On 10/4/06, Komandur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to generate a light weight clientside package (without any
broker specifics) when a version is released ?
You could try patching the maven build to make a new smaller client
jar if you like?
--
James
---
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-954?page=all ]
Fritz Oconer resolved AMQ-954.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done, the updated the activemq-core-test.jar with the correct content.
Compilation error when building activemq-web with test enabled.
Build Issue on snapshot timestamp when downloading transitive dependencies.
---
Key: AMQ-956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-956
Project: ActiveMQ
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-956?page=all ]
Fritz Oconer resolved AMQ-956.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done, created an activemq-version property that will be used instead of using
${pom.version}.
Build Issue on snapshot timestamp when
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-956?page=comments#action_37105 ]
Fritz Oconer commented on AMQ-956:
--
revision: 453166
Build Issue on snapshot timestamp when downloading transitive dependencies.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-876?page=comments#action_37106 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-876:
Hi Vadim,
would you mind trying the latest code ? I've done some bug fixes in the kaha
area today - unfortunately one of the bug
Yep!
You still need to generate the ./configure file in the base directory
using ./autogen.sh but then do a:
mkdr out
cd out
../configure
make
On 10/5/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyway that this build system can be modified to put the object
files and other build
What happens when I add new classes, do I have to rerun ./configure
everytime I and files to the Makefile.am? I know nothing about
automake. I've noticed that the builds seem to take about twice as long
as they used to.
Yep!
You still need to generate the ./configure file in the base
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-813?page=comments#action_37110 ]
Gray Watson commented on AMQ-813:
-
This seems to generate another fault. With 4.1.0.0-fuse, I'm get a whole ton
of the following, possibly in an infinite loop:
On 10/5/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens when I add new classes, do I have to rerun ./configure
everytime I and files to the Makefile.am? I know nothing about
when you modify the Makefile.am files, re-run ./autogen.sh and then ./configure
automake. I've noticed that the
In the instance2 of the ws-notification example, the
org.apache.servicemix.tck.ReceiverComponent should be removed
--
Key: SM-676
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-582?page=comments#action_37102 ]
Grant McDonald commented on SM-582:
---
Committed changes.
Adding
Jsr181Component not using SU classloader to load service interface
--
Key: SM-678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-678
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Ralf Wunsch wrote:
We are starting a new EAI project. At this time ServiceMix is our choice
for the implementation plattform. We have strong requirements for
monitoring and control issues. At this one aspect is the handling of
unexpected errors. For this reason i have implemented the
We have recently been updating form servicemix-3.0-M2 to servciemix-3.0. I
encountered a problem with the lwcontainer with one of my components. This
component has several service units that comprise the service assembly. Two
of these service units requrie jars at runtime, which I included in
Sounds good. Nice work !
A few questions:
* How are the errorHandler and errorHandlerConfig related ?
* If I want to handle a given exception specifically, i guess
I need to implement a custom errorHandler, right ?
* how does the errorHandler plug into the jbi container ?
If you want to
Hej!
I just discovered that installing the binary distribution like described in
the
http://goopen.org/confluence/display/SM30UG/3.+Installation#3.Installation-WindowsBinaryInstallation
User's Guide / installation presents errors even for the simplest
configurations (at least with the default
On 10/5/06, Ralf Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnodet wrote:
A few questions:
* How are the errorHandler and errorHandlerConfig related ?
* If I want to handle a given exception specifically, i guess
I need to implement a custom errorHandler, right ?
* how does the errorHandler
Try
http://google.com/codesearch?hl=enlr=q=file%3A.xml+TraceComponent+package%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fincubator%2Fservicemix%2Ftrunk%22btnG=Search
It's a lot faster than looking on your hard drive (at least for me).
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Reference name errors in configs client-corba-sun, client-corba-yoko,
j2ee-corba-sun, j2ee-corba-yoko
-
Key: GERONIMO-2467
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2467?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2467:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2467.patch
Reference name errors in configs client-corba-sun, client-corba-yoko,
j2ee-corba-sun, j2ee-corba-yoko
Hi David,
Count me in. I am willing to help in this. Will start
reading the specs as my knowlege in this is limited. This page cleared
some of my questions on why axis/celtix is required. Probably it will
be useful for others who are new and interested
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 10/4/06, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can add this functionality to the console and provide it as a patch.
What do u think?
I think that sounds great! Seems like this would fit nicely as an
additional item in the Actions column in the initial table
Sorry about that, I made the references follow the naming convention
of being capitalized and forgot to update the plans. It should be
fixed now, rev 453117
Thanks for pointing this out!
david jencks
On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Anything that needs a refresh
hi David,
I would also be glad to make some contributions. I am new to this so
would need some pointers as to what to focus on. I would start by
reading the specs and also getting familiar with Axis 2.
Regards
Krishnakumar
On 10/5/06, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
Did anyone check this patch. I would like to continue to work on this and
just want to be sure that I'm heading in the right direction.
Also, there are two open questions:
- should I add JSON mapper in the AMQ distribution or not?
- should we be compatible with current handling of byte messages
hi,
I get this error during build
[INFO] Packaging module configuration: C:\Apache\geronimo-1.2\configs\client-cor
ba-yoko\target\plan\plan.xml
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
The problem has been fixed few hours ago. Refresh trunk.
--vamsiOn 10/5/06, Krishnakumar B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,I get this error during build[INFO] Packaging module configuration: C:\Apache\geronimo-1.2\configs\client-corba-yoko\target\plan\plan.xml[INFO]
Krishnakumar B wrote:
hi,
I get this error during build
[INFO] Packaging module configuration:
C:\Apache\geronimo-1.2\configs\client-cor
ba-yoko\target\plan\plan.xml
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
Is there anyway that this build system can be modified to put the object
files and other build artifacts into someplace other than the root dir
of the code being built? This really clutter ups the workspace.
Previoulsy we had everything going into the out dir under the root
activemq folder.
What about adding an xbean annotation on
the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
a commonly used object and it would
benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
The plugins should use this, since they have similar restrictions at
install time but not at runtime. It would be nice to carry that over
so any installed Java 1.5-only plugins just wouldn't start if you
started Geronimo under Java 1.4.
Still, if you try to start a module manually (with the
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about adding an xbean annotation on
the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
a commonly used object and it would
benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
Good idea - though I'd added them to the connection factory
implementations in the
Cool :)
I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..
On 10/5/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about adding an xbean annotation on
the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
a commonly used object and it would
benefit from
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-676?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-676.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Oct 5 05:04:06 2006
New Revision: 453195
URL:
What is your JAVA_HOME set to ?ThanksAnita- Original Message From: Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.orgTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 1:09:20 AMSubject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2393) Maven eclipse plugin is generating invalid classpath entries
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool :)
I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..
Ah yeah, I was using trunk. We should add them for 4.0.x I guess -
though hopefully we can release 4.1 soon
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
I have Sun JDK v1.4.2_12 installed in C:\SUNJDK142. JAVA_HOME is set to the same dir.
--vamsiOn 10/5/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is your JAVA_HOME set to ?Thanks
Anita- Original Message From: Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
dev@geronimo.apache.orgTo:
Tribes as the default group communication implementation for WADI
-
Key: GERONIMO-2468
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2468
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
Allow sharing of a single WADI group communication instance between multiple
Web-app
Key: GERONIMO-2469
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2469
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1551?page=all ]
Gianny Damour resolved GERONIMO-1551.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Invalid
This is no more required: Tomcat integration code has been removed and Jetty
integration code has
On 10/5/06, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes we go like that. Do you think is it ok to display list of schema's
tables in a deployed pool in the Geronimo console?
If I take your meaning correctly then the way a connection would be
tested would be to list the schema's tables.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2468?page=all ]
Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-2468:
Component/s: Clustering
Should have been created as a Clustering component improvement.
Tribes as the default group communication implementation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2468?page=all ]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-2468.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
This is now done.
Tribes as the default group communication implementation for WADI
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2469?page=all ]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-2469.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
This is now done.
Allow sharing of a single WADI group communication instance between multiple
Web-app
Add support for Session Replication
---
Key: GERONIMO-2470
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2470
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2320?page=comments#action_12440162
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2320:
Just had it happen on the Jetty build with a PostgreSQL pool (likewise when I
just downloaded the driver,
Hello all,
I finally managed to get my project development/testing server up and
working on 1.2-snapshot (Thanks again djencks!).
And I finally got to see the JMX console that was added - Which is very
cool.
But, I think that it brings to light a performance issue. Because we
are using
I do not see this problem on the trunk. This morning I also deployed a MYSQL DBPool on tomcat-j2ee using Download Driver -- Skip Test and Show Plan -- Deploy Pool and it worked fine. The pool was listed in 'Database Pools'.ThanksAnita- Original Message From: Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
On 10/5/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not see this problem on the trunk.
That's good, but I'd still like to see the issue fixed in the 1.1 line...
Thanks,
Aaron
- Original Message
From: Aaron Mulder (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
To:
The idea was to get something working now... and then refactor later.
--jason
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:33 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
The plugins should use this, since they have similar restrictions at
install time but not at runtime. It would be nice to carry that over
so any installed Java
On 10/5/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea was to get something working now... and then refactor later.
No problem -- once you check it in let's put in a Jira to link it up
for runtime start operations too.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:33 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
ognl-2.6.9.jar is 164k compared to 129k for commons-jexl... so I'm
inclined to use jexl for now based on its size and relative simplicity.
--jason
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:45 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
btw.. ongl might also be a good canidate to use as an expression
language.
On 10/4/06,
As I mentioned earlier, I agree your page is quite useful and we
should keep it around. However, Dain and I will stick with our own,
more detailed, page for our release management efforts.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi Alan,
I wouldn't say that I have
For the simple expressions we are using I don't think it matters...
and the jexl bits are already coded... once this is committed, if you
guys still want ognl we can look at replacing it. But right now I
don't care enough to change it.
--jason
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dain Sundstrom
Hello Jay,
I agree with your idea to improve Dojo’s performance in G. I suggest you
create a JIRA for this so we can keep track of it. You might want to
checkout the Dojo builder (uses ant) which packages js and related files
into a single compressed js file. I think somebody from the devlist
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2463?page=comments#action_12440214
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2463:
TODO: Add support for version ranges like {{1.4+}} or {{1.5*}}
Add support to conditionally load modules
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could build
and cache custom
Okay, I implemented a ognl condition parser... it appears that the
similar syntax can be used... so !java.is1_5 appears to work in both.
Not sure which is better though, both provide some sort of syntax
errors... neither complains about invalid variable references.
I will update the patch
Supprot a create=false option on the vm://localhost transport so that the
connect fails if the broker is not allready running
-
Key: AMQ-958
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-958?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-958.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed in trunk revision: 453380
Supprot a create=false option on the vm://localhost transport so that the
connect fails if the broker
Paul McMahan wrote:
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could
Paul McMahan wrote:
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-813?page=comments#action_37112 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-813:
---
Hi Gary,
Please open a new issue since ti seems like a different problem. Also, a small
web app test case would help us be
I marked the ones to remove IMO with an X
I seem to have a more extreme view of micro than you :-)
I'd also prefer to pull the specs out of rmi-naming into a separate
config so we can swap in the jee5 ones more easily.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 5, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The
I think we need to keep enough in there that the command-line deploy
tool still works. It looks like online-deployer is empty (or else I
would have said to keep that), but I think j2ee-security is required
for the JMX remoting used by the deploy tool. Without this, I think
you'll have to mangle
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-805?page=all ]
Tom Kaitchuck reopened AMQ-805:
---
This issue seems to have never been fixed.
Restart network bridges if they ever get stopped
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-805?page=comments#action_37114 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-805:
---
Hi Tom,
do you have a test case?
Restart network bridges if they ever get stopped
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-805?page=all ]
Tom Kaitchuck updated AMQ-805:
--
Attachment: test_patch.diff
Does this make sense as a way to deal with the problem?
Obviously before committing this we should make the interval configurable,
On Oct 5, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think we need to keep enough in there that the command-line deploy
tool still works. It looks like online-deployer is empty (or else I
would have said to keep that), but I think j2ee-security is required
for the JMX remoting used by the deploy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't get me wrong: I'm not aiming at critisizing the example or
the great work done so far. I'm just and only trying to show where newbies
lack information. As the user feedback request showed, for most users
quality of information is an issue -- and mainly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1823?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona updated GERONIMO-1823:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-1823-trunk2.patch
ldapviewer-jetty-1.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1823?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona updated GERONIMO-1823:
-
Attachment: ldapviewer-portlet-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jpg
ldapviewer-webapp-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jpg
Add Embedded LDAP Server
org.apache.servicemix.soap.handlers.security.WSSecurityHandlerTest
--
Key: SM-680
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-680
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
I am looking at migrating the openejb-itests to the new testsuite framework.
I already have the plan migrated to the 1.1 format. However I have
some questions regarding the way the classes for the ejb jars are set
up and the classes for tests. Can someone please shed some light on it
and help me
Yes, we need to keep enough to be able to run the command line deployer.
When I pulled j2ee-deployer I was unable to run the command line
deploy.
more comments/questions below
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think we need to keep enough in there that
org.apache.servicemix.jsr181.Jsr181SpringTest
-
Key: SM-681
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-681
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: servicemix-jsr181
org.apache.servicemix.jsr181.Jsr181SpringProxyTest
--
Key: SM-682
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-682
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components:
org.apache.servicemix.jsr181.Jsr181ProxySUTest
--
Key: SM-683
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-683
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: servicemix-jsr181
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-684?page=all ]
Fritz Oconer updated SM-684:
Summary: (servicemix-itests)
org.apache.servicemix.itests.deadlock.DeadlockTest (was:
org.apache.servicemix.itests.deadlock.DeadlockTest)
Component/s:
org.apache.servicemix.itests.deadlock.DeadlockTest
--
Key: SM-684
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-684
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components:
(servicemix-itests) org.apache.servicemix.itests.WSNComponentTest
-
Key: SM-685
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-685
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
(servicemix-itests) org.apache.servicemix.itests.Jsr181HttpTest
---
Key: SM-686
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-686
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
(servicemix-itests) org.apache.servicemix.itests.HttpJmsRoundtripTest
-
Key: SM-687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-687
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type:
(servicemix-itests) org.apache.servicemix.itests.EIPAndXsltTest
---
Key: SM-688
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-688
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Sub-task
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2465?page=all ]
Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-2465.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Created a repository list at
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/plugin-repository-list-1.2.txt and
Just checked in a first take on pluggable stomp to amq translation.
Right now there is one interface defined for doing both message
conversions and destination name conversions.
The behavior for the legacy conversion scheme is identical, I just
moved the code around so that those four
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413?page=comments#action_12440341
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2413:
---
Excerpt from my first comment:
Certification Authority portlet with the following functions:
1.
88 matches
Mail list logo
