For others that use IJ, when you create a Lib for the JS swc, you can add
the;
http://www.teotigraphix.com/assets/apache/dom/asdoc/index.html
as a documentation URL to the library and you can then use Ctrl-Q to pin or
view the docs, which then shows you the function signature for all the
callback
Yeah, don't worry about it man! I was just showing you the error.
The Flex SDK asdoc emits DITA XML files and then runs XSL on the DITA
files. So I guess, if you produced the same DITA spec from the new
intermediate model, you could use the same XSL transformations. That would
be the way to do it
On 6/23/15, 7:47 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>You can try and see if you could get asdoc working on those files but, I
>boiled it down and asdoc just didn't want to parse Object, it said
>Namespace not found and pointed to the package { declaration.
I assume this is asdoc from the current F
Yeah, it would be probably really easy for you to create XML from the
intermediate model.
But, for now I don't feel good committing it, there are things I need to
reorganize and stuff, remove hundreds of license headers etc.
I will put it on my list of things to do, on the list of many. :)
You c
On 6/23/15, 7:02 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>No, this is a full program.
>
>There is a huge amount of logic that goes into generating this stuff, same
>would be the case for XML.
>
>Right now it's AST -> Intermediate Model -> Velocity -> HTML.
Ah yes, I remember you mentioning "Intermediate
gt;seems that old gramps wasn't having it. Had namespace issues, I really
> >don't know what is wrong, Falcon parses this stuff fine but asdoc chokes
> >and dies.
> >
> >So, just for people to get an example of the API, I posted the HTML asdocs
> >of JS and
>So, just for people to get an example of the API, I posted the HTML asdocs
>of JS and JQuery SWCs up on my server for the time being.
>
>These docs were made with My documenter I mentioned weeks before. My
>program had no problem creating these. The only thing is, I never finished
&g
Thank you Mike! :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-DOM-JQuery-ASDocs-viewable-API-html-online-tp48154p48155.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
posted the HTML asdocs
of JS and JQuery SWCs up on my server for the time being.
These docs were made with My documenter I mentioned weeks before. My
program had no problem creating these. The only thing is, I never finished
it for global functions and constants, which this project uses.
So I hack
To include asdocs in a (Flex) swc library, the following is required:
- Generate asdocs adding the following arguments (via Ant):
keep-xml = true
skip-xsl = true
- Create the swc as usual
- Add the generated asdocs to the swc minus 2 files that aren't needed
(ASDoc_Confi
On 6/13/15, 3:15 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was just curious if we can include the source for asdoc in the JS swc.
>IMHO it's pretty important dealing with the hundreds of classes and 1000's
>of fields and members a lot have some docs and most all have at least 1
>@see tag that dir
Hi,
I was just curious if we can include the source for asdoc in the JS swc.
IMHO it's pretty important dealing with the hundreds of classes and 1000's
of fields and members a lot have some docs and most all have at least 1
@see tag that directs you to the w3c or whatever documentation.
Not to me
e;
> >
> >
> >
> >Can somebody put a conditional in there to look for 'sdk' as well. I
> >checked out my repo in sdk and not flex-sdk.
> >
> >I am only saying this because I have seen Fred's comments elsewhere and
> >the
> >git che
have;
>
>
>
>Can somebody put a conditional in there to look for 'sdk' as well. I
>checked out my repo in sdk and not flex-sdk.
>
>I am only saying this because I have seen Fred's comments elsewhere and
>the
>git checkout page says use sdk.
>
>As it s
ut my repo in sdk and not flex-sdk.
I am only saying this because I have seen Fred's comments elsewhere and the
git checkout page says use sdk.
As it stands, I have asdocs for all the 10+ projects going so people that
like to see API or read asdoc, run the asdocs/build.xml and it should work.
> I did notice that on the installer page [1], the version number is not
> showing up on the badge. Can anybody take a stab at that one?
Done.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
3:56 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On 31/03/15 12:45, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>
>> The only thing that isn't done is asdocs. The Apache SVN was doing weird
>> things last night when I got to that point. I'll try again this evening.
>>
>
> Did you crac
On 31/03/15 12:45, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
The only thing that isn't done is asdocs. The Apache SVN was doing weird
things last night when I got to that point. I'll try again this evening.
Did you crack this problem yet ?
I'm going to be busy next week.
Tom
The only thing that isn't done is asdocs. The Apache SVN was doing weird
things last night when I got to that point. I'll try again this evening.
-Nick
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > On it. I'll have it out this evening when I get home f
> On it. I'll have it out this evening when I get home from work.
Awesome!
Thanks,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
On it. I'll have it out this evening when I get home from work.
-Nick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While the update is officially released, we still need to:
>
> - update the website [1]
> - publish the new ASDocs [2]
> -
Hi,
While the update is officially released, we still need to:
- update the website [1]
- publish the new ASDocs [2]
- blog about the release [3]
Thanks for volunteering!
EdB
1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34793
2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34794
3: https
Just a heads up, I've finished putting the FlexUnit tutorials and ASDocs on
the staging website. For the most part, they should be good to go, but may
need some styling tweaks because of the mdtext parser.
If anybody wants to make any edits / corrections / additions to them, feel
free. Th
Just a heads up -- I just pushed the 4.12 docs onto staging. When we feel
good about the Team page, we can publish both changesets to production.
Whomever ends up doing that -- just a heads up, it will take a long while
(>15 minutes) for everything to get pushed because of the number of changes
t
my last word on the subject ;) ... asdocs build successfully when i use
4.10 (apache git master branch)
On 21/10/2013 17:50, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
That is going to be difficult to help you.
It's probably one of the asdoc tools/libs that is missing or incorrectly build,
or one o
apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] 4.11.0 RC 2 ASDocs
I included everything there was (except include_examples)
On 21/10/2013 17:26, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Since it contains static files only, can you also send topLevel.xml file
> located at the root of asdoc-output.
&g
: lundi 21 octobre 2013 18:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] 4.11.0 RC 2 ASDocs
zip attached.
On 21/10/2013 16:33, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Can you add the following to the ant task:
keep-xml="true"
so that the intermediary files are not deleted.
Then zip
Thanks.
Since it contains static files only, can you also send topLevel.xml file
located at the root of asdoc-output.
Maurice
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 18:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] 4.11.0 RC 2 ASDocs
zip
octobre 2013 17:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : [DISCUSSION] 4.11.0 RC 2 ASDocs
Just reposting with new subject to separate conversations...
On 21/10/2013 16:03, Lee Burrows wrote:
> Sorry, that was for the asdocs build - it seems to be doing everything
> correctly (including temporary
Just reposting with new subject to separate conversations...
On 21/10/2013 16:03, Lee Burrows wrote:
Sorry, that was for the asdocs build - it seems to be doing everything
correctly (including temporary creation of tempdita folder) but no
files (other than examples) exist at the end of the
Ok, I will add it to .ignoreButKeepAnEyeOnIt file :-)
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 23:29
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASDocs issue
Hi,
> Ah, OK sorry for that one. I will add it to my .gitig
Hi,
> Ah, OK sorry for that one. I will add it to my .gitignore.
I wouldn't do that, sometime it does need to change and if someone else changes
it you'll need to update it.
Justin
Ah, OK sorry for that one.
I will add it to my .gitignore.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 14:57
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASDocs issue
Hi,
> My configuration being a little tweak
Hi,
> My configuration being a little tweaked (with .gitignored files), can you
> please double check ...
You might want to not check in changes to flex-sdk-description.xml but other
than that all good from what I can see.
Thanks,
Justin
You're welcome.
My configuration being a little tweaked (with .gitignored files), can you
please double check ...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 13:01
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet :
Hi,
> Status:
> - build is OK
> - asdoc build is OK (no error)
> - asdoc content looks good.
Much appreciated for sorting that out.
Thanks,
Justin
Committed to :
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-sdk.git;a=commit;h=5ae5a847
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 12:10
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
> However, I noti
'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 11:07
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
I have fixed the issue with AnimationTarget, and experimental manifest and now
Experimental.swc and asdoc are compiling ok.
Didn'
sted by Tom, to understand
what went wrong.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 11:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
Thanks, I will do.
-Message d'origine-
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.
Thanks, I will do.
-Message d'origine-
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 10:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASDocs issue
Check the web view of the branch e.g.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo?p=flex-sdk.
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
Actually, the problem comes from asdoc build.xml It's referencing (line 150 and 168 the
namespace " library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark-mobilecomponents" which does not
exist) As far as I know, mobile components are also in the regular spar namespace
(library:
arget to public, and the problem has gone.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 04:34
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : ASDocs issue
Hi,
We're currently getting this:
doc:
[asdoc] Loading con
ry to recover that lost changes by
hand.
Any idea ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 10:13
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
Actually, the problem comes from asdoc buil
m]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 09:48
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
I have checked the asdoc build.xml and it's missing some of the changes I have
made before (and I am sure I have commited and pushed, on 10/6).
I have also noticed some of the classes I have r
flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ASDocs issue
I have run the asdoc build.xml and getting this error:
D:\ApacheFlex\git_source\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\mobiletheme\src\spark\skins\mobile\ViewMenuSkin.mxml:
Could not resolve to a component implementation.
mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoy
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASDocs issue
On 10/10/13 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop
>>branch.
>Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd
>reason I
Hi Justin,
I have created a test subdirectory in asdoc containing this single file and
also build_test.xml so that I can quickly quickly changes to the asdoc compiler
or templates
Without having to run through the whole SDK classes asdocs (while I was
working on the experimental asdoc
Hi,
> Let me know if you get past this before you quit for
> the day otherwise I'll try to dig deeper.
Day is already over for me. Any help would be appreciated.
> OK, pushed and merged (I think).
Yep. looks good. Mind updating the RELEASE_NOTES?
Thanks,
Justin
On 10/10/13 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop
>>branch.
>Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd
>reason I'll fix and merge for you.
OK, was able to reproduce the problem. I've never worked w
Hi,
> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop branch.
Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd reason I'll
fix and merge for you.
> Should I just push everything to develop then merge all of it to release?
That seems the simplest way to me.
>
On 10/10/13 10:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem?
>Yes in the release branch. But the release branch is merged with develop
>so you should see it there as well.
Hmm. I'll rebuild develop and see. None of the commit email
Hi,
> Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem?
Yes in the release branch. But the release branch is merged with develop so you
should see it there as well.
> Some minor stuff like missing imports for Falcon and some improvements for
> SWFDump, but also:
> FLEX-33690 <
The TLF change is part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33409
On 10/10/13 10:44 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/10/13 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>>
>>> but the main build should have failed in the same way.
>>It compiles no issues.
>Did you push the other ASDoc fixes req
On 10/10/13 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> but the main build should have failed in the same way.
>It compiles no issues.
Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem? I
just ran "ant asdoc" and got the AnimationTarget issue.
>
>> I have a fix for that FTETextFiel
Hi,
> I assume you meant ViewMenuLayout? The manifests, etc look ok.
Yep I meant ViewMenuLayout.
> I guess you could dump the mobilecomponents.swc and see if that class is
> actually
> in there
It;s in there:
swfdump ./mobile/mobilecomponents.swc | grep ViewMenuLayout
> but the main build
On 10/10/13 8:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fixed that issue (and a few more) but now have this one:
>doc:
>[asdoc] Loading configuration file
>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
>[asdoc]
>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/fra
Hi,
Fixed that issue (and a few more) but now have this one:
doc:
[asdoc] Loading configuration file
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
[asdoc]
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/projects/mobiletheme/src/spark/skins/mobile/Vie
Hi,
Looks like an issue with the asdocs build file - just trying to sort.
Justin
Hi,
We're currently getting this:
doc:
[asdoc] Loading configuration file
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
[asdoc]
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/projects/experimental/src/spark/layouts/supportClasses/AnimationNavigatorL
Hi,
Looks like this file is showing up in ASdocs:
SampleExperimental.as
Should that be the case? and if so why is it missing an Apache header?
Thanks,
Justin
Lee Burrows created FLEX-33586:
--
Summary: Packages missing from online asdocs
Key: FLEX-33586
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33586
Project: Apache Flex
Issue Type
>>> Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint,
> I
> >>> would rather keep them on our domain.
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
> >>> wro
gt; Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
>>> would rather keep them on our domain.
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wasn
gt; > -Nick
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
> >> questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
> >>
> >> A
ven us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
> would rather keep them on our domain.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
> wrote:
>
>> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
>> questioning if having
Quoting Alex Harui :
On 1/14/13 6:18 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
On a side note;
I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the
FlashPlayer API in there as well.
We do not have a license to copy the Flash and other Adobe ASDocs to Apache.
Someday, o
On 1/14/13 6:18 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> On a side note;
>
> I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the
> FlashPlayer API in there as well.
>
We do not have a license to copy the Flash and other Adobe ASDocs to Apache.
Someday, our AS
On 1/14/13 9 :02AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly
>available SWCs that the new asdoc generator could load and parse the
>DITA with their documentation, adding Flash Player documentation is
>possible.
I'm pretty sure you don't have acce
>
>>>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I like the
>>>> https://flex.apache.org/v2/**asdoc<https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc>ASDOCs
>>>> atm. It has less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
&
Michael,
Can you update the source branch for ASdocs? This will fix future versions
of the asdoc download we provide users as well...
-Nick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
>
> Quoting Harbs :
>
> Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core clas
, Michael Schmalle wrote:
I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer.
Harbs
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has
less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
-Original Me
Neither am I, but it looks much better.
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer.
>
>
>> Harbs
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
>>
>>> I like
It would be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:apa...@teotigraphix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:03 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly available SWCs
that the new
the playerglobal.swc somewhere has asdocs embedded.
Mike
Quoting Michael Schmalle :
Quoting Harbs :
Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I
mentioned in the other thread I started).
I answered this, the only way to get core classes is by creating a
new asdoc that p
the API. I see no real option of getting
the descriptions with those, only code generated links that point to
the Adobe livedocs for each member etc which would be really akward.
I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR
version on occasion. For the classes whe
Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I mentioned in
the other thread I started).
I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR version on
occasion. For the classes where it matters, those filters are useful.
If we're picking the ASDocs
Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the CMS.
Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
would rather keep them on our domain.
-Nick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> I wasn't debating the fact tha
I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has less clutter
than the adobe ones and load faster.
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
As you said, republishing them kills the build and that proves there
must be some other option or hosting solution.
Mike
Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski :
Personal
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS
Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only
selectively check out whiteboard
ooking at the ASDocs on the Apache Flex website, and I noticed
> that only Flex specific classes are included. This is contrary to the Adobe
> ASDocs which have all Flash classes. I understand the reason for this, but
> it really limits the usability of the docs.
>
> I picked a rando
I was just looking at the ASDocs on the Apache Flex website, and I noticed that
only Flex specific classes are included. This is contrary to the Adobe ASDocs
which have all Flash classes. I understand the reason for this, but it really
limits the usability of the docs.
I picked a random page
83 matches
Mail list logo
