[RESULT] [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

Hello, Thanks very much to all who voted for this release. The votes were as follows: === +1 vote (with *: binding) === Philippe Mouawad (pmouawad)* Andrey Pokhilko (undera) Maxime Chassagneux (mchassagneux) Christophe Dumont Antonio Gomes Rodrigues (agomes)* Felix Schumacher (fschumacher)*

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

+1 Get Outlook for iOS On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:45 AM -0500, "Milamber" wrote: My vote : +1 On 09/04/2017 17:31, Milamber

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

[+1] We support this release. Thank you for taking into account the reported issue with RC2 Thanks to RM ! Regards On Thursday, April 13, 2017, Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > > > Am 9. April 2017 18:31:50 MESZ schrieb Milamber

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

Am 9. April 2017 18:31:50 MESZ schrieb Milamber : >Hello, > >The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been >prepared, >and your votes are solicited. > >This release brings new features and fixes bugs. > >Please, test this release candidate (with load tests

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

+1 Antonio 2017-04-13 10:20 GMT+02:00 Christophe Dumont : > +1  > > 2017-04-13 10:05 GMT+02:00 Maxime Chassagneux < > maxime.chassagn...@gmail.com> > : > > > My vote : +1 > > > > 2017-04-13 9:46 GMT+02:00 Milamber : > > > > > > > > @PMC > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

+1  2017-04-13 10:05 GMT+02:00 Maxime Chassagneux : > My vote : +1 > > 2017-04-13 9:46 GMT+02:00 Milamber : > > > > > @PMC > > > > We need at least 3 '+1' votes from PMC members to allow this release. > > Currently we have only 2 +1. > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

My vote : +1 2017-04-13 9:46 GMT+02:00 Milamber : > > @PMC > > We need at least 3 '+1' votes from PMC members to allow this release. > Currently we have only 2 +1. > > > On 09/04/2017 17:31, Milamber wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

@PMC We need at least 3 '+1' votes from PMC members to allow this release. Currently we have only 2 +1. On 09/04/2017 17:31, Milamber wrote: Hello, The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new features

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

My vote : +1 On 09/04/2017 17:31, Milamber wrote: Hello, The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new features and fixes bugs. Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or functional tests)

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

+1 Andrey Pokhilko On 09.04.2017 19:31, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been > prepared, and your votes are solicited. > > This release brings new features and fixes bugs. > > Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

Thanks to RM! [+1] I support this release. Regards On Sunday, April 9, 2017, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been prepared, > and your votes are solicited. > > This release brings new features and fixes bugs. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

On 10/04/2017 13:32, sebb wrote: I think I have found the Windows issue. Instead of failing, the test code logs a message if it cannot find the properties file: 2017-04-10 11:46:32,771 ERROR o.a.j.r.d.ApdexPerTransactionTest: Problem loading properties. java.io.FileNotFoundException:

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

I think I have found the Windows issue. Instead of failing, the test code logs a message if it cannot find the properties file: 2017-04-10 11:46:32,771 ERROR o.a.j.r.d.ApdexPerTransactionTest: Problem loading properties. java.io.FileNotFoundException:

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

There are also frequent failures with the Ubuntu builds in the test: TestSchedulerWithTimer This is possibly a timing issue, but again I don't think it's a good idea to ignore such errors. I have added an extra test to try and debug the Windows failure - it looks like the Props collection is

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

On 10 April 2017 at 08:07, Milamber wrote: > > On my Windows 10 virtual machine, I built successfully JMeter from svn > trunk. I don't why we have this issue... The Jenkins machine is a Windows > 2012 R2, perhaps they have some differences with Windows 10 for this test?

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

On my Windows 10 virtual machine, I built successfully JMeter from svn trunk. I don't why we have this issue... The Jenkins machine is a Windows 2012 R2, perhaps they have some differences with Windows 10 for this test? On 10/04/2017 01:58, sebb wrote: The last few Windows builds have

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

The last few Windows builds have failed with testgetApdexPerTransactionProperty(org.apache.jmeter.report.dashboard.ApdexPerTransactionTest) [java] java.lang.AssertionError: expected: but was: Has anyone investigated that? On

[VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC3

Hello, The third release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1790748) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new features and fixes bugs. Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or functional tests) using Java 8 on Linux/Windows/Mac OS, especially on

[CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, Due of the API backward issue with Ubik plugin, I cancel the vote and start the next RC3 asap. Milamber On 01/04/2017 16:23, Milamber wrote: Hello, The second release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1789808) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

before the RC3 >>>> ;-) >>>> >>>> Milamber >>>> >>>> >>>> On 03/04/2017 10:45, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Like Philippe >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

RC2 to find a lot of bugs before the RC3 >>> ;-) >>> >>> Milamber >>> >>> >>> On 03/04/2017 10:45, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Like Philippe >>>> >>>> [X] I

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

;> >> >> On 03/04/2017 10:45, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Like Philippe >>> >>> [X] I do not support this release >>> >>> In my opinion, we need to deprecate this API in 3.2 release and remo

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

rigues wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Like Philippe >> >> [X] I do not support this release >> >> In my opinion, we need to deprecate this API in 3.2 release and remove it >> in 3.3 >> >> Antonio >> >> 2017-04-03 7:40

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Philippe [X] I do not support this release In my opinion, we need to deprecate this API in 3.2 release and remove it in 3.3 Antonio 2017-04-03 7:40 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com>: Hello, Thanks Milamber for your work on RM for this. Due to issue reported my vote i

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hi, Like Philippe [X] I do not support this release In my opinion, we need to deprecate this API in 3.2 release and remove it in 3.3 Antonio 2017-04-03 7:40 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com>: > Hello, > Thanks Milamber for your work on RM for this. >

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, Thanks Milamber for your work on RM for this. Due to issue reported my vote is: [X] I do not support this release I can fix issue if ok for you to commit in trunk. Regards On Sunday, April 2, 2017, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Hello, > I am to blame for

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, I am to blame for this issue, sorry ! http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1783666=rev Regards On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:08 PM, UBIK LOAD PACK Support < supp...@ubikloadpack.com> wrote: > Hello, > Note this is annoying as fixing it would mean that our plugin would only > support 3.2. > We

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, Note this is annoying as fixing it would mean that our plugin would only support 3.2. We usually try to support N and N-1 versions to allow for migration. And this was usually the policy with JMeter releases. Hope you can take this into account. Regards On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 3:03 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, First thanks a lot for all the team for the great work on Apache JMeter and thanks to RM ! Now for this release, it appears HeaderManager API has been modified in a breaking and undocumented way: This method: -

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Am 01.04.2017 um 18:23 schrieb Milamber: Hello, The second release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1789808) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new features and fixes bugs. Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or functional tests) using Java 8

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

+1 Andrey Pokhilko On 01.04.2017 19:23, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > The second release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1789808) has been > prepared, and your votes are solicited. > > This release brings new features and fixes bugs. > > Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or

RE: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

+1 -Original Message- From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 11:23 AM To: JMeter Dev List <dev@jmeter.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2 Hello, The second release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1789808) has been prepared, and your

[VOTE] Release JMeter 3.2 RC2

Hello, The second release candidate for JMeter 3.2 (r1789808) has been prepared, and your votes are solicited. This release brings new features and fixes bugs. Please, test this release candidate (with load tests and/or functional tests) using Java 8 on Linux/Windows/Mac OS, especially on

Re: Release a 3.2

o fix before? > > > On 28/03/2017 10:07, Maxime Chassagneux wrote: > >> +1 >> >> 2017-03-28 10:13 GMT+02:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>: >> >> +1 >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> 2017-03-27 22:34 GMT+02:00 Philip

Re: Release a 3.2

gmail.com>: Hello, Shall we start the 3.2 release process now that all points have been handled ? Regards On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks a lot Woonsan, merged. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>

Re: Release a 3.2

+1 2017-03-28 10:13 GMT+02:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Antonio > > 2017-03-27 22:34 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello, > > Shall we start the 3.2 release process now that all poin

Re: Release a 3.2

+1 Antonio 2017-03-27 22:34 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > Shall we start the 3.2 release process now that all points have been > handled ? > > Regards > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua.

Re: Release a 3.2

>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874 > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> Andrey Pokhilko > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> On 16.03.2017 16:01, P

Re: Release a 3.2

Hi, >>>>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> > > >> Yes, it's that message. The bugzilla is here: >>>>> >> > > >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874 >>>>> >> > > >> >>>>&g

Re: Release a 3.2

gt;>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> Andrey Pokhilko >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> On 16.03.2017 16:01, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >>>> >> > > >>> Hello Andrey, >&

Re: Release a 3.2

>>> >> time > > >> >>> >> >> to > > >> >>> >> >> > > work on it and we don't consider it as release > > blocker. > > >> >>> >> >> > > > > >> >>

Re: Release a 3.2

;>> >> >> > > > What are the other "number of issues " ? >> >>> >> >> > > > Thanks >> >>> >> >> > > > >> >>> >> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:02 PM,

Re: Release a 3.2

;>> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> Hi, > >>> >> >> > > >> > >>> >> >> > > >> Yes, it's that message. The bugzilla is here: > >>> >> >&

Re: Release a 3.2

>> >> > > >> Yes, it's that message. The bugzilla is here: >>> >> >> > > >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874 >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> Andrey Pokhilko &

Re: Release a 3.2

Scripting languages ? >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> Thanks >> >> > > >>> Regards >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Andrey Pokhilko

Re: Release a 3.2

PM, Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru > <javascript:;>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>> Hi, > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> From plugins side, we've m

Re: Release a 3.2

>>>> of them, but one is specifically breaking WebDriver sampler. We're > > > going > > > >>>> to file bugzilla on it. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> IMO it's not good to release without fixing this, since it will > &

Re: Release a 3.2

;>>> IMO it's not good to release without fixing this, since it will > break > > >>>> everyone who uses WebDriver Sampler. > > >>>> > > >>>> Andrey Pokhilko > > >>>> > > >>>> On 16.03.2017 15:32, P

Re: Release a 3.2

> >>>> On 16.03.2017 15:32, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> Any feedback on patch ? > >>>>> Shall we proceed with release without fixing it ? > >>>>> Is there any other remaining work ? > >&

Re: Release a 3.2

t;> > >>> Thanks > >>> Regards > >>> Philippe > >>> > >>> On Sunday, March 12, 2017, Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> I'v

Re: Release a 3.2

gt;> Thanks >>> Regards >>> Philippe >>> >>> On Sunday, March 12, 2017, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I've filled New and Noteworthy section, feel free to improve.

Re: Release a 3.2

? > > > > Thanks > > Regards > > Philippe > > > > On Sunday, March 12, 2017, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> I've filled New and Noteworthy section, feel free to improve. > >> I

Re: Release a 3.2

ilippe > > On Sunday, March 12, 2017, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> I've filled New and Noteworthy section, feel free to improve. >> I've also documented migration to new logging. >> >> I think we can now re

Re: Release a 3.2

e to improve. > I've also documented migration to new logging. > > I think we can now release the 3.2 except for this bug which exists since > many versions, I've attached a patch for review: > - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 > > Regards > > On Mon,

Re: Release a 3.2

Hello, I've filled New and Noteworthy section, feel free to improve. I've also documented migration to new logging. I think we can now release the 3.2 except for this bug which exists since many versions, I've attached a patch for review: - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830

Re: Release a 3.2

gt; > >> full >> > > > > > >> > >> work" >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> Which files are? >> > > > > > >> &g

Re: Release a 3.2

; > >> > > xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_proxy_step_by_step.xml > > > > > > >> > > xdocs/usermanual/junitsampler_tutorial.xml > > > > > > >> > > xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_accesslog_sampler_step_by_ > step.xml >

Re: Release a 3.2

tutorial.xml > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Felix > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks > > > > > >> > >&g

Re: Release a 3.2

t; >> Thanks > > > > >> > >> Antonio > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> 2017-03-01 10:44 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < > > > > ra0...@gmail.com > > > > >> >: > >

Re: Release a 3.2

com > > > >> > >>> >: > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Hello, > > > >> > >>>> We're now at: > > > >> > >>>> > > > >

Re: Release a 3.2

gt; >> > >>> Hello, > > >> > >>>> We're now at: > > >> > >>>> > > >> > >>>> - 48 Enhancements > > >> > >>>> - 31 bug fixes > > >> > >>>> > >

Re: Release a 3.2

gt; >> > >>>> - Ensure the migrated docs (from PDF) do not contain old > "Urban > >> > >>>> legends" > >> > >>>> :-) nor bad practices. Those are the 4 Tutorial links in left > >> >

Re: Release a 3.2

gt; >>>> It >> > >>>> would be nice to review them. I've fixed some but not done the >> > full >> > >>>> work >> > >>>> >> > >>>> TODO >> > >>>> >> > >>>&

Re: Release a 3.2

> >>>> > >>>> DONE > >>>> > >>>> - If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET with > no > >>>> body (see my mail) > >>>> > >>>> DONE > >>>> > >&

Re: Release a 3.2

gt;>> >>>> - Fill in New and Noteworthy section >>>> >>>> TODO >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you ok to start a release soon ? >>>> >>>> Ok >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >

Re: Release a 3.2

o me) Depending on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the next release. On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Since our discussion on "Release a 3.2 ?" , trunk has nicely evolved: - 33 Enhancements - 25 bu

Re: Release a 3.2

>> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I'm seeing some test failures on Windows. >> > >> > I've started to set up a Jenkins build to be able to catch these. >> > (at present the failure mails are sent direct

Re: Release a 3.2

> > > Depending on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the next > > release. > > > > On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad > > <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Since our discussion on "Release a 3.2

Re: Release a 3.2

> >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Where ? > >> >> > I thought I had done it > >> >> > >> >> The string log_level appears in quite a few places. > >> >> AFAIK it is not used in

Re: Release a 3.2

gt;> > >> >> >- If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET with >> no >> >> >body (see my mail) >> >> > >> >> > DONE >> >> > >> >> >- Fill in New and Noteworthy section >> &

Re: Release a 3.2

gt;> > > >> > > >> > Are you ok to start a release soon ? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > &g

Re: Release a 3.2

e you ok to start a release soon ? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I'm seeing some test failures on Windows. >> >> >>

Re: Release a 3.2

<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I'm seeing some test failures on Windows. > >> > >> I've started to set up a Jenkins build to be able to catch these. > >> (at present the failure mails are sent direct to me) > >> > >> Dependin

Re: Release a 3.2

o be able to catch these. >> (at present the failure mails are sent direct to me) >> >> Depending on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the next >> release. >> >> On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad >> <philippe.moua...@gmail.com

Re: Release a 3.2

ng on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the next > release. > > On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad > <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Since our discussion on "Release a 3.2 ?" , trunk has nicely evolved: > > > >

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

Hi, Thanks. Notice that for InfluxDB, I changed the annotations to events so that it's easier for beginners to create the correct dashboard (example use this). So it may break your existing dashboard on this part. Thanks Regards On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Maxime Chassagneux <

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

- properties reference >- jmeter.properties >- changes.xml as Incompatible change > > > > > Someone have made test with GC G1 to switch to it with the right > parameter > > in 3.2 release? > > > I've commited some changes and refreshed some old links

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

Hi Philippe, I will deploy your nightly build in our permit to operate service tomorrow. It's the best way to test it :) Let me some days and come back to you quickly. Thanks. 2017-01-16 21:57 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad : > Hello Maxime, > I merged some of your PR.

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > One more thing > > Release 3.2 will need Java 8. Is it the moment to switch to Nashorn Engine > by default? > +1 for me but we need to make it clear wherever Javascript

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

Hello Maxime, I merged some of your PR. Did you have the opportunity to make tests of nightly build ? Your feedback is welcome. Thanks Regards On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Maxime Chassagneux < maxime.chassagn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Pls, could you consider to merge this PR too : > >

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

Hi Philippe, Thanks to your job 2017-01-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad : > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher < > >

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher < > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > >> Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>> Hello, >>> What do you think of releasing a 3.2

Re: VRT listener with JavaFX html view don't work with openjdk 8 [was Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?]

Hello Philippe, Works better now the VRT is available and the HTML render works (fallback to old render) (just 1 WARN line + stacktrace each time I had a VRT listener into the JMeter tree) Thanks Milamber On 13/01/2017 13:51, Philippe Mouawad wrote: Thanks. Can you test new build which

Re: VRT listener with JavaFX html view don't work with openjdk 8 [was Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?]

Done https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583 On 13/01/2017 11:21, Philippe Mouawad wrote: Hi Milamber, Can you create a bugzilla for this ? Thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Milamber wrote: - Up to date Browser based on javafx The

VRT listener with JavaFX html view don't work with openjdk 8 [was Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?]

- Up to date Browser based on javafx The listener View Result Tree don't appear in the menu if you start JMeter with openjdk8 (openjdk is the default JVM on Linux distros) If you try to open a script JMX which include a VRT listerner a error box display too. Seems to be like a

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

Hi, Pls, could you consider to merge this PR too : - PR-241 : Support variable for all JMS messages (bytes, object, ...) and sources (file, folder) - PR-240 : Improves JMS component robustness Thanks . 2017-01-12 21:02 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad : > On Thu, Jan

Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >> Hello, >> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ? >> > I think I said before, that I would like to release often :) > >> >> I see following