On Jun 15, 2006, at 1:27 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/15/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* java.lang.IllegalStateException: Timer already cancelled
exception happens when acquiring a connection from a database pool
All but
Matt,
This is good. However, I think it's useful to think in terms of a
1.1.x release stream, or at least two 1.1.x releases. Where 1.1.1 is
going to address our worst/highest priority problems. 1.1.x should be
very soon (a few weeks?) after 1.1. This would be followed by a 1.1.2
which I
On Jun 17, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevan Miller wrote:
In Ken's announcement of the change to the commit model, he stated
that a +1 to an RTC request means I have applied this patch and
tested it and found it good
On Jun 20, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo
community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership
of Joe Bohn. Joe has contributed in many areas, including the
console and as of recent, the work on our minimal
+1
--kevan
On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The corrections applied due to license files are first in this
list. Thanks to John for dogging this.
The distributions and builds were not affected. Based on previous
feedback the vote continues. Thanks for your feedback.
On Jul 3, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Simon Godik wrote:
I'm having difficulty building 1.0.0 tag. Dependencies are missing:
commons-fileupload-1.1-dev.jar, dwr-1.0.jar,
org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-corba_2.3_spec/1.0/jar
I did not get past corba dependency. Any special instructions for
1.0
On Jul 7, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey Jacek,
BTW, I apologize about the blessing of the final 3 +1s within the 18
hours period. I did not mean to go against your statement. I just
recalled an email about 3 +1s allowed it to happen and there was no
need
to wait...that a -1
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
In the Derby library does not have line number debug information
mail thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to
upgrade to the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].
David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I tried to build the v1.1 of Geronimo tag and I noticed that when I
went
to do a m:co of openejb, it is giving me the openejb branch instead of
the 2.1 tag. Sure enough, upon perusal of the tagged root maven.xml,
its pulling the openejb
diligence first
We still need to fix the reference to people.apache.org...
--kevan
Kevan Miller (JIRA) wrote:
Tagged versions of Geronimo should not include people.apache.org/
repository in their list of maven repositories
On Jul 9, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 9:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There's a geronimo version of the commonj spec at
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec:1.0:jar at
ibiblio. I'm not entirely
On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
You know... every field in an interface is by default public static
and final. Adding these modifiers is redundant.
You're right, of course. They already had redundant 'public
static'. The patch that Jeremy submitted added the 'final'. I
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would
should be to avoid releasing with any outstanding -1 votes, but it's not a requirement...--kevanOn Jul 10, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Jul 9, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 9:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There's a geronimo version of the commonj spec at
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec:1.0:jar at
ibiblio. I'm not entirely
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to survive
another six months. We definitely need to get someone else to take
that job for a while.
What do you
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to
survive another six months. We
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to
survive
Sachin,
I'm afraid I don't see either a NOTICE or LICENSE files in the plugin
zip file, itself, nor any of the embedded jar files. They all must
contain both LICENSE and NOTICE files. Afraid this is a hard
requirement. And you'll need to create new binaries... See http://
C5.ziphttp://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-updatesite-RC5.zip (still uploading available shortly)On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,I'm afraid I don't see either a NOTICE or LICENSE files in the plugin zip file, itself, nor any of the embedded jar files
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileWhich root license file I you referring to? Do I just append each license to this?By root, I meant the notice
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of release candidate drivers in one day)http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC10.zipSachin, All the license/notices
It looks like we didn't release geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar when we
released the last round of geronimo specs. The only repo in which I
can find the jar is people.apache.org/repository (http://
people.apache.org/repository/geronimo-spec/jars/geronimo-spec-
corba-1.0.jar).
Matt or Alan, is
Hey David,
I'd like to get this process rolling for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT and 1.2-
SNAPSHOT. Are these builds running on GBuild? Can we get multiple
people (not just you) to help maintain this?
--kevan
On May 10, 2006, at 9:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates
We've been letting the GBuild builds push out the Maven 1 artifacts.
I was just working on getting the javamail spec into gbuild, since
this is killing the Geronimo 1.2 build.
We need some process for getting Maven 2 artifacts deployed. Jason,
didn't you have some ideas on how to get that
Agreed.
--kevan
On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to make the change (pending tck verification)
-dain
On Jul 14, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've been taking some hard looks at all of the places where
Geronimo creates/configures ORB instances as part of an
official
locations are for m2 artifacts (release + snapshot + sync to central).
--jason
On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
We've been letting the GBuild builds push out the Maven 1
artifacts. I was just working on getting the javamail spec into
gbuild, since this is killing
the current official
locations are for m2 artifacts (release + snapshot + sync to
central).
--jason
On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
We've been letting the GBuild builds push out the Maven 1
artifacts. I was just working on getting the javamail spec into
gbuild, since
Dims, thanks a bunch.
+1
To be safe, I'm starting up some Geronimo tests using this new
release of Commons-Modeler. I'll give you an update tomorrow.
--kevan
On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Team,
I'd like to help cut a release of 1.2 of Commons-Modeler as requested
Rick,
You seem to be attaching a lot of patches to Jira's for what seem to
be bug fixes. Is there a reason why you aren't committing them?
--kevan
On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Rick McGuire (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2199?page=all ]
Rick McGuire
Doh!
Sorry, obviously didn't look at the patches or read the jira
closely... I'll have a look at them this afternoon.
--kevan
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Rick,
You seem to be attaching a lot of patches to Jira's for what seem
to be bug fixes
On Jul 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Well, I think adding the files to every module is potentially a
problem. I think the release should have a central place all
modules derive their LICENSE file from. The NOTICIES file is a
different animal.
Matt,
What modules are you
I think the first two are definitely bugs. You lost me on the
discussion of 2128...
I'd like to see the discussion included on OpenEJB dev, also...
--kevan
On Jul 17, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I opened 3 JIRAs that affect CMP deployment, Session bean
performance and
Hey Jason,
These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For example
the Geronimo 1.2 :: Configs build used geronimo/configs. So, at the
moment the configs, applications, and assembly phases of the G 1.2
build are broken.
I've never really cared for separating the build steps
Somebody recently added Jencks and Lingo projects to Continuum
running on GGbuild. That's all fine. However, the builds are failing.
I tried fixing up the svn url being used for the Jencks project, but
it's still failing. Could whoever added the projects fix things up so
that the builds
ven 1 or 2 project. That's how a fair number of our existing projects were added.--kevan On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Hey Jason,These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For example the "Geronimo 1.2 :: Configs" build used geronimo/configs. So, at th
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Whilst testing the geronimo eclipse plugin, eclipse prompted me to
acknowledge the Sun license at http://developers.sun.com/license/
berkeley_license.html when caching the j2ee schema files (e.g.
to be I'd rather do away with splitting up the build.
--kevan
On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Hey Jason,
These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For
example the Geronimo 1.2 :: Configs build used geronimo/configs.
So, at the moment the configs
with Jencks and Lingo trying to get the builds to work, I
suddenly got the urge to stop... My note was the result... :-)
--kevan
On 7/17/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody recently added Jencks and Lingo projects to Continuum
running on GGbuild. That's all fine. However
FYI -- all our test results looked good.
--kevan
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Dims, thanks a bunch.
+1
To be safe, I'm starting up some Geronimo tests using this new
release of Commons-Modeler. I'll give you an update tomorrow.
--kevan
On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:02 PM
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
corba:1.0?
Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
The problem with the geronimo-corba-2.3 spec is that it's built using
the new IDL compiler. This compiler
/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
--kevan
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
corba:1.0?
Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
The problem
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Whilst testing the geronimo eclipse plugin, eclipse prompted me
to acknowledge the Sun license at http://developers.sun.com/
license/berkeley_license.html when caching
and compiling the information is the
hard part, not getting them into the necessary format...
--kevan
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Whilst testing
On Jul 25, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK, so, I've now discovered that the Geronimo 1.1 CARs are not in the
Maven 1 repo, as well as not being in the Maven 2 repo.
I believe they will need to be in order to build Geronimo CARs or
Geronimo Plugins from Maven (with the
Looks like your base LICENSE and NOTICE files contain only AL 2.0
license information. Since you're releasing code under multiple
licenses, according to http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html, all
license/notice information needs to be placed there.
--kevan
On Jul 26, 2006, at 1:26 AM,
). I just faxed my NDA for
confidential materials. I'll let you know when I get my
authorization.
Hey Joe,
That's great! Thanks.
--kevan
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system
leaves a config.ser in the
repository but doesn't write a config.info causing problems later.
GERONIMO-2080 Open John Sisson Create a Geronimo Bug
Guidelines Page
GERONIMO-2169 Open Kevan Miller
Once tagged, the m:co goal of tags/1.1.1 should checkout the
corresponding
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hey everyone,
We're almost there for 1.1.1. I noticed that people are opeening
new JIRA's for 1.1.1 which is great. However, unless you feel you
can get them done before the cut off time please put them in 1.x or
1.2. I plan on
On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Just back online after OSCON. Reading/replying on this thread one
at a time.
On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'm interested in setting up VMware Server on my GBuild boxes, since
my understanding is that the TCK is pretty
Congrats David!
--kevan
On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The PMC would like to welcome David Jencks as the newest member of
the PMC. Please join us in welcoming David.
Matt
Agreed. I'm seeing problems during TCK runs, also. We've obviously
regressed somewhere. I'm pretty sure it's happened in the last two
weeks (or at least one of the problems was created in the last two
weeks).
I've already started looking at the Jira Jeff raised -- GERONIMO-2240.
--kevan
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Concur...blocked.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Jeff just noted that Liferay seems to take an abnormal amount of
memory to run.
I just redeployed the console twice and got an OutOfMemoryError.
When working on the console for 1.1, I could redeploy
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Most of the remaining issues marked for 1.1.1 seem to have been fixed
for 1.1.1 but are still open pending different solutions for 1.2.
There is one big exception -- an ERROR during shutdown on Java 5. It
would be great if someone could look
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner. RTC is a
development model; what it and CTR are concerned with are
patches. Please call them patches. Changes are
Geronimo community members,
There is a Geronimo BOF being held at LinuxWorld in San Francisco,
later this month. Here are the details that I have:
BOF 15: Apache Geronimo 1.1 - Open Source Application Server
Wednesday, August 16, from 6-7 PM
Moscone Center Room 305
I'll be there. Anyone else
Hi Dave,The current deadline for the new policy is for releases distributed after Sept 1. See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. Some people are questioning that deadline. However, I'd guess that 1.1.1 will be our last release under existing policy...--kevanOn Aug 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM,
stuff that needs adding to the NOTICE file?
On 8/3/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for
derby, at
least.
Also, the shell scripts in /bin are not marked executable when I
untar the tar distribution...
--kevan
On Aug 1
+1
On Aug 7, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We've gotten through the initial TCK tests. I am going to branch
OEJB branches/v2_1 to branches/2.1.1 and remove the SNAPSHOT. I
will then build and update Geronimo. One we have the final run
I'll do a move to tags. This is all being
Congrats Paul!
--kevan
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our
midst. Paul McMahan has recently accepted an invitation to join
the Geronimo project. Paul has been active on Geronimo for several
months and
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
all also issues in 1.1.
DEPLOYMENT
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
- Redeploy broken when module ID does not include a type (patch
available)
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe
they are
all also issues in 1.1.
DEPLOYMENT
http
, only that, to my knowledge, it hasn't been discussed...
You gave two additional reasons for not performing the work at
Apache. I commented on those two reasons. The rest inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006
Looks like we're stuck halfway in updating for the release.
branches/1.1.1 needs to be updated to checkout openejb/branches/
v2_1_1/openejb2
Hogstrom, are you doing that?
--kevan
--kevan
On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Build is failing since OpenEJB is looking for
It definitely impacts aspects of TCK. Agreed that it's important that
we hear from the people who are going to get those aspects of the TCK
working... ;-)
At this point, I don't see any harm in dropping m1. It's not going to
add any additional work and will drive our adoption of m2...
Sounds good.
--kevan
On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead
with the tagging and bagging of OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no
objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it
to tags.
Objections?
On Aug 9, 2006, at 10:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I am trying to build the eclipse project files for a clean 1.1 build.
I did the following:
* svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1
* cd 1.1
* maven m:fresh-checkout
* maven new
* maven m:eclipse -o
The m:eclipse
On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1.1.1 is in a form that we can get ready to release it. I was
talking with Aaron and he mentioned that there were some security
issues he was concerned about. I
I'm not getting that far... I'm getting a test failure in modules/
activation:
test:test:
[junit] Running org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.MailcapTest
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
0.237 sec
[junit] [ERROR] Test
Which spec was updated by Alan's fix? Shouldn't it be at a SNAPSHOT
version, also? I'd expect geronimoSpecsVersion and at least one spec
version to be SNAPSHOT... Are there any other spec changes which will
be released?
--kevan
On Aug 14, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The old pom
On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
What is the status on 1.1.1 wrt this change? Can I go ahead and
make these changes?
My reading of Matt's note (which I agree with) is that you should
wait until 1.1.1 has been shipped (unless 1.1.1 runs into an extended
delay in
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I've chopped off the obvious ones... but there are still 185 marked
as Not Merged which someone should peep at.
I generally hate all things microsoft... except I'm starting to
like my xbox, and well excel was really handy to sort the table
Congrats Guillaume!
--kevan
On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an
invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best
known for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been
available to
As long as we have inter-dependencies between specs (e.g. javamail
depends on activation; jaxrpc on saaj, qname, and servlet; and
especially geronimo-spec-j2ee depends on everything), I'm not
convinced that this really makes things any better...
I agree that your plan is better than the
+1
--kevan
On Aug 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Given that we are close to completing the M2 conversion and have
some disruptive changes to make to trunk this vote is to capture
the communities input on the structure of the Geronimo repository.
Given that this is about our
On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 21, 2006, at 7:13 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
As long as we have inter-dependencies between specs (e.g.
javamail depends on activation; jaxrpc on saaj, qname, and
servlet
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:47 PM, toby cabot wrote:
Hi Folks,
We're using 1.0 and while it's getting a little long in the tooth it
still works great. I tried to build it the other day and had some
problems, mostly relating to various external infrastructure changing.
If anyone cares, here are the
On Aug 22, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 21, 2006, at 7:13 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
As long as we have inter
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Well, the current activation spec is at version 1.1. When that
version was bumped from 1.0 (or 1.0.x), you'd have needed to know/
remember to change the poms in the following specs: geronimo
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
Review-Then-Commit model for a couple of months now,
and I think the issues the change was intended to
highlight have been .. well,
Congrats, David!
--kevan
On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC.
David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily
and that is joining
Geronimo GBuild uses ActiveMQ to pass build requests/results between GBuild
agents. Twice, now, the M4 ActiveMQ server has become unresponsive and
required a restart. Unfortunately, logging information was not captured.
However, nohup output was captured and contained a thread dump.
I took a look
On 3/9/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2006/3/8, Kevan Miller (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org: GBuild agent JMS reconnect logic is incorrect
-
Key: GERONIMO-1719URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1719
I thought GBuild has
Hi Alexei,Thanks for the information. Are you both building and running tests with JRockit? Or are you building w/ Sun and only running tests under JRockit? Would be good to isolate the two. Good chance, however, that it won't make any difference... Geronimo currently has direct ties to the Sun
Jacek,
Builds run under the continuum login on stan.gbuild.org. If you don't
have a login, already, I'm sure we could get you one...
Here's an excerpt from TEST-
org.apache.geronimo.jetty.SecurityTest.txt on stan. Let me know if
you need more info...
Failed to initialize module
On Mar 20, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/20, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Failed to initialize module
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to configure properties
file login module: java.net.UnknownHostException: home
kernel name: geronimo.test" and "runFinalizer" messages seem to imply that you're seeing collisions between Junit tests on different components...--kevan Regards, Alexei 2006/3/18, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Alexei, Thanks for the information. Are you both building and run
Hmmm. Good question. I would guess that David copied the LICENSE.txt
from the util directory and didn't realize it wasn't the Apache
license. Is it proper that util only contains the BouncyCastle
license?
--kevan
On Mar 29, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Why is the BouncyCastle
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I just ran a clean build of trunk and once again received the out
of memory error. Here are some of the details:
- Whenever I see this problem I also get multiple instances of
messages issued (14 each in this most recent case). I've attached
On Mar 31, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I get the following error building 1.1. It looks like some OpenEJB
class wants org/apache/geronimo/interceptor/Interceptor which doesn't
seem to be present (now
org/apache/geronimo/core/service/Interceptor?). I don't have OpenEJB
checked out,
Last night's Continuum build of Geronimo 1.1 didn't run any tests
(which I think is a problem). However, it still failed later on in
AxisBuilder.createServiceInterfaceProxy().
I'm building fine, locally. However, I haven't picked up last nights
updates...
Dain,
Looks like you're the most
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:25 AM, John Sisson wrote:
I tried building 1.1 on Solaris and got the following error (note
the FileNotFoundException at the bottom):
I read on IRC that DayTrader was working on 1.1, are there changes
that haven't been committed?
Hi John,
The problem isn't specific
On Apr 3, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 4/3/06, continuum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Online report : http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/
target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/1880
Build statistics:
State: Failed
How can I know what has caused it?
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 4/3/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You'd need a login onto the GBuild machines -- in particularstan.gbuild.org. Seems like you and I discussed this previously.You'll need to check with David Blevins. Done it. Awaiting his response.Do
-up to the story about BEA VMs. I have analized
2006/3/21, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 20, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Kevan,
I was lucky to build it using JRockit 1.4.2 + Maven 1.1 Beta.
Therefore,
this was a pure JRockit experiment.
As for dependencies from Sun
On Apr 9, 2006, at 9:23 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Well Safari just about crashes my machine trying to load the continuum
report page, and it comes up with a text area like 10 screens wide...
But UI aside, the long and the short if it is that the most recent
failure was caused by an
On Apr 11, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I asked about it before, but can't find the answer.
How can I upload Geronimo jars to Maven1 and Maven2 repositories on
iBiblio. I'd like to use M2-ized version of some already-migrated
modules, but since they're not
Hi Jeff,
I'd prefer to make some progress 1.1 testing-wise before throwing a
new version of Tomcat into the mix. Once things are relatively
stable, with the current 1.1 codebase, then we could move up the
Tomcat version. Otherwise, I'm afraid we're going to be dealing with
too many
OK. It's causing me problems, now. Guess we'd better do something
about it... ;-)
Dave, have you tried removing installer from your assemblies? Wonder
if this is an installer assembly issue or a general assembly issue. I
would assume it's a general issue...
Running with maven -X, you get
[X ] +1 - Close development for 1.1 on Monday 4/24 0600 PT
--kevan
On Apr 20, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping
tape on the box. There have been new features / functions coming
in and at some point we need to
1 - 100 of 3005 matches
Mail list logo
