Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 23

[X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 (please justify -1) [X] binding (member of PMC) My vote is based on [X] I have built and tested the source with OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu23.28+85-CA (build 23+37) [ ] I have tested the binary zip with on [ ] I have tested the installer(s) with on [ ] I have te

Re: [External] : Re: Plugin Verifikation Plugins Portal (changing rules)

Sounds good, thanks Jirka. Gj On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 19:27, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > Since there has been no further communication on this topic, let's take > this as a lazy consensus that signatures won't be considered at all when > verifying plugins going forward. I have updated step 8 in the "

Re: [External] : plugin verification

Thanks for the ping Jirka. Plus, more are welcome to join us. Gj On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 9:37 AM Jiří Kovalský wrote: > > I have verified all plugins in my queue today. > > Mani, Geertjan, Carlos - please join me with your verifications. > > -Jirka > > Dne 05. 06. 24 v 18:47 Ernie Rael napsal(a):

Re: UPDATE Java Help in Netbeans substitution project

Very cool and interesting. Blog about it publicly and we’ll spread the word to get traction. Gj On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 16:33, Oliver Rettig wrote: > Hi all, > > here is an update of our Java-Help substitution project at the > DHBW-Karlsruhe: > > https://github.com/MobMonRob/JavaHelpStudien2 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 22

[X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 (please justify -1) [X] binding (member of PMC) My vote is based on [X] I have built and tested the source with OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.40+19-CA (build 17.0.6+10-LTS) on Mac OS X version 13.6.7 running on x86_64 [ ] I have tested the binary zip with on [ ] I

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 21 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 21 was released on February 20, 2024. What's in the Apache NetBeans 21 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/21 With thanks to 24 contributors, including 3 who have contributed for the first time. Th

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 20 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 20 was released on December 1, 2023. Apologies for announcing this so late. What's in the Apache NetBeans 20 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/20 With thanks to 26 contributors, including 6 who h

Re: Who is responsible for NB plugin portal?

We're all working on this project together, sometimes responses may take some time. :-) Indeed, there's no option for paid plugins -- you'd need to make those available yourself, though there are several ways (blogs, etc) that these could be promoted, including on this mailing list. The plugin po

Re: Community installers for NetBeans 20

Great and welcome back! Gj On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 12:09 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > Firstly, a big thank you to Eric for handling the NetBeans 20 release > build and vote! Due to a bereavement I had to hand over everything I > had been planning to do at short notice. > > I've now fini

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 20

[ X ] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 (please justify -1) [ X ] binding (member of PMC) My vote is based on [ X ] I have built and tested the source with Zulu17.40+19-CA (build 17.0.6+10-LTS) on macOS Ventura 13.6.1 (required) [ ] I have tested the binary zip with on [ ] I have tested the installer(s) w

Re: [NetBeans PluginPortal] Check your plugin with the new Apache NetBeans 20! X3D-Edit 4.0.31

I've voted positively on it. Gj On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:45 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) < brutz...@nps.edu> wrote: > Dear plugin gurus: we submitted X3D-Edit plugin update 4.0.31 several > weeks ago, but have not seen a corresponding response for review and > release yet. > > > >- Apach

Re: Windows 11 Issues - Copy/Paste Failure

Here's the issue that awaits you when you move on from NetBeans: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-5980/ I.e., it's probably connected to Swing and a race condition with the clipboard. Gj On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 7:39 PM Kenneth Fogel wrote: > > Thank you everyone for your comments. As so

Re: Apache NetBeans swag ready on the RedBubble storefront!

I also > > have special mentions: > > > > * Emmanuel Hugonnet, who peer-reviewed the designs before they were > > even public, ensuring that once we put them out there, they were clean > > cut > > * Mark Thomas from the ASF, who guided us through the process o

Re: plugin portal submission inquiry

getting responses to email subscription requests. > > > > > > > > > > > > all the best, Don > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br > > > brutz...@nps.edu > > > >

Re: plugin portal submission inquiry

ode USW/Br > brutz...@nps.edu > > Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA > +1.831.656.2149 > > X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics > https://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman > > > > *From:* Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) > *Sent:* Sunday, May

Re: X3D-Edit plugin for Apache NetBeans updated - request status

I've voted "Go", one more needed and then it is approved. :-) Gj On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 7:26 AM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) wrote: > > We submitted an update to X3D-Edit plugin last week on Apache NetBeans Plugin > Portal. > > > > https://plugins.netbeans.apache.org/catalogue/?id=90 > > > > H

Proposal: Bi-weekly 30 minute NetBeans clinic

Hi all, We have a continual stream of releases following our quarterly release cycle, things are going well, though a lot of the work within the release cycle falls on a few shoulders. And those shoulders aren't always well coordinated. I'd like to propose that we have a standing meeting every s

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 18 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 18 was released on May 30, 2023. What's in the Apache NetBeans 18 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/18 With thanks to 31 contributors, including 5 who have contributed for the first time. Thank y

Re: plugin portal submission inquiry

Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA > +1.831.656.2149 > > X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics > https://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman > > > > *From:* Geertjan Wielenga > *Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2023 11:12 AM > *To:* Brutzman, Donald (Don)

Re: plugin portal submission inquiry

Jiri, Can you advise? Gj On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 20:09, Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) wrote: > Hello. Terry Norbraten and I are trying to see if his submission for > review of a corrected Apache NetBeans plugin was received. > > > >- https://plugins.netbeans.apache.org/catalogue/?id=88 (vers

Re: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

Could it be a solution to continue Java 8 on a branch and then, if that works, i.e., if the work that needs to be done is actually done there, we bring it back into the main repo -- i.e., we put it on a sidetrack for one release, to see if this lightens the burden for those who have felt frustrated

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

Yes, they're loading a ton of org.netbeans.modules.cnd modules, which may be keeping them on older versions of NetBeans Platform, meaning that they can't move to later JDKs anyway. Gj On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:19 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 13:07, G

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

-cd0c929e4999] org.openide.windows [6.71.1 20221005-cd0c929e4999] org.netbeans.swing.tabcontrol [1.51.1 20221005-cd0c929e4999] On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:58 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 12:43, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > To Karl's question -- the cool new lo

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

er wrote: > > On 4/11/23 05:55, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Well, what we're trying to do here is keep the whole project together > > and not branch, which comes down to forking. > > When there's an irreconcilable argument about the direction of a > project,

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

n the blog, etc, be aware that organizations may pop up and indicate their concerns etc -- in which case, they'll need to start contributing here actively, whether on the JDK 8 branch or in the main line. Those who do not contribute cannot complain. Gj On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:55 PM Ge

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

Well, what we're trying to do here is keep the whole project together and not branch, which comes down to forking. Gj On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:19 PM Glenn Holmer wrote: > > On 4/10/23 10:19, László Kishalmi wrote: > > There is a way to support old software, and that is called branching. > > It

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

Hi all, Could a consensus solution be that for all JDK 8 - compatibility related items, any/all work related to that, we assign those issues to Svata -- and we try this for one release and see how that goes? If it fails, then in the release after that, we should all then have consensus to move awa

Re: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

If Jaroslav, Svata, and Toni will take ownership of and be responsible for ALL items that relate to handling JDK 8 related incompatibilities and any other issues connected to this, then we may be able to solve this problem. I perceive little faith in that this will be done, since this has thus far

Re: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

One strand that comes through in this discussion is that those that want to continue JDK 8 should also be the owners of it. It is clear that a level of exhaustion is being reached by the majority of the core contributors of this project. A bigger risk than us losing the ability to run projects de

Re: AW: [Lazy Consensus] Minimum JDK build and run policy (dropping JDK 8)

My feeling on this discussion is that, yes, it’s unfortunate that we’re getting to fruitful discussion only at this late stage — but better late than never and without this useful thread we wouldn’t have been getting where we’re getting at all. Could one way forward be to do a Zoom call with all t

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 17 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 17 was released on February 21, 2023. What's in the Apache NetBeans 17 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/17 With thanks to 36 contributors, including some who have contributed for the first time.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 17

[X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 (please justify -1) [X] binding (member of PMC) My vote is based on [X] I have built and tested the source with Azul Zulu build of OpenJDK 17.06 on Mac OS X Catalina 10.15.7 [ ] I have tested the binary zip [ ] I have tested the DEB installer [ ] I have tested the Maven a

Re: 17 blocker? — [apache/netbeans] no library found for namespace http://omnifaces.org/ui (Issue #4976)

OK, let’s prioritize for the next release and note as a known error to be fixed ASAP since it blocks all usage of Java/Jakarta EE. Gj On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 10:07, Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 08:24, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Do we have an asses

Re: no library found for namespace http://omnifaces.org/ui #4976

Thanks! Gj On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 09:51, Michael Bien wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > On 14.02.23 12:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, especially Ondro, Gaurav, and others, > > might be worth to @ the devs directly under the issue on github. Emails > are sometimes ove

17 blocker? — [apache/netbeans] no library found for namespace http://omnifaces.org/ui (Issue #4976)

Hi all, Do we have an assessment on the below, why it’s happening and what should be done — I thought a lot of Jakarta EE work had been done recently, could this be included? Gj On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 09:08, Frank Cornelis wrote: > Tried out NetBeans version 17-RC3. Unfortunately this issue is

Re: no library found for namespace http://omnifaces.org/ui #4976

Some investigation has already been done in the issue above, has this been covered in the recent Jakarta EE work or is this different? Gj On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:50 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, especially Ondro, Gaurav, and others, > > Can we take a look at this,

no library found for namespace http://omnifaces.org/ui #4976

Hi all, especially Ondro, Gaurav, and others, Can we take a look at this, do we have a solution for it: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/4976 Thanks, Gj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org Fo

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

Maybe relevant: https://foojay.io/today/sboms-first-steps-in-a-new-journey-for-developers/ Gj On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 8:11 PM Edwin F. wrote: > > Thanks Neil > Gonna try it. I'll keep posting. > BR, > === > Edwin F. López A. > ===

Re: Rust, anyone?

Would be very cool as a plugin, I think. Looking forward to trying it and congrats! Gj On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 3:54 PM Antonio wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there interest in adding Rust support to NetBeans? > > I have a minimal cluster with Rust support, but I'm not sure I'll be > able to maintain

Re: [slack] Is it still used?

The Foojay.io Slack is very welcome and open to NetBeans, where we can easily add a new channel. bit.ly/join-foojay-slack Go there to join it. Gj On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 17:16, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > Hello, > > I am not really used to Slack so pardon me if my question seems obvious. > > I saw

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 16 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 16 was released on November 30, 2022 (though there's been a delay in announcing the release). What's in the Apache NetBeans 16 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/16 With thanks to 26 contributors,

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

nd if the Changes (ChangelLog, etc.) would have it's own > section, even if it would be just the link on the GitHub Release Page. I > found that link hard enough at the 4th glimpse, it's 23:00+ here though. > > On 12/7/22 21:29, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Done, say the word, and

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Done, say the word, and I'll send out release announcements, put out the blog post, and tweet. Gj On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:30 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 16:32, Neil C Smith wrote: > > I'll get on with archiving NB 15 and adding the notification. > > OK, archiving done and

NetBeans at FOSDEM

Hi all, We've historically had a pretty good time at FOSDEM over the past years, with sessions and beers and catching up with people in hotel lobbies. https://foojay.io/today/friends-of-openjdk-at-fosdem-2023/ The chance exists again to have that experience, the day for our content is Sunday 5 F

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Let me know when ready, will then post tweet and blog. Gj On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 10:36, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 09:22, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > Great, it works now, needed to refresh the page. > > > > I believe everything is updated

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Great, it works now, needed to refresh the page. I believe everything is updated now for 16. Gj On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:20 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > But https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb15/index.html works, while > https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb16/index.html

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

But https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb15/index.html works, while https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb16/index.html does not. Gj On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:09 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Great, thanks. > > Gj > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:10 PM Eric Barboni wrote

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

[RELEASES] Post-vote release update > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 07:23, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > Page for 16 is here but not displaying: > > > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans-website/tree/master/netbeans.apache > > .org/src/content/download/nb1

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Page for 16 is here but not displaying: https://github.com/apache/netbeans-website/tree/master/netbeans.apache.org/src/content/download/nb16 Gj On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 14:43, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Great, working on it. > > Gj > > On

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Great, working on it. Gj On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:41 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 16:34, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Once the installers are there, let me know, will then provide pages for 16. > > Everything except the Linux DEB packa

Re: [RELEASES] Post-vote release update

Once the installers are there, let me know, will then provide pages for 16. Gj On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 5:02 PM Eric Barboni wrote: > > To draft a new release as we did not merge #4826 :p > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases > click button on right draft new release > Choose a tag => 1

Re: Netbeans Vision / Roadmap

As every release, we add to the release what individual contributors want to contribute, we will release 4 times per year. I don’t see this roadmap changing. Gj On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 13:42, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > Hi dear PMCs, > > I would like to reactivate this discussion, because we (our t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 16

+1 (binding) openjdk 11.0.13 2021-10-19 LTS OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu11.52+13-CA (build 11.0.13+8-LTS) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu11.52+13-CA (build 11.0.13+8-LTS, mixed mode) Built basic and then full, both work, and everything runs smoothly. The main problem that I have is that since

Re: [PLUGINS][RELEASES] Preparation for NetBeans 16 plugins

Great, thank you for your work. Gj On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 11:31, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 10:04, Neil C Smith wrote: > > I totally agree with the points raised there. We haven't had a > > vaguely useful plugin catalog since NetBeans 13. The plugin catalog > > for 16 is cu

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

; wants to support nb-javac as an optional plugin fine, but overall the > > platform needs to move forward, not hold on to the past. Apache shouldn’t > > directly concern itself with nb-javac anymore. > > > > > > Changes is inevitable, resistance is futile, etc… I’m m

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

Just been looking into open source work done in the context of the European Union and one of the key applications there requires JDK 8: https://github.com/l-e-x/leos I.e., we need to stop thinking that Java 8 is somehow dead or ethically or otherwise problematic -- it's simply what a great deal o

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

The direction is clear — we all work together on NetBeans and, since we’re all different people with different perspectives, we share our different ideas and perspectives, discuss them, and provide pull requests based on our ideas and perspectives. Some are accepted and some not, depending on how c

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

opment via Jaroslav and others? Where should it be on Maven Central where it is not versus where it is now? Gj On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 2:43 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > (But, of course, we already are dependent on nb-javac, nothing changes there.) > > Gj > > On Mon, Oct

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

(But, of course, we already are dependent on nb-javac, nothing changes there.) Gj On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > I’d vote against at the moment, since we’d be dependent on nb-javac, the > development and ownership of which is indeed a bit fuzzy. > >

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

I’d vote against at the moment, since we’d be dependent on nb-javac, the development and ownership of which is indeed a bit fuzzy. Gj On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 13:51, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 12:31, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022

Re: nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > Multiple people have expressed massive reservations on this already. > Michael expressed a -0.99 already. Given code changes are really +1 > or -1 anyway, I'll lend the -0.01 until his and other reservations are > adequately considered at le

nb-javac for building NetBeans itself

Hi all, Right now, when we build NetBeans, we’re using the javac from the JDK that we’re using to do the build — so that we’re dependent on the JDK team, which can decide to drop features. If, instead, we were to set the compiler in NetBeans the build script, to nb-javac, which is available on Ma

Re: JBake guy in Manchester

Yes, a pity! I should have let you know. By the way, check out the Foojay Slack (https://join.slack.com/t/foojay/signup), maybe you could speak at an upcoming Manchester JUG meeting. Gj On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 6:51 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 15:

JBake guy in Manchester

Hi all, I’ve just met the JBake guy Jon Bullock at the Manchester JUG. https://github.com/jonbullock Do we have questions or feature requests for him, especially Neil, Eric, and Antonio? Gj

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop separate platform source and binary zip from release artefacts?

Makes sense. Gj On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 12:57, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 11:30, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Isn’t it useful/needed for apps created on top of the NetBeans Platform? > > Needed, no. Useful? Not sure, hence the questions. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop separate platform source and binary zip from release artefacts?

Isn’t it useful/needed for apps created on top of the NetBeans Platform? Gj On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 12:28, Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > Every release we include source and binary zip artefacts for the > platform alone. eg. > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/netbeans/netbeans-plat

Re: Java Help student project started

Brilliant. Gj On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 09:55, Oliver Rettig wrote: > Hi all, > > since years we miss a modern (on- and offline) help-viewer for your > netbeans > platform applications. Now, we have just started a student project at the > Cooperative State University Karlsruhe (Germany) to fill th

Re: Netbeans swag - PMC validators needed!

Great, yes, use this mailing list, that's great. Also note that NetBeans is written with a capital N and a capital B. Gj On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:23 PM Pyro MX wrote: > > Hello Netbeans developers! > > A few months ago, I voiced my interest in producing some swag designs > for Apache Netbeans >

Re: [External] : Re: [DISCUSS] Future of cpplite projects

Well, maybe on installing CND, the CCPLITE modules should get uninstalled and vice-versa. Gj On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:38 PM antonio wrote: > > Hi all, > > A quick update on the status of cnd and cpplite. > > 1. Both cnd and cpplite want to register different stuff for the > text/x-c++, text/x-c,

Re: Plugin/Code donation

The key question is if/who will maintain/further develop this code -- unless you feel it's completely stable, no issues expected, nor further development needed? If you're going to donate something and not maintain it and no one will maintain it, and you expect there to be things that need to be m

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 15 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 15 was released on August 31, 2022 (though there's been a delay in announcing the release). What's in the Apache NetBeans 15 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/15 With thanks to 33 contributors, i

Re: Copy Paste still an issue

Out of interest, what shows with CTRL_SHIFT-D (paste from history)? Gj On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 at 19:44, Kenneth Fogel wrote: > The problem with copy and paste occurs when I have NetBeans, Microsoft > Word, and Notepad++ all open. On a fresh reboot of a Windows system you may > be successful copying

Re: Copy Paste still an issue

Well, as a workaround (and, like Neil, I'm not able to reproduce) you could copy from GitHub where your files are stored. Gj On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:51 PM Kenneth Fogel wrote: > And now I notice that I cannot paste from Word into NetBeans. I usually > write code with NetBeans and then paste i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 15

+1 (binding) Downloaded voting artefact and successfully built and ran with the following. java -version openjdk version "11.0.13" 2021-10-19 LTS OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu11.52+13-CA (build 11.0.13+8-LTS) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu11.52+13-CA (build 11.0.13+8-LTS, mixed mode) Thanks

Fwd: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

FYI, maybe useful for us too. Gj -- Forwarded message - From: Sheng Wu Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 09:00 Subject: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community To: Incubator Cc: dev Hi podlings Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incubator years ago, but we stil

Re: [RELEASES] Slight delay on 15-rc3?

ad/vzx1jm5gz2w1rtof4swlvrclng0xsq8q > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 10:47, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > Excellent. > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 11:26 AM Neil C Smith > wrote: > > > > &

Re: [RELEASES] Slight delay on 15-rc3?

Excellent. Gj On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 11:26 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 11:27, Neil C Smith wrote: > > There are currently (at least) two high priority issues for NetBeans > > 15. I suggest we hold back rc3 until we can get these fixes in? > > > > Breakpoint issue already ha

Re: Netbeans 8.2

Quite some more context is needed here. And, for the free open source Apache NetBeans project, people like you are needed to join in and collaborate with us, in at least testing, but better than that, contributing code and fixes, will you and others working with you on that project be able to spen

Re: [RELEASES] Slight delay on 15-rc3?

Great, yes, let's get these in. Gj On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:27 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi Eric, Geertjan, Martin, all, > > There are currently (at least) two high priority issues for NetBeans > 15. I suggest we hold back rc3 until we can get these fixes in? > > Breakpoint issue already has a

Re: NetBeans 15 performance improvements

Really excellent! Gj On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 04:16, Josh Juneau wrote: > Great work to everyone who contributed! Looking forward to the > performance improvements. > > Josh Juneau > juneau...@gmail.com > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau > > > On Jul

Re: NB14 'call hierarchy' 'search from base class' does not work

Maybe somewhere here, if I knew more, I'd advise, probably Jan Lahoda can help: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/tree/master/java/java.editor Gj On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 10:19 AM Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > Can anyone provide me with some pointers to where i can find the > subsystem responsibl

Re: NetBeans 14 does not generate correct Mac applications. I need help deploying NetBeans platform mac applications

You brag about being a user of NetBeans for many years, you're creating NetBeans Platform applications, yet provide no contributions to the NetBeans code repository. (As far as I can find.) Gj On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:11 PM Todd Stevenson wrote: > I’ve been a user of NetBeans for many years an

Re: [RELEASES] Getting ready for NetBeans 15 branching

Awesome and agree with all points plus would like to be involved again, maybe a weekly Zoom call with anyone wanting to be involved to see where we are and how we can work together and of course anything we discuss will be put back into this mailing list. Gj On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:17 PM Neil C

Re: Suggestion: Rename the VS Code Language Server Extension

https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/4295 Gj On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:13 PM Bruno Borges wrote: > Sure, but unless this extension will be useful for any language, I'd still > add "Java" somehow in the name. > > Still, don't forget how extensions are displayed in VS Code / VS Codium > > On

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NetBeans 14 released

Hi all, The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce that Apache NetBeans 13 was released on June 9, 2022 (though there's been a delay in announcing the release). What's in the Apache NetBeans 14 release: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/14 Note it's the first time we're doing

Re: releases changelog in github

Great, will send out the announcement today. Gj On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 16:11, Eric Barboni wrote: > I would say this one is clear: > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/14 > > Eric > -Message d'origine- > De : Geertjan Wielenga <> > E

Re: releases changelog in github

In the announcement of the Apache NetBeans 14 release, can we refer to this release changelog in GitHub, what is the best link for that purpose? Gj On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:00 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > This is brilliant progress, automated release notes, plus the idea of > taggi

Re: releases changelog in github

This is brilliant progress, automated release notes, plus the idea of tagging issues as features or highlights, etc, for automation into sections in the generated release notes. Gj On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:39 PM Michael Bien wrote: > > another thing so that I don't forget: > > gh releases alway

Re: NB 14 tags and home page update

Maybe you need to refresh the home page. Yes, we’re updating things now and announcements will be going out as well. Gj On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 18:30, Rangi Keen wrote: > It looks like the NetBeans 14 release is now available to download, > but the home > page is

Re: Netbeans 13.0 only supposed to properly runs on GraalVM 17?

, rely on Truffle > classes during startup. As I am not a JVM expert, I was not knowing what > Truffle is. By the way, is NB now supposed to only run on GraalVM? Same > question for NB platform based applications, which is actually my concern. > > JM > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2022

Re: Netbeans 13.0 only supposed to properly runs on GraalVM 17?

You’re surprised that messages about missing Truffle classes do not appear when you use GraalVM? Gj On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 10:42, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > Hello all, > > Since I had several issues with NB 13 (see > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/4050), I tried different JVMs. > > I n

List of fixes for Apache NetBeans 14

Hi all, With the next release almost ready, do we have a quick link to the list of fixes that have made it in? I’m in favor of not creating release notes, unless someone volunteers, but to just highlight some of the most useful fixes and then point to the entire list. Thanks, Gj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 14 Windows installer

+1 (binding) Gj On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 17:19, Tomáš Procházka wrote: > +1 > > - checksum and signature OK > - installation OK > - opened PHP project, basic editing works > > Used Windows 10 and JDK 11 > > Thank you. > > Tomáš Procházka > > On 03. 06. 22 20:44, Eric Barboni wrote: > > Vote for Ap

Re: next release

At this point, it’s clear the releases are good and so added my binding +1 where needed to round off the voting. Gj On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 07:04, John Mc wrote: > Hi, > > I think the macOS(me & Josh) and Windows installer(me & Eric) votes need > another PMC +1 vote to allow them to pass - Can so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 14 macOS Installer

+1 (binding) Gj On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 06:52, John Mc wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Just need 1 more PMC +1 vote > > Regards > > John > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:37, Javier Ortiz Bultron < > javier.ortiz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > Seems to work fine on > > > > Mac 12.4 > > > > Java 17.0.1;

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 14

+1 (binding) Gj On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 06:51, John Mc wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > > John > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 16:04, Tomáš Procházka wrote: > > > +1 > > > > - verified sha512 and asc signatures for sources and convenience binary > > - verified LICENSE and NOTICE > > - sources don't

Re: next release

And please note this text in the vote thread, and can we try to really follow this in the Apache NetBeans 14 vote thread, please: “Only respond if you are going to vote, i.e., this is NOT a discussion thread.” Thanks, Gj On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 10:12, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wi

Re: next release

Search in your inbox for NetBeans 14 vote thread. Gj On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 10:10, Colin <78429...@qq.com.invalid> wrote: > Where is Netbeans 14 vote thread? > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: > "dev" > > 发送时间: 2022年6月2日(

Re: next release

Hi all, For those wanting NetBeans 14 to be released: vote in the NetBeans 14 vote thread, please. Thanks, Gj On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 23:29, Ty Young wrote: > > On 5/30/22 8:55 AM, Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 14:46, Ty Young wrote: > >> Is the JDK 19 compatibility issues fix

Re: Apache NetBeans Plugin Portal verifications and approvals

Great, yes, will get you included. I believe I approved these, but will check again. Gj On Sat, 28 May 2022 at 22:51, Fabian Bahle wrote: > Hello all, > > I published a new plugin to the Apache NetBeans Plugin Portal two weeks > ago and also an update for an already approved plugin which I req

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >