Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
I'll do 2008/7/7 Dan Tran [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you may want ping java.net ws group, they own this plugin -D On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I didn't get more success with tools.jar in plugin defs : [INFO]

Re: svn commit: r674674 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/maven-model/pom.xml

2008-07-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Yes I do, but there is currently no previous version to compare with, besides the 2.0.x branch. For 2.1 I would also expect to see binary incompatible change to the model. But I will put it in there and comment it out for now. Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Dennis, Do you plan to merge your

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
More on this : More on this : In the 1.10 pom file I could see : profiles profile !-- This is only for non MAC OS X builds, hence the property below -- iddefault-tools.jar/id activation property namejava.vendor/name valueSun Microsystems

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
How could I get the latest sources ? https://svn.dev.java.net/svn/jax-ws-commons/tags/jaxws-maven-plugin-1.10 require authorization. Which one ? 2008/7/7 Dan Tran [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you may want ping java.net ws group, they own this plugin -D On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Henri Gomez

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 8-Jul-08, at 12:19 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 08/07/2008, at 1:47 AM, John Casey wrote: Jason's referring to a ruby script I wrote to lookup the version string for a particular staged project, for use in the stage:copy mojo. This allows us to setup generic promotion scripts in a CI

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Any news on how to get the source of jaxws-maven-plugin via SVN ? I'd like to track in sources why the plugin try to open (and read) POM as zip when using IBM SDK and not with Sun SDK. [WrapperGen - method: placeOrder(com.mycorp.myapp.orderbook.service.PlaceOrderRequest)]

Re: MNG 624 and 3267

2008-07-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/07/2008, at 5:38 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Actually, after looking at the code a little bit it looks like this can be done without needing to modify the install or deploy plugins at all. This should just be a few lines in DefaultMavenProjectBuilder (my favorite piece of code!). That

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
Please take this to the users list. This is not even a plugin from Apache. On 8-Jul-08, at 8:42 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Any news on how to get the source of jaxws-maven-plugin via SVN ? I'd like to track in sources why the plugin try to open (and read) POM as zip when using IBM SDK and not

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Dan Tran
register an account with java.net, the url is here https://svn.dev.java.net/svn/jax-ws-commons/ On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any news on how to get the source of jaxws-maven-plugin via SVN ? I'd like to track in sources why the plugin try to open (and

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Please take this to the users list. This is not even a plugin from Apache. maven dev list is not also a list for maven plugin/mojo ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
register an account with java.net, the url is here Allready got one. https://svn.dev.java.net/svn/jax-ws-commons/ Ok I'll use my account. Next step, how to provide fixes and patches ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
No, it's for our development of the core and our plugins. Your questions are user questions, users also develop plugins. On 8-Jul-08, at 9:11 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Please take this to the users list. This is not even a plugin from Apache. maven dev list is not also a list for maven

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
No, it's for our development of the core and our plugins. ok. Your questions are user questions, users also develop plugins. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Please take this to the users list. This is not even a plugin from Apache. A question for the dev list. Did the system scope is still available with maven 2.1 ? --- dependencies dependency groupIdcom.sun/groupId artifactIdtools/artifactId

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Brett Porter
I think it should be. On 08/07/2008, at 11:46 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: Please take this to the users list. This is not even a plugin from Apache. A question for the dev list. Did the system scope is still available with maven 2.1 ? --- dependencies dependency

Re: MNG 624 and 3267

2008-07-08 Thread Ralph Goers
Brett Porter wrote: On 07/07/2008, at 5:38 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Actually, after looking at the code a little bit it looks like this can be done without needing to modify the install or deploy plugins at all. This should just be a few lines in DefaultMavenProjectBuilder (my favorite piece

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
I think it should be. it should be available or no more supported ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jaxws-maven-plugin failure on non Sun SDK

2008-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
It will be supported. Ok, so the bug (MNG-3586) is still open, but I feel it's a problem with the tools.jar (apt) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven dependencies on itself.

2008-07-08 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Barrie Treloar wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Oleg Gusakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To clarify: the new resolver only cares about metadata, not actual binary. Current artifact, even as late as 3.0-SN, dictates that even when you try to get artifact metadata, you get all the goods

Getting a config.xml via HTTP

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I imagine this is simple, but for a given job name how do I retrieve the config.xml? I made a simple replicator and started with grabbing config.xml files from the file system and now I want to do it remotely. I can't get the sample client to do anything, and I can't figure out if

Re: Getting a config.xml via HTTP

2008-07-08 Thread Stephen Connolly
Jason, did you send to the wrong list by mistake? he asked thinking this smells like a Hudson question Sent from my iPod On 8 Jul 2008, at 19:18, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I imagine this is simple, but for a given job name how do I retrieve the config.xml? I made a

Re: Getting a config.xml via HTTP

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
Yup, wrong list. On 8-Jul-08, at 2:21 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Jason, did you send to the wrong list by mistake? he asked thinking this smells like a Hudson question Sent from my iPod On 8 Jul 2008, at 19:18, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I imagine this is simple, but

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-08 Thread Tom Huybrechts
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:47 PM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: There are groups there for Maven 2.1, Plexus, Maven IDE (really embedder consumers), and I will also limit the plugins to the default lifecycles of the commonly used packagings like JAR, and WAR. John

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
Is the code anywhere? I'm interested in the process, but have gone down the Drools workflow way, and I'm trying to work on the promotion from Nexus. But I'll definitely take a look at code. On 8-Jul-08, at 3:40 PM, Tom Huybrechts wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:47 PM, John Casey [EMAIL

Re: Developing Maven 2.1

2008-07-08 Thread Tom Huybrechts
There's a setup section on the wiki page which has the necessary info on setting up Hudson. The staging plugin is part of the 'tom' branch which is linked to from the page. On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the code anywhere? I'm interested in the

Ant Task for 2.0.9 on trunk?

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hervé, Were you releasing the 2.0.x Ant Task off trunk? As I see version 2.0.9 in there for the Maven version. I want to make the tasks for trunk using 2.1.x and don't want to mess up anything you were doing. Thanks, Jason -- Jason

Re: Ant Task for 2.0.9 on trunk?

2008-07-08 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 08 juillet 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hervé, Were you releasing the 2.0.x Ant Task off trunk? no, I was using branches/maven-ant-tasks-2.0.x As I see version 2.0.9 in there for the Maven version. I want to make the tasks for trunk using 2.1.x +1 do you intend to use embedder

Re: Maven dependencies on itself.

2008-07-08 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Oleg Gusakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the moment - metadata includes a URI to the actual binary. I am working on integrating it with a new delivery vehicle, and that will be the first found. So all is defined by the order of repositories. As Nexus repository

Re: Maven dependencies on itself.

2008-07-08 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Barrie Treloar wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Oleg Gusakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the moment - metadata includes a URI to the actual binary. I am working on integrating it with a new delivery vehicle, and that will be the first found. So all is defined by the order of

Re: Ant Task for 2.0.9 on trunk?

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 8-Jul-08, at 6:04 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mardi 08 juillet 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hervé, Were you releasing the 2.0.x Ant Task off trunk? no, I was using branches/maven-ant-tasks-2.0.x As I see version 2.0.9 in there for the Maven version. I want to make the tasks for trunk

Re: Ant Task for 2.0.9 on trunk?

2008-07-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
If what's currently on trunk is actually being used for the branch do you want me to cut that over to the branch? I assume you haven't used the branch for a while? On 8-Jul-08, at 6:04 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mardi 08 juillet 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hervé, Were you releasing the

Re: svn commit: r674876 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/DefaultWagonManager.java

2008-07-08 Thread Brett Porter
Sorry, I think I hadn't yet merged that from artifact trunk. Let me do that for consistency as it was a little different and includes a test. On 09/07/2008, at 2:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Tue Jul 8 09:54:18 2008 New Revision: 674876 URL:

Re: svn commit: r674876 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/DefaultWagonManager.java

2008-07-08 Thread John Casey
sounds good. Brett Porter wrote: Sorry, I think I hadn't yet merged that from artifact trunk. Let me do that for consistency as it was a little different and includes a test. On 09/07/2008, at 2:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Tue Jul 8 09:54:18 2008 New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r674941 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/repository/ test/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/

2008-07-08 Thread Brett Porter
Hehe, got to watch out for those Java 5 for loop conversions :) Was this regression the one Igor was referring to, or is there still more work being done on MARTIFACT-25? Thanks, Brett On 09/07/2008, at 6:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jvanzyl Date: Tue Jul 8 13:36:14 2008 New

Re: svn commit: r674941 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/repository/ test/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/

2008-07-08 Thread Igor Fedorenko
This is not related to the concerns I have about current solution of MARTIFACT-25. Unfortunately, I do not have time to have another look at MARTIFACT-25 right now and cannot tell if caching missing pom.xml is good enough. Personally, I think maven should obey repository update policy (i.e.

Re: svn commit: r674941 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/repository/ test/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/

2008-07-08 Thread Brett Porter
On 09/07/2008, at 11:32 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: Personally, I think maven should obey repository update policy (i.e. never/daily/etc) and force (i.e. -U) flag for all missing release artifacts. It doesn't have to right now because it doesn't cache missing release artifacts. As I said