Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

ote: >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> Thank you everyone for your feedback. Given we're in agreement with >>>>> >>>> Daan's proposal, I'll summarize and add strategy: >>> >>>> - We'll freeze the 4.11 milestone to only thes

Re: Which StringUtils to use?

I'd say remove as much functionality as we can from 'our' StringUtils and phase them out asap. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > We have com.cloud.utils.StringUtils which has a few nice functions, but > throughout the code I also see

Re: cloudstack Wikipedia page

just anonymously removed it, Giles On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Giles Sirett wrote: > Somebody has made an edit to the cloudstack wikipedia entry > > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=819108440=815849996 > > In essence, they have changed the start of the

Re: [DISCUSS] new way of github working

> > merged? Or, are you talking about a merge commit that is added to a PR > when > > a conflict is solved by its author(s)? > > > > > > I do not have problems with the first type of merge commits. However, I > > think we should not allow the s

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

; > :D tnx ) > > Updated by my colleague already > > > > 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > >> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Volosh

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Voloshanenko Igor <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com > >: > > > Sure. Got it. > > > > Will post update soon > > > > 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It

[DISCUSS] new way of github working

Devs, I see a lot of merge master to branch commits appearing on PRs. This is against prior (non-hard) agreements on how we work. It is getting to be the daily practice so; How do we feel about 1. not using merge commits anymore? 2. merging back as a way of solving conflicts? and Do we need to

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>: > > > +1 Daan > > > > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Rohit, Ivan, I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger

Re: test file sticking around

t; - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ____ > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 7:17:04 PM > To: dev > Subject: test file sticking around > > devs, > >

test file sticking around

devs, This has been bugging me but not enough to tackle: a file named 'services/secondary-storage/server/testfile' is created during the build and I think it is created in NfsSecondaryStorageResourceTest.testSwiftWriteMetadataFile(). I want to solve this with an @After method. Any reason not to?

Re: [VOTE] Clean up old and obsolete branches.

0 On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > +1 > > 2018-01-02 9:46 GMT-02:00 Rafael Weingärtner >: > > > Hope you guys had great holy days! > > > > Resuming the discussion we started last year in [1]. It is time to vote

Re: DZone article on software management

thanks Ron, Not planning any long train rides but this is worth one ;) On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ron Wheeler < rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote: > For those who are interested in process. > > This is an interesting summary of "Best Practices" for teamwork on > software projects. >

Re: Adding Spellchecker to code style validator

like the idea Ivan, I hope it won't be enforced though, and just a help. Coders are notorious for using spelling to distinguish between instances. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Rohit Yadav

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

eleted seven (7) business days after the notification email is > sent; > >8. After the branch removal, the Jira ticket must be closed. > > > > > > I will wait more two days. If we do not get comments here anymore, I > will > > call for a vote, and then if th

Re: [Discuss] Management cluster / Zookeeper holding locks

Are you proposing to add zookeeper as an optional requirement, Marc-Aurèle? or just curator? and what is the decision mech of including it or not? On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was wondering how many of you are running

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

sounds lime a lazy consensus vote; +1 from me On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > Khosrow has done a great job here, but we still need to move this forward > and create a standard/guidelines on how to use the official repo.

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

also I think we can tolerate collective work on our repo. Not everything has to go on forks. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rafael, I don't think that works. the versions in the pom.xml files are > updated to non snapshot versions on

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

utors/committers. These branches can be at their own > personal forks. > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > thanks for that list Khosrow, Also very usefull for cleaning people to > > clean their own fork. > >

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

thanks for that list Khosrow, Also very usefull for cleaning people to clean their own fork. I think you can start with the lowest pom versions but I changed one because the referred ticket isn't closed. It's my own and I'll have a look later today. For a lot of the branches the ticket aren't

Re: Hello

nice to virtually meet you again, Ernie. have fun On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Nux! wrote: > Welcome Ernie :> > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Rohit Yadav"

Re: CloudStack LTS EOL date?

Ivan, don't do two sets of fixes. We will forwarfd merge from the 4.10 branch to master On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hi, Paul. > > All my fixes to 4.10 are in pr: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2320 > > I think it should be

Re: New committer: Gabriel Beims Bräscher

welcome Gabriel, go get'm On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale < ma...@exoscale.ch> wrote: > Welcome Gabriel & congrats! > > Marc-Aurèle > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:32 -0200, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack

Re: jetty simulator problem

ans. So, if they are not being > used, we can simply remove them. > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > &

Re: jetty simulator problem

ion of the > dependencies changed? > ​don't know, i haven't found any yet (looking at CLOUDSTACK-10012 tagged commits) > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > it actually already works with only the depends-on attributes in

Re: jetty simulator problem

, everything started working. I committed these changes at > https://github.com/rafaelweingartner/cloudstack/tree/daanTestSimulator > > Could you test it? If it works I can open a PR. > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: jetty simulator problem

trying with only the depends-on lines removed now On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > from maven: > mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > rafaelweingart...@gmail.co

Re: jetty simulator problem

; > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > didn't work:( trying with only some parts removed now > > > > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory. > > NoSu

Re: jetty simulator problem

e configuration > "depends-on" you find in the XML "bean" element is to define an exotic and > not obvious dependency. > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm looking at a problem, any one

Re: POLL: ACL default egress policy rule in VPC

3 of course ;) On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi Devs > > The last days I fought with the ACL egress rule behaviour and I would > like to make a poll in which direction the fix should go. > > Short Version: > > We need to define a better default

jetty simulator problem

I'm looking at a problem, any one recognises this on master? simulator does not start cleanly. [WARNING] Failed startup of context o.e.j.m.p.JettyWebAppContext@51de5efa

Re: Adoption Survey seems to be abandoned

Hey Ivan, I am not very familiar to that survey. Is it mail based and where did you sent it? If not can you do me a link? I don't think it is intended to be ignored. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hi, DevTeam. > > May be dev@ is wrong list,

Re: Upgrade Cloudstack 4.5 to 4.9 - Unable to upgrade the database

. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Ciobanu Cristian <cristian.c@istream.today> wrote: > Daan, > > Can I track this issue somewhere? > > > Thank you! > Cristian > > -----Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thur

Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master

Mike, i created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2296 after investigation. haven't tested it yet. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike, absolutely right and I would usually just say "okay revert" but in > this case

Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master

Mike, absolutely right and I would usually just say "okay revert" but in this case I want to look to fix forward. This commit is an attempt to make network types more pluggable. So let me see if I can find a solution. I had trusted on the smoke tests to pick this up. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:50

Re: release manager 4.11?

, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Imran Ahmed <im...@eaxiom.net> wrote: > Hi Daan, > I would be happy for contributing my part. Please guide me about the > procedures. > Regards, > > Imran > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent

release manager 4.11?

users and devs, Sorry for the cross post. Is there any devops guru that wishes to take on the 4.11 release, with assistence of course? -- Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Syed Mushtaq Ahmed has joined the PMC

Good going and clear trail Syed On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulation Syed, and thanks for the hard work you have put into ACS so > far. > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > > >

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

I am a fan of convention and think everyone should have some. Strict enforcing of non-functionals, I'm not to big on. I see what you want to achieve here but am reluctant not to -1 any strictness. If we do it with a post-commit-hook (or if such a thing exists a post-merge-hook) we will allow for

Re: Clean up of unused constants

+1 Sigert, be my guest. We will run integration tests on your changes anyway, so low risk ;) On 2017/09/26 15:55, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: IMO, if something is not used or if something does not work, it has to be removed or fixed. I am +1 for the

log4j(2)

People, I am trying to up log4j to log4j2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10089 A discussion earlier led to the question if we should use sl4j, but my answer is no, because ACS uses to advanced features at some places and log4j-2 leaves you the choice to install a proxy for

Re: New committers: Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier

congrats guys, go get'm On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Milamber wrote: > > Congrats Nathan & Marc-Aurèle! > > On 22/09/2017 17:31, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited >> Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle

Re: one question network survey

ready configured into a switch stack). There can be multiple case scenarios but I am mentioning the most generic one . Hope that answers your question if I have correctly understood your question. Regards, -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [m

one question network survey

Devs and users, Can you all please tell me how you are using VxLan in your cloudstack environments? The reason behind this is that I am planning some refactoring in the networkgurus and I don’t want to break any running installations on upgrade. If you are not using vxlan but know of people

user_ip question

devs, there is a field is_system in the user_ip_address. I see no instance of it that is not 0 in my envs. I am looking to implement some ip reservation for systemVMs. it seems this field is applicable or even intended for this purpose. Anyone that has some advice on this? tnx -- Daan

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

Looking forward to this but I will only be available the first half hour for this. On 19/07/2017, 20:58, "ilya" wrote: Hi Devs and Users Hope this message finds you well, As mentioned earlier, we would like to start with quarterly calls to

Re: 4.10.0.0 release announcement draft

How about using one of the older announcements as draft, Rajani? That is how I did it in the past. On 19/07/2017, 08:11, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: api changes and fixed issues are available at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30 Pierre-Luc is

Re: @ACL annotation

yes, see ParamProcessWorker for the handling On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Pavan Kumar Aravapalli wrote: > Hi, > > I found some of the api parameters annotated with @ACL in source code. > Is this feature enabled ? In ACS , if so provide me some information

Re: Cloudstack dev Noob start :-)

s "starter/noob" level? (just some easy issue I could have a look to discover the code) Thanks! Cheers Olivier daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On 11 July 2017 at 00:56, Da

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

John, too bad but that indeed means it isn’t running. You can double check with # service cloudstack-usage status cloudstack-usage is stopped and if need be # service cloudstack-usage start Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage [ OK ] I am not running the

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can. # yum install cloudstack-usageit makes sense to look at the docker definition and do it there On 12/07/17 09:07, "John McDonnell" wrote: Hi, Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?

Re: Usage Server in Docker Simulator

maybe a double post due to mail issues: Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can. # yum install cloudstack-usage assuming centos as base. It makes sense to look at the docker definition and do it there On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:07 AM, John McDonnell wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [4.10] repos

https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/release/job/build-systemvm is configured to push the systemvm for a version taken from a parameter On 12/07/17 08:45, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I manually copied the

Re: next major release

Thanks Rajani, I created the upgrade paths and am no test compiling. Expect a PR in the next hour (I added the new path to every version not just past 4.0) On 12/07/17 08:41, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT 4.10

Re: [4.10] repos

Monsieur, The job should be altered to go into 4.11. lemme look. On 12/07/17 02:06, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote: Hi, I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our release, The jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget job

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

. > > My bad. :) > > *Will Stevens* > CTO > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >> No I am creating the upgrade code for the next version. >> (schema-41000to41100 and upgrade jav

Re: [DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

r that. Are you creating a PR to this set of documentation or where are you working? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/master/source/upgrade *Will Stevens* CTO <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland <da

[DISCUSS] upgrade to 4.11

Devs, I am busy creating the skeleton upgrade code for our next version (working name 4.11). Are we still supporting all direct upgrades from 2.x onward or should we only assume upgrade paths from 4.y onwards? Tnx, daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

should be very separate from the wiki though, no? > >> On 10 Jul 2017, at 16:10, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> > wrote: >> >> Alex, >> Do you have a CLA on file with Apache. >> You should have one to contribute to the wiki. >> >> R

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

You should have one to contribute to the wiki. > > Ron > > On 10/07/2017 10:42 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> create your account on cwiki and we can give you access >> >> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Alex Hitchins <a...@alexhitchins.com> >> wrote: &

Re: Cloudstack dev Noob start :-)

Oliver, I am pretty sure you where having a mysql version error at first. This one is new to me. Did you fully remove mysql and the cloud database and then install mariadb? Maybe you can drop all tables and run the mvn command for installing a db instead of the create db script. just for checking

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

e lots of amendments however 4 >> years seemed a long time to go with nothing. Are we still on JDK 6 for >> example? >> >> More than happy to amend Confluence with updates as I come across them. >> >> >> Alexander Hitchins >> &g

Re: Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide?

Why do you ask, Alex? Is something not working? Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico On 7 Jul 2017 9:54 pm, "Alex Hitchins" wrote: > Hello all, > > > > I note this was last amended 2013, is there a better/more recent resource > for the aspiring CloudStack

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

we need another binding vote and I know Boris way of working. I don't have time to test myself but given Boris vote I +1 (binding) On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: > +1 > > I’ve did upgrade testing with VMWare 5.5u3, advanced zone running on

Re: Cloudstack dev Noob start :-)

Btw, I use mariadb 10.2.6 installed with brew On 06/07/2017, 09:27, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: H Oliver, your mysql seems to new for cloudstack ;) and welcome back On 06/07/2017, 09:02, "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org> wrot

Re: Cloudstack dev Noob start :-)

H Oliver, your mysql seems to new for cloudstack ;) and welcome back On 06/07/2017, 09:02, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: Hi, Long time I didn't participate here. I'd like to do some hacking. I'm not clear on the process for noob :-) I ran sql scripts: *

Solved: Silent failure of deploydb on developer machine

For the interested: This is the behaviour on macos 10.12 with mysql 5.6. Downgrading mysql solves the problem On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Has anybody outthere seen a > mvn – P developer –pl developer –Ddeploydb > report

Silent failure of deploydb on developer machine

Has anybody outthere seen a mvn – P developer –pl developer –Ddeploydb report success without executing any sql commands? No create schema is not even executed. daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

Re: JIRA - PLEASE READ

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > + Release notes will be impossible to create without a proper Jira history. > And no one will know what has gone into CloudStack. No they are not mr Grumpy. they should be base on the code anyway, hence on git, not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

ce the >> community as a >> whole tends to focus more on the new branch rather than on >> testing the RC >> and releasing it). >> >> I believe we should do the following: As we approach the first >> RC, we need >> to limit the number of PRs going into t

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

It was an optimization that got merged and if someone is hindered we should back out and proceed, I’d say. On 21/06/17 16:00, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Op 20 juni 2017 om 21:35 schreef Kris Sterckx : > > > I am sorry,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

this is why i say we should branch on first RC, fix in release branch only and merge forward On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I know it is hard to justify not merging PRs that seem ready but are not > blockers in an RC, but it is a vicious circle

Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning

The wiki page exists for changes to be introduced at 5.0. It has been there for more than a year so it needs tlc. As for the API I sugest to start with a v2Beta api that we then migrate to v2 once we feel it can be maintained for a while without breaking backwards compatibility. (and move to

Re: Miami CCC '17 Roundtable/Hackathon Summary

At the moment I am looking at CAMP, used by Apache Brooklyn, to see if it makes sense to embed a Brooklyn engine in ACS. There is an extension to Brooklyn for TOSCA for comparison but I’d like to keep it as simple as possible and hence use CAMP. (as you know Rafael ;) On 29/05/2017, 23:17,

Re: Miami CCC '17 Roundtable/Hackathon Summary

re (milestones for delivering piece by piece of the complete feature), then the draft of a proposal, and later define the implementation job, so people of the community can embrace it. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@

Re: Miami CCC '17 Roundtable/Hackathon Summary

Great thanks Simon, Just want to play bingo a bit; dividing the VR into VNFs (virtual network functions) was mentioned. This pertains to the mention of making the VR more modular ;) Hopefully everybody is inspired by this because no one company or person is going to make this happen. Dahn

Re: GSoC'17

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, sachin patil wrote: > >> > >> According to the link you told me to enter in acs.list in source.d >> > >> folder. Cloudstack-agent 4.9.2 is installed. I build CS management >> from >> > >> code 4.10.0.0 snapshot. You better have a

Re: GSoC'17

Sachin, this seems more a code version issue to me than an environment issue. SetHostParamsCommand is not recognised as a command. Could you try this on 4.9 branch and see if you have the same issue? You also might want to look at the versions of gson. And if there is a jar for that

Re: Extend CloudStack for a new hypervisor

John, I never implemented one but I am about to investigate the ovm3 one to see if I can maintain it for a customer. I know the guy that wrote it and he says it’s fairly simple given the constraint of a hypervisor plugin, so I’d have a look at that one if I where you. Important thing to

Re: [Proposal] MaaS Integration for Baremetal Provisioning in Cloudstack

Good initiative, looks nice. On 11/05/17 16:53, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: Hi All, I want to propose a new plugin in Cloudstack to enable Baremetal provisioning using MaaS by Canonical. This will enable a lot of interesting features some of which are

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

As far as I remember only 4.4 and the commercial 3.x series were releases that way. On 09/05/17 08:25, "Erik Weber" <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > LS, > > In a

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: LS, In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs

[PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

LS, In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will fork on the first RC branches for future

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

er <w...@widodh.nl>: > > > > Op 3 mei 2017 om 14:49 schreef Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > > Happy to pick this up, Remi. I'm travelling now but will look at both on > > > > Friday. > > > > On 3 May 2017 2:2

Re: GSoC'17

Have fun Sachin, May you come up with the most flexible, extensible, pluggable, configurable addition to our project ever ;) daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On 05/05/17 17:49, "sachin patil"

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

Happy to pick this up, Remi. I'm travelling now but will look at both on Friday. Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico On 3 May 2017 2:25 pm, "Remi Bergsma" wrote: > Always happy to share, but I won’t have time to work on porting this to > CloudStack

Re: Github messages on dev list

Sorry to poop the party late but I am really opposed to commits@clo… To me this one is only for commits on potential release branches not for all the work in progress. I’d rather see either a separate list or people subscribing themselves to PRs on github. I do agree the dev@ is polluted and

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker. On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com Thanks, ~Rajani daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53

Re: [Github/Gitbox] Setting up your committer account

Paul if we put effort in automation we should do so using the review functionality of github, where you can approve a PR On 16/04/17 09:45, "Paul Angus" wrote: That’s in progress... It would be cool if we could parse comments for LGTM and OK to Merge so that

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] CA authority plugin definition

more use cases then just for CA-plugins (fantasy running now) On 14/04/17 16:57, "Simon Weller" <swel...@ena.com> wrote: Daan, What about integrating some like Vault (https://github.com/hashicorp/vault)? - Si ___

[DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] CA authority plugin definition

Devs, Following a discussion with a client they came up with the idea to create a pluggable CA-framework. A plugin would serve components in cloudstack that so require (management servers, agents, load balancers, SVMs, etc.) with certificates answering certificate requests and validating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment.

r their response and will update if I have more information regarding this move. Wido > Op 10 april 2017 om 18:22 schreef Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host > mirrors of Apa

Re: growing #threads problem

/04/17 13:11, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: Nproc == -1 , both soft and hard so unless this is inherited from VMs in nested environments this can’t be the problem Also no strange unexpected exceptions found, only failed connections to host

Re: growing #threads problem

; <koushik@accelerite.com> wrote: Check the MS logs to see if there are OOM exceptions due to threads not available. If that’s the case then you may have to adjust nproc limits in /etc/security/limits.conf. On 11/04/17, 1:11 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.

Re: growing #threads problem

My next step is to rebase my change to 4.9 and see if that works. But that is a stab in the dark I must admit. On 11/04/17 09:30, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: Devs, While I am creating a runnable tob e scheduled I ran into a problem. My sch

growing #threads problem

Devs, While I am creating a runnable tob e scheduled I ran into a problem. My scheduledJob nevers gets called and looking at the process the number of threads of type “DirectAgent-*” and “DirectAgentCronJob-*” keep growing. My job is scanning for templates in the primary storage and references

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment.

In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on github and put labels on PRs. I move to have the project added to the gitbox experiment please cast

Re: F5 compile issue with 4.5.x

Mike, you need to get a newer f5 jar (icontrol) didn't dive into getting the f5 jar yet as I'm not using it. disabling works ;) On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > javac 1.8.0_121 > > By removing F5, though, I just got a successful compile. :) >

[PROPOSAL] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment

In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on github and put labels on PRs. I want to propose that we join that project and intend to start a vote

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

re in CloudStack). On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >