Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.5.0

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 03/29/2011 10:06 AM, Rob Davies wrote: +1 On 28 Mar 2011, at 21:03, Gary Tully wrote: Hi all, I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.5.0 release. The main points to note are described in the new features page:

Fwd: [SECURITY] Frame injection vulnerability in published Javadoc

Hi all, I guess that most of you already saw this warning e-mail. Camel, ActiveMQ, and CXF are affected (Karaf is not). I will start to review ActiveMQ today and Camel tomorrow. Is someone from CXF can take a quick look ? I will get back to you soon for ActiveMQ and Camel. Thanks ! Regards

Re: Fwd: [SECURITY] Frame injection vulnerability in published Javadoc

whirr.apache.org2 wicket.apache.org 3 wink.apache.org 13 ws.apache.org 22 xalan.apache.org1 xerces.apache.org 5 xml.apache.org 1 xmlbeans.apache.org 3 zookeeper.apache.org18 -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http

Re: [DISCUCSS] - Apache Camel 5.9 release

it seems like a last minute thing, and that possible let us forget some cool stuff. Maybe we should get on the habit and do like Camel and work on a release notes page during development - Any other stuff ? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http

Re: [DISCUCSS] - Apache Camel 5.9 release

forget some cool stuff. Maybe we should get on the habit and do like Camel and work on a release notes page during development - Any other stuff ? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Cleanup on HA website pages

and promote KahaDB as prefered solution. This page could be merged and adapted to be included in the KahaDB one. WDYT ? Thanks Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUCSS] - Apache Camel 5.9 release

: http://www.manning.com/ibsen -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Fwd: Signed CLA

have been invited as a committer, please advise the project PMC that your ICLA has been filed. Warm Regards, -- James Carman Assistant Secretary, Apache Software Foundation -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.0 - RC2

as Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.0 [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release

in the 5.9.0 release that have now been fixed and perhaps we should cut a release now before any major changes make their way into trunk? What do ya guys think? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release

. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.netwrote: Hi Hiram, I'm fully agree. I have some fix about OSGi and Karaf

Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release

fixed and perhaps we should cut a release now before any major changes make their way into trunk? What do ya guys think? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a sub-project.

Chirino's Bit Mojo -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.7.0 RC2

-- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ActiveMQ 5.8 - OSGi - Uber bundle now

://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ActiveMQ 5.8 - OSGi - Uber bundle now

-- Dejan Bosanac -- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi I would

Re: Fwd: ASF Board Report for Apr 2013 is now due

-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

OSGi dependency in ActiveMQ 5.3.2

Hi all, as you know, ActiveMQ is used in ServiceMix as default message broker. ServiceMix 3.3.x uses Spring configuration and loads the ActiveMQ bean in activemq.xml Spring file: beans xmlns:amq=http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core; !-- ActiveMQ JMS Broker configuration -- amq:broker

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.0

+1 (non-binding) Regards JB On 08/15/2010 09:01 AM, Rob Davies wrote: +1 On 14 Aug 2010, at 02:17, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 283 issues resolved. Please find the staging repo here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.5.1

to approve this release [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.5.1[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 Regards, Hiram FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com/ -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Jira versions not up to date

Hi all, The ActiveMQ Jira doesn't seem to be up to date. ActiveMQ 5.5.1 has been released (mostly the same as ActiveMQ 5.5.0 but with a license legal fix), however this version is still flagged as unreleased. Could you update it please ? Thanks Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

Re: Jira versions not up to date

Hi Dejan, yeah, it's done and the issues have been moved to 5.6.0 version. Thanks !! Regards JB On 10/21/2011 11:29 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: Hi JB, this should be fixed now. Thanks! Regards -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.0 - Release Candidate 2

-- Dejan Bosanac -- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.0 - Release Candidate 2

-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681843.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Better release notes for ActiveMQ releases

the information from the release notes to say something about the highlights. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ActiveMQ Monitoring alerts

-logstash-and-kibana/ Regards JB Thanks in advance ! Venu. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Monitoring-alerts-tp4682028.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http

Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2014

are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - ActiveMQ -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com/ -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org

Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ

and best regards, Clebert. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ

the existing flexibility of ActiveMQ with the performance of HornetQ. Anyway, these are just some initial ideas, for now I'm really just interested to know how the ActiveMQ community would feel about a donation of the HornetQ codebase. Thanks and best regards, Clebert. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

Re: OSGI ActiveMQ TCP port and webconsole

-ActiveMQ-TCP-port-and-webconsole-tp4683031.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ

+1 for separate repo. It makes sense. Regards JB Original message From: Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com Date:10/10/2014 16:20 (GMT+01:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Cc: Subject: Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ I'm +1 for a separate repo as long as

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ 5.10.1 release

will create a 5.10.x maintenance branch and start porting the most relevant and only compatible fixes. Thoughts? Hadrian -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

) Here's my +1 Regards, Gary. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt)

NOTE: I used Hadrian's prior thread as a template (thank you Hadrian). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-1-3rd-attempt-tp4689959.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt)

+1 (non binding) Regards JB Original message From: Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com Date:16/01/2015 08:02 (GMT+01:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Cc: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt) Hi I gave the RC a test spin with latest Camel

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming trunk to master

+1 Regards JB On 01/05/2015 07:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days. I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked. Any objection to rename? Hadrian -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net

Re: Improvments for the unix init script / ActiveMQ community work

-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ActiveMQ DSLs

. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ ActiveMQ's next generation

will be ActiveMQ 6. Cheers, Lionel Cons -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ ActiveMQ's next generation

-and-active-committers-td4685833.html [2] http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Accept-hornetq-code-grant-and-active-committers-td4686006.html -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pluggable Brokers...

there's an opportunity here as well. Thoughts? James -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: CPU core/thread scaling test

, It was mentioned on another thread that ActiveMQ has hard challenges with CPU core/thread scaling - I was wondering if there was a test case/script published some where that shows this issue occurring? Cheers, Jamie -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend

Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ ActiveMQ's next generation

. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Improvments for the unix init script

wants to discuss or merge these changes? :-) Secondly, i want to improve the documentation. May i have write access to the wiki - i.e. the pages referenced at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5448. Regards Marc -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [HEADSUP] ActiveMQ 5.10.3 release preparation

archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: New PR build for ActiveMQ 5.x

. If anyone would like to contribute something (e.g. a Maven profile) that Jenkins could invoke to perform this general testing for PRs feel free. I can change the job to execute any Maven target. The job is at https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-PR-Build/. Justin -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

Re: Naming Suggestions?

: @hiramchirino -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename

. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Calling ActiveMQ committers

/activemq/pulls ? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: ApacheCon 2015

if possible. Before I do this, however, I'd like to know who else is planning to attend. Bruce -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Discussion: JMS 2.0 API support

-support-tp4681089p4697789.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0

-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=a9eeb03520f074d5013239b8d8708a05ba31e176 Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0 [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré

RE: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2

+1 RegardsJB Original message From: Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org Date: 06/08/2015 16:57 (GMT+01:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2 This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.2 Staging area:

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.3

=a820bfb4c5489ed842efc6ef5702f0fc21975c41 Issues resolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12333254 This vote will be open till Monday. Here is my +1 -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1 [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 (non-binding) -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1 [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 (non-binding) -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [HEADSUP] ActiveMQ 5.12.2 release

?projectId=12311210=12333874 Most importantly, it contains the fix for CVE-2015-5254. If anyone has any blockers, let me know. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0

of libaio is optional anyways and the system works as expected. what also covers other questions we had here on this thread. -- Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré j

Re: Artemis OSGi: Prototype available

protocols using: feature:repo-add mvn:org.apache.activemq/artemis-features/1.1.1-SNAPSHOT/xml feature:install artemis-core artemis-hornetq artemis-stomp artemis-mqtt artemis-amqp I would be happy about your feedback. Christian -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.13.0 Release Date

/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12329848 I was thinking about calling a vote for a release in the 2-3 week time frame and wanted to see if there were any blockers that would prevent this. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: “No space left on device (28)” error while running C Client producer

at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Active MQ docker image

Hi I already have an improved docker image with karaf and ActiveMQ. We have a discussion at Apache about where to put this. For now it's on my local server. I don't think it should go directly in the project. Regards JB On Aug 16, 2016, 09:10, at 09:10, "Ismaël Mejía"

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ utility project name

Agree to create a more generic repo as it could contain different modules in the future. Regards JB⁣​ On Feb 1, 2017, 13:45, at 13:45, Christopher Shannon wrote: >I'm going to ping infra to create a new project but wanted to get some >feedback from people

Re: [Discuss] Move camel-activemq component to camel project and deprecate camel plugin for broker

Hi Christian It sounds good to me. Thanks. Regards JB On Feb 7, 2017, 06:38, at 06:38, Christian Schneider wrote: >There are some issues supporting the new camel version 2.18.x in >activemq. See > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6585 > >In the issue we

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ utility project name

Yes, it just takes some time for the first sync. Regards JB⁣​ On Feb 2, 2017, 17:58, at 17:58, Christopher Shannon wrote: >I believe the mirror should happen automatically within 24 hours. > >On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andy Taylor

Re: Many old open PRs

Good idea Hadrian. I will try to take a look. Regards JB ⁣​ On Oct 23, 2016, 03:48, at 03:48, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >There are a number of old, even very old, PRs open [1]. Some I suspect >are not relevant anymore. It'd be great if somebody could look into >them >and

Re: Many old open PRs

erging the PR >- by adding a commit saying. > "This closes #NR" >- by asking infra > > >If the PR is stale you will need to ask infra. As no one outside the >Apache >infra have auth to close the PR. > >On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...

Re: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation

+1 Regards JB ⁣​ On Nov 16, 2016, 12:15, at 12:15, Dejan Bosanac wrote: >+1 > >Regards >-- >Dejan Bosanac >http://sensatic.net/about > >On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Bennet Schulz >wrote: > >> +1 >> >> > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:16 schrieb Clebert

Re: ActiveMQ and Consul

of networks. This is a proof of concept, just to show it’s possible. I hope this helps others. Cheers, Antoine -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Many old open PRs

d a closer attentions. I saw that cshannon merged a PR, I looked at it too, but I am not sure how it was tested as many test fail intermittently, some just fail and jenkins didn't have a clean build in a while. I'll look into those too. Cheers, Hadrian On 10/23/2016 02:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

+1 Regards JB ⁣​ On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen wrote: >+1 > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic > wrote: >> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I >> don't really think anyone will be

Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis 2.0.0 target features

Agree with Christian. It's a bit unfortunate. Regards JB⁣​ On Dec 8, 2016, 07:53, at 07:53, Christian Schneider wrote: >As artemis is an open source project I would not use a marketing like >reason for a new major version (like a certain feature set). >Instead I would

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.2

. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.2 [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 (binding) Regards JB⁣​ On Dec 19, 2016, 14:02, at 14:02, Christopher Shannon wrote: >+1 > >On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Christian Schneider > wrote: >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Christian >> >> On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp

Re: [DISCUSS] Web site update

:). Maybe bring Artemis a bit more up front on the website and make the look and feel a bit more modern and clean. Anyone available to help here? :) -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.1 #2

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Sep 28, 2017, 19:23, at 19:23, Clebert Suconic wrote: >+1 > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM Robbie Gemmell > >wrote: > >> On 28 September 2017 at 16:04, Christopher Shannon >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.2

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Oct 18, 2017, 12:56, at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >On 17 October 2017 at 15:37, Christopher Shannon > wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.2 release and it's ready for a vote. >>

Re: Twitter

No objection from my side. Regards JB On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" wrote: >Hi All, > >I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase >the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have. > >It is possible to

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.4

+1 Regards JB Le 17 mai 2018 à 20:15, à 20:15, Christopher Shannon a écrit: >Hi Everyone, > >I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.4 release and it's ready for a vote. >This >release includes 10 fixes/improvements. > >The list of resolved issues is here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5 #2

ivemq.git;a=commit;h=e411ed4af0fbbae3706c5941f6c84a5722d40361 >> >> Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72 >> hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5 >> [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) >> >> Here's my +1 >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5 Release

4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5 Release

Hi Christopher, I have a couple of improvements that I'm planning (index to improve performance with JDBC persistence adapter when the number of pending messages is high, the backoff multiplier handling when using non blocking redelivery, ...). However, they are not release blocker. Regards JB

[PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

Hi guys, If there's no objection, I would like to submit ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release to vote today. It includes several fixes and improvements: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12344049 No objection ? Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

I can also tackle that if you want. Up to you. Thanks ! Regards JB Le 22 oct. 2018 à 18:04, à 18:04, Christopher Shannon a écrit: >I can create the release and call a vote tomorrow morning if there are >no >other blockers that come up. > >On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 1:46 PM jgenender wrote: > >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

nt fix. > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:33 PM alan protasio wrote: > >> I think worth trying to include >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7082 >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 5:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

out so i don't think we should release > until then > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7080 > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:32 AM Jamie G. wrote: > >> Sounds good :) >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

t; See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7080 > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:32 AM Jamie G. wrote: > >> Sounds good :) >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> If there's no

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7

+1 Thanks ! Regards JB On 24/10/2018 16:41, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have created the 5.15.7 release and it is ready for a vote. > > The list of resolved issues is here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12344049 > > You can

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.7 release

Sounds good, thanks ! Regards JB On 23/10/2018 17:43, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I will take care of it but I’m unexpectedly out of the office today so I > plan to do the release first thing early tomorrow morning (US eastern time) > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:06 PM Jean-Bap

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.8

+1 Regards JB Le 14 nov. 2018 à 20:43, à 20:43, Heath Kesler a écrit: >+1 > >Heath > >> On Nov 14, 2018, at 2:03 PM, alan protasio >wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> >> Alan Diego >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:25 AM jgenender >wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: >>>

Re: Need contribution for October ASF Board report

he board on Oct 10. > > Thank you in advance! > > Bruce > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

[PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org

-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org

now or wait a little > bit. If we have releases imminent, I’d say wait till after the release. > Otherwise, I’m OK at any time. > > Dan > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >>

Re: [Discuss] Refactoring KahaDBStore class

st-practice, and there >> are >>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>> individuals looking at these code changes now. More are >>> always >>>>>> welcome, >>>>>>>>>> and access is certainly not

Re: [Discuss] Refactoring KahaDBStore class

> Perhaps future passes for new Java features (bring all code up to Java > 8 perhaps?). > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:32 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi Jamie, >> >> That's interesting. >> >> What's the rationale behind the refactoring ? Ne

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release ActiveMQ 5.15.9 ?

port any bugs so we aren't quickly turning around > and having to do a 5.15.10 and 5.15.11 etc and allow more changes to go > into a 5.15.9. > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 3:16 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> For ActiveMQ 5.15.7, I did a c

[PROPOSAL] Release ActiveMQ 5.15.9 ?

jira/browse/AMQ-7076). I would like to know if you would agree if I quickly do a ActiveMQ 5.15.9 release to include this fix, in order to limit the impact of the users. Thoughts ? Thanks and sorry about that :/ Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Ta

Re: Cassandra Persistence Adapter

tinued QSandra project it seems that no one is > interested in a Cassandra persistence adapter, is there any specific reason > to that? > > Ivan > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...

Re: Cassandra Persistence Adapter

abase. > > Is kahaDb reliable and well performing ? > > Regards > I > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >