Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

and to present at the CloudStack Meetup in Prague hosted by Interoute). On 3/30/17, 4:28 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9? On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mik

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

Well…it did work. However, I tried it again and am having trouble getting it to reconnect using that manual method. On 8/2/17, 4:28 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: However, the workaround that Paul Angus noted in the ticket worked for me just fin

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

However, the workaround that Paul Angus noted in the ticket worked for me just fine. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 4:26 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: VMware VR

Re: VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

I knew this issue sounded familiar. :) I logged a bug for it a couple years ago: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@c

VMware VR stuck in Starting state (master branch)

Hi, I’m running some tests on master with VMware 5.5 in a Basic Zone. My SS and CP VMs come up fine, but the VR is stuck in the Starting state (even when I manually reboot the VM hosting the VR). Anyone have thoughts on this based on the cloud.log from the VR VM: Wed Aug 2 04:04:14 UTC 2017

Re: Marvin Install Issue

sudo python ./setup.py install > ... >>>> import mysql.connector as msc >>>> msc.__version__ > ‘2.1.3' > > Thanks, > Jayapal > > On Jul 27, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: >

Re: Marvin Install Issue

tar.gz > Marvin > nose-timer > > working fine. > >> On 27/07/17 05:16, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am having trouble installing Marvin on Ubuntu 14.04 from master. >> >> It’s complaining that it’s having trouble with mysql-connec

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

IOPS after translating them. I am not using a fifth parameter since it is an either or situation, if you pass IOPS/GB in your API call and also pass an IOPS value, I will error out saying that you can only use one of those. Thanks, -Syed On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Tutkowski, Mike

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

Hi Syed, I have a couple questions. What about the minimum number of IOPS a storage provider can support? For example, with SolidFire, in some releases we can go down as low as 100 IOPS per volume and in newer releases as low as 50 IOPS per volume. Perhaps you should just leave it to the

Re: [DISCUSS] IOPS/GB and Highest Min and Max IOPS for disk offering

ou are right, the existing offerings will still work as expected. An IOPS/GB setting will be used independently of the current method (fixed or custom) Thanks, -Syed On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: H

Marvin Install Issue

Hi everyone, I am having trouble installing Marvin on Ubuntu 14.04 from master. It’s complaining that it’s having trouble with mysql-connector-python. mtutkowski@mike-ubuntu:~/cloudstack/cloudstack$ sudo pip install --upgrade tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-*.tar.gz Unpacking

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

Hi Ilya, I think this is a good idea and thanks for the proposed breakdown of the contents of the call. One thing to note about August 17 is that there is a CloudStack Meetup in London on that day. The call would be happening around 5 PM local time (during part of the meetup or during the

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

hone to the pub  > > > > > ________ > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:19 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and > Community

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

How's about a week before or after August 17? Same time. > On Jul 19, 2017, at 3:26 PM, ilya <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The date conflict is noted - please provide range of alternative dates. > > Thanks, > ilya > >> On 7/19/17 12:35 PM, Tutkowsk

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

ull/2162 Kris - Nuage Networks On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: +1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount

Re: CS Collab Conf Brazil page is down

n the >>> road. The Brazilian community cannot do the CCC at this moment. We are >>> considering a small event like CloudStack Day and/or meetups in partnership >>> with Universities. >>> >>> Sorry for the long delay on that. We tried u

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

+1 I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous one and my positive vote remains. > On Jul 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC7

> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On July 3, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > +1 > > I examined the changes for this RC when compared to the previous > one and my positive vote remains. > > On Jul 2, 201

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

n. >> >> People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not making the >> product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see here. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Paul Angus >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www

Re: Github messages on dev list

I don’t know…I like waking up to about 200 e-mails that I need to delete. ;) On 4/28/17, 7:52 AM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: I personally prefer the way it worked before, where Github username was shown in From field and not in Subject. That way mails could be

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

;>>> Giles >>>> >>>> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com >>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > [http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]<http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi, I went ahead and opened the following PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2096 Talk to you later! Mike On May 10, 2017, at 9:26 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: Hi, I analyzed the problematic PR and fix

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

of this code in the next RC for 4.10. Thanks! Mike On 5/10/17, 2:34 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: OK, here’s the gist of the problem: In StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean), the following line in 4.9

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

} else { +s_logger.debug("Volume " + vol.getUuid() + " is already destroyed"); + } On 5/10/17, 8:17 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one have passed. The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

sPR Any other additions? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

for your efforts on this, everyone! Mike On 6/9/17, 8:52 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Hi Rajani, I will see if I can get all of my managed-storage testing (both automated and manual) done today. If not, we’ll need to see if someone else can com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

Hi Rajani, I don’t see the following PR in this RC: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098 I ran all of my managed-storage regression tests. They all passed with the exception of the one that led to PR 2098. As I examine the RC in a bit more detail, it sits on top of ed2f573, but I

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

I should also point out that I performed my tests on a fresh system (I did not upgrade from a prior system). On 6/20/17, 9:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: +1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests again

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6

+1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated and manual testing that I performed on a previous RC. On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

kers, unfortunately, its a side-effect > of taking more than three months in the RC phase :( > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@neta

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

+1 (binding) I ran all of the managed-storage automated regression tests against the prior RC. The results can be located here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2141. As noted in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2150, I submitted fixes to resolve two issues I had discovered.

Re: Volume snapshot and primary storage space

“A friend answered me: the last snapshot is required to take any future snapshots, that is the reason it stays on primary store” That answer is correct as far as I know. If you take another volume snapshot, we only want to transfer the data since the prior volume snapshot. To do this, we need

Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning

Yeah, I think the phrase is that CloudStack’s API uses “conditional parameters.” As Syed notes, based on the presence of, say, parameter X, it may be required that parameters Y and Z are also passed in. On 6/6/17, 9:44 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: The interesting thing

Re: [DISCUSS] API versioning

This sounds like a good idea to me. > On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > +1. I like it. > >> On Jun 4, 2017 5:04 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

as this is the only commit added to it since the current RC. Thanks! Mike On 6/9/17, 7:43 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Hi everyone, I found a critical issue that was introduced into this RC since the most recent RC, so I am -1 on this RC.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

> of taking more than three months in the RC phase :( > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On June 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

On 6/12/17, 2:40 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > Op 10 juni 2017 om 21:18 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>: > > > Hi, > > I opened a PR against the most recent RC: https://git

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 RC3

th all the new features AND all the > new fixes in. > > People sliding new changes/bug fixes/enhancements in are not > making the > product better, they're stopping progress. As we can clearly see > here. > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeb

Re: New committers: Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier

Congratulations, guys! > On Sep 22, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > congrats guys, go get'm > >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Milamber wrote: >> >> >> Congrats Nathan & Marc-Aurèle! >> >>> On 22/09/2017 17:31, Rafael Weingärtner

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Syed Mushtaq Ahmed has joined the PMC

Congratulations, Syed! On Oct 9, 2017, at 5:32 AM, Wido den Hollander > wrote: Op 9 oktober 2017 om 13:26 schreef Paul Angus >: Fellow CloudStackers, It gives me great pleasure to say that Syed

Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master

s. - Rohit ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 1:17:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master Hi Rohit,

Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master

physicalNetwork.getIsolationMethods() is of size = 0. This method returns false and none of the network gurus can support the creation of a Basic Zone. On 10/12/17, 7:03 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Yes, I can debug it more. I’m in the middle of some othe

Re: [README][Quarterly Call] - CloudStack Development, Blockers and Community Efforts

Hi Ilya, Can you send out the remote conference/phone info again? Thanks! Mike On 9/5/17, 12:27 PM, "ilya" wrote: I assume Raja forgot to CC: dev@cloudstack.apache.org - this is the email forward On 9/4/17 10:21 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Hi

Re: Advice on converting zone-wide to cluster-wide storage

eesh Ch, CloudStack Development, Accelerite, www.accelerite.com<http://www.accelerite.com> @accelerite -Original Message----- From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudst

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

I wonder if it wouldn’t be best to wait on this until master is in code freeze. At that point, it seems like we could add whatever rules we’d like and have almost no impact on pending master PRs. For me personally, although I haven’t opened it yet, I have a large PR I plan to open in the

Re: Advice on converting zone-wide to cluster-wide storage

Hi Andrija, I just took a look at the SolidFire logic around adding primary storage at the zone level versus the cluster scope. I recommend you try this in development prior to production, but it looks like you can make the following changes for SolidFire: • In cloud.storage_pool, enter the

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

That sounds like another one to wait for until code freeze. :) On Sep 29, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: ohw dear Mike, I am changing the log4j version, brr. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tutkowski, Mike

Re: Need some help in getting started

Hi, Welcome to the CloudStack Community! I would recommend you start here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Developers Feel free to send your questions to the list. Thanks! Mike On 10/9/17, 4:41 PM, "Kapil Jain" wrote: Hello, I

Re: Can't create Basic Zone with master

ithub.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/NetworkOrchestrator.java#L715 - Rohit ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Can't create Basic Zone with master

Hi, I was trying to run the managed-storage regression test suite on PR 2018 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2081) when I realized I couldn’t create a Basic Zone (using XenServer) with that code. I then took a step back from that PR and tried to create a Basic Zone (again, with

Bug in ViewResponseHelper.java of 4627fb2

Hi, I noticed an issue today with a fairly recent commit: 4627fb2. In ViewResponseHelper.java, a NullPointerException can be thrown when interacting with a data disk on VMware because the disk chain value in cloud.volumes can have a value of NULL. I can put in a check for NULL and avoid the

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10025) To create a better VNC client for Cloudstack using noVNC

Hi, You can find information on how to unsubscribe here: https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html Thanks, Mike On Dec 11, 2017, at 1:10 AM, Mohammad Aladwan > wrote: hi, please i want to leave this group,i am not sure how i can leave

Re: Bug in ViewResponseHelper.java of 4627fb2

, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com<mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>> wrote: What is the line in that class that may generate a NPE? 291? Please do open a PR to propose a fix for this situation. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutko

Re: New committer: Gabriel Beims Bräscher

Congratulations, Gabriel! On Nov 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE > wrote: Congratulations Gabriel! *Sigert Goeminne* Software Development Engineer *nuage*networks.net

Re: Snapshots only on Primary Storage feature

Perhaps instead of renaming the setting, we can note in its description the hypervisors it currently pertains to. > On May 19, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Glen Baars wrote: > > Based on the responses, I think it is a worthy feature to be retained. Maybe > the following

Can't build master

Hi, Did I miss an e-mail or something? I’m having trouble building master (below). Thanks! Mike Running org.apache.cloudstack.storage.configdrive.ConfigDriveBuilderTest log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.cloudstack.storage.configdrive.ConfigDriveBuilder). log4j:WARN

Re: Can't build master

Just an FYI that this is on OS X Version 10.11.6. From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Date: Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Can't build master Hi, Did I miss an e-mail or someth

Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

t; www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: 23 May 2018 19:53 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: PR 2670

Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

;>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> There's a NetApp Jar in the nodist which is related I think - be nice >> to >>> get rid of that too. >>>> >>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >>>> www.shapeblue.com >>&g

Re: Can't build master

WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 05/22/2018 08:58 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: >>> Hi Rohit, >>> >>> I’ve tried a few

Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

Including users@ on this (below). On May 23, 2018, at 12:53 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote: Hi everyone, I opened the following PR today: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2670 There is an old, what we believe

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC1]

+1 (binding) I created a new cloud using commit 5f48487dc62fd1decaabc4ab2a10f549d6c82400 (RC1). I ran the automated regression tests for managed storage. All tests passed. On 5/24/18, 9:56 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: Hi All, I've created a

Re: Can't build master

nts. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> ________ From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 2:13:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Can't build master

PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

Hi everyone, I opened the following PR today: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2670 There is an old, what we believe to be unused, NetApp plug-in in the CloudStack codebase that I’d like to remove. I’m sending this e-mail out for the following reasons: 1) To see if, by

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC2]

+1 (binding) This is what I did for RC1: I created a new cloud using commit 5f48487dc62fd1decaabc4ab2a10f549d6c82400 (RC1). I ran the automated regression tests for managed storage. All tests passed. This is what I did for RC2: I looked at the Git changelog and didn’t see anything that

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0? > On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:17 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > >> On 06/19/2018 11:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself

Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

<https://cloudstack.apache.org> ____ From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 1:06:52 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: PR 2670: Removing an old, unused NetApp plug-in

Re: Open Summit CFP anyone ?

ent: 21 June 2018 16:54 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Open Summit CFP anyone ? >> >> Hey! >> >> I'm also interested :) Actually planning a talk abount attaching >> active/active iSCSI targets w/ TCQ and ALUA capability to a ceph clust

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC3]

+1 (binding) (Based on my testing of RC1 and not seeing anything that concerned me going into RC2 or RC3.) On 6/21/18, 9:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.11.1.0 release (RC3), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: The changes

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

Sorry, Wido :) I missed that part. On 6/20/18, 5:03 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0? > Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

Also, yes, I agree with the list you provided, Wido. We might have to break “other fancy stuff” into more detail, though. ;) On 6/20/18, 12:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: Sorry, Wido :) I missed that part. On 6/20/18, 5:03 AM, "Wido den Ho

Re: Open Summit CFP anyone ?

nic wrote: >>> >>> That is OK from my side, but they insist on open source (acs is...) but >>> not sure about SF, at least what I read on CFP page...could you give it a >>> read ? >>> >>> Otherwise I'm perfectly fine! >>> >>> On Tue, Ju

Re: [DISCUSS] new way of github working

Hi everyone, We had a good conversation going here. Maybe we can continue it, get some level of reasonable consensus, and implement it (if, in fact, the consensus is a change from what we currently have). My suggested approach is the following: Before you create a PR, squash all applicable

Re: John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander now ASF members

Congratulations, guys! :-) > On May 2, 2018, at 9:58 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > Hi folks, > > As noted in the press release[1] John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander > have been elected to the ASF's membership. > > Members are the 'shareholders' of the foundation, elect the

Re: Bug in ViewResponseHelper.java of 4627fb2

Hi everyone, Just wanted to follow up on this. I was going to open a PR on this, but I realized after a rebase that it had been fixed already in this commit: 4627fb2. Talk to you later! Mike On 12/18/17, 6:33 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: I’m no

Re: [GitHub] DaanHoogland commented on issue #2298: CLOUDSTACK-9620: Enhancements for managed storage

I know that the StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy class in particular is getting a bit unwieldy. I plan to go through it after 4.11 to modularize and simplify it. Once we are good to go with our standard tests for this PR, I can re-run all managed-storage tests to make sure none of the

Re: Squeeze another PR (#2398) in 4.11 milestone

“technically we should only have "one" on primary storage at any given point in time” I just wanted to follow up on this one. When we are copying a delta from the previous snapshot, we should actually have two snapshots on primary storage for a time. If the delta copy is successful, then we

Re: [GitHub] rhtyd commented on issue #2298: CLOUDSTACK-9620: Enhancements for managed storage

Sounds good. I can start those tests up. It typically takes a couple days to run them all. > On Jan 8, 2018, at 11:44 AM, GitBox wrote: > > rhtyd commented on issue #2298: CLOUDSTACK-9620: Enhancements for managed > storage > URL:

IP Address Discrepancy with VMware

Hi, While I was running some tests related to 4.11 tonight, I noticed the following discrepancy with regards to the IP address given to a VM of mine: https://imgur.com/3ODXHNe According to CloudStack, the IP address should be 10.117.40.28. However, when I run ifconfig, I get 10.117.40.115.

Re: IP Address Discrepancy with VMware

ovent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com] > Sent: 11 January 2018 07:31 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: IP Address Discrepancy with VMware > > Hi, > > While I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Or perhaps just the first RC should have a longer window? On 1/17/18, 8:12 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: If all of our testing were completely in an automated fashion, then I would agree that the 72-hour window is sufficient. However, we don’

Re: 4.11 RC1 KVM Issue: Incorrect hostname/no IP address

it's a firewall issue. [1] - http://dl.nux.ro/utils/iptflush.sh -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message ----- > From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

If all of our testing were completely in an automated fashion, then I would agree that the 72-hour window is sufficient. However, we don’t have that kind of automated coverage and people aren’t always able to immediately begin testing things out like migrating from their version of CloudStack

Re: 4.11 RC1 KVM Issue: Incorrect hostname/no IP address

[1] - http://dl.nux.ro/utils/iptflush.sh -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message ----- > From: "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the 72-hour window. For 4.12, I plan to automate the remainder of my tests, but I’m not quite there with 4.11 (the vast majority of managed-storage tests are automated, but not yet all). On 1/17/18, 7:34 AM, "Daan Hoogland"

Re: 4.11 RC1 KVM Issue: Incorrect hostname/no IP address

te: Hi Mike, First thing to check would be the firewall on the hypervisor. Can you paste the output of iptables-save and ebtables-save ? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message ----- > Fro

4.11 RC1 KVM Issue: Incorrect hostname/no IP address

Hi, I noticed a problem related to hostnames/IP addressing on KVM with RC1 for 4.11. I have a single Basic Zone with KVM (no other hypervisor type in use). My two KVM hosts are running on Ubuntu 14.04. All system VMs come up and I create a new VM whose root disk resides on NFS (alongside the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Jan 19, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Thanks Mike - do you see any blockers wrt to 4.11.0.0-rc1? > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ____ > From: Tutkowski,

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

I made it final per @wido’s comment (in #2415). How’s about you guys hash it out and get back to me. :) > On Jan 20, 2018, at 8:06 AM, GitBox wrote: > > rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: > CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails >

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

hetical future programmer to remove the final and change the > variable. Perhaps a better documentation for the method explaining this > situations could bring more benefits. A single variable declared as final > does not give a hint for people on why it was made final. > > On Sat, Jan 20,

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

Perhaps your argument against the final keyword is that it should never be used? If so, you and @wido can debate that and let me know which way you’d like this bit of code to end up. > On Jan 20, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

> situations could bring more benefits. A single variable declared as final >> does not give a hint for people on why it was made final. >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Perhap

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

@wido just wanted to make sure the Boolean variable didn’t accidentally get changed later since it’s critical it keep that value. > On Jan 20, 2018, at 8:14 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > > I made it final per @wido’s comment (in #2415). How’s a

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

ingart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Changed by a future programmer that may develop some changes in your code? > Because, if you do not code any other assignment to that variable, it will > never happen. > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@neta

Re: [GitHub] rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2416: CLOUDSTACK-10244: KVM online storage migration fails

s that describes the object and is > loaded to the JVM. This is what PowerMock does to deal with static and > final method/variable mocking. > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > >> “For instance, when we have to desi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

managed-storage tests. I had run them just prior to you creating RC1, so I expect they will all pass. Thanks! Mike On 1/19/18, 6:56 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: Yes, but only one (for KVM) and it is trivial to fix. I’ll open a PR. Also, I’m alm

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

a PR for RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2416 This comment lists the tests I performed while running RC1 + PR 2416: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2416#issuecomment-359220967 Thanks, Mike On 1/19/18, 3:59 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>

Re: 4.11 RC1 KVM Issue: Incorrect hostname/no IP address

<ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Mike, Have you configured vlan ? What if you migrate VM to same host as VR and reboot the VM ? -Wei 2018-01-15 22:36 GMT+01:00 Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>: > Hi, > > I noticed a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi everyone, For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite against RC1. With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed. Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. Once I’ve

<    1   2   3   4   5   >