On 03/11/2018 01:45 PM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> It is like rumors works. It is as it is. Some one said smth and
> everyone is thinking omg. Me too, but for me it is clear now.
One person in particular on the users list is making a fuss over it
(saying re. Subversion that we should "discourage its
It is like rumors works. It is as it is. Some one said smth and everyone is
thinking omg. Me too, but for me it is clear now.
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:42
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
I don't get it, at all. :-
t;
> Von: Banee Ishaque
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:37
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
>
> A suggestion : Remove SVN from core - and make it available as a official
> plug in.Then if we need SVN - simply add a plug in is enough.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:37
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
A suggestion : Remove SVN from core - and make it available as a official
plug in.Then if we need SVN - simply add a plug in is enough.
In years ago - I used SVN and hg for VCS. But
e in
> NetBeans,
> > > but the Problem was one of the components hase license Problems.
> > > Von: Emilian Bold
> > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:15
> > > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
> > >
> &
t is still available in
> NetBeans,
> > > but the Problem was one of the components hase license Problems.
> > > Von: Emilian Bold
> > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:15
> > > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Possible Remo
ag, 11. März 2018 19:15
> > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
> >
> > Could the OP provide a link where it was decided to drop Subversion? I
> > just don't remember this talk. But, I might have missed it.
> >
>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:15
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
>
> Could the OP provide a link where it was decided to drop Subversion? I
> just don't remember this talk. But, I might have missed it.
>
> From what Jan m
As I understand it right, the SVN Support is still available in NetBeans, but
the Problem was one of the components hase license Problems.
Von: Emilian Bold
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. März 2018 19:15
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
Could the OP provide a
Could the OP provide a link where it was decided to drop Subversion? I just
don't remember this talk. But, I might have missed it.
>From what Jan mentions, only a Java SVN library was dropped but I think we can
>still have Subversion support by calling the svn native binary?
Obviously, being st
Yes, installed via a plugin.
Gj
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Gary Bello wrote:
> I don't understand - It is available in my Netbeans 8.2 Team dropdown.
> Perhaps installed from plugin - is that not part of Netbeans ?
>
> -Gary
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertj
I don't understand - It is available in my Netbeans 8.2 Team dropdown.
Perhaps installed from plugin - is that not part of Netbeans ?
-Gary
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:16 AM, emiddio-frontier
> wrote:
>
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:16 AM, emiddio-frontier
wrote:
> my vote is keep both CVS and SVN .
>
We can't keep something that already isn't kept. CVS has not been part of
NetBeans for several years now. We can decide to reintroduce it, though I
wonder if there's a need for that.
Gj
>
> -Gar
my vote is keep both CVS and SVN .
-Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans
Hi all
In agreed with Mathias and others, and taking in consideration the
specific end purpose use of SVN i would not remove, support of
Subversion in Net beans.
IF it depends on this solely opinion, being an outlier too.
cheers
On 08/03/2018 15:29, Paul Franz wrote:
There has been a disc
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:11:14 +0100, Wade Chandler
wrote:
+1
+1
As others, I have customers using it with some projects, and they will
probably stay with SVN for those projects until they die...
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
htt
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2018 09:44 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> I agree completely Subversion should stay as a standard part of NetBeans.
>> CVS, on the other hand, which has been a separate module for several years
>> now, is IMHO not something we shou
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2018, 14:33 + schrieb Mark Struberg:
> tons of companies and projects are still using SVN. Also new
> projects.
> While git is great, it is also very easy to destroy a GIT repo.This
> is a major reason why some companies still prefer SVN.The other
> argument is se
, please, don’t do
that.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Antonio
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 16:09
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
Hi there,
As far as I remember the support of svn in NetBeans was due to licensing
issues. This has nothing to do with who uses
FWIW, IIRC, NetBeans is using different backends to work with SVN
repositories, and one of the backends is has a license[1] that is
possibly/probably incompatible with an Apache project, so that one was
excluded:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/commit/e32f86aeecc1b0bb890ff95ed7e1c31c6d
On 03/08/2018 09:44 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> I agree completely Subversion should stay as a standard part of NetBeans.
> CVS, on the other hand, which has been a separate module for several years
> now, is IMHO not something we should give high priority.
+1
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux registere
Ok, thx for clarification.
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 16:44
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
Just for the record, Oracle did not remove Ruby and UML support from
NetBeans. Sun did that. Was there a mean spirited nefarious
gt; Cheers
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Antonio
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 16:09
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
>
> Hi there,
>
> As far as I remember the support of svn in NetBeans was due to licensing
> issues. This has noth
Offtopic, we should also Support TFS (Team foundation Server from MicroSoft).
Von: Christian Lenz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 16:23
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Possible Removal of SVN
I’m really against the idea to remove such a big Feature. Mercurial, SVN and
GIT
:09
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Possible Removal of SVN
Hi there,
As far as I remember the support of svn in NetBeans was due to licensing
issues. This has nothing to do with who uses subversion or not. FreeBSD,
as an example, has been using/is using subversion successfully
Hi there,
As far as I remember the support of svn in NetBeans was due to licensing
issues. This has nothing to do with who uses subversion or not. FreeBSD,
as an example, has been using/is using subversion successfully for years.
Kind regards,
Antonio
On 08/03/18 15:29, Paul Franz wrote:
The
I agree that it is too early to remove support for Subversion.
I also agree that the best alternative to it is Mercurial. (It’s like Git meant
for use by for humans ;-))
I would hate to see support for either dropped.
Scott
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Paul Franz wrote:
>
> There has been a d
tons of companies and projects are still using SVN. Also new projects.
While git is great, it is also very easy to destroy a GIT repo.This is a major
reason why some companies still prefer SVN.The other argument is security. SVN
is strictly centralised and file based. So you cannot take the whol
There has been a discussion going on in the NetBeans Users list about
removing support for SVN. And it was recommended to bring up the topic
here.
Just to give me 2 cents into the thought of removing Subversion support
from NetBeans. I am against it just because older FLOSS projects and of
co
29 matches
Mail list logo
