We're fairly new at using JunkMail and we want to refine the process beyond
the basic tests (typically weight10 or weight20). What strategy or steps
would you recommend next?
Two obvious ideas are Filtering and the ip4r tests. For filtering, I'm
concerned about the system overhead and the
blah.
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:41 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] refining the filtering process
We're fairly new at using JunkMail and we want to refine the process
beyond
the basic
Thanks for the answer on the subject question. Your answer on the other
(refining...) question was a bit shorter than I was hoping for. Do you have
an archive for your JunkMail list messages? I've been scanning through the
archives of IMail, but it's hard to pinpoint the right information.
Did I miss something here? I created a whitelist for a client (we use DJ
Pro) by adding this line to their domain-specific $default$.junkmail file:
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\PaulsonCommodities\whitelist.txt
(I put it in right before their list of weighted tests).
Inside the whilte list
Thanks Scott. You're saying the whiltelist file needs a blank line at the
end? I didn't have one, but I just added one now.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
My client says they are still have getting email spam filtered by JM when it
should be white listed. Here is what I have:
The have a file whitelist.txt which for now has these entries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are two blank lines after the scott listing. This file is
I sent you the JM log file off-line as you request. However, once I looked
at it closer, I found these lines:
03/18/2004 14:26:00.973 Q21f8015800fcaa67 Domain name =
paulsoncommodities.com, User name = Steve.
03/18/2004 14:26:00 Q21f8015800fcaa67 Using [incoming] CFG file
So how do we use this functionality? Per your instructions, I'm trying to
study the newsgroup postings to see how to use the extra functionalities
included in the Interim releases, but those postings seem to leave me with
more questions than answers.
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
And where do you get these?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countries List
Mailpure's foreign-TLD and badcountrynorevdns are also good examples of
country filters
...
:)
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countries List
So how do we use this functionality? Per your instructions, I'm trying
to
study the newsgroup
We have JM Pro, and have a few per-user settings. Now we have a client with
a nobody alias setup to catch all emails that aren't specifically
addressed to one of their mailboxes. They want custom JM settings for this
nobody alias. Can we just setup a nobody.jumkmail file like we would for
any
Hmmm..., that doesn't quite do what they want. They have an mailbox
julie, and nobody is an alias that resolves to julie. They want different
JM settings for mail specifically addressed to julie versus mail addressed
to no legitimate mailbox (which would get handled through the nobody alias).
Thanks, Scott. Actually, we're back at IMail 7.15. I have yet to see any
real benefit in the 8.x series.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] per user settings
I'd like to second this question. I remember seeing a couple of discussions
here where people couldn't agree on which McAfee product to use as the
command line scanner with Declude. And, of course, the online stores always
emphasize the Windows-based products. So exactly which product is it
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server
would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a
client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight.
Here is the message header:
Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by
We're still running Imail 7.15 -- I have yet to see any value in upgrading
to 8.x -- so is there an easy way to do the whitelisting of local accounts
for IMail 7.x?
Also, what would you think about lowering the weight for CMDSPACE from 8 to
4?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott
Is it possible to make the weight of a test conditional?
Here is my thinking: we've been having problems with our own users getting
zapped by the CMDSPACE test. We are running IMail 7.15, so we don't have
access to the whitelist auth option. We can whitelist our own domains, but
that would let
- Original Message -
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional test weighting
on 6/24/04 6:07 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Is it possible to make the weight of a test conditional?
Here
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the quick reply. What do you mean by apply to certain users?
If I add a line to a filter to the global.cfg file, it runs for everyone.
So where in the filter file do I apply per-domain settings? For example, in
the REMOTEIP code I was looking at, it seems the REMOTEIP test
Sorry Scott, I just realized I was being Monday-morning befuddled. The
inclusion of the filter line in the global.cfg file only defines the test,
just as all the other tests are defined there. It's only when I put the
reference in the $default$.junkmail file to that test name that the test is
I must really be slow today, so my apologies in advance... Applying actions
for different tests for different users/domains is fine. If I put
YOURTESTNAME DELETE into a per-domain junkmail file, then messages that
fail that test will be deleted. However, what about weighting? If I define
a
Thanks for your patience Scott. I think I understand now, although my
actual test doesn't seem to be working. Perhaps you can tell me where I'm
going wrong?
1. I put a reference to the filter in the global.cfg file (e.g.,
c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0). Notice that I gave the
Hi Scott,
That's just what I needed. I took the script from someone else's earlier
reply to my questions about CMDSPACE. I guess the email message reformatted
the text, so the way I read it was to put the filter name inside the filter
file instead of inside the global.cfg file. Now that I've
I've been just begging for motivation to upgrade from 7.15 to 8.x, and so
far, the only good reason I've found is the WHITELIST AUTH feature.
Otherwise, it's hard to see any reason for upgrading, especially when I've
got a stable, trouble-free mail server now, and an upgrade could introduce
any
Hi,
There is one point about the setup of SPF records in DNS that confuses me:
SPF compares the return address of email against the IP of the MX record for
that domain. However, the MX record doesn't point to an IP, it points to a
host name, which may be in another domain. So the MX record for
Hi,
I'm trying to better understand how JM scores weights. I sent a test
message from one of our internal accounts to another, and it came out with a
spam weight of 5. This was in the header:
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.224.41.4]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
So what does the =IGNORE mean in the logs? Such as this:
CMDSPACE=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE SPFFAIL=IGNORE
LOCALCMDSPACE=IGNORE WEIGHT5=SUBJECT WEIGHT5r=MAILBOX CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE
And if this is only a list of tests that failed, then is there no list of
tests the passed?
Thanks, Scott. Ok, one more: here is the scoring system I use:
BADHEADERS badheaders x x 8 0
BASE64 base64 x x 4 0
CMDSPACE cmdspace x x 8 0
COMMENTS comments x x 7 0
HELOBOGUS helovalid x x 5 0
IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3
MAILFROMenvfrom x x 12 0
NOLEGITCONTENT nolegitcontent x x 0
Thanks for your help, Scott.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] understanding JM scores
Thanks, Scott. Ok, one more: here is the scoring system I use:
Hi,
I have a question about setting up the SPF string.
If I use this string:
v=spf1 a mx a:bcw5, a:bcw6 -all
as a text record in our domain (bcwebhost.net), then the SPF test checks the
sending IP and tries to match it against either bcw5.bcwebhost.net or
bcw6.bcwebhost.net. The -all option
Thanks, Scott.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF question
I have a question about setting up the SPF string.
If I use this string:
v=spf1 a mx
I think Jerry has this right. Both our Declude and IMail support agreements
are currently lapsed. We were planning on renewing both in early 2005 when
Ipswitch had their big fiasco over discontinuing IMail as a stand-alone
program. So we plan on dropping IMail and we postponed renewing the
Hi,
We regularly use the whitelist feature with our clients, and it always
works. Now, however, when I try to use it with our own domain, it doesn't
seem to be operating.
When I connect to our mail server from home (using broadband cable) to send
messages, the system always gives me a high spam
Thanks, Scott. I also thought that whitelist files included all of the same
options as the whitelist commands that go into a global.cfg file. What
about @domain-name? Does that work in a whitelist file?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi,
I've noticed in the last couple of weeks a huge upsurge in junk mail getting
through our system with lower weights (i.e., ending up in the InBox instead
of the spam folder or being deleted). We don't do a lot of tweaking with
our configuration files, so we normally expect a certain small
Hi All,
Hope you don't mind another simple question...
I have a spam message with a weight of 2:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFER [2]
The problem with this line was that we have sniffer weighted at 7. So I
went to the Declude JM log and came up with this:
03/01/2005 13:17:46 Qdbca042102961063
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] timeout test on Spam
That usually indicates your are having DNS issues. Are you sure your DNS
server is healthy and responding to queries quickly?
Darrell
Imail Admin writes:
Hi All
use a variant of Matt's badcountrynorevdns test to punish timeout's from
spam haven countries:
BadCountryREVDNSTimeout.txt:
REVDNS END NOTIS (Timeout)
COUNTRY 50 IS CN
COUNTRY 50 IS KR
COUNTRY 40 IS RU
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
Hi,
I have a strange question, which once against my
astounding ignorance. I just tried using DLAnalyzer Lite on our latest
Declude JM log. For the sample I tested, I got these results:
Total Messages Processed: 11,234Messages That
Failed Defined Test(s): 10,153Percentage
t one stuck into my
head.
Hope that helps.
Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message
sages (70%) that failed some other
test.
Thanks,
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From:
Imail
Admin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 12:15
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
catchallmails question
Thanks, Darrell. This at lea
Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Yes.
If all users send through your
, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I think it uses STP...The Racer's Edge.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re
So how about all the hot new features of IMail 8.2? How do those compare
with similar features in SmarterMail?
Also, we mostly use IMAP, rather than the web interface. How does the IMAP
feature in Smartermail compare to Imail?
For that matter, is there any change to the IMAP feature in Imail
We use Declude JM Pro with IMail, and have been thinking about SmarterMail.
We often use the ability to direct messages in certain weight ranges (e.g.,
10-20) to go to certain mailbox folders (spam). Are you saying this
feature isn't supported when using JM with SM?
Ben
- Original Message
Just a curiosity: I received an email from someone at Veritas, and the
subject line was:
Fw: [WARNING - POSSIBLY NOT VIRUS SCANNED]Re: VERITAS Support: Case ID
I'm assuming that this warning was added by their system? Why would they do
that? If they knew it wasn't scanned, why wouldn't they
Hi Barry, and thanks for the explanation. The only thing that concerns me
is that we renewed our Declude service agreement this spring, but have never
been able to download an upgrade to Declude due to the bug(s). So I'm just
a little concerned about how long before we have a stable 2.x version
I think you have this backwards: the hang-up here isn't Declude, it's
SmarterMail. I'm very interested in SmarterMail myself, but I'm not even
going to try a trial until they add the AUTH feature.
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi,
For the last few weeks, we've seen an explotion of spam mail with the from
line as New Account. The subject and text vary. Some messages get caught
by our threshold and dumped, but many do not. Sniffer seems to spot these
pretty effectively, but not always and we don't take action on
it in MAILPOLICE, and if you have URIBL support, it is
also in SURBL presently.
Matt
IMail Admin wrote:
Hi,
For the last few weeks, we've seen an explotion of spam mail with the
from line as New Account. The subject and text vary. Some messages
get caught by our threshold and dumped
yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0
Nice to know!
Now
Title: Message
Hi Barry,
Maybe I've just been out of the loop, but that's
the first mention I've heard of Declude 4.0. We've been waiting on
upgrading to 3.0 pending some confidence in its reliability. Is 4.0
something schedule for this year, or far out in the future?
Thanks,
Ben
BC Web
First, I vote AGAINST anything with 4 in it. Why 4? You were calling it
version 4, but that's a complete misnomer. Currently, it represents the
same feature set as the so-called version 3, so there is no reason to call
it version 4. In addition, there are three components in it (AVA, JM, HJ),
Hi All,
I was testing out our domain name at dnsreport.com, and it complained that
we had recursion turn on at the DNS server. So I tried turning it off, and
suddenly all our JM scores went through the roof. I've got a sample from
some personal mail below. It looks to me like IPs weren't
OK, so now I've turned all recursion back on. As it is, I can't see any
postings to the group because the SPAM ratings are all too high and they're
being deleted. Let's hope things are back to normal.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED
it wouldn't be available to the
public. The public DNS servers I can then turn off their recursion feature.
What do you think?
Thanks again,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Admin Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:06
, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:20 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM
scores?
Hi Sandy
but allow recursion.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Hi All,
I've been trying to access www.dnsstuff.com and www.dnsreport.com from my
desktop system. I keep getting this reply:
Sorry, you have triggered our rate limiting system. If you are reading this
in a web browser, we apologize -- we want you to use the site as much as you
like. What we do
.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:08 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site
Hi All,
I've been trying to access
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site
I read the abuse link before, but it is unhelpful, and I couldn't get
questions or issues you may have. If you have a need to contact us in a
non-public way our whois record does have an E-mail address that can be
used.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/pages/forums.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent
Thanks Scott, and good to hear from you again!
Is there anyway to back track this Java program that was browsing your site?
I keep a pretty tight lid on viruses and spyware, but it seems to me
something must be infected somewhere. Also, do you have any dates? It
would help if I knew something
Based on the discussion under Declude JM, I'm also looking at adding
invURIBL. However, I find the weighting system in the invurible.exe.config
file very confusing. This is the total weight passed to Declude? I can't
figure out what typical weight scores would be or how to adjust them.
Just
I'd sure like to see some Declude comments on this discussion.
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x
Darrell,
I put up two Windows Explorer
Hi All,
We're in the process of tesing JM 4.x as an upgrade and I ran into what I am
sure is a minor mis-configuration.
I find that I occassionally get messages that are clearly spam, but are
whitelisted. The common characteristic is that they are sent with a from line
that is my own email
Of Imail Admin
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting
Hi All,
We're in the process of tesing JM 4.x as an upgrade and I ran into what I am
sure is a minor mis-configuration.
I find that I
whitelisted to all recipients.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting
Hi David,
Yup, that was my first check. The address book in question
,
and also my own address.
My question is: why is Declude using this file for whitelisting? And why do I
have this file anyway?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:01 AM
Subject: Re
is testament to the fact that it affects a lot of people that use this
functionality.
Matt
Imail Admin wrote:
Hi All,
Last week I was struggling with this mysterious accidental whitelisting.
Emails addressed to me were whitelisted, even though I had (to the best of my
knowledge
of turning whitelisting based on the address book on or
off, uh, ah, golly gee, that is what AUTOWHITELIST is for.
As for not knowing that 2006.2 no longer uses the aliases.txt files…
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent
Right now, we only use JM on a domain-by-domain basis. We're considering
turning on spam filtering on all outbound email. How do we configure that as a
default?
Thanks,
Ben
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, and SmarterMail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Imail Admin wrote:
Right now, we only use JM on a domain-by-domain basis. We're
considering
Hi All,
This is is off-topic, but the people here seemed to always be ahead of the
game with these kinds of problems. I wanted to know if what I'm
experiencing is some sort of trojan or virus, or just bad luck.
We have had two unrelated systems (one desktop, the other a notebook, on
different
Hi,
We have Declude running with IMail 2006.23. One of our clients has their mail
box setup to forward to their AOL account. The problem we have is that if they
receive a message and mark it as spam, then AOL thinks the spam came from us
and we risk being blocked.
I thought we were
to delete unless you are sure.
Lastly, you'll want to get on AOL's postmaster feedback loop, if you aren't
already.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] why
they are only processed as incoming. As for
changing the subject, that again would be done on the inbound filter for
forwarded messages.
As to the CPU question, the cost is the same for the same tests, inbound or
outbound doesn't matter.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
Hi,
Lately, we've been getting a lot of stuff like this:
Received: from mail5.slik.com.ru [194.62.0.249] by mail2.bcwebhost.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD-9.20) id ABB40398; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:43:16 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: =?koi8-r?B?7dXSwdfDxddh?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
The answer to your question is yes, the mailbox is created automatically.
We use it all the time.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox
Hi,
I have a question of strategy. Per David's message below, one can setup a
filter for a character set (such as Russian). Alternative, one could use
BANCHARSET. For a third alternative, one could use rules.ima within IMail
itself. So what are the pros and cons of these three approaches?
.
Ferrell
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
Hi,
I have a question of strategy. Per David's
March 2007]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:45 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking certain character sets
David,
Can you tell me when (what version number
I prefer
table...
tennis
- Original Message -
From: John T
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tip of the day??
Pong
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: Declude
Hi,
A couple of months ago I read the discussion about the new Barracuda BRBL.
Then I went to the archives to see how people were implementing it into
Declude. I have Declude 4.2.x, so I don't have the features of 4.4. I was
unable from reviewing the archives to figure out the best way to
Hi,
We've been using Declude JM/AV with Imail for a long time. The current
versions are Imail 2006.23 and Declude 1.63. I don't spend much time
tweaking the system any more -- it's a small server that only handles about
40 domains (none of them heavy users). Anyway, lately (last couple of
-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Imail
Admin
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:30 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with my Declude?
Hi,
We've been using Declude JM/AV with Imail for a long time. The current
versions
was checked by Declude]
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@microneil.com
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with my Declude?
On 7/28/2010 2:29 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
lately (last couple of
weeks
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with my Declude?
On 8/1/2010 1:36 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Hi Pete,
By SNF I assume you mean Sniffer? How do I tell for sure which version
is running and whether it is getting the latest downloads? I know it's
]
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@microneil.com
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with my Declude?
On 8/1/2010 1:36 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Hi Pete,
By SNF I assume you mean Sniffer
, Imail Admin wrote:
Hi Pete,
OK, I did the upgrade. One thing that was slightly different from the
instructions was that even though I directed it to install into the
same folder as the prior Sniffer installation (d:\imail\sniffer), it
only offered me a choice of a new install and said nothing
Hi,
I've run into a small problem between Declude and lists. I have a domain
with a list on it such as listn...@domain.com. You have to be on the
posters' list to send messages to that list. One of the posters sends
messages to the list and is authorized for the list, but gets this error
Message-
From: IMail Admin
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 11:23 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] weird processing of lists
Hi,
I've run into a small problem between Declude and lists. I have a domain
with a list on it such as listn...@domain.com. You have
Everyone gone on vacation?
-Original Message-
From: IMail Admin
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 11:23 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] weird processing of lists
Hi,
I've run into a small problem between Declude and lists. I have a domain
with a list
Most likely ;)
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of IMail
Admin
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weird processing of lists
Everyone gone on vacation?
-Original
What surprises me is that I haven't found anywhere where this problem has been
discussed before. Granted that IMail's list server is primitive and that
seriously list services use a separate list server, still a lot of IMail admin
use the built-in list service for basic list services. So I
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net
General and Non-Emergency support ticket:
https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
--
From: Imail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Wednesday
I'm still having trouble with more spam seepage, so I've been looking at my
various tests. I noticed that in the past, the Inv-uribl test caught 63-70%
of messages, but recently it's only catching 56%. When I look at a lot of
the low value spam (messages that barely get classified as spam), they
/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: IMail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How effective should Inv-Uribl be?
I'm
://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: Imail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log
Message-
From: Imail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 7:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
So I'm still looking at ways to make Inv-Uribl more effective. I'm getting a
lot of spam
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
