Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.7.0 RC1

Thank you Adrien! SUCCESS! [0:59:16.681584] +1 On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 3:35 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > SUCCESS! [1:04:57.975885] > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/27/console > > Smoke tester ran with Java 11 and Java 17. Unfortunately theres still no > support by

Re: Welcome Chris Hegarty to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations Chris! On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:50 AM Greg Miller wrote: > Congrats! Welcome Chirs! > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:02 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> Welcome Chris! >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023, 7:31 AM Michael McCandless < >> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> >>> Welcome

Re: [VOTE] Dimension Limit for KNN Vectors

Alessandro, Thanks for raising the code of conduct; it is very discouraging and intimidating to participate in discussions where such language is used especially by senior members. Michael S., thanks for your suggestion and that's what we used in Elasticsearch to raise dims limit, and Alessandro,

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.6.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:34:12.604559] On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:38 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:42:35.102645] > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:45 PM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.6.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>

Re: call for 9.4.1 release (bug in vectors format)

+1, Thanks Julie for tackling this, and serving as a release manager. On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:51 PM Michael Wechner wrote: > +1 :-) > > Thanks > > Michael > > Am 18.10.22 um 19:52 schrieb Julie Tibshirani: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We recently discovered a severe bug in the 9.4 release in the

Re: Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.4.0

t; > >> but if you can do the backport today or tomorrow, that's fine by me. > > >> > > >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:55 AM Adrien Grand > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Mike, I'm tempted to backport > https://github.com/apache/lucene/p

Re: Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.4.0

1994MB. I did not specifically set heap > > > size. I used maxConn/M=200. I'll try with larger buffer to see if I > > > can get 9.4 to produce a single segment for the same test settings. I > > > see you used a much smaller M (16), which should have produced quite > > &g

Re: Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.4.0

and the size of the RAM buffer for indexing? Usually, when we have multiple segments, recall should increase, not decrease. But I agree that with multiple segments we can see a big drop in QPS. Here <https://gist.github.com/mayya-sharipova/e4d66af49a5b67e8a2338d0c3c522a9e> is my investigation with de

Re: Lucene 9.4.0 release

excerpt from CHANGE.txt below. I'll volunteer to be > >>>>> >>> release manager. I'd just like to know if anybody has any > outstanding > >>>>> >>> work that is nearing completion and that they'd like to include, > &

Re: Welcome Vigya Sharma as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome Vigya! On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:31 AM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > Welcome, Vigya! > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:09 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> >> Congratulations and welcome, Vigya! >> Dawid >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:34 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >>> I'm pleased to

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10054) Handle hierarchy in HNSW graph

d somehow lock it as read-only ... >> > >> > >> > >> > > Handle hierarchy in HNSW graph >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Key: LUCENE-10054 >> > > URL: >> https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:02:21.446662] On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:32 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:33.954171] > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 1:12 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.3.0 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >>

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

Just for the update, Michael, I went ahead and applied your reverted changes to the `main` branch as well. I will introduce the new Lucene 94 codec. On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:08 AM Mayya Sharipova wrote: > Thanks Michael for reverting the changes. > I think we should do the reversio

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

s fine by me. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 7:21 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > > > > Hi Julie, > > thanks for raising this point, I was also thinking about it. > > I think it would be valuable to clarify what constitutes the format > changes. Is on disk changes

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

o there have not been > any real format changes-- Lucene93Codec is the same as Lucene92Codec. > Should we remove Lucene93Codec on branch_9_3 (effectively reverting > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/924) ? > > Julie > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:02 AM Mayya Sharipova >

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

out LUCENE-10592, it's also a big > change, maybe we should not even try to get it in before cutting the branch? > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:09 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> Thanks for the reminder about the release, Ignacio! >> About LUCENE-10592 <https://issues.ap

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

Thanks for the reminder about the release, Ignacio! About LUCENE-10592 I will see what progress we can make today, and will let you know before Wednesday at 9:00 CEST. On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:12 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Thanks for

Re: Welcome Lu Xugang as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome, Lu Xugang! On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 7:53 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Welcome and congratulations! > > Jan > > > 1. jun. 2022 kl. 09:07 skrev Adrien Grand : > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Lu Xugang has accepted the PMC's > > invitation to become a committer. > > > >

Re: Welcome Chris Hegarty as Lucene committer

Welcome and congratulations, Chris! On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 7:53 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Welcome Chris! > > Jan > > > 1. jun. 2022 kl. 09:04 skrev Adrien Grand : > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Chris Hegarty has accepted the PMC's > > invitation to become a committer. > > > > Chris, the

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

Hi Alan, I want to report that all scheduled changes to vectors' format have been merged to 9.x, and from our side we are good to proceed with the 9.2 release. Sorry for the delay and thank you for waiting. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 9:24 AM Mayya Sharipova wrote: > Hi Alan, > we have PR

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

Hi Alan, we have PRs (870 , 872 ) in progress that involve format changes to vectors. We would like to merge them for 9.2. Would it be possible to wait for a couple of days for the branch cut? I can update here

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2

Thanks Julie for summarizing the issues. I've got SUCCESS on the second run: SUCCESS! [1:45:55.377066] So, +1 from me as well. On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 4:04 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > I found a way to disable the log4shell patch on my work machine, and got a > pass: > > SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2

I've got java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space for the test below. May be, not a big deal? Reproduce with: gradlew :lucene:core:test --tests "org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.testStressUpdateSameDocumentWithMergeOnGetReader" -Ptests.jvms=8

Re: Lucene 9.1 release soon?

+ 1 On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:28 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:05 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:43 AM Michael Wechner >> wrote: >> > >> > I think this would be great :-) thank you very much for your efforts! >> > >> > Michael >> >

Re: Need for multiple entry points in HnswGraphSearcher?

Hello Greg, This code is a close implementation of the original HNSW paper . Multiple entry points in HnswGraphSearcher are used during a graph construction in HnswGraphBuilder for levels <= nodeLevel. In this case the number of entry points is equal to

Re: Welcome Guo Feng as Lucene committer

Welcome and congratulations, Feng! On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:50 AM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Feng! :D > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 6:09 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Guo Feng has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to become a committer. >> >>

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations, Julie ! Very well deserved! On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:45 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Congratulations Julie! > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:03 AM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome! >> >> - Alan >> >> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 21:49, Adrien Grand wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:09:47.023515] On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:42 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > totally unofficial, but I posted a Docker image for testing 8.11.0 RC1 > on K8s here: thelabdude/apache-solr-dev:8.11.0-rc1 > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > Please vote for release

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.10.1 released

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.10.1. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 12 (12 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED. Thanks everyone for testing this release candidate.

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.10.1-RC1-rev2f24e6a49d48a032df1f12e146612f59141727a9 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1

update. My apologies for not coming and checking in the thread > first. Please let me know if this is ok, I can revert if you need me to. > Thanks for handling the release! > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 9:04 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> Thank you for the suggestion, Jan,

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1

le branch you must instead manually adapt andd > perform those steps on the new apache/lucene and apache/solr repos. > > Jan > > 10. okt. 2021 kl. 13:45 skrev Mayya Sharipova : > > Hi Houston, > Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I've corrected the 8.10.1 > change

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1

ross various branches (branch_8_10, branch_8x, and main). > I don't see LUCENE-10119, and LUCENE-10126 is marked as an 8.11.0 entry in > at least branch_8x. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:32 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >&g

Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1

Hello everyone, I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_10 Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. * All issues accepted for

Re: 8.10.1 Patch release?

ng a month and doing 8.11 seems fine too? > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:17 AM Adrien Grand > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Mike, it's unclear to me if you are suggesting waiting before doing > a 8.10.1 release? On my end I'm

Re: Welcome Michael Gibney as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome, Michael! On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:56 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Welcome Michael! > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 4:12 PM Namgyu Kim wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Michael! :D >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael Gibney >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you all

Re: 8.10.1 Patch release?

> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 2:14 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 to a 8.10.1 patch release >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 2:03 AM Mayya Sharipova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the update, Robert. Would be nice to have these bug fixes >>> as well. &g

Re: 8.10.1 Patch release?

ller) > * LUCENE-10126: Sort optimization with a chunked bulk scorer > can wrongly skip documents (Nhat Nguyen, Mayya Sharipova) > * LUCENE-10134: ConcurrentSortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts shouldn't > share liveDocs Bits across threads. > (Ankur Goel) > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021

8.10.1 Patch release?

Hello everyone! Thank you, Timothy, for the recent 8.10 release. I wonder if we are ok to do a 8.10.1 patch release and do it fairly soon? this week? Nhat fixed a bad bug where "sort with after" on a numeric field can incorrectly miss

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

Hello everyone, We have discovered a bug and fixed a bug in Lucene sort optimization (LUCENE-10106) and would like to merge it to Lucene 8.10 if it is not too late. I apologize for the inconvenience, the bug was discovered just yesterday. On Tue, Sep

Re: 9.0 release

I will be working on LUCENE-9334, I will try to finish it soon. On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:40 AM David Smiley wrote: > There are also deprecations to remove: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638 > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova to the Lucene PMC

Thank you very much everyone! I am very humbled and honored by this invitation. On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:04 AM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > Congrats Mayya! > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:50 AM Dawid Weiss > wrote: > >> >> Congratulations, Mayya! >> >> Dawid >> >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:17 PM

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.9.0 released

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.9.0. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

gt; > > > - > > > Uwe Schindler > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Atri Sharma > > > &

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 9 (8 binding: Jan Høydahl, Michael Sokolov, Robert Muir, Adrien Grand, Atri Sharma, Uwe Schindler, Anshum Gupta, Timothy Potter) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > >> > line 687, in verifyUnpacked > > > >> > java.run_java8('ant clean test -Dtests.slow=false %s' % > testArgs, > > > >> > '%s/test.log' % unpackPath) > > > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

t; >> +1 > > >> > > >> Robert - not sure if one test-run failure should cancel the build. > Our smoketester and tests are sometimes a bit picky, and does not mean that > the artifacts are faulty. > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> > &

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x - Build # 220 - Still Failing!

/jar-helling "jakarta.annotation" package/module: > > >> > > >> 1. https://github.com/javaee/javax.annotation/ > > >> 2. https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/common-annotations-api > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >&

Re: Branch branch_8_9 has been cut and versions updated to 8.10 on stable branch

gt; I will open a new issue for it. > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:24 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> Please observe the normal rules: >> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch. >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be >&

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x - Build # 220 - Still Failing!

1c506ffc02d4f3d16c7a0b0ec4250ba79fb7d from June 2nd. Evidently > > there's still other problems though. > > > > I'll look into this on my end for sure. Do you happen to have the > > command that reproduced this for you? Or understand what "sheisty" > > mean

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.x - Build # 220 - Still Failing!

Hello Jason, thanks for the update. While trying to build a release candidate and doing the smoke test, I am getting the following error: RuntimeError: JAR file "../.lucene-releases/8.9.0/RC1/smoketest/unpack/solr-8.9.0/contrib/gcs-repository/lib/javax.annotation-api-1.3.2.jar" contains sheisty

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

> SOLR-15316 / PR 2502 is now merged to branch_8_9 > > Jan > > 3. jun. 2021 kl. 20:53 skrev Mayya Sharipova < > mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID>: > > I can wait till this PR 2502 is backported (hopefully by tomorrow? and > hopefully will be the last item to wa

Re: Branch branch_8_9 has been cut and versions updated to 8.10 on stable branch

; > Thanks again! > > Cheers, > -Greg > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > > > > Please observe the normal rules: > > > > * No new features may be committed to the branch. > > * Documentation patches, build patches and s

Branch branch_8_9 has been cut and versions updated to 8.10 on stable branch

Please observe the normal rules: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review and

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

he last I >> checked, my comments were not addressed? >> >> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 00:31 Walter Underwood, >> wrote: >> >>> Could someone else please take a look at SOLR-15056? This is a small >>> blast radius change that improves the circuit breakers. It i

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

wood.org >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >> >> On Jun 1, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Mayya Sharipova < >> mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID> wrote: >> >> Thank you for the update, Houston. >> >> I've started the release process, the

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

w.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mayya Sharipova >> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> I wonder if everyone is ok for May 31st (Monday) as the date for the >>> feature freeze date and branch cut? >>&

Re: Welcome Greg Miller as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome, Greg! On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:50 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Welcome, Greg! > > Jan > > > 29. mai 2021 kl. 21:47 skrev Adrien Grand : > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Greg Miller has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > > > Greg, the

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Colvin Cowie wrote: > Hello, > Eric was going to have a look at the PR. > But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block the > release > > Thanks > > On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> H

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

rong. > >>>> > >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it > >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test > >>>> coverage that helps combat risks. > >>>> > >>>> B

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

;>> >>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>&g

Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

Hello everyone, I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been more than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series. Thanks.

Re: Welcome Zach Chen as Lucene committer

Congratulations, and welcome Zach! On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:23 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Zach! > > -- > Steve > > > On Apr 19, 2021, at 10:13 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Zach Chen has accepted the PMC's invitation > to become a committer. >

Re: Welcome Peter Gromov as Lucene committer

Welcome, Peter! On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:17 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Peter! > > > On 6 Apr 2021, at 18:47, Robert Muir wrote: > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Peter Gromov has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > > > Peter, the tradition is that new

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani as Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations and welcome Julie!!! On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:51 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > Welcome Julie! > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 11/19/20 02:50:57 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani

Re: Payloads for each term

For sparse vectors, we found that Lucene's FeatureField could also be useful. It stores features as terms and feature values as term frequencies, and provides several convenient

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma to the PMC

Congratulations, Atri! On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:04 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Welcome Atri! > > > On Aug 21, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > > > Welcome Atri! > > > > Tommaso > > > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:47, Namgyu Kim wrote: > > Congratulations and welcome, Atri! :D > >

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

Congratulations, Michael! On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 4:30 PM Michael McCandless wrote: > Welcome to another Mike! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:57 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Michael Sokolov has accepted the

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

Congratulations Tomoko! On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:35 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Tomoko. Well deserved. > > Dawid > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 8:26 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Tomoko Uchida has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > >

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

to do a school project on the Information Retrieval. It is exciting to learn more about Lucene and contribute to it. On 2020/06/08 16:58:35, jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Mayya Sharipova as the latest Lucene/Solr > committer. > Mayya, it's tr

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8727) IndexSearcher#search(Query,int) should operate on a shared priority queue when configured with an executor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889181#comment-16889181 ] Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-8727 at 7/19/19 9:28 PM: -- Some

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8727) IndexSearcher#search(Query,int) should operate on a shared priority queue when configured with an executor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889181#comment-16889181 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-8727: - Some comments about design option # 1. I think we

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8901) Load frequencies lazily for postings and impacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mayya Sharipova resolved LUCENE-8901. - Resolution: Fixed > Load frequencies lazily for postings and impa

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8901) Load frequencies lazily for postings and impacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16877080#comment-16877080 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-8901: - PR: [https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/595

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8901) Load frequencies lazily for postings and impacts

Mayya Sharipova created LUCENE-8901: --- Summary: Load frequencies lazily for postings and impacts Key: LUCENE-8901 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8901 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6968) LSH Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16783921#comment-16783921 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-6968: - [~andyhind] Thanks very much for your answer, it made

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6968) LSH Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16706571#comment-16706571 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-6968: - [~andyhind]  Hello Andy! I have several questions

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #460: LUCENE-8497: refactor multi-term analysis han...

Github user mayya-sharipova closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/460 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8529) Use the completion key to tiebreak completion suggestion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16654125#comment-16654125 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-8529: - Thanks [~jim.ferenczi]. I was wondering

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #460: LUCENE-8497: refactor multi-term analysis handling

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/460 @romseygeek Thanks Alan, I will address your comments. But for the final change to this PR to remove `MultiTermAwareComponent` completely, will wait till #328 gets merged

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #460: LUCENE-8497: refactor multi-term analysis han...

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/460#discussion_r221589543 --- Diff: lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/miscellaneous/ScandinavianFoldingFilterFactory.java --- @@ -51,7 +49,7

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #460: LUCENE-8497: refactor multi-term analysis han...

GitHub user mayya-sharipova opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/460 LUCENE-8497: refactor multi-term analysis handling - Add `normalize` method to CharFilterFactory and TokenFilterFactory The goal is to get rid of MultiTermAwareComponent

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #320: LUCENE-8033: FieldInfos always use dense enco...

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/320#discussion_r167653245 --- Diff: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java --- @@ -63,21 +62,30 @@ public FieldInfos(FieldInfo[] infos

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #320: LUCENE-8033: FieldInfos always use dense enco...

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/320#discussion_r167649286 --- Diff: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java --- @@ -63,21 +62,30 @@ public FieldInfos(FieldInfo[] infos

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #320: LUCENE-8033: FieldInfos always use dense encoding

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/320 @jpountz Adrien, thanks for your feedback. I tried to address it in the 2nd commit. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #320: LUCENE-8033: FieldInfos always use dense enco...

GitHub user mayya-sharipova opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/320 LUCENE-8033: FieldInfos always use dense encoding FieldInfos always to use an array to store FieldInfo byNumber You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3475) ShingleFilter should handle positionIncrement of zero, e.g. synonyms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16347069#comment-16347069 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-3475: - [~jpountz] thank so much for suggestions

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3475) ShingleFilter should handle positionIncrement of zero, e.g. synonyms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16344192#comment-16344192 ] Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-3475 at 1/29/18 11:33 PM

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3475) ShingleFilter should handle positionIncrement of zero, e.g. synonyms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16344192#comment-16344192 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-3475: - [~jpountz] Hi Adrien!  I wonder what would be the best

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8100) Error on reindex using WordNet synonyms file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mayya Sharipova resolved LUCENE-8100. - Resolution: Won't Fix Looks like it is an issue in the Elastic Search > Er

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8100) Error on reindex using WordNet synonyms file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mayya Sharipova updated LUCENE-8100: Description: Originally reported in the ES issues: https://github.com/elastic

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8100) Error on reindex using WordNet synonyms file

Mayya Sharipova created LUCENE-8100: --- Summary: Error on reindex using WordNet synonyms file Key: LUCENE-8100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8100 Project: Lucene - Core

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #280: LUCENE-8011: Improve similarity explanations

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/280 @jpountz Adrien thanks for your help. Sorry, I will make sure to run `ant precommit` before committing next time. I have pushed another change to address

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #280: LUCENE-8011: Improve similarity explanations

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/280 @jpountz Thanks, Adrien, sorry for that. I will correct this, and next time make sure to run the tests before submitting a PR

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #280: LUCENE-8011: Improve similarity explanations

Github user mayya-sharipova commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/280 @jpountz thank you Adrien, I will work on these classes as well --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #280: LUCENE-8011: Improve similarity explanations

GitHub user mayya-sharipova opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/280 LUCENE-8011: Improve similarity explanations You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mayya-sharipova/lucene-solr LUCENE

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8011) Improve similarity explanations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16270661#comment-16270661 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-8011: - thanks [~jpountz], will work on the classes you

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8011) Improve similarity explanations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266230#comment-16266230 ] Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-8011: - Hello! What other specific similarity classes we would

  1   2   >