Re: Can we enforce beta release for the freeze

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:20 PM Shaun McCance wrote: > Hi Georges, > > > What I want is a discussion on how we can ensure beta releases happen in > the future. For example, can we do more to automate releases? Or (again, > for example), could we have an automated script that emails this list

Re: Version numbers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:17 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > Several developers are interested in moving away from our confusing > even/odd versioning scheme. > > Emmanuele has proposed a new version scheme on Discourse: > >

Re: Intent to deprecate Jabber server

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:44 AM Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > > Hello, > > During routine infrastructure review, we found out that our Jabber > server usage is very low, i.e. fewer than 5 users login regularly. We > would like to shut it down, but as we could have missed some serious use > case,

Re: Replacing "master" reference in git branch names (was Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:00 AM Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Doing some thread grave digging. Just as an FYI - in terms of happening - I see it very likely that github and gitlab are all going to be changing the name of the default branch in git. (I talked to Nuritzi - and she said discussions have

Re: Spinach Con at GUADEC

Leave it to me to screw up dates.. even though I check it. The dates are on Tuesday 8/27, not Monday. Sorry about that. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:33 PM Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > Just wanted to let all of you know that at GUADEC - on Monday 8/26 we > will be having SpinachCon, if

Spinach Con at GUADEC

Just wanted to let all of you know that at GUADEC - on Monday 8/26 we will be having SpinachCon, if you have a project that you would like to have user feedback on, this will be an opportunity to have it at GUADEC! You can reach out to Deb Nicholson, (mail me and I'll give you her email address)

Re: how to submit a bug

Hello Stephen, On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 7:40 PM Stephen Adler wrote: > > Gnome developers, > > > I've run across a bug, (maybe a feature) in gnome 3.32. I ran across this bug > when I upgraded from fedora 29 to fedora 30. > I'd like to report this bug, but I don't know where to do so. You can

Re: Extension review

Talk to me and Neil. We have a general idea on what we want done .. Sri On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 9:07 PM wrote: > Hi devs, > > I found a volunteer who's interested in helping out with shell > extension review. Who should he talk to? > > Michael > > >

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 8:29 PM Michael Terry wrote: > (I assume you meant that deja-dup doesn't have much to worry about in the > main context of this thread about Documents support etc being dropped from > GNOME. And you're correct there. But Michael's comment about GNOME losing > it's

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 2:24 PM Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list wrote: > PS. Yes, count me among the completely surprised that GOA is not an API that > apps should use. It was not communicated anywhere close to the level it > needed to be. That's on GNOME, not on those app developers.

Re: GitLab postmortem

I would say things have been fantastic from the engagement team perspective. I think the engagement team is more accessible now that we are using the same system as the rest of GNOME. We are able to project management ourselves and overall more efficient. I don't think we are using gitlab at a

Re: This Week in GNOME

of a project can give > > a > > > one-liner (or 2 liner) what the listed MRs are about. I'm afraid > > that > > > otherwise some MRs with very technical titles will get discarded > > by > > > the audience, while some MRs with a sensationalist or > &

new GNOME Weather maintainers

Greetings all, I just want to let you that Christopher Davis and Falk Seidl will be co-maintainers of GNOME Weather. GNOME Weather has no active maintainer and both Chris and Falk will provide much needed energy back into the project. Philip will be providing code reviews as needed, and has

Re: This video is dedicated to all of you

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:01 PM Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via > desktop-devel-list wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 18:30, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 19:24 +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella via desktop- > > >

GUADEC 2018 Registration is now open!

Hello Everyone! The GUADEC team is pleased to announce that registration for GUADEC 2018 in Almería, Spain, is now open! We look forward to seeing all of you for many days of talks, hackfests, and conversations. We have some amazing events including a beach party and a picnic during the

Desktop miniconf @ Linux Plumbers Conference

Hello folks! I recently had a discussion with the organizers of LPC. My basic complaint (as one of original organizers) was that they have strayed away from "plumbing" and userspace hasn't been represented as well as it could have been. That LPC has become almost all kernel. I was offered to

Re: Documentation - language default

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:51 AM Alexandre Franke <afra...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:18 PM Jeremy Bicha <jbi...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> Let me confirm and r

Re: Documentation - language default

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:18 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Allan Day wrote: > > Michael Hall wrote: > > ... > >> We have a project > >> on GNOME's Gitlab, a Telegram channel, and have been trying to hold >

Re: Documentation - language default

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:35 PM Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > Mostly because "promoting JavaScript" from a documentation point of view > isn't related to toolchain improvements. > Right. That's why I wanted to ask where we were with tooling when it came to javascript. Christian

Re: Documentation - language default

Hi Allan! On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:19 AM Allan Day wrote: > Michael Hall wrote: > ... > > We have a project > > on GNOME's Gitlab, a Telegram channel, and have been trying to hold > regular > > meetings on it. > > This is all news to me... it would have been

Re: Documentation - language default

or discuss on IRC. I'm not interested in creating undue conversations that will have no end. So please think before responding that it meets the topic of this conversation. sri > > -Bastian > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> &

Documentation - language default

Some of you may be aware that we have started a documentation effort in order to give application developers a proper set of documentation for them to write applications. We need to optimize for one language rather than promoting all the languages. In the past, we have promoted javascript above

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved and 'tips of the week'

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:07 AM Florian Müllner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Robert Ancell > wrote: > > You can also easily set up CI to build on multiple OSs (e.g. Ubuntu and > > Fedora). > > But please take into consideration that

Gitlab hosting - Fwd: Transmitter - GUI for transmission-daemon and transmission-remote

Since Sébastien brought this up. Do we want to advertise hosting space if people are thinking of writing GNOME applications as part of a greater desire to create a more solid GNOME/GTK+ developer community? Advantages are that we would be more active in what our developers are writing and see

Re: GitLab: Projects moved and some advice

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:23 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > > The goal for this week was that all newcomer projects > were moved, so we can > start modifying the newcomers guide. Unfortunately one of the newcomer > apps, GNOME

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57 PM wrote: > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > Looking over #8, I think duplicate issues, canned replies, and > > dependencies between issues should all be considered blockers to > > issue

Re: Projects page on wiki

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:19 PM Diane Trout <di...@ghic.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 22:41 +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > So we have this great projects page but it seems we need to clean up as a > lot of them seem inactive. I will likely go through them and post

Projects page on wiki

So we have this great projects page but it seems we need to clean up as a lot of them seem inactive. I will likely go through them and post the list that i believe are unmaintained and then get approval. If you want to help, please do. :-) I don't want people to waste their time looking at

Re: GNOME Mobile, or "GNOME on Purism's Librem 5"

Hi Matthias! Exciting news indeed! I personally would love to see our platform on a phone! On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 8:48 AM Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Hi! > > 2017-09-03 17:27 GMT+02:00 Alberto Ruiz : > > [...] > >> Did anyone try to use GNOME on a

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, 4:33 AM Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Before committing to tons more search providers, I'd like to see a bug > and some development effort dedicated to make the providers we already > ship more efficient. > Yes. This could be consolidated with the performance

Matrix as a replacement for Telepathy

I thought I would put it out there after some discussion to make sure it isn't a completely crazy idea. What do people think about integrating directly with Matrix as a replacement for Telepathy? This would mean that we can focus on chat, video-conferencing, and anything else through Matrix.

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:18 AM Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:42:07PM +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > I have gone ahead and contacted the > > owners of all the GNOME Goals that were more than a year old and asked > > whe

GNOME Initiatives

Looks like GNOME Initiatives could use with some updating as well. There are some that are current and some that might need to be revisited. For instance: Document Centric GNOME Memory Reduction There is not a lot actually. I know some of these are still ideas that people are pursuing but

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> > wrote: > > Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still > > something that is active?

Updating GNOME Goals?

Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still something that is active? I only ask as I know at least some that seem outdated to me. Two are /ModernAutotools and /NicerBuilds

Re: Paperwork / Gnome's dos and don'ts

Howdy! On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:57 AM wrote: > > b) Commercialization of Windows portage > > A while ago, I tried to sell the Windows version of Paperwork. It was > based on a 60 days trial > period + activation keys (the code is still visible on GitHub, but it is >

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

First off, thank you so much for all your contributions as a user and contributor. I think all of us appreciate that. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:27 PM Mirko Crowther via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > I'm *AGAINST* any initiative about moving GNOME to either GitLab

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:23 AM Allan Day wrote: > > We are confident that GitLab is a good choice for GNOME, and we can’t wait > for GNOME to modernise our developer experience with it. It will provide us > with vastly more effective tools, an easier landing for newcomers, and

Re: Stackexchange community for GNOME/GTK+

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:38 AM wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:02 AM Tobias Mueller > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> On Mi, 2017-05-10 at 08:04 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> > Looks like if you want to do this, we'd have to host it >> Or use

Stackexchange community for GNOME/GTK+

I'm creating a stackexchange community for the GNOME platform and the GTK+ toolkit. I'm looking for help in subscribing to the forum and of course some people who would be willing to answer questions. We have three days to build 5 followers and build about 5-10 questions that can be answered.

Re: Paperwork : a personal document manager (scanned and PDFs)

advice. Don't stop now! :-) sri > > 2 mai 2017 17:21 "Sriram Ramkrishna" <s...@ramkrishna.me > <%22sriram%20ramkrishna%22%20%3c...@ramkrishna.me%3E>> a écrit: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017, 5:54 AM <jfle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > First of all, I

Re: Paperwork : a personal document manager (scanned and PDFs)

On Tue, May 2, 2017, 5:54 AM wrote: > First of all, I want to thank you all for your comments and feedbacks. I > wasn't really expecting such a nice welcome :-) > Hopefully not because our reputation precedes us. :) > Regarding the HIG, you can actually also thank Mathieu

Re: Paperwork : a personal document manager (scanned and PDFs)

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:48 AM, jfle...@gmail.com wrote: 1 mai 2017 17:59 "Matthias Clasen" a écrit: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Jerome Flesch wrote: On Github, someone told me that there is someone else in the Gnome design team working

Re: How could GNOME become the de facto desktop environment

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella <es204904...@gmail.com> wrote: Sriram Ramkrishna: > Please be aware, that we were not involved in the decision by Ubuntu > to make GNOME the default desktop. If you are unhappy about this > decision, I strongly su

Re: How could GNOME become the de facto desktop environment

Alberto, On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:41 PM Alberto Salvia Novella < es204904...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782002 Thank you for your bug report. Clearly, you put some work into it with your included video link. Please be aware, that we were not involved in

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 To Ship with GNOME Desktop

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM Kunaal Jain wrote: > > Would love to have a community discussion on this! > > > Well I would say, we welcome the news and look forward to working together again. Not really much to discuss as you know, while great news.. GNOME marches on, and

Re: irc.gimp.org is now available via Matrix (was: Re: Thoughs about communication)

at stuff, will gather a bunch of feedback. So far the lack > of automatic gravatar support comes to mind. > > 2017-03-02 22:00 GMT+00:00 Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>: > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:53 PM Alberto Ruiz <ar...@gnome.org> wrote: > > Tried

Re: irc.gimp.org is now available via Matrix (was: Re: Thoughs about communication)

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM Matthew Hodgson wrote: > On 03/02/2017 15:57, Matthew Hodgson wrote: > >> On 3 Feb 2017, at 13:00, Alexandre Franke > >> Matthew, anything blocking the bridging on our side? > > > > Nothing blocking at all; it's all on our

Re: Improving the way we build nightly apps

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:16 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:50 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: > > You make it sound like there is already unanimous support for this > > (considering I've seen no discussion on the topic, I find that hard > > to > >

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:55 AM Allan Day <allanp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> > wrote: > ... > > My two cents, and bear with me on my slight rant - I really hate the idea > of depending on a web app l

Re: Thoughs about communication

Hi Matthew! On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:43 AM Matthew Hodgson wrote: > On 26/01/2017 22:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > > It would be really awesome to have a GNOME Chat app based on Matrix. > > Instead of implementing support for multiple protocols in the app, > > like we

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:52 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 20:56 +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM Allan Day <allanp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Attracti

Re: Thoughs about communication

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM Allan Day wrote: > > Attracting and retaining contributors has to be the most important > consideration. It's worth noting that IRC cuts in a few different > directions here: on the one hand, IRC means there's no barrier between us > and all

Re: [ Revised Proposal ] Continuous Builds in GNOME

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:45 PM Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 22:24 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > [...] > > > This of course, requires real thought and engineering, but I wanted > > > to > > > at least offer some technical input, some starting

Re: Continuous Builds in GNOME

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:03 PM Christian Hergert wrote: > On 06/06/2016 12:48 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I agree with you that when landing a big API change, if you don't want > > to use side branches, then a revert is less preferable to tagging in > > Continuous and

Re: Continuous Builds in GNOME

Hi Milan! On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:05 AM Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 09:49 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > A revert is not supposed to be "punishment" in any way... rather, > > consider it as assistance to make sure GNOME stays buildable. :) > > Hi,

Re: Continuous Builds in GNOME

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:42 AM Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sri; > > On 3 June 2016 at 02:53, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> wrote: > > I found this discussion really fascinating and so I wanted to continue > it, > > separately f

Continuous Builds in GNOME

I found this discussion really fascinating and so I wanted to continue it, separately from Emmanuele's thread so that issue is resolved without bifurcating the discussion. My thoughts are that we really shouldn't be looking at something and say 'well, we can't do it we don't have the resources'

LAS GNOME Conference - call for papers committee participation

Greetings! We are working on a new concept conference promoting applications in the Linux eco-system. LAS GNOME stands for Libre Application Summit hosted by the GNOME Foundation. This is an attempt to put together the great technologies we've created like xdg-app and OSTree and outreach to

Re: mutter plans for 3.22

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:01 AM Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi; > > On 22 March 2016 at 17:51, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> wrote: > > >> 1) put clutter and cogl in mutter > > > > > > Is clutter still via

Re: mutter plans for 3.22

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > More feature planning for 3.22: > > We've put a lot of effort into getting Wayland to feature parity, and > almost got there. Some of the remaining loose ends require closer > integration with cogl and clutter,

Re: GNOME Music needs you!

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:26 AM Allan Day <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> wrote: > ... > >> Music suffers more from rough edges than lack of features, in my > >> opinion. It would benefit greatly from a new maintainer, particular

Re: GNOME Music needs you!

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:19 AM Allan Day wrote: > Felipe Borges wrote: > ... > > Music is one of those core applications that we all love. It follows a > > design-oriented approach, and it's written on Python. > > > > Music has been a little

Re: Reminder: Bugzilla patch report and My Bugs page

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi all, > > We as a project have a problem with good patches getting lost in > Bugzilla. > > Maintainers, please try to minimize the number of patches in the > unreviewed or accepted-commit-* states for your

Re: GNOME Music needs you!

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:56 AM Felipe Borges wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Music is one of those core applications that we all love. It follows a > design-oriented approach, and it's written on Python. > > Music has been a little abandoned since the last release, and it

Re: Status Query: file-roller

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:16 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 02:17 +, Ikey Doherty wrote: > > If there are some mockups we can work from, it's something we can > > put some time into on our end :) Don't wanna see something we use > > so much go to

Re: Presentation

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:37 AM Pedro José Piquero Plaza wrote: > Hello GNOME developers, > I am a student of computer science (currently I am on my last year) in > Córdoba, Spain. I am GNU/Linux user since I was a teenager but I have > never contributed to any free/open

Re: GNOME Shell browser plugin

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:05 AM Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: > Michael Catanzaro writes: > > > Let's fix the issues instead, then. > > Michael, myself, Scott and others discussed this at GUADEC. Here are the minutes from that talk. We had outlined some

GTK+/win32 documentation is out of date

The wiki documentation building GTK+ on windows is out of date. I have a volunteer who will help document it if someone will spend the time with them on getting a win32 build up and running. In the meanwhile, I need someone who will archive these pages. We can't have documentation that go to

Re: Changing gnome-love to newcomers

at it means and so what we want to present outside of GNOME is something easy to understand. 'newcomer' would make sense to bugs being advertised on openhatch for instance. Great point, though, much appreciated. sri > > Evan > > On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 16:44 +, Sriram Ramkrishn

Re: Changing gnome-love to newcomers

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:59 AM SAHIL SAREEN wrote: > Hi Sri > > I agree that #newcomers is more descriptive and a better name, > but can we still have #gnome-love running for a couple of weeks with a BOT > message redirecting the users to #newcomers and > asking

Re: Changing gnome-love to newcomers

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015, 12:00 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: On 09/05/2015 06:44 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > Yes, and we'll need to figure out how hard that would be to change. > What would be an appropriate name to replace it? A newcomer keyword? I > kind of l

Changing gnome-love to newcomers

Does anybody have an objection to changing the irc channel from #gnome-love to #newcomers? We'll probably change wiki names and everything else associated with gnome-love over time. But the immediate change will be the irc channel. gnome-love isn't very descriptive at least for outsiders trying

Re: bugzilla commentary...

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:19 AM Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 17:40 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Maintainers, If you have a bug report where commentators where there are disagreements, please contact the engagement team How? I was thinking either popping

bugzilla commentary...

Maintainers, If you have a bug report where commentators where there are disagreements, please contact the engagement team so that we can look and help out. Sometimes it might just be an education issue. I think this will help with communication with the project and those who file bugs. sri

Re: Looking for speakers for hacknight in Gothenburg on Aug 11th

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:34 AM Andreas Nilsson li...@andreasn.se wrote: Hi all! FOSSGBG is a local free software group here in Gothenburg that has meetups every month or so to discuss various FOSS subjects. They're having an event on the 11th of August [1]. Since this overlaps with the

Re: Does GNOME Terminal need a UI update?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Justine O'Neil justine_on...@zoho.com wrote: P.S. Since this is my first post to the list, I suppose I should give a little introduction. I am a 23 year-old young lady going to university to study science and computing. I am getting my minor in computer

Re: Marco

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote: This is terrible news. I remember fondly working with him on Epiphany many years ago. His patience and good character were instrumental in getting me started on this whole crazy business, as I'm sure it was the case for many

Re: A dock

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM, alex diavatis alexis.diava...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Emmanuele, While I think we can discuss whether the presence of a dock could ensure gaining users, I also don't think GNOME needs to win back users in the first place. What that's supposed to mean? GNOME

Re: A dock

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:21 PM, alex diavatis alexis.diava...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Emmanuele, How you can see metrics when GNOME hasn't a metric system? :/ You can only see that by perception :) Right, so perception is not really accurate is it? :-) However, guess what? When we finally

Re: GNOME 3.15.92 Release Candidate

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Hello all, We have now reached the end of the development cycle and here comes a release candidate for you to download, build, and test. Enjoy it as fast as you can, the final release is scheduled next Wednesday. To

Re: Canonical jhbuild documentation

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Lasse Schuirmann lasse.schuirm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-03-13 21:01 GMT+01:00 Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com: Hi everyone again, Sorry for reborn this, but now that most of the changes for 3.16 are done, it's time to think again =) I have been

Re: Canonical jhbuild documentation

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez csori...@redhat.com wrote: - What do I propose? So, what we actually need is a Canonical documentation for contributing gnome. In developers.gnome.org. As I offered before for the Jhbuild one, I offer me volunteer (with whoever wants

Re: Canonical jhbuild documentation

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: ... Seems like you should talk this through with Carlos and Ryan - they're the effective maintainers of the wiki pages in question. I know that Carlos is keen to reduce the amount

Canonical jhbuild documentation

Problem: we have many pages on jhbuild documentation We want to eliminate all of this and have https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeLove/BuildGnome There seems to be some objections to removing some of the more in-depth jhbuild documentation. I think overall this is a little confusing, they are also

Re: Canonical jhbuild documentation

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Problem: we have many pages on jhbuild documentation Let's list them: 1. https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Jhbuild 2. https://developer.gnome.org/jhbuild/unstable/ 3. https://wiki.gnome.org

Re: I want to make a Gnome PC, what integration would you do?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Jason (spot) Brower encomp...@gmail.com wrote: Yikes, talking about a late response. I was on vacation, otherwise I would have answered this. No not a sales terminal, but a PC, just one model, no options, that would feature gnome and a selected repository of

Re: I want to make a Gnome PC, what integration would you do?

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Jason (spot) Brower encomp...@gmail.com wrote: One additional postscript. Please subscribe to engagement-l...@gnome.org. This is kind of off topic on desktop-devel which is concerned

Re: OUTAGE: bugzilla.gnome.org, 09th February (09:00 CET) - 10th February (22:00 CET)

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org wrote: The upgrade has been finalized and the machine is back to production. A special thank you goes to Andre Klapper and Krzesimir Nowak for their hard work to make this happen. We are also happy to announce Krzesimir has joined the

Re: Gnome / systemd

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:25:26AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote: Internet. The greatest way of changing minds and hearts is to be calm and coherent on what we're trying to do. That said, this thread and its replies are a

Re: new maintainer for gnome-dictionary?

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 08:59 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote: I dare to propose myself for maintainer. I have almost no experience in maintenance (I maintain libchamplainmm, which doesn't count); Looks like

Re: The GNOME Infrastructure is now powered by FreeIPA!

Andrea, Thank you for all you and Patrick's hard work on getting this done! Awesome! ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Giving up maintenership of my modules

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Thanks for announcing because many developers end up AWOL not realizing and overcommitting while time is precious. Wondering if Engagement / Outreach (CCed) has general thoughts on communicating modules in need of active

Re: Glade release to include GtkHeaderBar?

On Sep 4, 2014 6:47 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: None of this is new news of course - we've talked about it a lot in the past, and some work has been done. The problem is that no one has found the (probably significant) time to resolve the issues we're facing. We need a

Re: System services jhbuild

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: Unless someone has plans on fixing this (somehow) soon, I would suggest we either kick out all system services from jhbuild all together or at least remove them from dependency list of other modules. +1 for me,

Re: Glade release to include GtkHeaderBar?

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: Sriram Ramkrishna sriram.ramkris...@gmail.com wrote: ... We need a volunteer or many volunteer who can help here. Happily will mentor or find a mentor who is willing to put the time. Anybody interested in getting

Re: Glade release to include GtkHeaderBar?

On Sep 1, 2014 6:28 PM, meg ford meg...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: the C++, Python, and JS examples in gnome-devel-demos. If nobody volunteers to review them before 3.16, then I think they should be removed. I

Re: Glade release to include GtkHeaderBar?

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Joey Hain hain.jos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: If it is a problem with developer resources, perhaps I can try to find someone who is willing to help out provided there is a mentor? I'd

Glade release to include GtkHeaderBar?

Is this cycle's release of glade/libglade going to include GtkHeaderBar? I looked through the git history and I didn't see anything in there that indicated that anytihng was done. This: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700914 shows some progress. But it seems we have missed the cut

Re: Unreviewed patches - is the boat sinking?

On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Joanna Larsen oaksp...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I'm new to Gnome. Some time ago I started looking into the inner workings of it. Reading the source code, learning from it. Coming up with a few ideas. So I jumped on Bugzilla eager to fix bugs and contribute

  1   2   3   >