for a
Lucene.Net.Extensions for the core.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andy Pook [mailto:andy.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:26 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-469) Convert Java
Iterator classes to implement
Welcome Itamar!
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Welcome Itamar Syn-Hershko as a new committer
Hey all,
I'd like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-486.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Are_Wildcard.2C_Prefix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-486.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Wildcard queries are not analyzed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257792#comment-13257792
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-486:
bq. Of course I have solved the problem for myself
GetPrefixQuery doesn't use analyzers, and it is a well known issue of
Lucene.
Suppose a hypothetical analyzer(with stemming) which stems 'went' as 'go'
and you want to search 'wentworth miller'.
A search like 'went*' would be converted to 'go*' which i guess wouldn't be
what you want.
DIGY
+1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 Release
(take 2
Hi Chris,
There are many methods of IndexReader you can make use of.
For ex, to get the field names in the index GetFieldNames or to get the
terms Terms.
I posted here (http://pastebin.com/aiCy26mj) a simple example to get all
terms in the field myfield.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180965#comment-13180965
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-463:
My guess:
Either it is not widely used as you think
level)
As a result, creating a new branch for .Net friendly Lucene.Net or
continuing on this branch is just a matter of taste.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 5:05 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
I forgot to mention, 2.9.4g implements IDisposable for many of the classes
that has a Close() method
which can be thought as .Net friendly API.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 5:05 PM
To: lucene-net
didn't think it as a separate branch to evolve on its own path. It
is(or I think it is) the final version of 2.9
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:20 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-459:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Italian stemmer (from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175117#comment-13175117
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-459:
Fixed in 2.9.4g branch.
DIGY
Italian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-412.
Resolution: Fixed
2.9.4g is ready to go
DIGY
Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc
FYI, 2.9.4 can be compiled against .Net 2.0 with a few minor changes in
CloseableThreadLocal
(like uncommenting ThreadLocalT class and replacing extension-methods
calls
with static calls to CloseableThreadLocalExtensions)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens
OK, here is the code that can be compiled against .NET 2.0
http://pastebin.com/k2f7JfPd
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:26 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Re
If I recall it correctly, last memory leak problem for 2.9.2 was reported in
~August from RavenDB, and it was fixed in 2.9.4(g)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:33 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
... and it was related with CloseableThreadLocal (fixed in 2.9.4(g)) which
now creates
compilation problem against .Net20 :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:09 AM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE
Chris,
Sorry, if you took my comments about pain of porting personally. That
wasn't my intension.
+1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011
My english isn't enough to understand this answer. I hope it is not related
with
employee-employer relationship as in the past.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:08 AM
To: lucene-net-dev
for another release.(I use it in all my projects since long).
PS: Hearing the pain of porting codes that greatly differ from Java made
me just smile( sorry for that:( ). Be ready for responses that get beyond
the criticism between With all due respect Just my $0.02 paranthesis.
DIGY
-Original
Troy,
I am not againt it if you can continue to understand and port so easyly.
No one here -I think- wants a java-tastes code.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:42 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject
What do folks think about including LUCENENET-427, LUCENENET-431,
LUCENENET-433 LUCENENET-443 fixes in that release and removing
Similarity.Net?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:19 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-448:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.4)
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-448.
Resolution: Fixed
Hi Jeff,
Your fix is for 2.9.4g branch and I committed it.
(Although I was hard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141418#comment-13141418
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-450:
Similarity net is obsolete and all of its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-441.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Maverick904, Please use mailing lists to ask question.
Encountered
Similarity was include, though are there any tests for this project ?
Similarity is obsolete (Queries.Net replaces it has test cases). It has
already been removed in 2.9.4g
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21
cases.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:09 PM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
On 20.09.2011 23:48, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4
You are right in race condition NullReferenceException.
but
static SupportClass.WeakHashTable slots = new
SupportClass.WeakHashTable();
wouldn't work since it is intented to be created in all threads not once.
Would you patch it or leave it to me?
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
I reconsidered it and there is no race condition. A new slot will be
created for each thread.
But NullReferenceException bug is still there.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:16 AM
To: lucene-net
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-e
xcerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx
Yes, this is the trick some obfuscators use.(they use also some scrambling
fxns to hide the code in resource)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon
I am not against it, but personally think it as a toy.
I am from the generation where people used vi to write codes.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE
Not that old :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Punch cards or bust!
Sent from my Windows Phone
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:08 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
No interest
I think, there was a sync problem between our eMails :(
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:22 AM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
On 22.09.2011 00:16, Robert Jordan wrote:
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-444:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 3.x)
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Snowball stemmers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-444:
---
Attachment: PortugueseStemmer.cs
TurkishStemmer.cs
RomanianStemmer.cs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-444.
Resolution: Fixed
Snowball stemmers (Portuguese, Hungarian, Romanian, Turkish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105418#comment-13105418
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-444:
committed to trunk 2.9.4g branch.
Snowball stemmers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105478#comment-13105478
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-443:
+1 for IDisposable in 2.9.4g (since
Analyzers
I created a working portuguese stemmer (
http://people.apache.org/~digy/PortugueseStemmerNew.cs ) from
http://snowball.tartarus.org/archives/snowball-discuss/0943.html
http://snowball.tartarus.org/archives/snowball-discuss/att-0943/01-SnowballC
Sharp.zip
Since it has a BSD license (http
Good news. Thanks Itamar.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
We have been running
How about indexing the new document(s) in memory using RAMDirectory then
calling indexWriter.AddIndexesNoOptimize for NRT master index?
DIGY
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Stewart robert_stew...@epam.comwrote:
Is it possible to add a document to more than one index at the same time
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote:
Ok, core compiles
.
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-414.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
DIGY
The definition of CharArraySet is dangerously confusing and leads
+1 for an official release.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Hey All,
How do people feel about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-442:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-442.patch
Thanks Andy.
Nice catch.
I prepared a patch for 2.9.4g and will commit
To avoid misunderstanding...
Community==all Lucene.Net users
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's
Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
against all projects using Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13092541#comment-13092541
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-358:
New CloseableThreadLocal implementation and its test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-358:
---
Attachment: TestMemLeakage.zip
TestMemLeakage.zip shows that bug.
CloseableThreadLocal memory leak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13091175#comment-13091175
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-441:
What does your query look like?
What is your question
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067389#comment-13067389
]
Digy edited comment on LUCENENET-437 at 7/18/11 11:28 PM:
--
bq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067409#comment-13067409
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
Already fixed in 2.9.4g
Port Contrib.Shingle from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-437:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Port Contrib.Shingle from Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067361#comment-13067361
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
Java Docs says:
public boolean equals(Object o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067366#comment-13067366
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
See even with worst implementation, Equals method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067375#comment-13067375
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
bq. This ensures that list1.equals(list2) implies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13067389#comment-13067389
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
bq. It ensures equality, but does not ensure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-437:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Port Contrib.Shingle from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13066717#comment-13066717
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-437:
Using HashCode for equality comparison is not a good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy reopened LUCENENET-437:
Port Contrib.Shingle from Java
--
Key: LUCENENET-437
has been checked - is this correct?
absolutely.
For the project specific tasks I'd ask all of you to fill in whatever
you feel like adding. All Lucene.NET committers should be able to
modify the status page.
Stefan
DIGY
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13062351#comment-13062351
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-434:
very nice.
Remove Anonymous classes to increase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-432.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Lucene.Net 2.9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-430.
Resolution: Fixed
Instead of creating a small project, I put it into Contrib.Analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061125#comment-13061125
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
It works! Thanks.
DIGY
LuceneTestCase should
: Bug
Reporter: Digy
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
If you work a tokenstream, consume it, then reuse it and add an attribute to
it, the computed state is wrong.
thus for example, clearAttributes() will not actually clear the attribute added.
So in some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061214#comment-13061214
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-433:
Here is the test case
{code}
[Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-172.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy (was: Scott Lombard)
Fixed in 2.9.4g. No fix for 2.9.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061304#comment-13061304
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-433:
Committed to 2.9.4g branch
AttributeSource can have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061595#comment-13061595
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-172:
Already fixed for 2.9.4g
This patch fixes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-172:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
This patch fixes the unexceptional exceptions ecountered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13060709#comment-13060709
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-431:
Thanks Olle and Matt,
I committed the LUCENE-1930
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-431.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Assignee: Digy
Spatial.Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059955#comment-13059955
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
It fails in both builds.
LuceneTestCase should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-430:
---
Attachment: ChainedFilterTest.cs
ChainedFilter.cs
Contrib.ChainedFilter
Contrib.ChainedFilter
-
Key: LUCENENET-430
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: Digy
I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util folder
Since it is a Lucene.Net specific code, may Support be a better place?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:53 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's
OK. Maybe I asked wrong question, Suppose I committed IsolatedStorageDirectory
only to trunk. How would you merge this branch trunk?
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 12:28 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
to do with the trunk. It need not be an offical release and can live in
branch as a PoC.
As a result, I got bored to listen to this should be done that way. What I
want to see is I did it that way, should we continue with this.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar
), then commit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Troy,
I've already started working
I can not say I like this approach, but till we find an automated way(with good
results), it seems to be the only way we can use.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
=12310290reportKey=com.sourcelabs.jira.plugin.r
eport.contributions%3AcontributionreportNext=Next
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Ayende Rahien [mailto:aye...@ayende.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:16 PM
To: Rory Plaire; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net
Hi Rory,
I agree with you in theory. But collecting people to work on a project is
not easy as giving advise.
Till now, line-by-line port have seemed to be the best with a limited human
source.
Would you be willing to work on your approach and maintain newer Lucene.Net
releases?
DIGY
.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-428.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Please post questions to the mailing list, not in JIRA
How to do that the results
Hi Scott,
Please avoid crossposting(as I do now). Since when I reply to your eMail, it
goes to one of the lists and thread is splitted into two.
It may be good for announcements but not for discussions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on user vs.
contributor.
I am sorry for this misunderstanding.
What I tried to say with contributor(not committer) was the people that
works on Lucene.Net source code, not the ones who just consume it.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3255
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-429:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-429.patch
Corrupted segment file not detected and wipes index contents (LUCENE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-427:
---
Attachment: FastVectorHighlighter.patch
Provide limit on phrase analysis in FastVectorHighlighter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-427.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed
Provide limit on phrase analysis in FastVectorHighlighter (LUCENE-3234
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054935#comment-13054935
]
Digy commented on LUCENE-3234:
--
I am not sure how much it is related to this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053722#comment-13053722
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-426:
10 min. work done.
DIGY
Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-426.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Thanks
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
