the Imail configured DNS server (or the one defined in the Declude
config file).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:
Okay - so it would NOT fulfill the stated requirements to be a contributor -
since it is not going through a "caching" server.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Scott:
I'm assessing http://www.njabl.org/contribute.html.
Where does Declude fit into this? When declude looks up black lists, does
it connect DIRECTLY to each black-lists DNS server - or does it query
through the Imail (or Declude) DNS server?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 20
server (one hop down)>
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Harvy
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 12:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Dec
ed to deliver it to that third party.
You implement authenticated SMTP by specifying it in your Email software
(e.g., Outlook Express, Outlook, Eudora, Netscape - take your pick). Look
for something like "Outgoing Mail Server Requires Authentication").
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone:
Hi,
If you implement SMTP AUTH and white list anyone who is using an
authenticated connection, then this will override the SPF FAIL - thus
leaving only those to truly fail who are not using authenticated SMTP.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934
Hi Bill:
For what it's worth, MY problem was clearly due to a rogue DNS zone. I am
using multiple includes - one of them to a zone that really has no use, but
it came handy to 'document' the SPF records. Unfortunately, I had not
verified the proper configuration of that zone and there had been
Hi Scott:
Disregard! I found the DNS problem. It has nothing to do with the
information that you are logging, though - it's the "include hmsoftware.de"
that's failing on that machine.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-92
/25 ip4:65.119.204.0/24 -all Sorry, the DNS server
(63.107.174.65) did not respond with an answer (rcode=2).
63.107.174.147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [andyshome]: UNKNOWN: v=spf1
ip4:63.107.174.0/25 ip4:65.119.204.0/24 -all Sorry, the DNS server
(63.107.174.65) did not respond with an answer (rcode=2).
Best Rega
- you are looking for the UNKNOWN information in the wrong spot.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 08:40
ess/failures.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 08:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude
nitepenguins.net/SPF/check.php?action=spfcheck&ipv4=63.107.17
4.146&helo=andyshome&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received-SPF: fail (heifong.phase.org: domain of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not designate 63.107.174.146 as permitted
sender)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (B
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
I assume the FOOTER
action only works for the "plain-text" version of an email? Since most
SPAM is using HTML, the footer will never be visible to the
viewer?
Sample:
12/19/2003 17:31:29
Q7c3f039300ba7da8 Msg failed WEIGHTFOOTER (Total weight between 5 and 7.).
record does not exist).
63.107.174.149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [TechT1]: UNKNOWN: SPF not
supported (the HM-Software.com TXT record does not exist).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Title: Message
Hi:
I have lots of SPF
"unknown" in the SPF.log file - most look as if they should have
FAILED:
12.219.157.132 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [family]: UNKNOWN
Here the Imail
log:
12:18 23:10
SMTPD(16C9012A) [63.107.174.78] connect 12.219.157.132 port 449312:18 23:10
SMTPD(16C90
Title: Message
I'm impressed who is
already on board:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=altavista.net&type=TXT
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=softhome.net&type=TXT
It's been catching a
few spammers already.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(B
Excellent!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 06:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
e "?all" since any of our users may be "sending" mail
through a third party web site. Of course, ?all means that there will never
be a "FAIL" - which is equivalent to giving no or little weight.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescen
Title: Message
Hi,
X-Declude: Version
1.77i3; D2acb18b6021e5887.SMD from sccrmhc12.comcast.net
[204.127.202.56]
X-Declude-Date: 12/18/2003 22:37:23
[5]
Is this something I
can turn off, or will it eventually be removed from this
beta/interim?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtH&M Systems Softwar
Title: Message
I noticed that local
form mails seem to "PASS" SPF? That's nice - but
how/why?
Example:
12/18/2003 17:21:45 Q28781b8a01d045e5
SPFPASS:-5 . Total weight = 5.
...12/18/2003 17:21:45 Q28781b8a01d045e5 Msg
failed SPFPASS (SPF returned PASS for this E-mail.).
Action="">12/18
y the
owner of each domain and thus are more likely to be accurate. But we can't
reach block based on SPF failures without ignoring the reality of the www?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone:
Wow,
With only a few hundred domains registered, what were the chances that it
would already catch spam:
12/18/2003 16:32:17 Q1cd609ef0252d469 DSBL:5 SPAMCOP:7 NJABLDUL:4
SORBS-DUL:5 CBL:7 SPFFAIL:8 . Total weight = 36.
12/18/2003 16:32:17 Q1cd609ef0252d469 Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with
Hi Scott:
A) Is there an %SPFSTATUS% variable for use in the headers (that will show
FAIL/PASS/UNKNOWN)?
B) If not, is there a "generic" SPF test in the global.cfg, so that I can
use one line to create a WARN action e.g.
SPF spf * x x x
Best Regards
Andy Sc
ocked, messages could pass
to those people who truly wanted to know what items are new at Walmart.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://
Thanks.
I set up my primary domains. I still have to review client domains to
determine the proper setup for those that are used for emailing.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
he mail was actually sent from AOL's mail servers.
When I trace the TRUE source of the email, it usually is never truly from
AOL.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
arty often (if ever).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uot; (not "ignorant") server
faults, rather than being able to mail from every machine in the universe,
things are much more manageable.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
eantime, why not relay your outbound mail through your ISP?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 01:33 A
e.g., define a smart host), their mails won't be delivered to the
outside world. Nothing wrong with that.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
Title: Message
Hi,
I just noticed that
AOL has stepped up their policies another notch.
They used to say
that "AOL **MAY**" not accept email from servers without Reverse DNS.
In the last two
weeks, that changed:
http://postmaster.aol.com/guidelines/standards.html
AOL's servers wi
constructively as
possible.
(I'm confused about your remark about the GeoLocation extra setup - I don't
recall any complexities?)
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
he
COUNTRIES variables? If so, would it make sense to upgrade the routing test
so it uses the same information as COUNTRIES?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fa
milar entry in their mail server). Their provider will
know that they are a valid customer IP address and the provider's SMTP
server will (hopefully) not be black-listed - certainly not in DUHL-SORBS.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suit
n.
So - they are spamming me with virus notifications that I don't want to see,
they don't stop the infected message and they do nothing to stop the
infected PC from sending.
Bunch o'morons.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upp
- if anything, the person was very
thorough and acted entirely reasonable.
I concur that it is necessary to keep the "easily accessible" interims
release as "mainline code" and to place "debug code" at a unique URL.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software,
Okay - thanks. Just wanted to make sure that you were aware that the bug
was not related to "WEIGHT..." tests only.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
quot;SORBS" in my HIDETESTS - it's
the end of the line.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
---
[Th
- and you could keep the "interims" code strictly for one-on-one
situations.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-So
-readable and has been for as long as I can remember.
Does anyone out there have an installed.bin file that is NOT?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 2
d.
Declude Hijack Status: NOT REGISTERED: No activation code.
End of diagnostics.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http:
Title: Message
My installed.bin
says = 1.77i2.
My Global.cfg
contains a line:
HIDETESTS CATCHALLMAILS IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT
WEIGHT8 WEIGHT10 WEIGHTHDR NJABL AHBL SORBS
My
$Default$.Junkmail contains a line:
WEIGHTHDR WARN X-RBL-Warning: Failed %TESTSFAILED%
[%WEIGHT%]
My .EML te
501 - 600 of 968 matches
Mail list logo
