us If there is a plan for continuing 1.3
> line.
>
> Thanks,
> - Youngwoo
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > This week I'm planning to go through the hanging jiras
> > and see where we are on it.
> >
> > Please sp
Sounds good to me.
This effort [to make coordination engine that HBase uses pluggable] was
started and work was done towards making dependency of ZK separated into
the set of defined interfaces, but subsequent phases never were completed.
The proposed cleanup sounds good to me. Thanks for taking
If ASF has "official" slack channels then migrating over to it might be
just the logical thing to do?
-Mikhail
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Prefacing this with the disclaimer that I'm not a regular slack user, so I
> don't know what serves those users best.
>
> Are we cur
This week I'm planning to go through the hanging jiras
and see where we are on it.
Please speak up if you have open jiras targeted to 1.3.2 that you'd
like to get to 1.3.2 or backport in there, also if you have any concerns
regarding the jiras that already went in or are about to, or have any
find
I apologize for being late to this discussion, but will add a few points
here.
Speaking of moving stable pointer to 1.3.2 release, as you say:
>>>"According to our testing at Salesforce, yes, so far. We have yet to run
in
full production. Give us a few months of that and my answer will be
uncondi
Yeah all 89-fb jiras should be closed I think.
Mikhail
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:53 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Thanks, I was trying to get it without anchoring on a specific issue, but
> the correct JIRA rest command escaped me at the time.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Dave Latham wrote:
I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18090 some time ago
and attached draft patch to it. It's not complete as we need some deeper
changes in the way we open regions (see comments) but basic stuff works (I
ended up going the other route and didn't have bandwidth to finish that -
wo
I can also start separate discussion thread on what prevents 1.3 (and 1.4
subsequently, though Andrew would be the right person here) from being
marked stable in our books, so this issue gets more focused attention.
-Mikhail
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> I think
I think in the dev community interest and ultimately in interest of our
users to have a fewer maintained branches.
For a variety of reasons.
Efforts put in the maintenance of old release lines is the effort not put
into releasing new ones, since community resources are
finite. Active backporting
I totally agree we have too many branches to maintain.
I think we should EOL 1.1. 1.2 has been out and stable for a long time,
doesn't have any outstanding major problems preventing upgrade that I'm
aware of, though obviously Sean would know better.
Speaking of 1.3, there's one issue that I feel
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-18397:
---
Summary: StoreFile accounting issues on branch-1.3 and branch-1
Key: HBASE-18397
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18397
Project: HBase
Congratulations and welcome Ashu!
-Mikhail
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Ashu Pachauri
wrote:
> Thank you, everyone!
>
> Best,
> Ashu Pachauri
>
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Allan Yang wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Ashu!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Allan
> >
> > 2017-06-17 18:55 GMT+08
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-18090:
---
Summary: Improve TableSnapshotInputFormat to allow more multiple
mappers per region
Key: HBASE-18090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18090
+1 for not trying to backport massive new features to branch-1.
IMO Branch-1 release lines should be continuing the path towards
maintenance mode only.
-Mikhail
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> bq. concentrate on getting MOB out the door in 2.0.
>
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, May 15, 201
wrote:
> While I'm in there, I'll drop 1.3.0 as well? Should be only one release per
> branch, IIRC.
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:30 PM Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > +1, and also to EOM 0.98.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <
&g
+1, and also to EOM 0.98.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> We also have decided 0.98 is EOM too, I believe.
>
>
> > On Apr 30, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> >
> > Heya,
> >
> > I noticed we still have hbase-0.94.27 and hbase-1.0.3 syncing out on the
> > mirrors
tag rel/1.3.1 has been pushed.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Pushing release tag is a step I tend to forget :( Thanks for the ping!
> Will push the tag tomorrow.
>
> -Mikhail
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 PM, lars hofhansl wrote:
>
>>
Pushing release tag is a step I tend to forget :( Thanks for the ping! Will
push the tag tomorrow.
-Mikhail
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:26 PM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> I don't see a 1.3.1 tag, yet.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
The HBase team is happy to announce the immediate availability of HBase 1.3
.1!
Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational
database. Apache HBase gives you low latency random access to billions of
rows with millions of columns atop non-specialized hardware. To learn mor
push it and post an announcement.
Thanks,
Mikhail
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Stack wrote:
> Did this get pushed?
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce
Congratulations Yu!
-Mikhail
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Congratulations Yu and thanks a lot! Keep up the good work!
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:22 AM Anoop John wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC I"m pleased to announce that Yu Li
> > has accepted our
Yeah, I also would prefer to wait until 1.3.1 is released.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > Okay, so rephrasing.
> >
> > I'd rather not mark 1.3.0 as the stable release since HBASE-17069 is in
+1 to EOL 0.98.
Thanks Andrew for all the work maintaining it!
-Mikhail
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Dima Spivak wrote:
> +1
>
> -Dima
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > I agree we should EOL 0.98.
> > St.Ack
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell
Compatibility report is available at:
http://home.apache.org/~antonov/1.3.0_1.3.1RC1_compat_report.html
-Mikhail
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that the second release candidate for Apache HBase
> 1.3.
.html
>
> This didn't show up at all.
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:42 PM Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm. Looks like this change has already went out in 1.2.5 though, looking
> > at
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> ver
n for one week and close Fri Apr 14, 2017 02:00 PST.
Thanks !
-Mikhail Antonov
suspends and will wait for Sean's response.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 6 April 2017 at 16:50, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
>
> > My bad on not checking compatibility report here.
> >
> > I think leaving unified metric names in place is conceptually right thing
ed, and supporting both names and (add-back and) mark the old one
> > deprecated as per Duo suggested in 17886 might be a good idea?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > On 6 April 2017 at 14:42, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm. Looks
then, or leave as is?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Thanks Yu Li!
>
> You picture doesn't load for me, could you repost? I'll run compatibility
> checker too.
>
> -Mikhail
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Yu Li wrote:
>
&
79)
> Compatibility check: Failed
>
>
>
> Checked the commit history and the above issue is introduced by
> HBASE-17716, and have opened HBASE-17886 to fix it.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 6 April 2017 at 07:38, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
>
>> Hello ever
All right, I cherry picked HBASE-17227 and the first RC is out.
Thanks Andrew for the help pushing it!
-Mikhail
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Thanks Andrew!
>
> So after open jiras has been re-targeted for 1.3.2 and looking at the
> filter
> `aff
ackage as Apache HBase 1.3.1
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
This Vote will run for one week and close Wed Apr 12, 2017 22:00 PST.
Thanks ! (also separate thanks to Andrew Purtell for the help to get the RC
out)
-Mikhail Antonov
t-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git
>fd297e2..3a2f3aa branch-1.3 -> branch-1.3
> * [new tag] 1.3.1RC0 -> 1.3.1RC0
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been planning to cut an
releases. Just ping me when you need a hand, Mikhail.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:35 PM Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been planning to cut an RC for 1.3.1 for some time, apologize for
> the
> > delay here. I'm going to go over out
Hi,
I've been planning to cut an RC for 1.3.1 for some time, apologize for the
delay here. I'm going to go over outstanding jiras tomorrow,
I think there are still few issues waiting for backports.
Andrew - appreciate your offer! I have started preparations for 1.3.1
release, but any help with tr
Congratulations and welcome!!
-Mikhail
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Congrats, and warm welcome.
>
> Enis
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Jiang
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations! Looking forward to working with all 3 of you and make
> > HBase better!
> >
> >
to branch-2.1, branch-2.2, branch-3".
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
> >>"The only way forward for saving 2.0 at this point is to *make the
> branch
> and spin the RC."
>
> big +1 to that.
>
> I do also think that talking about
>>"The only way forward for saving 2.0 at this point is to *make the branch
and spin the RC."
big +1 to that.
I do also think that talking about planning in the context of open-source
community development is a bit hard - there's no planning but what people
do. If we release regularly, however, w
Hey guys,
It's been 2 months since 1.3 release came out; time to start preparing
1.3.1 release (and then time to assess when 1.3 should be labeled "latest
stable" in the book).
Looking at the Jira there's about 40 committed patches to branch-1.3, about
a dozen jiras in review and 2 dozens or a bi
;>>>>>> jdk1.8.
> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> That means there is some library which has to be compiled
> >>> > >> with
> >>> > >>>>> jdk8
> >>> > >>>>>>> or
> &
Thanks Ted!
Yeah we need to wind down the rate of changes for 1.3.1 and actually wrap
it up. First need to make sure CI builds are stable, because
for the past month they really have not been so. Then I was going to go
over the git history and compare it with what's
marked as "fixedV=1.3.1" in Jir
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-17643:
---
Summary: Failing/flaky tests on branch-1.3
Key: HBASE-17643
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17643
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Done; created tag named rel/1.3.0, it's been synced to GH.
-Mikhail
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Oh. There is 1.3.0RC0 in Apache repo, but it seems there' no finalized
> release tag pushed. Let me check.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience.
>
>
Oh. There is 1.3.0RC0 in Apache repo, but it seems there' no finalized
release tag pushed. Let me check.
Sorry for inconvenience.
-Mikhail
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Zach York wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at the github tags and there doesn’t appear to be one for
> release 1.3.0.
> I
+1 to delete
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Maybe it's meant to serve a notion like "core"? Anyway it doesn't seem
> useful. +1 for deleting it.
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > Anyone know what the intended scope of the "hbase" component
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-17524:
---
Summary: HBase 1.3.1 release
Key: HBASE-17524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17524
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Umbrella
rerequisites). They are good
> places to document this and suggest to use a later version of Hadoop if
> needed. I can open a JIRA to do it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Stack. I ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-15341.
-
Resolution: Fixed
resolving after 1.3.0 release
> 1.3 release umbre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-15347.
-
Resolution: Fixed
resolving as 1.3.0 was released
> Update CHANGES.txt for
The HBase team is happy to announce the immediate availability of HBase 1.3.
0!
Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational
database.
Apache HBase gives you low latency random access to billions of rows with
millions of columns atop non-specialized hardware. To learn mor
er scale.
> Will do for 1.3.1. Have done a bunch of larger scale ITBLLs w/ Chaos on
> recent tips of 1.3 and it seemed sound.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the first re
02):
> > > Loaded 1 million rows with LTT (8u102, 10 readers, 10 writers, 10
> > updaters
> > > @ 20%): all keys verified, no unexpected or unusual messages in the
> logs,
> > > latencies in the ballpark
> > > 1 billion row ITBLL (8u102): failed, but known
ntainer on the
> upstream branch (this will change).
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > I should say I was talking more about "should these things be discussed
> > together or separately", not any particular direction we s
Yeah - thank you for all hard work and time investment on reviews,
cherry-picking, backporting and testing Andrew!
+1 to retire 0.98.
-Mikhail
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Thanks for all the hard work around 0.98 Andrew!
>
> I'm +1 on retiring 0.98, but I think we shou
ntain
branch-1 lines until at least Feb 2018 definitely makes total sense to me.
2 years overlap with 2.0 might be something we'd want to discuss in some
more depth.
-Mikhail
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Mikhail Antonov
>
I like this idea in general (and thanks for volunteering!).
Speaking specifically about branch-1 and given 2.0 release
discussions, is it proper time/thread to also discuss what
do we want to do with branch-1? Like, say that 1.4 would be
the last release off this line and hence branch-1 should be
I support that idea of cutting branch-2 early. Yes it will create some
burden for the RM and committers to port things between the
branches, but until the branch is cut we won't have that sense of imminense
of approaching release, and more importantly, until
branch is cut _all_ commits will continu
Hello everyone,
I'm pleased to announce the first release candidate for HBase 1.3.0 is
available to download and testing.
Artifacts are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/1.3.0RC0/
Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-17422:
---
Summary: Broken tests on hbase 1.3
Key: HBASE-17422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17422
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
Thanks.
> >
> > 2017-01-01 9:24 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) :
> >
> >> Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is
> used
> >> to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.
> >>
> >> Could you try to
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-17406:
---
Summary: Occasional failed splits on branch-1.3
Key: HBASE-17406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17406
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
to #86 (the latest).
>
> Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
>
> Do you see the test fail locally ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
> > co
Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't had
cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if someone
could pick this one up.
Congratulations Josh!
-Mikhail
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:20 PM, 张铎 wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> 2016-12-12 9:03 GMT+08:00 Jerry He :
>
> > Congratulations , Josh!
> >
> > Good work on the PQS too.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, all.
(side note @Yu - FYI there has been a number of fixes/optimizations to the
way we cache and invalidate caches of region locations on the client side
in 1.3, see for example HBASE-15658, HBASE-15654).
On the topic -
Hosting meta on the machine that doesn't serve user regions would help to
ensure t
Great to see progress here.
As I'm reading through the list, here're some high-level questions I have:
- Regarding the work on new AssignmentManager - any notes on
perf/stability testing? Are you guys running tips of master branch through
ITBLL setup?
- Anyone (Ram, Anoop?) wants to post a hi
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-17032:
---
Summary: CallQueueTooBigException and CallDroppedException should
not be triggering PFFE
Key: HBASE-17032
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17032
On the original topic - on one hand, the fewer code lines we maintain the
better, as less volunteering time and efforts
are spent on that. Also does postponing of EOL-ing of older releases slow
down adoption of newer releases?
On the other hand, if we believe ITBBL is broken / unreliable for some
l.
Thanks!
-Mikhail
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Looking - thanks!
>
> -M
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li wrote:
>
>> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Looking - thanks!
-M
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li wrote:
> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antono
there but failed to
> draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
>
> Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I've been working on get
Guys,
I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to share
an update on the current state of the things.
- HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
- HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the balancer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-16743.
-
Resolution: Fixed
marking resolved, and filed a separate jira to re-enable it on master
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16966:
---
Summary: Re-enable TestSimpleRpcScheduler#testCoDelScheduling in
master branch
Key: HBASE-16966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16966
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-16951.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> 1.3 assembly scripts dont package hbase-archetypes in the tarb
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16951:
---
Summary: 1.3 assembly scripts don't package hbase-archetypes in
the tarball
Key: HBASE-16951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16951
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-15348.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Fix tests broken by recent metrics re-w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov reopened HBASE-15348:
-
> Fix tests broken by recent metrics re-w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-16701.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.1)
1.3.0
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16909:
---
Summary: Fix TestHRegion and TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush timing
out (second iteration)
Key: HBASE-16909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16909
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Antonov resolved HBASE-16701.
-
Resolution: Fixed
resolving as committed to relevant branches
> TestHRegion
@Andrew sorry if I perhaps missed that..
Are those ITBLL issues you're seeing being tracked / looked at somewhere in
one place? How easily reproducible are they for you?
Intermittent ITBLL failures is what I spent quite a bit of time on earlier
this year..
-Mikhail
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:18 P
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16852:
---
Summary: TestDefaultCompactSelection failed on branch-1.3
Key: HBASE-16852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16852
Project: HBase
Issue
Hi guys,
just wanted to give a heads up on the status of this release. We've been
testing the current 1.3 code against some realistic workloads and here're
the issues that we found so far that need to be addressed before the first
RC.
HBASE-16644 Errors when reading legit HFile' Trailer on branch
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16644:
---
Summary: Errors when reading legit HFile' Trailer on branch 1.3
Key: HBASE-16644
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16644
Project:
ion. Using user defined axis,
> >> tool environment and env variable injection.
> >> See latest diff to https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/
> job
> >> for reference.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Mik
Congratulations!
-Mikhail
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:14 PM, 张铎 wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> 2016-09-08 7:56 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Hsieh :
>
> > Congrats Misty!
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> >
> > > On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC I am pleased to announce that Mist
Congratulations!
-Mikhail
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Honghua Feng 冯宏华
wrote:
> Congratulations, Duo.
>
> 发件人: Ted Yu
> 发送时间: 2016年9月7日 12:31
> 收件人: u...@hbase.apache.org
> 抄送: HBase Dev List
> 主题: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Duo Zhang (张铎) joins the Apache HBa
Congratulations!
-Mikhail
> Congratulations Dima, and thank you!
FYI, I did the same for branch-1.3 builds. I've disabled hbase-1.3 and
hbase-1.3-IT jobs and instead created
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8 and
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-JDK7
This should work for now until we figure out how to move forward.
Thanks,
Mikhail
On Wed, A
Hey guys,
I'm stabilizing branch-1.3 now again getting it ready for release (that was
delayed by integration tests investigations and during that period we
definitely had more changes going into it, so I'm re-stabilizing it again).
So I'd like to limit commits going in this branch to only (ideall
with the release.
I'm stabilizing and cleaning up the branch again for the release. Will send
more updates as it goes.
-Mikhail
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Mikhail Antonov
wrote:
> Lately the only things blocking release have been integration test issues.
>
> First it was HBA
Lately the only things blocking release have been integration test issues.
First it was HBASE-16074 which took quit some time to address.
Now HBASE-16232 is the only thing blocking it
(ITBLL running on sufficiently large cluster with enough regions looses
data. For the record, I once saw the lost
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16232:
---
Summary: ITBLL fails on branch-1.3, now loosing actual keys
Key: HBASE-16232
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16232
Project: HBase
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16230:
---
Summary: Calling 'get' in hbase shell with table name that doesn't
exist causes it to hang for long time
Key: HBASE-16230
URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji
ch point it gets rebooted.
> Troubleshooting tools cause additional outages by freezing the JVM while
> collecting thread traces for hundreds of threads. ASF is trying to engage
> Atlassian support to figure it out. Looks like a JIRA bug.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Mikhail An
Anyone knows ASF Infra / ASF Board position on it? Why is ASF jira not
stable enough - is it matter or insufficient hardware, no people supporting
it or ...?
I probably missed some discussions around this matter in the past.
-Mikhail
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> JIR
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-16118:
---
Summary: TestHFileOutputFormat2 is broken
Key: HBASE-16118
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16118
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
6 at 1:00 PM, Dima Spivak wrote:
>
> > Opened INFRA-12166 to see if ASF Infra can do something to certs on this
> > slave or if we’ll just need to have someone go into all our jobs and
> > exclude building on it manually.
> >
> > -Dima
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 201
d like to, Mikhail).
>
> -Dima
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Mikhail Antonov
> wrote:
>
> > Just saw that on several 1.4 builds -
> >
> > Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException
> > <
> >
> http://stacktrace.jenkins-ci.org/search?que
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
