Sharmadha Sainath created ATLAS-1985:
Summary: Regression : Basic/DSL Query fired on PASSIVE server
redirects to ACTIVE server , adding an extra "amp;" to the parameters
Key: ATLAS-1985
URL: https://issues.apa
Hi Sarath,
Great, personally for the Entity's current relationshipAttributes, I
prefer relationships as it is simpler - is there a reason you need
attribute in the name?
all the best, David.
From: Sarath Subramanian
To: dev@atlas.apache.org
Cc: Madhan Neethiraj
Date: 24/07/
Current name of ‘relationshipAttributes’ makes sense looking from an entity
point-of-view – it distinguishes regular-attributes of an entity from
attributes injected by relationships. However, given that relationships can
themselves might have attributes, it can be confusing.
I was going to sug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61040/#review181192
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nixon Rodrigues
On July 24, 2017, 3:50 a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61040/#review181193
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nixon Rodrigues
On July 24, 2017, 3:50 a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61076/
---
Review request for atlas.
Repository: atlas
Description
---
https://issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098097#comment-16098097
]
David Radley commented on ATLAS-1984:
-
As per my dev list comment, I like the way of u
Personally I think 'relatedEntities' is clearer.
Best regards,
Graham
Graham Wallis
IBM Analytics Emerging Technology Center
Internet: graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com
IBM Laboratories, Hursley Park, Hursley, Hampshire SO21 2JN
Tel: +44-1962-815356Tie: 7-245356
From: Madhan Neethiraj
To:
David Radley created ATLAS-1986:
---
Summary: Rename relationshipAttributes in Entity to relationships.
Key: ATLAS-1986
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986
Project: Atlas
Issue
I'm good with relatedEntities
- relationshipAttributes is definately confusing
- relationships isn't clear to me
other options could include
- relatedEntityAttributes - but is a little longwinded
- injectedAttributes - another option but perhaps unclear for some
Nigel Jones, Analytics CT
On 19/07/2017 16:26, Graham Wallis wrote:
> I think that specifying the -source and -target options won't help
really.Thanks for doing the more detailed analysis.
> In my view the safest and preferred option would be to build, test
and run
> with Java 8; and to spot and patch any source incom
On 19/07/2017 16:45, David Radley wrote:
for Hadoop 3 to bring in Java 8 and Janus? We should look to see what the
migration considerations are for Hadoop 2 customers to move to Janus.
It's probably worth creating a subtask, or separate JIRA for the
specific data migration work.
Initially I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098166#comment-16098166
]
Nigel Jones commented on ATLAS-1982:
thanks for adding the user mailing list update to
On 23/07/2017 10:36, David Radley (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [~ivarea] some thoughts:
> I think there is a value in Atlas having the capability to validate
attribute values conform to a certain pattern.
I think there's 2 forms of validation here..
a) Capturing validation rules in Atlas - ie more met
On 22/07/2017 00:00, Madhan Neethiraj (JIRA) wrote:
> Madhan Neethiraj created ATLAS-1982:
> Summary: Update referenced to "incubator" in website
>
When INFRA update the mailing lists, I presume the old subscriber list
is still in place?
-> Users should update any email filters th
Hi all,
I have just had a chat with Graham. we are thinking that we should go with
relationships as the top level name. We also think we could helpfully add
in the related entity in the new class like this:
class AtlasRelationshipObjectId {
AtlasObjectId relatedEntity;
String relationsh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098207#comment-16098207
]
Israel Varea commented on ATLAS-1955:
-
I think these two validations will cover most o
I was just reading ATLAS-1870 which related to default audit
repositories. I see the default is HBaseBasedAuditRepository, and that
there is also NoopEntityAuditRepository, and InMemoryEntityAuditRepository.
I'm thinking that when Atlas is used in a non-hadoop oriented
environment it would be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61077/
---
Review request for atlas, Madhan Neethiraj and Sarath Subramanian.
Repository:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098330#comment-16098330
]
David Radley commented on ATLAS-1986:
-
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61077/
> Rename r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Radley resolved ATLAS-1986.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Rename relationshipAttributes in Entity to relationships.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Radley updated ATLAS-1986:
Attachment: ATLAS-1986.patch
> Rename relationshipAttributes in Entity to relationships.
>
On 12/07/2017 13:17, David Radley wrote:
> will derive the tags associated with an entity. We have not designed yet
> how to override this behaviour, when the propagation behaviour in the Def
> is not appropriate. I have not got the Jira number for this : by copy
> Madhan - do you have this for
David Radley created ATLAS-1987:
---
Summary: Relationship creation for many to many does not work.
Key: ATLAS-1987
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1987
Project: Atlas
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Radley updated ATLAS-1987:
Attachment: 0005LinkedMediaTypes.json
0210Glossary.json
0230Terms.jso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Radley updated ATLAS-1839:
Attachment: (was: 0230Terms.json)
> Area 2 of the open metadata model
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Radley updated ATLAS-1839:
Attachment: 0230Terms.json
> Area 2 of the open metadata model
> -
>
Hello Nigel,
This makes a lot of sense to me.
Does the Audit log interface assume a transactional backing store -so that
data updates and the audit log entry are committed in the same
transaction? If not then we might also want to consider a simple file
based audit log as the entry level ser
As I said earlier, I prefer “relatedEntities” – as this name states that the
values in this attributes are references to entities. I think “relationships”
is good as well. However, I would prefer to use “AtlasRelatedObjectId” instead
of “AtlasRelationshipObjectId” – as “RelationshipObjectId” mig
Hi Madhan,
I agree with you that AtlasRelationshipObjectId could be confusing; good
point.
I am thinking
- relatedEntities is a good name if we want to focus on the target
entities; in this case it makes sense to extend the objectid - as this
focuses on the target entity. I think this might b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sarath Subramanian reopened ATLAS-1986:
---
This change is not committed yet, moving to patch available state
> Rename relationshipAt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61085/
---
Review request for atlas, Madhan Neethiraj and Sarath Subramanian.
Repository:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098880#comment-16098880
]
David Radley commented on ATLAS-1986:
-
Hi Sarath,
Sorry about that - I am still quite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098905#comment-16098905
]
Sarath Subramanian commented on ATLAS-1986:
---
Yes, once the change is committed t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61085/#review181253
---
repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/
Sarath Subramanian created ATLAS-1988:
-
Summary: Implement REST API to search for related entities
Key: ATLAS-1988
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1988
Project: Atlas
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sarath Subramanian updated ATLAS-1988:
--
Description:
Add a new endpoint (v2/search/relationship) in DiscoveryREST to search for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sarath Subramanian updated ATLAS-1988:
--
Description:
Add a new endpoint in DiscoveryREST to search for related entities.
*v2/se
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61088/
---
Review request for atlas, keval bhatt and Madhan Neethiraj.
Bugs: ATLAS-1988
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sarath Subramanian updated ATLAS-1988:
--
Attachment: ATLAS-1988.1.patch
> Implement REST API to search for related entities
> --
David,
I would suggest going with the following:
class AtlasEntity {
// ...
Map attributes;
// ...
Map relationships; // Object type can be either
AtlasRelatedObjectId or Collection
}
class AtlasRelatedObjectId extends AtlasObjectId {
String relationshipGuid;
AtlasStruct relati
Apoorv Naik created ATLAS-1989:
--
Summary: Atlas Hooks should package atlas-intg jar
Key: ATLAS-1989
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1989
Project: Atlas
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apoorv Naik updated ATLAS-1989:
---
Attachment: 0001-ATLAS-1989-Hooks-to-include-atlas-model-classes-atla.patch
> Atlas Hooks should packa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61100/
---
Review request for atlas.
Bugs: ATLAS-1989
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nixon Rodrigues reassigned ATLAS-1985:
--
Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues
> Regression : Basic/DSL Query fired on PASSIVE server redire
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61100/#review181317
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Madhan Neethiraj
On July 25, 2017, 5:38
46 matches
Mail list logo