Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1808
This in reference to a query on user@, where a user failed to build from
source tarball due to incorrect version set in tools/checkstyle/pom.xml.
@jburwell this needs to be included
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1808
CLOUDSTACK-9648: Fix release script to update checkstyle pom
This fixes build_asf.sh release script to update checkstyle pom.xml with the
provided new version.
You can merge this pull
John,
I'll have a look at where/how the fingerprint method is used, if necessary I'll
upgrade it to use SHA-256. Thanks for the pointers.
Regards.
From: John Kinsella
Sent: 02 December 2016 13:12:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
All,
It seems that TravisCI is experiencing issues in their infra [1][2], and
furthermore they have introduced changes in their default environment [3]
yesterday due to which MySQL installation fails while deploying a simulator
based environment. Due to these issues, TravisCI won't be
2 thoughts:
1) I know this is partially git’s fault on the diff, and i know this is a
standard gripe from me, but for reviewers things are much easier if
syntax/whitespace changes are separated out into a separate patch from
logic/functionality.
2) One thing that caught my eye was the SHA-1
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-303
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
Thanks @dsclose can you help review PR #1659 and see that all of your
changes are ported too, in which you may close your PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
Pinging for review -- @jburwell @abhinandanprateek @borisstoyanov
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
CLOUDSTACK-9633: Revert addition of `vhd` extention to snapshots
This reverts commit f1fd325c085cd61336ac616ba76e2c1f3f916cd1 and changes
introduced in commit
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600#discussion_r90595496
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -538,7 +562,7 @@ public
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Test lgtm, @murali-reddy are we good on this PR? I'm seeing some failures
though not sure if they related to your changes. /cc @jburwell
@abhinandanprateek
---
If your project is set up for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
Test lgtm, based on the test results I'm seeing no new failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1764
Thanks @marcaurele
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1764
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@mike-tutkowski you please fix the git commit summary (not the PR summary)
in the requested format? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Test LGTM. @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy can you give a final
review/lgtm?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726#discussion_r90594621
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -2199,15 +2199,20 @@ public void cleanupDownloadUrls(){
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765#discussion_r90594670
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -100,36 +100,25
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill @jayapalu thanks for your work, can you rebase against latest
master, fix the conflicts. Also use the JIRA id in the git commit summary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1795
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
@sudhansu7 this may be useful, can you at least change the PR's base branch
to 4.9?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1798
@marcaurele one of the component tests have failed, please have a look
and/or push -f to rekick Travis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1803
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1804
@nitin-maharana this looks useful, can you change the base branch for the
PR to 4.9, rebase your PR branch against 4.9? Can you add a marvin test for
this?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1805
Nice fix, @sudhansu7 this looks useful, can you change the base branch for
the PR to 4.9, rebase your PR branch against 4.9?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
All,
I've sent a PR that will upgrade bountycastle dependency to the latest version
[1]. In terms of security, an upgrade is necessary though it would also require
for users (who are upgrading to 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0 or later) to destroy old
systemvms such as CPVM and SSVM so the agents that
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@karuturi ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1800
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1800
Thanks @syed I'll go ahead and merge this, as the changes confirm. I'm okay
that moving (4.10+) fwd we've `.vhd` extension in snapshot files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765#discussion_r90590680
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -100,36 +100,25 @@ protected
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@jburwell rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1797
@sudhansu7 could you please either add or update an existing a Marvin test
case to verify this change?
Also, this change seems like it would be useful for LTS users. Could you
please
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Tests look good so far, I'm waiting for a vmware specific test run to
complete. Some failures in kvm, xen are known intermittent failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@murali-reddy can you have a look at why private_gw failed again for vmware?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873#discussion_r90589284
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1719,6 +1719,7 @@ public boolean storagePoolHasEnoughSpace(List
volumes,
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873#discussion_r90589240
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1746,10 +1747,10 @@ public boolean
storagePoolHasEnoughSpace(List volumes,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
Test LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
@sureshanaparti sorry, this is a restricted command to avoid resource abuse
issues.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
Travis is failing due to an env issue in their VMs, I'm investigating it
with #1806
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
Thanks @ProjectMoon
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Thanks @ProjectMoon
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566
LGTM. Thanks @ProjectMoon
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1806
travis: cleanup apt before installing packages
This aims at fixing recent Travis failures.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
CLOUDSTACK-9632: Upgrade bouncy castle to version 1.55
- Upgrades Maven dependency version to v1.55
- Fixes bountycastle usages and issues
- Adds timeout to jetty/annotation scanning
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
I looked at the failure, all of them are environment related or known
intermittent failures. I'll proceed with merging this. LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
Trillian test result (tid-537)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34106 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user nitin-maharana commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1804#discussion_r90584766
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -3092,8 +3092,12 @@ public Vlan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Trillian test result (tid-534)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26155 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
Trillian test result (tid-536)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25203 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Trillian test result (tid-532)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35829 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Trillian test result (tid-533)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35604 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Trillian test result (tid-525)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 34869 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-302
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
@blueorangutan test centos6 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
Addressed all the changes suggested and rebased against latest master.
- Used CollectionUtils.isEmpty() as suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257#discussion_r90532049
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -138,6 +142,8 @@
@Inject
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1248
This PR is no longer valid since #1257 replaces this. Closing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sureshanaparti closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1248
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
Trillian test result (tid-520)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 38128 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user sgoeminn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r90520113
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/nuage-vsp/src/com/cloud/network/resource/NuageVspResourceConfiguration.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+//
+//
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
Coupled with @rhtyd's explanation, we can merge this PR if the current
blueorganutan run comes up clean.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@abhinandanprateek could you please rebase this PR to pick up the fixes to
the broken tests? I want to make sure that this PR doesn't introduce any
side-effects that break the test runs.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy @jburwell this may be useful for 4.9/lts,
would you like to review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
LGTM. Travis failure was due to an intermittent issue with oobm test, which
has been fixed now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@jburwell the issue was with an intermittent test that sometimes fail when
clocks get skewed in virtualized environment: `
HypervisorUtilsTest.checkVolumeFileForActivityTest:68 Didn't block long
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7
mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@murali-reddy @rhtyd can you investigate the Travis failures?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-301
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sgoeminn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r90510869
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/nuage-vsp/src/com/cloud/agent/api/manager/UpdateNuageVspDeviceCommand.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+//
+//
Github user sgoeminn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r90510701
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/nuage-vsp/src/com/cloud/agent/api/manager/CleanUpDomainCommand.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+//
+// Licensed
Github user sgoeminn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r90510516
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/nuage-vsp/src/com/cloud/network/element/NuageVspElement.java
---
@@ -387,41 +400,39 @@ public boolean
Github user sgoeminn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r90509963
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/nuage-vsp/src/com/cloud/network/element/NuageVspElement.java
---
@@ -387,41 +400,39 @@ public boolean
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-300
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
@rhtyd @jburwell
I think the fix for CLOUDSTACK-9376 will not address below scenario. I will
test this and confirm.
1. templatefilter=all or isofilter=all is applicable
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
Thanks @jburwell I'll get this re-tested against both Travis and Trillian.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
CLOUDSTACK-9632: Upgrade bouncy castle to version 1.55
- Upgrades Maven dependency version to v1.55
- Fixes bountycastle usages and issues
- Adds timeout to jetty/annotation scanning
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I'll take a look at this. It's been some moths but afaik I added that
extension because previously that code wasn't working. I'll take a look in
detail and let you guys know
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:34 mike-tutkowski wrote:
> Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
@rhtyd can you investigate why the fix for this issue in 4.5 was not pulled
forward? For traceability purposes, it would be preferable to forward merge
the fix than commit a new version of
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-299
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1786#discussion_r90487461
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
---
@@ -260,7 +264,7 @@ public boolean
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1800
Thanks, @rhtyd I've been trying to get test_snapshots.py to fail in my
environment, but haven't been able to.
I'll let @syed answer your question, Rohit, since that is a change
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
Trillian test result (tid-519)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27196 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1776
@priyankparihar could you please provide further explanation as to how this
fix addresses the issue of `concurrent.snapshots.threshold.perhost` not being
validated?
Also, is there an
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1802
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo