NTLM currently does not work with httpd 2.2.x and reverse proxy configurations
due to the fact that httpd 2.2.x
uses connection pooling for its backend connections. NTLM does not respect the
fact that HTTP is a stateless
protocol. Thus is fails.
See also:
-Original Message-
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:34 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Repeated
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. April 2007 11:32
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 08:30 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
Georg von
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mladen Turk
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. April 2007 17:25
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
stickysession=JSESSIONID stickysession=;jsessionid
stickysession=MYSESSION
would mean:
Thanks for the clarifications.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mladen Turk
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. April 2007 13:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
Plüm wrote:
1. You want to change sticky in struct
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. April 2007 16:16
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Plüm wrote:
Yes, although MAX_ENTRIES
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stuart Children
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 14:25
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyErrorOverride and redirects (PR 39245)
Looks to me like a valid usage case for ProxyErrorOverride 3xx.
I don't see how it would achieve what
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mladen Turk
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. April 2007 07:07
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy buffering small chunks
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is only fixed in trunk so far. See
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41056
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Niklas Edmundsson
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 09:07
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] mod_cache 304 on HEAD (bug 41230)
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Are you really sure that it gets deleted?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Guenter Knauf
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. April 2007 18:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: SSL-enabled interaction with MySQL
Hi all,
although some of us might find the thread here interesting,
some others might object that it doesnt belong to
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Georg von Zezschwitz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 10:05
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
You declare a balancer:
Proxy balancer://mycloud
BalancerMember ajp://192.168.1.1:5001
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bojan Smojver
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 04:46
An: Apache Dev List
Betreff: [PATCH]: Call dbd_setup() for all virtual hosts or
create mutex inmod_dbd.c
The problem is that the current 2.2.x code calls dbd_setup() only for
global
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David McCreedy
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 04:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r543511 -
/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/main/http_main.c
June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
On 06/01/2007 05:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In general you should use Apache 2.2 instead of Apache 2.0 if possible,
especially if you are building for 64 bit. As far as I remember Apache 2.0
has some problems with 64 bit (I do not remember the details now).
Apache 2.2 works smoothly with 64 bit, but on Linux you might be hit
by an apr-util
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Juni 2007 13:16
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:07 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Stoddard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it
provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: news Im Auftrag von Bill Barker
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 05:07
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
Not strictly true, it's just that it's never graduated from
experimental
due to lack of user
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 12:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Digging somewhat deeper to actually do this I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Karel Kubat
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 16:57
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Mod_proxy / mod_proxy_balancer question: How to take
workers gracefully out of service
8030
VirtualHost*:8030
# All URI's go
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 09:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:57 +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robin Bryce
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 11:08
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Jun 20 23:55:54 2007
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE 2.3 STATUS:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 09:11
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r551171 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:17:36 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 13:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] pid safety checks for 2.2.x
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:38:10PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+/* Ensure the given pid is greater than zero;
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 16:37
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] pid safety checks for 2.2.x
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:42:35PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger,
VF-Group wrote:
The problem is that waitpid() does
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sander Temme
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 06:44
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: -X and SIGTERM
On Jun 28, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Brian J. France wrote:
Here is a patch that will allow SIGTERM to work with -X
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Juli 2007 16:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: apr_table_setn in mod_proxy_balancer.c
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/27/2007 05:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 13:37
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: httpd returns 500 when a route does not belong to
the balancer.
Hi,
I would like to fix a problem in mod_proxy_balancer when the
configuration
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Allen Pulsifer
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 17:11
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: 2.2.5?
Issue 42665 fixes a long existing bug in httpd. A patch is
included with
the issue. I would like to nominate it for inclusion in v2.2.5
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Allen Pulsifer
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 17:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: 2.2.5?
Thank you for contributing! As Rüdiger already points out,
we want
patches to go into the development trunk
Whenever someone is ready
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2007 23:20
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r559837 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_filter.c
Agreed. I'm happy with the changes you imply in this and your
other post.
On the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. August 2007 10:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Davi Arnaut
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r561616 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:58:21AM -, wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. August 2007 16:58
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: x64/x86: Apache http server 2.0.55 is getting
installed with some errors, server does not start after installation
You might be unfamiliar with the
This is the wrong list for such questions. Please post it to the users
list. See also
http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: aadi
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2007 11:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: URL modified to
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Eric Covener
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. August 2007 16:08
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Fwd: svn commit: r563329 - in
/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
I just now realized this change drops the timezone
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jose Kahan
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2007 09:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: How to contribute new tests to the Apache TestSuite?
Hi!
I've added some tests to your Perl Framework test suite (latest
co from svn). These tests cover
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oden Eriksson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. August 2007 13:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
But for some reason and only under our build system HTTP::DAV
is not
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 27. August 2007 10:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r569947 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
So the model didn't work, and for NT I propose to stop inheriting the
handles other than
IMHO APR_HAS_THREADS has nothing to do with the choice of your MPM (except
BEOS).
It only tells you if APR has thread support or not and this only
depends on the platform or if you instructed APR explicitly to build
without thread support.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. August 2007 16:00
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: 1.3.39?
Since it's expected that there will be quite a delay
in the next release of 1.3, assuming no security patches,
I'm seriously considering not
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 16:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Hi,
In order for URLs proxied using RewriteRule with the P-flag
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2007 08:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
What if the backend address is not known in the configuration
because computed
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2007 10:05
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Persistent backend connection when proxying using RewriteRule
is exactly what I am
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 14:03
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_balancer
Hmmm... maybe:
worker_is_initialized = (workers-s
PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED
(workers));
instead of
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 07:50
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
Zvi Har'El wrote:
This looks similar to PR 43334
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43334).
Could
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 11:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new
proxy_workers
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 13:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche
, modifying proxy_utils.c
might not be a nice solution...
On 05/09/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 15:13
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:22
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: New flag for RewriteCond: novary (NV)
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:04:19 +0200
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I propose to add
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Regarding the 2nd one... the:
+else {
+worker_is_initialized = 0;
+}
seems
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:51
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:37 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
typedef struct
Thanks for testing. The attached patch cleanly applies to 2.2.x and also
contains a backport of r527937.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auftrag von Vinicius Petrucci
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 03:11
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 11:35
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote:
That was the goal of my
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2007 10:34
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/11/2007 10:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2007 09:47
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Looking at the scope of all
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2007 12:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
The check for worker_size is not needed as worker_size is
never zero.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Roy T. Fielding
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2007 16:45
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Broken URI-unescaping in mod_proxy
On Sep 9, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/09/2007 04:30 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
How so?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Roy T. Fielding
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2007 17:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Broken URI-unescaping in mod_proxy
On Sep 13, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Changes to the request URI must be referred back
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.
I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional
LogFormat
directive %R, which logs the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fernando - Dfcom
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 16:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: new webaccel appliance
debian:/cache# grep 'fd.jpg?' * -r
Binary file
3IT/6la/Omd/Jn@/287/BxY4K0g.header.vary/uaR/FRo/84M/RjT/oFp/MO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 11:13
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.
Plüm wrote:
1. Please provide a patch against trunk.
mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk,
Sorry, but I do not get the purpose of this patch.
Why reading from our *client* (regardless if it is SSL or not)
when the backend is SSL?
Did you confuse c-input_filters and backend-connection-input_filters?
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2007 03:07
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: PR#41798 - mod_proxy URL mangling
Some time ago, I posted a draft fix for PR#41798:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg37836.html
It
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 14:30
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: PR#41798 - mod_proxy URL mangling
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:02:21 +0200
Plüm, Rüdiger, wrote:
However, on further reflection, I think it would be better
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 11:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_serf is in trunk
On Tue, November 13, 2007 6:34 am, Paul Querna wrote:
I've added mod_serf in r594425:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 14:31
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: keepalive connections and exiting MPM processes
When the MPM process handling the connection is or will be exiting, we
can incorrectly tell the client
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Im Auftrag von Justin Erenkrantz
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 15:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Adoption of mod_dns to httpd?
On Nov 14, 2007 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] Immediate
-if (APR_BRIGADE_SENTINEL(ctx-bb)) {
+if (APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY(ctx-bb)) {
+*len = 0;
+return APR_EOF;
+}
+
+if (APR_BUCKET_IS_EOS(APR_BRIGADE_FIRST(ctx-bb)) ||
+AP_BUCKET_IS_EOR(APR_BRIGADE_FIRST(ctx-bb))) {
*len = 0;
return APR_EOF;
Why do
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?
looks like a leak to me; what do you think?
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pavel Stano
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Dezember 2007 09:53
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: apache 2.2 mod_proxy_http disable buffering
hello,
it is possible to disable buffering in mod_proxy_http ?
or something like flush after each received data
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ruediger Pluem
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 21:26
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?
On 11/27/2007 07:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With APR now out, I think we're close to releasing 1.3.40 and
I noticed that mod_substitute can consume an insane amount of memory
in specific situations.
I used the following testcase:
One file with 10,000,000 lines of
Replace me
(about 105MB, yes this is an edge case :-)))
and the following configuration:
Substitute s/Replace me/blah/
SetOutputfilter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pavel Stano
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 02:48
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: apache 2.2 mod_proxy_http disable buffering
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
You are correct. This is only fixed in trunk so far. You
are affected by
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 11:22
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: apache 2.2 mod_proxy_http disable buffering
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pavel Stano
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 11:24
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Memory consumption of mod_substitute
On Dec 5, 2007 8:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* My test case lead
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Im Auftrag von Justin Erenkrantz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2007 11:05
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Apache memory usage
On Dec 10, 2007 10:42 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that works as well. I wanted to avoid calling
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Fritsch
Gesendet: Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 22:43
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Apache memory usage
On Sunday 09 December 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But I think your patch to server/protocol.c can be done much
simpler. Can you
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 22:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r602503 - in
/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/http/http_etag.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 12:08
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r603502 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:44:03 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 13:59
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r603502 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
On Dec 12, 2007, at 6:16 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jiri Tulach - Position
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007 08:39
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy in Apache 2.2 and HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR
It's possible fault of mod_fastcgi which returns
HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR in cases
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007 14:49
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?
Anyone opposed to us shooting for a TR early next week?
No. Let's rock.
I offer to RM
Thanks for doing so.
Regards
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 17:43
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: proxy returning apr_status_t to handler?
On Dec 17, 2007 11:20 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 10:27 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2007 00:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r605396 -
/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/support/httxt2dbm.c
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/19/2007 04:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sander Temme
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 08:01
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_dav patch to force scheme/port on
https-http proxying
On Jan 8, 2008, at 3:10 PM, David Sklar wrote:
Any comments on the patch would be
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 01:27
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:29:43 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 16:17
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40,
2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 12:41
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Symbian/S60 port of Apache httpd
...
I took a brief look at the docs, but could not find anything
that indicated which version of httpd was ported (1.3.x,
-Original Message-
From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 13:16
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: High security
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:10:23PM +0100, Nick Gearls wrote:
You specify one directive, and the only thing you have
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 16:32
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: ap_sub_req_lookup_* loosing filter context
In a number of places we are usingL
... = ap_sub_req_lookup_uri(..., r, NULL);
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2008 13:12
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: cache - cleaning up mod_memcache and making
other caches their live easier
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2008 01:22
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: cache - cleaning up mod_memcache and making
other caches their live easier
I currently do not understand your worries here. Could you please
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Akins, Brian
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 18:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On 2/13/08 11:07 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started looking at adding ping support for
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 17:07
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: ping for http in mod_proxy
I've started looking at adding ping support for
mod_proxy_http to complement whats in mod_proxy_ajp...
The idea is to send a
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Akins, Brian
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 18:34
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On 2/13/08 12:27 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This does not help with race conditions on HTTP
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 18:52
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Akins, Brian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 19:00
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Agreed, but I doubt that it is possible with a reasonable
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 18:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Akins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 12:37
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ping for http in mod_proxy
On 2/13/08 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And again, we're basically doubling
1 - 100 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
