Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/26/2006 10:53 PM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
I already have a prototype of an external health checker process that
uses an AJP cping/cpong and a simple connect for http/https.
Basicaly mod_proxy uses the health_worker_method routine to write and
read from a
On 07/27/2006 11:31 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/26/2006 10:53 PM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
I already have a prototype of an external health checker process that
uses an AJP cping/cpong and a simple connect for http/https.
Basicaly mod_proxy uses the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/27/2006 11:31 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/26/2006 10:53 PM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
I already have a prototype of an external health checker process that
uses an AJP cping/cpong and a simple connect for
sorry if this is a double post - I was not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I sent this the 1st time...I am doing some work with Apache 2.2.2 (currently testing win32)
and am running into some problems with CacheEnable and proxy requests.
My ultimate goal is to cache only proxy requests (with
Hello Nick,
I did some tests again with mod_dbd, but now against trunk versions of
httpd, apr, apr-utils. And it seems to me, that the problem persists.
It crashes with the same symptoms as I posted last week.
Function ap_dbd_prepare called with corrupted arguments (s=0x80e6ed0,
Nick,
On Jul 26, 2006, at 1:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?
rev=425677r1=425676r2=425677view=diff
==
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:36:00AM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
...
The real solution of course, is to upgrade to the current release of
PCRE, version 6.7. However, we should probably not do that on the
stable branches.
Agreed. Given that the pcre already shipped and in the tree is patched
Chinese firedrill time folks.
There is a vulnerability affecting mod_rewrite which this release addresses.
See the recent commit activity for detail. Need your votes on the following
in the usual http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1 Package
[ ] apache_1.3.37
[ ] httpd-2.0.59
[ ]
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define SERVER_BASEVENDOR Apache Group
#define SERVER_BASEPRODUCT Apache
-#define SERVER_BASEREVISION 1.3.37
+#define SERVER_BASEREVISION 1.3.38-dev
What, no Apache 1337 ? Uncool!
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had caught that already... in the tag;
#define APACHE_RELEASE 10337100
in trunk;
#define APACHE_RELEASE 10338000
we should be cool.
Sander Temme wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define SERVER_BASEVENDOR Apache Group
#define SERVER_BASEPRODUCT Apache
On Jul 27, 2006, at 10:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Jul 27 10:06:27 2006
New Revision: 426143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=426143view=rev
Log:
Wrong project name
That line is for the product name, not the project name.
Roy
+1 for release for the 2.0.59 and 2.2.3 tarballs - thanks for RMing!
testall passes for both on:
PASS: RHEL3/i686 RHEL4/i686 FC4/i686 FC5/i686 RHEL4/x86_64 FC5/x86_64
joe
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 10:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Jul 27 10:06:27 2006
New Revision: 426143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=426143view=rev
Log:
Wrong project name
That line is for the product name, not the project name.
And - I
On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 10:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Jul 27 10:06:27 2006
New Revision: 426143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=426143view=rev
Log:
Wrong project name
That line
Build with no issues on Win32. Tested all common modules including SSL and
Deflate.
Made it available for testing for Win32 community at www.apachelounge.com
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 27,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Well, the docs project consensus is wrong. Our main product is httpd
(one of several products) and our project is Apache HTTP Server Project.
Our announcements say ``Apache HTTP Server (Apache)'', I'd prefer if
we used that as
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
That line is for the product name, not the project name.
And - I understood that our product is the Apache HTTP Server, not httpd.
At least that's been the consensus in the docs project for the last three
years.
Well, the docs project consensus is wrong. Our main
On 7/27/2006 at 12:37 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
William
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chinese firedrill time folks.
There is a vulnerability affecting mod_rewrite which this release
addresses.
See the recent commit activity for detail. Need your votes on the
following
in
Builds fine on Windows in Win32 and Win64
On 7/27/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/2006 at 12:37 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
William
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chinese firedrill time folks.
There is a vulnerability affecting mod_rewrite which this release
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ] httpd-2.2.3
+1, tested (live!) on FreeBSD 6.1 and Ubuntu breezy.
--
Joe Schaefer
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] httpd-2.0.59
[X] httpd-2.2.3
+1 (as an RPM) on RHEL4.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I already reported that all is building and running fine on Win32.
Only one note (not critical):
The mod_authn_alias.dsp and mod_authz_owner.dsp are missing.
Also they are not included in Apache.dsw and Makefile.win.
I made/changed above files,
only I do not know how to add them to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chinese firedrill time folks.
There is a vulnerability affecting mod_rewrite which this release
addresses.
See the recent commit activity for detail. Need your votes on the
following
in the usual http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1 Package
[+1]
On 07/27/2006 08:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[+1] httpd-2.0.59
[+1] httpd-2.2.3
On SPARC Solaris 8 and SPARC Solaris 9 (compiled and started).
Thanks for RMing.
Regards
Rüdiger
Steffen wrote:
I already reported that all is building and running fine on Win32.
Only one note (not critical):
The mod_authn_alias.dsp and mod_authz_owner.dsp are missing. Also they
are not included in Apache.dsw and Makefile.win.
I made/changed above files, only I do not know how to add
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:37 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chinese firedrill time folks.
There is a vulnerability affecting mod_rewrite which this release
addresses.
See the recent commit activity for detail. Need your votes on the
following
in the usual http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/27/2006 08:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[+1] httpd-2.2.3
Working awesome on x86 Solaris 10. Thanks for getting the updates out so
quickly.
- Ryan
--
UNIX Administrator
http://prefetch.net
27 matches
Mail list logo
