done for you :) now we need to figure out the
plugin API which was being discussed in the last few emails.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
I was thinking more about the 3rd party artifacts that can not be included
in releases but n
Ron,
Maven and Jcenter are jar repositories. OFBiz components are not jars, so I
am not sure but I think it would not fit, unless perhaps we can jar and
unjar the folder not sure.
On Friday, 22 July 2016, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote:
For 3rd party libraries, would
e when you see it, thanks! :)
Here the right word would have been "due to" instead of "introduced by"
Jacques
PS: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=introduction
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
and hence weren't really adding value to the discussion.
Regards
Scott
On 20 July 2016 at 02:05, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com>
wrote:
It is not clear what you are expecting as a specific response.
As you move up the food chain, the definition of "units" chan
respond with your feedback and comments.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Proposed-Task-List-for-Moving-Forward-with-Gradle-and-the-Trunk-tp4687808p4688257.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
egration tests.
I intend to heavily refactor the framework and I
would
feel
better
about
introducing this change while refactoring. What
do
you
guys
think?
Ideas?
Suggestions? Approvals and thumbs up?
Regards,
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
vily refactor the framework and I would feel
better
about
introducing this change while refactoring. What do you guys
think?
Ideas?
Suggestions? Approvals and thumbs up?
Regards,
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
* and selectAll*
methods in there) into a file that can be included more locally.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
think so too. As always, feedback welcome.
Thanks
Sharan
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
On 17/06/2016 5:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 16/06/2016 à 22:53, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
One of the side benefits of having a small number of committer's is
that you prevent bad designs and poorly tested code getting into the
trunk.
The disadvantage is that the committers are easily
it's only an utopia?
Thanks
Jacques
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
z/webapp/view/JasperReportsXmlViewHandler.java
Regards,
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
andler.java
framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/view/JasperReportsPdfViewHandler.java
framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/view/JasperReportsPoiXlsViewHandler.java
framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/view/JasperReportsXmlViewHandler.java
Regards,
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
Preside
Great addition to the team!
Ron
On 10/06/2016 2:05 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Welcome, Taher! Keep up the great work.
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
and see what you think.
As usual I'm happy to get feedback on any of the points raised.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Setting-Up-Mentoring-tp4682877.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
ctoring-the-framework-tp4682539p4682591.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
anyone willing to be a
mentor?)
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Mentoring-to-Share-Knowledge-and-Improve-Code-tp4682594.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
other way of doing it in the Tomcat context is suggested
I did not dig further today, but I note this link here for myself
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html
Adrian also introduced InstrumentingClassLoader class then. It's
related
with Cobertura. But as Adrian said he wa
interested.
Taher Alkahteeb
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com>
wrote:
Just a reminder to everyone that there is an ongoing Skype conversation
around the framework refactoring sub-project.
If you are not part of the conversation, please ask to join.
ks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-Re-Managing-Emeritus-Committers-tp4679835p4679850.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype:
There may be some merit in this idea from the Cloudstack team.
Ron
Forwarded Message
All,
As I am sure many have observed, we have a large number of committers [1] who
are no longer active. Currently, we no status that continues to recognize
someone’s committer merit
's simple and faster, can you check it if you have a better idea
with an other externe tools to send a flow on spread software through
the screen engine ?
Nicolas
Le 21/03/2016 14:56, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
It can also output HTML files fully annotated for CSS styling.
It also can
s.
What do people think?
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Framework-Code-Re-Factoring-Maintaining-Quality-tp4679123.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email:
Perfect.
Welcome to the gang.
Ron
On 24/03/2016 11:13 PM, james yong wrote:
Yes, the secretary from Apache has acknowledged the receipt of my ICLA file
submission. The acknowledgement is also sent to OFBiz private email.
Ron Wheeler wrote
Do you have an ICLA on file with Apache?
Ron
ne help me to register as a contributor to the wiki?
My Confluence usernames is jamesyong.
Regards,
James
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/End-User-Documentation-tp4678247p4678257.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
R
for
import purpose, so i'll keep that in mind (and your post in
adtransform website)
Thanks !
Leila
Le 19/03/2016 02:38, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
ADTransform will do most (perhaps all) of what you want.
It will read a spreadsheet (or a CSV file), let you manipulate the
data, verify
is that the complex
refactoring would include design changes to the API signatures which might
affect existing systems as was raised by Ron Wheeler.
Regards,
Taher Alkhateeb
-Original Message-
From: Sharan-F [mailto:sharan.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 March 2016 11:43
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject
ould make the system easier to learn and safer to modify.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
be done from the software suite
interface, but i was wondering: does anyone know of a library that can
transform html to spreadsheet file ?
Does anyone has another suggestion than the html generation to achieve
a fast spreadsheet file rendering ?
Thanks for any idea or advice
Leila Mekika
-
and included in the
superseded releases?
Do we really want new users downloading 12.04?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
for that.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Skype-Group-Call-Next-Week-re-Framework-Re-Factoring-tp4677595p4677610.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee
mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
There has been a long discussion about release strategies in the Apache
Cloudstack forum.
This is an interesting proposal that has been fleshed out to a pretty
good level of detail.
Although Cloudstack and OFBiz serve very different areas, both could be
described as critical applications
.
But there are some open questions:
There is a jackrabbit branch. Is this branch still "active"? Is it still
planned to integrate this branch with the trunk. Or do you rather prefer
to use the actual data model and only improve the GUI of the CMS Backend?
Kind regards!
Bruno
--
Ron Wheeler
Presiden
change)?
This would include things like function and variable rename, breaking up
big classes and functions, adding unit tests, rewiring classes and so on.
Cheers
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 8
ains all components active) but on the next frozen release. We
could even do it on R14.12 if we have a consensus.
To start, I'd at least uncomment out:
example
exampleext
pos
ecommerce(? if not OK then we create the main Jira and a subtask for it)
Adds your please...
Opinions?
Jacques
--
ld be much easier to follow some of the idea expressed here about
agility, freedom and rough consensus if the risks were minimized by
limiting the scope of the impact of the decisions.
Ron
Le 14/12/2015 16:47, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
It seems that this discussion is just dancing around the co
This gives a bit of an insight about how another Apache project that
builds a key infrastructure product, manages releases.
They seem to have an organized process of deciding how and when new
features get added.
This also allows them to have a pattern of frequent releases so bug
fixes get
december 2015 heeft Ron Wheeler <
rwhee...@artifact-software.com> het volgende geschreven:
This gives a bit of an insight about how another Apache project that
builds a key infrastructure product, manages releases.
They seem to have an organized process of deciding how and when new
featur
directly
by
an ant target :
$ ant load-component -D"component=ecommerce" load-demo start
or
$ ant load-component -D"components=ecommerce projectmgr
myportal"
load-demo start
This help beginner through easy command line to copy/past from
documentation or expert by scripting
, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Would it be possible create a graphic in the docs identifying what
overrides what as you find this out?
A description would be great but at least a visual summary would help
the next person.
Ron
On 24/11/2015 8:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes I see, as suggested
interesting, thanks!
Julien.
Le 20/11/2015 07:41, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
This video is about the strategy surrounding the user experience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr1rN3jibIk
There are a lot of ideas about how to use the Kano Model to
determine what features should be included in a product
s a keypad could hardly be sold.
One of the more interesting parts of the discussion is about why you
need a process for saying "No." to new features.
How do you keep a piece of software at exactly the right level of
complexity?
Enjoy.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email
/META-INF/services/org.moqui.context.ExecutionContextFactory
-David
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ect would be
taken more seriously and we would get more attention. I will try to
get into this direction in the near future...
Thanks for your attention so far :)
Jacques
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-
taken more seriously and we would get more attention. I will try to get
into this direction in the near future...
Thanks for your attention so far :)
Jacques
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
of ideas backed
up by practical examples of good and sub-optimal design taken from the
Java SDK and other projects.
Well worth your time if you are doing any software design.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
really cumbersome compared to a code repository!
-David
On 17 Oct 2015, at 13:39, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote:
This seems like a very sound approach and something that can be started in the
wiki.
That way no one will be tempted to start coding before we kno
4673586.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
OK.
I will have a run at it.
Ron
On 17/10/2015 3:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
If it could be fixed/amended it would be great :)
Jacques
Le 17/10/2015 09:26, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
OK.
Does it need to be fixed or just deleted?
I found the problems identified in my first post and can fix
based on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
Jacques
Le 16/10/2015 17:49, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Features
This page is supposed to be a feature list but instead it reads like
a release note; - fix
is a
serious consideration it would change the API dramatically, and a lot of the
design ideas as well (I’d recommend against this BTW, the Spring ecosystem is
its own thing and VERY different conceptually from OFBiz).
-David
On 16 Oct 2015, at 08:47, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com>
et this kite flying.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
software.com
On 10/14/2015 5:53 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
This seems to be very good advice.
A completely separate sub-project under OFBiz with its own mailing lists
would keep the people together yet all allow the new framework the
flexibility to move forward.
Ron
On 14/10/2015 8:27 PM, Scott Gray
that makes sense to a person looking for an ERP.
The payment gateways are described in 2 places - once as core accounting
features and once as part of "Special Purpose".
Should this be cleaned up or deleted?
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software
, this is all I will say about the subject.
I'm done trying to convince everyone. I hope someone agrees with me
and they are able to build support for the idea.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
There are no details about the API on that page.
I was hoping that you might have some more details not yet added to the
page.
Ron
On 14/10/2015 8:05 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/14/2015 2:09 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
How much of the Foundation core either overlaps with Spring or could
.
--
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
ny commit
with 2 will be rejected as long as an agreement on 2 will not be reached
Jacques
Le 11/10/2015 19:09, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I am not sure why backwards compatibility is an issue with moving to Java 8.
It works well,
it is the supported version of Java.
As far as I have heard, the Java 8 JVM ru
:
Yes I think I confused myself on this one (for my defense I got a
*strong* cold recently and I'm just recovering :p)
Inline...
Le 14/10/2015 14:05, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
+1 on Tahar Alkhateeb's points.
I don't think that anyone is proposing to convert all existing code
to use the latest Java
to work on a few JIRAs and at the same refactor some
existing
code to utilize Lambdas and Streams utilizing Java 8 features.
Is it acceptable to develop with JDK 8 features into trunk?
Taher Alkhateeb
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
This note from the DITA users forum may be very helpful if we move to DITA.
Ron
Forwarded Message
[Attachment(s) <#TopText> from kate.lopre...@harmonicinc.com
[dita-users] included below]
All,
For those interested, here is a follow-up to testing for the DITA
converter
This might provide some interesting ideas for visualization and reporting.
I suspect that it will demonstrate the ideas with Jaspersoft but the
concepts should be applicable to other technologies.
Ron
Forwarded Message
Jaspersoft
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14900581#comment-14900581
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-6644:
In response to the question "Can anyone please pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14900577#comment-14900577
]
Ron Wheeler commented on OFBIZ-6015:
in response to the question "Can anyone please pr
An interesting reference for anyone who is looking at the issue of
generating docs and help automatically
I suppose that it could be adapted to SVN.
This might encourage developers to keep the docs in synch with the code:
- same repo and developent tools
- automatic update of documentation when
and usability of the remaining information.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
isn't applicable.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
Good analysis.
I wonder if Ionic is a good choice for a portable mobile framework.
http://ionicframework.com/
One does not want to get tied up in low level support for all the flavors
of mobile
. (No
surprise here).
There is no right or wrong answer but the current approach seems a bit
muddled and negatively affects the project's ability to project a clear
vision.
It would be nice if this decision was made soon so that we can get the
documentation cleaned up.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
thoughts.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
to subscribe to the mailing lists of the project? And
similar for each subordinate ml archive?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
--
Ron Wheeler
President
.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
--
Erik Schuessler
Vice President / Partner
www.Brainfood.com
214.720.0700 e323
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
at compile
time, you might consider adapting some of these rules to OFBiz java.
I am not sure that they their Don't use setters instructions will help
the DI or IoC crowd but they are JavaScript devotees who apparently do
not follow the Spring model.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software
On 14/06/2015 7:08 PM, Paul Foxworthy wrote:
Hi all,
Ron Wheeler wrote
I expect that everyone has an IDE that can edit and validate XML. All
the other tools required are free.
...
OFBiz is pretty XML intensive so I would be surprised if OFBiz
developers did not use an IDE that can validate
On 14/06/2015 2:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 13/06/2015 14:12, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
a) I am not sure why applications/datamodel/entitidef/ could not be
entitydef / since it is shorter and unambiguous and spells entity
correctly.
Applications was suggested because there are underneath
12/06/2015 13:17, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
It would be nice to get the philosophy of the structure agreed at the
beginning even if there is only one variant of
accounting-entitymodel.xml .
It might prevent conflicts over the content of some of the files and
encourage more contributors who
, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Le 11/06/2015 21:10, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would suggest adding other levels to the structure so that
specializations are easy to add without creating
create the UK variant.
Ron
On 12/06/2015 2:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 11/06/2015 21:10, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would suggest adding other levels to the structure so that
specializations are easy to add without creating conflicts or
constant flux as people alter the accounting
/ofbiz-component.xml
Regards,
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
for our
Community Day next week?
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Move-Application-Entity-Definitions-to-A-Separate-Component-tp4669903.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact
-tp4669377p4669576.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
go that way, but have a tool of
reference in OFBiz, still to choose if we don't keep Docbook)
Jacques
Le 05/06/2015 16:13, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I have found another great reference for planning a DITA project in
order to maximize the possibilities for reuse.
http://www.stilo.com/article-dita
with it. But I worry that
it will
put many people off.
Thanks
Paul Foxworthy
-
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
! :)
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 5 June, 2015 4:13:39 PM
Subject: Re: References for DITA as a tool for on-line help
What tools are you using?
Ron
On 05/06/2015 4:38 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
Great
and the font and
colors are not very attractive in my opinion.
Ron
On 05/06/2015 9:15 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
Hi Ron,
DITA-OT ! :)
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 5 June, 2015 4:13:39 PM
Subject
What tools are you using?
Ron
On 05/06/2015 4:38 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
Great resources Ron. Thank you for sharing. FYI I find DITA-OT to be nice and
powerful. I'm beginning to do some of our own documentation on it.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact
-
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
To: dev dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 June, 2015 6:14:56 PM
Subject: References for DITA as a tool for on-line help
http://www.slideshare.net/abelsp/using-dita-for-online-help
Slideshare has a lot of other presentations on DITA
http
This is an introductory webinar that should give some ideas about why
DITA is a good solution for OFBiz where we need translations and
branding for different installations.
The presenter represents a company that offers a commercial tool that
simplifies editing of DITA.
I don't use it but it
Options Supporting Microsoft® HTML Help
*Developing DITA-based Help for Existing Help Authoring Tools**
*-Converting DITA Content to WebHelp using RoboHelp®
There are a lot more articles on using DITA content in On-line help.
The same content is available for other uses.
Ron
--
Ron Wheeler
in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Documentation-and-help-solutions-DITA-tp4669377p4669411.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970
structured formats.
Thanks
Paul Foxworthy
On 3 June 2015 at 03:28, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
Anne Rockley is one of the top DITA experts and her webinars are excellent.
If you want to see how DITA could help improve the production and
utilization of documentation for OFBiz
.
Thanks
Paul Foxworthy
On 3 June 2015 at 03:28, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
Anne Rockley is one of the top DITA experts and her webinars are
excellent.
If you want to see how DITA could help improve the production and
utilization of documentation for OFBiz, you might
Anne Rockley is one of the top DITA experts and her webinars are excellent.
If you want to see how DITA could help improve the production and
utilization of documentation for OFBiz, you might look for a webinar
that relates to your particular concerns.
She is an expert in the pharmaceutical
If there is an interest in redoing the framework or upgrading it or
changing the base technology and the application interface, perhaps this
is something that should be investigated to see if it simplifies the
process and adds an optimization layer that we don't have to write.
Ron
If there is an interest in redoing the framework or upgrading it or
changing the base technology and the application interface, perhaps this
is something that should be investigated to see if it simplifies the
process and adds an optimization layer that we don't have to write.
Ron
Is the some reason to use CC0 rather than Apache?
Ron
On 22/05/2015 5:08 PM, David E. Jones wrote:
On 22 May 2015, at 11:29, David E. Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015, at 06:28, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
I am not a lawyer and Apache's legal team should
ofbiz+moque
instead of moqui alone? Why would people choose the ofbiz+moqui solution and
not just switch to moqui? I wasn't at the ApacheCon which started this thread
so maybe I'm missing something?
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
1 - 100 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
