The board resolution follows strict legal language and should only include the
initial PMC members of the new project.
I know the resolution draft is ambigous, but that’s why it’s a draft :). Sounds
like noone fancies my suggestion to start Solr TLP with committer===PMC.
So I’m fine splitting
+1
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:35 PM Atri Sharma wrote:
> Here is how I think it should be done (just my two cents):
>
> We create two sections in the board proposal: one for initial PMC and one
> for initial committers. Both are replicated from the existing set with the
> option for people to
Here is how I think it should be done (just my two cents):
We create two sections in the board proposal: one for initial PMC and one
for initial committers. Both are replicated from the existing set with the
option for people to opt out.
Atri
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 01:00, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
Absolutely. We can always add a section about committers. In the board
report, I will highlight that we have bootstrapped the new TLP using the
existing project.
They would be the same lists for both projects.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM Atri Sharma wrote:
> Since this is going to be a
Since this is going to be a TLP, I believe there can be segregation between
the PMC and the committer list (unlike an incubation project where the only
initial entity is a PPMC).
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 00:00, Gus Heck wrote:
> It's now unclear if non PMC folks should be on or off the list on the
It's now unclear if non PMC folks should be on or off the list on the wiki
(and how do we ensure we get added in the end?)
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:39 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> If we don't do opt-in (and there's plenty of people who seem to want
> opt-out instead), then I propose we instead seek
If we don't do opt-in (and there's plenty of people who seem to want
opt-out instead), then I propose we instead seek the board's input on how
to navigate these waters. The board is there to help with such things.
~ David
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
Let's switch to opt-out based approach. Unless someone explicitly doesn't
want to in Solr PMC, he/she should be part of it.
On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 10:48 pm Anshum Gupta, wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Thank you for taking the lead on this.
>
> Sure, I can take the lead on this especially as I need to work
Hi Jan,
Thank you for taking the lead on this.
Sure, I can take the lead on this especially as I need to work on the board
report and send our report by the 10th.
We just need the PMC members for the draft resolution and I strongly feel
that this shouldn't be an opt-in as people might miss this
Jan,
That draft resolution is ambiguous as to what *role* the "members" are that
are listed. In this email thread here you ask for all committers. My
original understanding of that draft resolution was PMC only.
~ David
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Note: All
Note: All committers, please add your name to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Solr+TLP+needed+changes#SolrTLPneededchanges-resolutionDraftboardresolution
11 matches
Mail list logo
