Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > In a library that has: > > apr_pstrdup() > apr_pstrndup() > apr_pstrmemdup() > which are all semantically and mechanically different... > and apr_pstrmemdup() and apr_pstrndup() are functionally

Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET < > christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just in case off, gnome as a set of function g_ascii_... >>

Fwd: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)

tl;dr - feel free to skip "httpd" specifics to get to the meat of the APR discussion items. -- Forwarded message ------ From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:42 AM Subject: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n

Re: Optimization, modern C and APR 2.0 onwards

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 11/20/2015 07:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > I'm wondering how the group would react to refactoring some of APR 2.0 > > to either offer inline code for many of our heavily consumed fu

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

roposed apr_str[n]casecmp > function do that POSIX.1 strcasecmp doesn't do? > > I guess that's two questions, either of which may be stupid. > > Is this is a performance issue? Supporting non-ASCII is a waste of time? > > Thanks, > -chris > > On 11/23/15 11:58 AM, Willia

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

docs and usage to remove the "greater/less than" > criteria and just say equal strings return 0 and non 0 means that > the strings don't compare/are different? > > > On Nov 23, 2015, at 10:19 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > > > On

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > +1 to apr_casecmpstr[n]() with a big fat warning in the docstring that > it works for ASCII only. > Well, it 'works' (does not segfault, does not case fold them) for high bit characters, but sorts them in a potentially

Optimization, modern C and APR 2.0 onwards

I'm wondering how the group would react to refactoring some of APR 2.0 to either offer inline code for many of our heavily consumed functions, or offering inline + fn implementations alongside one another? Would it still be necessary in this day and age to support C compilers that do not support

Re: Optimization, modern C and APR 2.0 onwards

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > If we are serious about having a serious update to APR, I > > would recommend that we use more up-to-date data structures, > > patterns and

Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0? It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about case-insensitive token string recognition, and non-POSIX char case gets weird quickly. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Nov 20,

Re: expat upgrade to 2.1.0

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 31 Oct 2015, at 7:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > > > I would like to repspond positively on this suggestion that "something" > be done. > > It could be updated, and fortunately expat is not a package

Re: IRIX errno for apr_stroff, apr_atoi64

Any chance you could review the man page of these functions on IRIX and report back, specifically return value and error exceptions? MAX is a valid value. They might be playing some game with endptr to signify errors. On Oct 14, 2015 18:17, "Rainer M. Canavan" wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: 100% CPU usage on apr_pool_cleanup_run ()

I don't see args in your backtrace, perhaps rebuild apr + your app with -g, or if it is a system package, install corresponding debuginfo for apr? On Oct 3, 2015 10:48, "Loïc BLOT" wrote: > Hello dev@apr.apache.org > Thanks for your library, it's very useful. > > I

Re: Bug Reports for APR?

I just looked at our sidebar and contributing pages and you are right, 12+ years later we still forgot to point that out :) Thanks for the observation, I see Dongsheng answered your question, but we will get this right for other users. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jeffrey Walton

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On Sep 5, 2015 10:14 AM, "Branko Čibej" <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util, > > and that library no longer draws in sub-dependencies until specific

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On Aug 28, 2015 9:24 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Am 28.08.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Michael Schlenker: Cmake provided project/nmake/make files have one issue though, which might not be obvious to someone never using cmake: Those depend on cmake for a variety of tasks (e.g.

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On Aug 27, 2015 3:47 AM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: On 8/26/2015 9:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM, Branko Čibejbr...@apache.org wrote: On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Several years ago, we combined

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote: That's why I want us to extend cmake to do the unix build as well. The biggest bitch I here from *nix/bsd system admins everywhere is cmake, the largest bitch is people know how to use --with-foo --with-bar now

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util, and that library no longer draws in sub-dependencies until specific

Time for APR 2.0?

Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util, and that library no longer draws in sub-dependencies until specific components are necessary (dbm providers, dbd providers, crypto providers etc). It seems overtime that we produce a release based on that effort, I'm offering

Fwd: Vulnerability in APR-UTIL, perhaps APR

Thanks Daniel, sharing this with the dev@ list, as the problem and the fix are both public. Folks, what are your thoughts? Our expat is already quite old, and the current release was 2.10, while we were still shipping 1.95.7, before this issue popped up. Bumping major versions in a subversion

Re: [Patch] apr_file_path_merge returns incorrect truepath on certain 'short paths' on Windows

Looks great, thanks Brane, and Bert for calling this out. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 17.06.2015 15:53, Branko Čibej wrote: Thanks for the reminder! Will do. On 17 Jun 2015 12:37 pm, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015

Re: [Patch] apr_file_path_merge returns incorrect truepath on certain 'short paths' on Windows

Great report, thanks Bert. I'll review. Bill On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: Trying yet another e-mail address... Nice that this just bounces instead of being moderated :( Bert -Original Message- From: Bert Huijben

Re: docs

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The docs cleanup has broken a TON of links... Do a search on any APR function and chances are good that results will refer to the now-nonexistant 1.3/1.4 urls. Just learning for the first time that apr's apmail config

Pruning APR 0.9 from the site

I've finally gotten round to purging the antique 0.9 references. But please check out http://apr.apache.org/ just in case I'd missed something, thanks. It seems that anything older than 1.5 is now stale, so the old doc references didn't make much sense at this point. Bill

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

And I see this was then addressed an hour later - still learning nuances of gmail filtering and threading. Thanks again, Jeff :) Bill On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:00 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: I am searching and do not see a call for vote on APR until Gregg just replied.

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

. My 2c USD (which apparently is worth a lot more than it used to be, heh). Bill On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:02 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: And I see this was then addressed an hour later - still learning nuances of gmail filtering and threading. Thanks again, Jeff

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

I am searching and do not see a call for vote on APR until Gregg just replied. I'd love to have this done, but doubt it is legit to start a clock on some other project's post ;-/ Me, myself, am looking forward to reviewing and integrating in the morning here. Thanks Jeff. Bill On Mon, Apr 27,

Retirement plan for apr-iconv?

Because we haven't had the voters to approve a release subsequent to apr-iconv 1.2.1, and this code is significantly out-of-date, I'd like to propose we shutter the codebase. Since we grabbed that particular starting point, GNU libiconv became the maintained reference standard for glibc. IBM's

Re: ABI compatibility tracker for APR

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:39:42 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/apr.html Nice! Thanks Jeff... I like the semantic change warnings, it ties in nicely to our recent rehash of versioning rules at APR. The 0.9 1.x modulo warning was pretty funny - and

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:56:14 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: It seems that the implementation is not that broken actually.

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:57:22 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Mar 7, 2015, at 2:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:19:40 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: After doing some additional research, I think

Re: Skiplist duplicates

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:36:55 -0400 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: No, it's a design error. There's not much helping that... once it ships, that's our implementation. Might caution us to provide more careful code review before n.n.0 releases on new features. S if

Re: Skiplist index on demand

By APR's revisioning rules, this proposal is invalid. The API cannot change behavior now that 1.5.0 has flown the nest. We'll need the converse, an API after creation to disable the indexing or, the other usual implementation is to add a create_ex() facility with the option to enable/disable the

Re: digest functions and validation

I would suggest that is a role for more cryptographic or hash provider libraries. These were included based on their prevalence in web and similar protocols, not for cryptographic strength. On May 2, 2014 6:59 PM, Helmut Tessarek tessa...@evermeet.cx wrote: I'm wondering why APR only supports

Re: permissions

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:47:49 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Any reason why we've never pulled http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=741869 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=741862 into apr-1.5 ? If these look useful, and adding

Re: New apr_sockaddr_info_copy() function

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:24:47 +0100 Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose the following/attached patch which adds the apr_sockaddr_info_copy() function to network_io. It can be useful when one wants an existing apr_sockaddr_t with a different lifetime (pool)

Darwin HFS+ filename case patch 1/2

You can find the first of two patches, this first for the apr_fileinfo api, which introduces [f]stat style support to resolve the canonical form of a given filename. APR_FINFO_NAME should return the corrected case/filesystem representation of the given name.

Re: Race condition in APR_DECLARE_LATE_DLL_FUNC() implementation

On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:44:52 +0100 Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100 Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: I think the dll load function should be converted

Re: CMake build doesn't define 'WINNT', but apr headers check for it anyway

On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:24:24 -0800 Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: Once all the 9x stuff is gone, we can drop the define. Precisely. And that would be a version-major/minor change, imho. In the interim, simply -D (ugh... /D it) WINNT. Problem solved. Leave it there for someone to discover

Re: Race condition in APR_DECLARE_LATE_DLL_FUNC() implementation

On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100 Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there instead of loading them

Re: buffered files read after apr_file_close()'ed

On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:55:25 +0100 Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote: Am 03.12.2013 15:15, schrieb Daniel Lescohier: However, the functions still need to change to return errors for the cases when they are unbuffered files. The buffer won't be referenced (and cause a crash) in those

Re: buffered files read after apr_file_close()'ed

On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 01:34:58 +0100 Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 02.12.2013 01:29, Eric Covener wrote: I am looking at a httpd bug that causes a hang on windows but succeeds on unix. It seems that (short) files are opened w/ buffering, read, apr_file_closed, and read again

aprutil ./configure rpath/LDADD magic [was: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.3]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:16:00 +0100 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Summary === [...] - crypto configure for OpenSSL expected to fail at least on Solaris, because when linking against the libssl we need the additional flags -ldl -lsocket -lnsl. Currently there's no

Re: svn commit: r1541745 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/Makefile.in

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:56:58 +0100 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Personally I think people doing out of tree builds are a minority and can cope with a small Makefile patch. Theyshould be OK with it already being fixed for the next release, so for me it wouldn't be a reason to

Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyan achalo...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most likely, then testing _MSC_VER only is not enough or appropriate. Please note, if one uses VS2013 (_MSC_VER == 1800), it doesn't necessarily

Re: testdup test fails when compiled in debug mode on Windows

On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:43:07 -0500 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:07:37 -0800 Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote: On 11/6/2013 1:06 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I

Re: Which of y'all are working on un-APR-izing gen_test_char, and how will the rest of us know if it is stalled and needs help?

On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:20:00 +0100 Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On 05.11.2013 22:51, Graham Leggett wrote: On 05 Nov 2013, at 11:04 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: TIA! (ping) If nobody in the gen_test_char-with-traditional-Windows-build sub-thread knows what

Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:49:22 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyan achalo...@yahoo.com wrote: These errors are caused by the use of the new Platform Toolset v120 which gets installed with VS2013. More specifically, the problem is in the function cast wrappers defined in apr_atomic.c and used only for

Re: testdup test fails when compiled in debug mode on Windows

On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:07:37 -0800 Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote: On 11/6/2013 1:06 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I just played with _commit() on stdin a bit. It turns out that _commit(0) fails if stdin is redirected (main.exe somefile) but works if stdin is a tty. That's the

Re: I'm planning to TR apr-util 1.5.3 at same time as apr 1.5.0

On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:17:43 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: There is a need to consume the cmake support downstream, and I see a few other fixes as well. (Please no apr-util 1.6 and corresponding rush to cram a bunch of stuff in there like I and others did with apr 1.5 ;) That

Re: SHA2 in APR

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:17:33 +0100 Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote: On 10 Oct 2013, at 21:49, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: The reason I've recently gotten interested in APR (and SHA support) is my work on https://github.com/mozilla/mod_authn_persona. OK, that raises two questions: 1. From

Re: [PATCH/RFC] no more 0.9.x releases or patches

Notwithstanding where other consumers sit, +1 from httpd perspective. On Nov 3, 2013 7:09 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: apr-0.9.x has a few fixes queued up, but I don't see any reason to release them since httpd 2.0.x is retired. Index: xdocs/index.xml

Re: svn commit: r1536785 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/include/private/apr_escape_test_char.h

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:17:24 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Tue Oct 29 16:08:31 2013 New Revision: 1536785 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1536785 Log: Remove generated file from

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:00:26 -0700 Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: On 10/28/2013 2:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400 Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: On Mon, 28

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700 Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead? You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build completely? -1 Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700 Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead? You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build completely? -1 I currently do not see the problem with

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:32 +0100 Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and headers buys us anything

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: Just a note, On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg

Re: gen_test_char build needs some help in the autoconf-based build

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:01:56 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: apr trunk on Unix: It gets built then run only after all .o files are generated, so it doesn't have the expected impact. .o/.lo/.libs (for gen_test_char) in tools don't get cleaned, so you may just see the link

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net

Re: gen_test_char build needs some help in the autoconf-based build

No... the entire dependency is on excluding it from svn. Please remember that default timestamps in svn are worthless and whatever you checked in is platform specific. On Oct 28, 2013 7:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm

Re: [PATCH] Global vs. Local prefix on named mutexes and named shm on Windows

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:47:35 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: Replacing Global with Local would basically limit the apr_shm API and it won't allow IPC using shm across sessions. With services running in

Re: exclusive file access under Windows (Was Re: svn commit: r1534139 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ CHANGES file_io/win32/readwrite.c)

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:13:08 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote: Am 21.10.2013 20:39, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com mailto:s...@myarm.com wrote:

Re: exclusive file access under Windows (Was Re: svn commit: r1534139 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./ CHANGES file_io/win32/readwrite.c)

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:02 -0500 William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:13:08 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote: Am 21.10.2013 20:39, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Mon

Re: Add skiplist to APR 1.5 (Was: Re: event MPM (Was: Re: Planning for 2.4.7 in Oct))

+1 to moving ap skiplist to apr (trunk + 1.5 future release branch) On Sep 28, 2013 11:12 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 26 Sep 2013, at 15:44, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Like I said, I think that skiplist fits better in APR; in fact there are a few other things

Re: Using UNIX domain sockets with apr

Yes, that would work. Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Sent: dinsdag 17 september 2013 20:13 To: Timo Rothenpieler Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Using UNIX domain sockets with apr On Mon, 09 Sep

Re: Using UNIX domain sockets with apr

On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:06:34 +0200 Timo Rothenpieler t...@rothenpieler.org wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use unix sockets with the apr socket functions, but it seems like it doesn't support that. In the current trunk there's an APR_UNIX define, which comes with additional code to make the

Re: svn commit: r1518760 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x: CMakeLists.txt README.cmake include/apr.hwc

On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:53:43 +0200 Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: traw...@apache.org [mailto:traw...@apache.org] Sent: donderdag 29 augustus 2013 20:49 To: comm...@apr.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1518760 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x:

Re: svn commit: r1518760 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x: CMakeLists.txt README.cmake include/apr.hwc

On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:56:48 +0200 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 05.09.2013 21:19, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:53:43 +0200 Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: traw...@apache.org [mailto:traw...@apache.org] Sent

Re: Why does apr_file_read() with !APR_XTHREAD use mutexes on Windows

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:33:38 +0400 Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: Append is special, in that POSIX has an append flag on open() which handles atomicity of seek-to-end+write; so that mutex isn't needed on all operating systems. This is a case where Windows needs a mutex but Unix

Re: Why does apr_file_read() with !APR_XTHREAD use mutexes on Windows

, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 4/26/2010 2:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: So I don't think there's any hidden reason why a mutex should always be obtained on Windows. I too wouldn't be surprised if the fix breaks some app code somewhere

Re: Why does apr_file_read() with !APR_XTHREAD use mutexes on Windows

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:39:35 -0500 William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:33:38 +0400 Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: Actually Windows supports atomic seek-to-end+write: file should be opened with FILE_APPEND_DATA access right only [1] or Offset

Re: Did anybody ever play with cmake+apr and/or have any advice applicable to cmake+apr?

The only toggle is to choose RelWithDebInfo as the cmake target (as opposed to Release or Debug). Pretty straightforward.

Re: Did anybody ever play with cmake+apr and/or have any advice applicable to cmake+apr?

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:47:46 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this week, for the purposes of getting a flexible build on Windows. Enough time to get something working? Dunno :( Just FYI, RELWITHDEBINFO was a broken

Re: Did anybody ever play with cmake+apr and/or have any advice applicable to cmake+apr?

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:47:46 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this week, for the purposes of getting a flexible build on Windows. Enough time to get something working? Dunno :( Feel free to attack it from either

Re: apr / apr-util roadmap

On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:06:03 +0200 olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, is there a public roadmap for apr and apr-util? I remember I have read something like changing to cmake. Also in the past there where sometimes a apr-2 snapshot where everything was delivered in one big distfile.

Re: apr-util v1.6 branch?

Is there any discussion yet of shipping this feature in 1.x as opposed to 2.0? As Jeff wisely points out, the multitude of branches does become overwhelming for keeping bug fixes in sync across all. Is it simple enough to keep it as a patch, for now, which you could easily apply to 1.6.x branch

Re: Apr Website: Canonical docs

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:38:02 + (UTC) Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: - Original Message - Hi all, Am 04.04.2013 13:44, schrieb Jeff Trawick: For a more complete list, please refer to the following URLs: http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/modules.html

Re: undefined reference to `apr_pool_mutex_set'

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:14:31 + (UTC) Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: Hi folks, I'm having issue with a piece of software (unimrcp) failing to build: Making all in unimrcp-server make[2]: Entering directory `/build/unimrcp/platforms/unimrcp-server' /bin/bash

Re: using new apr-util command-line make files... stuck on apr-iconv

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:50:45 +0200 Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote: What about the offering[1] from Pierre (MS guy) to write a script that generates the mak files? Just in case you don't want to do it yourself ;) Why not taking advantage of that? Because no such offer exists to dev@apr? A

Re: using new apr-util command-line make files... stuck on apr-iconv

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:14:42 -0400 Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid. I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1 (to get

Re: using new apr-util command-line make files... stuck on apr-iconv

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:41:16 -0700 Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: On 3/30/2013 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: To state the obvious, I'm

Re: missed aprutil.make file

On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:13:25 +0800 shangyu yush...@outlook.com wrote: Hi dear all,When compile apr-util-1.5.1 with nmake , this file is missed . Any suggestion ? Many thanks!!! As has been pointed out, this was last updated with 1.3.x. In each successive 1.x release, some old and crusty

The next configure schema? [was: missed aprutil.make file]

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:41:39 -0500 William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: The right solution is to export them using the (portable) scons or cmake. My own preference is cmake, which I've worked on quite a bit in the past couple years. Paul introduced a partial scons solution

Re: apr_socket_t hacking

On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:59:43 +0100 Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: More recently, I wanted to add optional TLS support to dynalogin. It also uses APR sockets. I repeated the same trick, but I'd prefer to find a more elegant solution than:

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

On 8/22/2012 10:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Sent: zondag 12 augustus 2012 19:40 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0 On 8/10/2012 1:05 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Thanks

Re: apu-util DBD back-ends

On 8/15/2012 6:10 PM, olli hauer wrote: On 2012-08-16 00:25, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 8/15/2012 4:03 PM, olli hauer wrote: Is there a way to find out if apu-util has support for different DBD backends like pgsql / sqlite3 / mysql ... I could test if apr_dbd_$dbtype exist, but this looks

Re: svn commit: r1367943 - /apr/apr/trunk/build/apr_hints.m4

On 8/1/2012 5:02 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Wed Aug 1 12:02:00 2012 New Revision: 1367943 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1367943view=rev Log: Update for Mountain Lion / OSX 10.8 / Darwin 12.x -*-apple-darwin1[[01]].*) +

Re: Build of libapritil-1.lib failed on Windows using VS2008

On 7/26/2012 4:23 PM, Prakash Reddy Bande wrote: Hi, If we are using apr in multi threaded environment, what is a better choice? Static libs or dlls? Red herring. If you are using apr from multiple invocations of a process, or from multiple processes at once, a shared apr dll wins an

Re: Build of libapritil-1.lib failed on Windows using VS2008

On 7/18/2012 5:40 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Alona Rossen aros...@opentext.com wrote: Hello, Build of libapritil-1.lib failed on Windows using VS2008: 1Linking... 1 Creating library Debug\libaprutil-1.lib and object Debug\libaprutil-1.exp

Re: Choosing a stronger password hash algorithm

On 6/29/2012 4:23 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Therefore I will go ahead and add bcrypt support to apr-util which will be a big improvement for the 95% of users who don't need FIPS. It sounds to me that after we spent a great deal of time to make APR largely library agnostic, you are insisting

Re: Choosing a stronger password hash algorithm

On 6/24/2012 3:34 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Sunday 24 June 2012, Graham Leggett wrote: Ideally, like we have a generic synchronous encryption API, we should have a generic hash API too, so that the user can use whatever hash that the underlying toolkit provides. I rather like the fact

Fwd: Apache BarCamp Washington D.C

I hope many of you already saw this and might be considering attending to present whatever short topics you would like during the BarCamp about our projects! I'd asked and there is no plan -yet- for any Hackathon activity, but Tim indicated it might be able to happen. Would anyone be up for a

Re: Cannot find regex.h when building with Developer Studio 2010

On 4/30/2012 11:26 AM, shath...@e-z.net wrote: I looked at pcre-8.3, but did not find regex.h. Am I missing some other third party library? I could not find regex.h anywhere under apr/apr-util/apr-iconv. And I don't believe it is part of Dev Studio 2010. regex is older than gnu and was

Re: Date-Time Computations

On 4/19/2012 11:08 AM, shath...@e-z.net wrote: I have systems where native 64bit integers are not available. Surely your c tooling has 64 bit emulation already? If you are really reimplementing 64 bit math you are in for a world of hurt, and won't be nearly as efficient or defect free as if

Re: apr_proc_create {detached} pipes?

On 4/12/2012 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Has anyone else ever encountered an opportunity to detach a process, which you would still enjoy stdio channels to communicate? First I actually have bumped into this, but we didn't seem to leave much in the way of an apr_proc_detach

Re: apr_proc_create {detached} pipes?

On 4/15/2012 3:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:37:13PM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Has anyone else ever encountered an opportunity to detach a process, which you would still enjoy stdio channels to communicate? Yes, this is done in Subversion to run hook

Re: apr_proc_create {detached} pipes?

On 4/15/2012 12:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/15/2012 3:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:37:13PM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Has anyone else ever encountered an opportunity to detach a process, which you would still enjoy stdio channels to communicate

Re: apr_proc_create {detached} pipes?

On 4/15/2012 4:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:02:55PM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Stefan I don't see where you detach... did you simply mean that cmd3 was meant to use detached processes? As in, not of this process group? We might be talking of two different

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >