Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
Hello,


Hello,

I have to say that I'm   a little bit confused by all this.
Even though I am in favor of an EN native-lang project, I'm afraid it 
would be created now for the bad reasons.
It is not because the Marketing project pretendedly does a bad job that 
an EN project should be created.
This community has rules and is coordinated in a way that can be 
criticized, but still in a way that has allowed us to survive and gain 
some significant market share since 4 years. It is not because some are 
frustrated that our community should divide itself into structural 
forks, like an EN NL project.
I just cannot let this happen. We all know that we need more 
independence, more power and ressources to accomplish the purposes of
OOo.
We all know that we are going to live exciting and hazardous times 
because a foundation will have to be created, and that who will be 
inside it and who will invest in it is still not clear. This is why a 
project, and especially such an important project as an EN NL project, 
cannot be created out of frustration.
This is why, although I usually don't do that, and that I hate to do 
this, I vote -1 for the EN NL project.

Sorry,

Charles-H. Schulz.

I agree with Charles.

Louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Pavel Janik
 I agree with Charles.

I too agree with Louis and Charlese.

Pavel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Kazunari Hirano
 I too agree with Louis and Charlese.
I contemplated the issue and the situation before making a decision.
I vote -1 for the English Native Language project.
Maybe not now but in the near future when we can form a united front
for the English NL, anglophone :)
Cheers,
khirano

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] IRC bot

2005-02-24 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Thanks, Daniel.

Charles.

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 01:29 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Just a neat update on the IRC conf idea. I just managed to write a really 
 cool IRC robot to help out at the conference.
 
 Recall the basic setup. Someone speaks for 10-20min (may include slides, 
 just tell us where to get them). After the talk comes a 5min QA. This is 
 where the bot comes in. During the QA the channel is moderated. To ask a 
 question you would type:
 
 /msg QuestionBot Your question.
 
 The moderator sees the question and posts it when the speaker is done 
 answering the previous one. The moderator would also try to give everyone 
 a chance, and if there are too many questions, pick the better ones.
 
 Then comes the free for all period where everyone can talk.
 
 This is so cool!
 
 Cheers,


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello,
I'd go for the first or the third option.

Charles,

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 01:34 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 We were talking about holding the conf at #ooonlc
 
 I just sent an email about moderating the channel. This means that we need 
 a channel op there to change the channel modes. I can see 3 solutions:
 
  1) Give channel op to whoever is speaking.
  2) Give channel op to whoever is moderating. Linda Worthington has 
  offered to moderate. She's cool. Can she get channel op?
  3) Get a current channel op to sit through the talk so they
  can set/unset moderation.
 
 Which of these would be easiest to acomodate?
 
 Cheers,


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
 Hello,

 I have to say that I'm   a little bit confused by all this.
 Even though I am in favor of an EN native-lang project, I'm afraid it 
would be created now for the bad reasons.
 It is not because the Marketing project pretendedly does a bad job 
that an EN project should be created.
 This community has rules and is coordinated in a way that can be 
criticized, but still in a way that has allowed us to survive and gain 
some significant market share since 4 years. It is not because some 
are frustrated that our community should divide itself into structural 
forks, like an EN NL project.
 I just cannot let this happen. We all know that we need more 
independence, more power and ressources to accomplish the purposes of 
OOo.
 We all know that we are going to live exciting and hazardous times 
because a foundation will have to be created, and that who will be 
inside it and who will invest in it is still not clear. This is why a 
project, and especially such an important project as an EN NL project, 
cannot be created out of frustration.
 This is why, although I usually don't do that, and that I hate to do 
this, I vote -1 for the EN NL project.

If I agree that an EN project should not be created out of frustration, 
however I think that what Ryan and Ian expressed has to be taken into 
consideration.
I'm surprised that we say no to people offering time an energy to our 
community. I feel that this is not the concept of the NLC. I'm surprised 
that we say no without proposing anything else. Please don't see all 
this as a critic, but more interrogations.
I feel that saying -1 doesn't give any answer to the strenght of 
community they asked for and the help they need to manage this 
community, even if I understand well that this could not be done in 
emergency and in response to a possible fork.

Kind regards
Sophie

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.3.0 - Release Date: 21/02/2005
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Pavel Janik
 I'm surprised that we say no to people offering time an energy to our 
 community.

No, certainly not. We want them to help inside marketing project for their
marketing goals of EN, N-L project in QA project for their QA goals of EN
N-L project etc.

We certainly do not want to have two groups of people doing marketing in
English language, one in global amrketing project and one in English N-L
project. This is nonsense.

Pavel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Jonathon Blake
Charles wrote:

appease the tensions at first, 

Consider that the tensions are a result of not having an NLP in the first place.

 This question can be today answered in two ways:
 -an EN native-lang project (not created out of frustration or in a desire of 
 going somewhere else)
 -regional groups of users.

For English, regional groups make slightly more sense than one NLP ---
if only because regional groups could handle translation into English
better.  [The difference between British English, and American English
is a lot more than Boot/Bonnet.  Likewise, the difference between
South African and Australian English is much more than vocabulary.  (A
triple negative in American English is a very ambigious yes.  A
triple negative in South African English is an emphatic no.)]

Mitigating against regional groups, is where English is spoken.   It
is a collapsing language in North America.  That is where I think
_most_ of the native English users live.

A north_american_regional_group would, by default, have to include, at
a minimum, Spanish, and French.  [French being an official language of
Canada.  Spanish being an official language in two states and the
dominant language in five states of the united states.

[OOo 1.1.4 does not support Spanish (US) as a Locale.  That should be
fixed for 2.0.]

xan

jonathon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Daniel Carrera
Pavel Janík wrote:

 Please have a look at VOICE privilege on IRC.

Yes, I know about voice. And during the talk itself and the QA all we 
need is voice. But when the talk first starts an op has to be there to set 
the channel to +m and after the QA set it back to -m.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera  | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   | 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Daniel Carrera
Charles-H.Schulz wrote:

 I'd go for the first or the third option.

Sure. Whatever floats your boat. :-)
As long as we can make this work without pulling any teeth...

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera  | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   | 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Pavel Janík
   From: Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:27:32 -0500

need is voice. But when the talk first starts an op has to be there to
set the channel to +m and after the QA set it back to -m.

You seem to already have op access to @ooonlc ;-)
-- 
Pavel Jank

die_if_kernel(Whee... Hello Mr. Penguin, current-tss.kregs);
  -- 2.2.16 arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Daniel Carrera
Jonathon Blake wrote:

 For English, regional groups make slightly more sense than one NLP ---
 if only because regional groups could handle translation into English
 better.

I don't think so... you don't seem similar distinctions between all the 
variations of Spanish. And the differences I see between Spanish spoken in 
different countries is greater than that between Brits and Yanks.

Another important issue to consider is not dividing our volunteers too 
much. There is an optimum region. Having too many people in a group is 
incredibly inefficient (I believe that some OOo lists suffer from this). 
But having too few is also ineffective.

And yet a third issue is that NLs are not intended to correspond to 
countries, but rather to linguistic groups. I *like* that, and wouldn't 
want to lose it. I would not feel confortable on an American NL or an 
British NL. That just rubs the the wrong way. But I would be right at 
home at an English NL.

 A north_american_regional_group would, by default, have to include, at
 a minimum, Spanish, and French.  [French being an official language of
 Canada.  Spanish being an official language in two states and the
 dominant language in five states of the united states.

Indeed, you're right. Yet another problem with country/region groups 
(that's a fourth point).

And a fifth point: Marketing already has MarCons that are divided based on 
regional boundaries.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniel Carrera  | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today!  | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org   | 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi all,

Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I concur. I think all four of us want (eventualy) an English NL project,
 and for the same reasons. We'll make it eventualy :-)

Yes!  Please add me to the all four. :)
Cheers,
khirano

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
Hi Sophie,

If I agree that an EN project should not be created out of frustration, 
however I think that what Ryan and Ian expressed has to be taken into 
consideration.
I'm surprised that we say no to people offering time an energy to our 
community. I feel that this is not the concept of the NLC. I'm
surprised 
that we say no without proposing anything else. Please don't see all 
this as a critic, but more interrogations.
I feel that saying -1 doesn't give any answer to the strenght of 
community they asked for and the help they need to manage this 
community, even if I understand well that this could not be done in 
emergency and in response to a possible fork.

I was under the impression that we--I and others--actually proposed a
bunch of solutions that seemed, to me, to be better.  That is: To boost
and promote the MarCon efforts, to develop more regional groups.  

I also think that having more effective communication is a good
strategy. Would an EN project, especially one born of frustration
accomplish this?  Or would it rather do the opposite?


Kind regards
Sophie



best
Louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
Hi Jonathon,


A north_american_regional_group would, by default, have to include, at
a minimum, Spanish, and French.  [French being an official language of
Canada.  Spanish being an official language in two states and the
dominant language in five states of the united states.

Not really.  You can have a user group/ marketing group with people who
speak different languages included; or many such groups.  I think what
counts here is local effectiveness, and I don't think that to be
effective everyone in a regional group must speak the same language. 

But let me also rephrase the issue.

If there is frustration now with process then let's address it directly.
Don't create a NLC project out of frustration. Do bring the frustration
to the Community Council or to NLC leadership.  (I think the CC is more
pertinent here, but Charles and I differ; both are options.)



[OOo 1.1.4 does not support Spanish (US) as a Locale.  That should be
fixed for 2.0.]

xan

jonathon

best
Louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Ian Lynch
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 20:59, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
 Hi Jonathon,
 
 
 A north_american_regional_group would, by default, have to include, at
 a minimum, Spanish, and French.  [French being an official language of
 Canada.  Spanish being an official language in two states and the
 dominant language in five states of the united states.
 
 Not really.  You can have a user group/ marketing group with people who
 speak different languages included; or many such groups.  I think what
 counts here is local effectiveness, and I don't think that to be
 effective everyone in a regional group must speak the same language. 
 
 But let me also rephrase the issue.
 
 If there is frustration now with process then let's address it directly.
 Don't create a NLC project out of frustration. Do bring the frustration
 to the Community Council or to NLC leadership.  (I think the CC is more
 pertinent here, but Charles and I differ; both are options.)

Well I believe our CC representative is well versed on the issue ;-)

-- 
Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZMS Ltd


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [native-lang] EN Native-Lang

2005-02-24 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
hi


I think it was agreed that one born out of frustration was not a good
idea which is why there has been backing off. That does not mean that
in principle an EN project is not needed for the reasons Charles and
Sophie articulate. To me its simply a matter of symmetry and being
seen to be even-handed with all native languages and as far as
possible their cultural identity. No doubt there are lines to be drawn
on that score but I wouldn't like to see a line drawn at the point of
never ever having an EN project.


Oh, I agree; an EN project is possible.  I think there are some
pragmatic issues to be dealt with, but those can be dealt with.

As to the representative(s) being versed in the issues, there are
actually three here: Sophie, Pavel (NLC), and Daniel (CCR).  

best
Louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[native-lang] Proposal for Indonesian native-lang project

2005-02-24 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
I'd like to propose a native-lang project for the Indonesian
language.For now, NLC level 1 will be best for us.
I have been working on OOo documentation project and provide
Indonesian version of the Manual, Setup Guide, HowTo, etc for several
months. The officialpage for Indonesian page that i maintain is
http://documentation.openoffice.org/id/
We have our local Documentation page to help Indonesian people who
likes tocontribute to the Documentation project
(http://project.informatix.or.id/ and
http://jogja.linux.or.id/project/Dokumentasi-OOo/). In this project,
we have 13 peoples who contributes to the Documentation project and
still more to come.
We also have two mailing list that provides OOo supports for
Indonesian user and also forcontributor to the OOo Documentation
project. The mailing list can be reached in
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oooindo for support and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proyek-ooofor contributors
I also a member of Jogja Linux User Group and moderator for
Indonesian Linux Forum, http://forum.linux.or.id, which can support
for the Indonesian project. It is an active OpenSource community.
Web space, cvs access, and mailing lists will be needed to make this
project alive
Code for Indonesia : IDMy OpenOffice.org username is willysr.I've
signed the JCA.
- --
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
Registered Linux User : 336579
Public-key : http://www.informatix.or.id/willy/public-key.txt
Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com
OOo Documentation Project (ID) : http://project.informatix.or.id
Mandrakelinux Translation Project (ID) :
http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/l10n/id.php3
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[native-lang] fisl6.0

2005-02-24 Thread Jacqueline McNally
Anyone planning to go to the 6th International Free Software Forum 
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/ June 1-4, 2005, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil ?

If you wish to present a paper, the Call for Papers deadline is Monday 
28 Feb, see: https://fisl.softwarelivre.org/papers/index.en.html

Anyone just planning to be there? I know some people that are going from 
other OSS projects, but I just wondered whether there was going to be an 
OOo contigent :)

All the best
Jacqueline McNally
Lead, OpenOffice.org Marketing Project
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [native-lang] fisl6.0

2005-02-24 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
Anyone planning to go to the 6th International Free Software Forum
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/ June 1-4, 2005, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
?

Yes.


If you wish to present a paper, the Call for Papers deadline is Monday 
28 Feb, see: https://fisl.softwarelivre.org/papers/index.en.html

Thanks!


Anyone just planning to be there? I know some people that are going
from other OSS projects, but I just wondered whether there was going
to be an OOo contigent :)

Friends, this is an important conference!  

All the best
Jacqueline McNally
Lead, OpenOffice.org Marketing Project



cheers
Louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]