Hi Bala,
There's not a separate mailing list as of yet.
There's plenty of documentation on the project's site (
http://github.com/mesos/mesos-go).
If you run into trouble, you can create a github issue. If you have
specific question regarding usage of the binding, post here for now (or
reach out
Hi All,
To push forward one portion of the conversation re: Mesos extension hosting
and a shared registry (MESOS-1759
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1759), I'd like to suggest
that we begin using the existing Mesos GitHub org (https://github.com/mesos/)
for community frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 6:22 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
On Dec. 18, 2014, 2:43 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/authentication/authenticator.hpp, line 59
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/7/?file=766647#file766647line59
Do we really want to reference the 'master' here? Authenticator could
conceivably be used by anything that wants to
On Dec. 6, 2014, 12:05 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticator.hpp, line 22
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/7/?file=766648#file766648line22
Why was this not a problem before? I don't see size_t in your review
elsewhere?
size_t is being used
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28723/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 6:39 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
On Dec. 18, 2014, 2:36 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/messages/messages.proto, lines 270-273
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28723/diff/1/?file=782815#file782815line270
Hm.. could you add some design description to this review or the ticket?
I can't remember why we'd want to
On Dec. 19, 2014, 1:42 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/messages/messages.proto, lines 248-251
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28723/diff/1/?file=782815#file782815line248
Per our discussion, we should probably call out that these are
resources that must be explicitly released by the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review65649
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27760]
All tests passed.
-
Great idea. I have been suggesting this to others when appropriate.
It's also worth pointing out the successful history of the Mesos GitHub
org:
Spark's pre-incubator github home was https://github.com/mesos/spark
Your project could be next!
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester
I think this is a reasonable start, but I'm not sure if you're suggesting
we make the mesos org the home for the community frameworks/modules, or
that we will maintain forks of those frameworks and modules in the mesos
org.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester daveles...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
I think this is a reasonable start, but I'm not sure if you're suggesting
we make the mesos org the home for the community frameworks/modules, or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28671/#review65652
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/poll_socket.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29226/#review65654
---
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/duration.hpp
+1 seems like a simple start and should aid discovery
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Dave Lester daveles...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
I think this is
That's going to cause issues for any companies that use existing github
orgs and have internal restrictions on how they can share their open source
work.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Dave Lester daveles...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules.
If it's optional I don't see a problem
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Dominic Hamon dha...@twopensource.com
wrote:
That's going to cause issues for any companies that use existing github
orgs and have internal restrictions on how they can share their open source
work.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014
Of course it will be optional, any solution should be. But using github org
specifically limits the people that can use it.
A standalone registry removes the barrier to entry.
As I said, it's a great start but deeper thought is probably needed for a
final solution.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:22
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28671/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 7:57 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
On Dec. 19, 2014, 7:09 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/src/poll_socket.cpp, line 5
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28671/diff/2/?file=796971#file796971line5
relative paths in includes worry me. Please find a way around this.
Thanks for catching this. My editor seems to
On Dec. 19, 2014, 7:11 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/duration.hpp, line 93
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29226/diff/1/?file=796956#file796956line93
tv_sec and tv_usec are the right types to use, just in case they're not
long int on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28697/#review65670
---
Ship it!
This looks good Michael, one thing that I think is
On Dec. 19, 2014, 8:23 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This looks good Michael, one thing that I think is important to highlight
about this approach is that we no longer know the static reservation for
a dynamically reserved resource.
This is ok for now because a dynamically reserved
On Dec. 19, 2014, 11:11 a.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/duration.hpp, line 93
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29226/diff/1/?file=796956#file796956line93
tv_sec and tv_usec are the right types to use, just in case they're not
long int on
On Dec. 19, 2014, 7:11 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/duration.hpp, line 93
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29226/diff/1/?file=796956#file796956line93
tv_sec and tv_usec are the right types to use, just in case they're not
long int on
I would like to be added as a mesos contributor so that I may be
assigned to JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2180
Thank you
---
Sheena Artrip
sheena.art...@gmail.com
sheenobu.net
404-641-0482
On Dec. 19, 2014, 11:11 a.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/duration.hpp, line 93
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29226/diff/1/?file=796956#file796956line93
tv_sec and tv_usec are the right types to use, just in case they're not
long int on
Hi Sheena,
Just added you to the contributor list, please try now.
Tim
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Sheena Artrip sheena.art...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to be added as a mesos contributor so that I may be
assigned to JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2180
Thank
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29270/
---
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-2180
Got it. Thank you
---
Sheena Artrip
sheena.art...@gmail.com
sheenobu.net
404-641-0482
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Timothy Chen tnac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sheena,
Just added you to the contributor list, please try now.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29219/#review65689
---
Ship it!
docs/configuration.md
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29227/#review65690
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Till Toenshoff
On Dec. 19, 2014, 12:55
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29219/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 5:02 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Till Toenshoff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29173/#review65679
---
Hey Michael, jie and I went over this and since Jie needs this as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29270/#review65692
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [29270]
All tests passed.
-
On Dec. 19, 2014, 10:13 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/messages/messages.proto, lines 178-179
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29173/diff/1/?file=794998#file794998line178
Jie and I took a look at this API. Here are some thoughts:
From your other patches, it looks like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29274/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and switched to 'mcypark'.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28218/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 10:36 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29219/#review65698
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [29227, 29219]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29274/#review65699
---
Ship it!
Per your suggestion, mind dropping in the TODOs to remove
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28218/
---
(Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 11:16 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28781/#review65702
---
It looks like this patch will change when we make the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review65703
---
Ship it!
Looks great! Just a few more comments/log messages to
On Dec. 19, 2014, 11:21 p.m., Adam B wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 3980-3981
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/7-8/?file=766650#file766650line3980
We use @param in at least a couple of src/linux/ c++ files, and may do
more with doxygen in the future, so how about:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29274/#review65709
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [29274]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29283/
---
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Till Toenshoff.
Repository: mesos-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/
---
(Updated Dec. 20, 2014, 12:41 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review65710
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Adam B
On Dec. 19, 2014, 4:41 p.m., Till
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review65711
---
src/master/master.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29283/#review65712
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Till Toenshoff
On Dec. 20, 2014, 12:37
On Dec. 20, 2014, 12:48 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 3922-3923
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/9/?file=797824#file797824line3922
I'd hold off on adding these @params, since they don't belong in .cpp
files IIUC, and we don't use them generally. This
On Dec. 19, 2014, 11:21 p.m., Adam B wrote:
Looks great! Just a few more comments/log messages to reword.
Thanks a bunch for taking care of the proper wording, much appreciated!
On Dec. 19, 2014, 11:21 p.m., Adam B wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 3980-3981
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29283/#review65715
---
Ship it!
LGTM. What's the motivation for this change?
- Adam B
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29283/#review65716
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [29283]
All tests passed.
-
On Dec. 20, 2014, 1:17 a.m., Adam B wrote:
LGTM. What's the motivation for this change?
Limit the scope of allocator-related includes. With allocator modules coming
soon, allocator tests will require at least modules API and allocator modules.
- Alexander
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review65719
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [27760]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29290/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon.
Bugs: MESOS-1919
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/
---
(Updated Dec. 20, 2014, 3:38 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Dominic Hamon.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon.
Bugs: MESOS-1919
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29289/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Dominic Hamon.
Bugs: MESOS-1919
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29289/
---
(Updated Dec. 20, 2014, 3:38 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Dominic Hamon.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29290/
---
(Updated Dec. 20, 2014, 3:39 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Dominic Hamon.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29290/#review65726
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [29288, 29289, 29290]
All
63 matches
Mail list logo
