Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-03-02 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. >> >> $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua > ... >> lua51 Lua - Lua language engine >> lua52

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
All; With the release issues identified during validation, we will call this vote CLOSED with the statement that 2.4.30 is not suitable for public release. I apologise for the clerical error in not noting this sooner. On 2018/02/19 14:54:35, wrote: > Hi, all; > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
It likely makes sense to CLOSE this vote with the result that 2.4.30 is not being released... > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-26 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. > > $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua ... > lua51 Lua - Lua language engine > lua52 Lua - Lua language engine > lua5.2

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate >> /use/lib64 files. >> >> Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? The delta between the first attempt after

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate > /use/lib64 files. > > Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs > may not be so kind. r1825147 works for me on

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate /use/lib64 files. Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs may not be so kind. On Feb 23, 2018 09:15, "Eric Covener" wrote: >> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Eric Covener
>> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for the module in your CentOS example? >> Did it happen to pick up the lib64 path? Or no lib path at all? > > /usr/src/apache/httpd-2.4.x/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc > -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall -O2 -g -o > mod_lua.la -rpath

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/23/2018 03:43 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? >> I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions >> installed as

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? > > On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-23 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions installed as well? On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > This wasn't pretty; candidate 2.4.30 build on current fedora... > >

Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

2018-02-22 Thread William A Rowe Jr
This wasn't pretty; candidate 2.4.30 build on current fedora... /path/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -L/path/lib -o mod_lua.la -rpath /path/modules -module -avoid-version lua_apr.lo lua_config.lo mod_lua.lo lua_request.lo lua_vmprep.lo lua_dbd.lo lua_passwd.lo

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-22 Thread Stefan Eissing
Wow! Nice work! > Am 21.02.2018 um 21:34 schrieb Rainer Jung : > > Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > -1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues > noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, > we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some > backports in STATUS that could also be

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
gt; s/(#define\s+AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN\s+)\d/${1}1/g; >>>> >>>> if(/(#define\s+AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL_NUMBER\s+)(\d+)$/){ >>>> $new = $2 + 1; >>>> $_ = "${1}${new}\n"; >>>> } >>>> ' include/ap_release.h >>>

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread DRuggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 > > Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up > that a T will actually b

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
iew=markup#l47 >> >> It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable >> was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? >> >> -- >> Daniel Ruggeri >> >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] >> Sent: Mon

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
-1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some backports in STATUS that could also be folded in. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
e.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.30/include/ap_release.h?view=markup#l47 > > It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable > was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread DRuggeri
I adjust the script and retry? -- Daniel Ruggeri From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:46 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in ap_release.h is set to 0

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 10:47 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > On 19 Feb 2018, at 5:45 PM, Jim Jagielski > wrote: > >> Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN >> in ap_release.h is set to 0 >> >> How does

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread Graham Leggett
On 19 Feb 2018, at 5:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN > in ap_release.h is set to 0 > > How does your release process work? What we've always > done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy > from that

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in ap_release.h is set to 0 How does your release process work? What we've always done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy from that branch to the tag. So the tag itself must refer to a specific SVN number on the

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate >

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-19 Thread DRuggeri
Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a