Re: Java 8 and functional programming in trunk

Hello Everyone, We created and provided the patches for this issue since June and OFBiz is pretty much ready to move to JDK 8. I'm not sure if lazy consensus is enough or whether a vote is warranted to move this issue forward? Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb - Original Message - From

Re: Welcome to our new committers Gil Portenseigne and Wei Zhang!

Congratulations Gil and Wei, may the community continue to grow and we look forward to working with you - Original Message - From: "Nicolas Malin" To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2015 12:37:47 PM Subject: Re: Welcome to our new

Re: Coding standards

-on-getters-and-setters.html http://www.javaworld.com/article/2073723/core-java/why-getter-and-setter-methods-are-evil.html Taher Alkhateeb - Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 July, 2015 10:22:48 AM Subject: Re

Re: OFBiz going mobile

My personal preference would be apache cordova Taher Alkhateeb On Jul 8, 2015 7:14 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, There are a lot of mobile specific development frameworks out there. There are even a few projects under the ASF umbrella that cater to that need. What

Re: OFBiz going mobile

a thin back end as well. Thanks Erik On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: My personal preference would be apache cordova Taher Alkhateeb On Jul 8, 2015 7:14 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all

Re: Removing Javolution and resolving sax implementation - OFBIZ-5169

. Any clue from the seniors here on how to approach this. I got a major headache looking at that darn thing? Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Adrian Crum < adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/jaxp/sax/parsing.html

Re: Adrian Crum

Very sad news! I had the pleasure of starting an initiative with Adrian about a project to rewrite the framework and I learned a lot and he was always very helpful. This is a loss not only to his family & loved ones but the community at large. We will miss you, rest in peace! Taher Alkha

Re: Refactoring code and JIRA

Thank you Jacques and Pierre Ok so perhaps a middle ground is to have a central JIRA issue to which I refer all commits. This way I can be lean in cleaning up the code base. Oh and please disregard the other email, it was my bad for sending twice Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Dec 23, 2015

Refactoring code without JIRA

rename, breaking up big classes or functions, rewiring of classes, adding unit tests and so on. Appreciate your feedback. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb

Refactoring code and JIRA

unit tests, rewiring classes and so on. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb

Re: [Proposition] deactivate by default all specialpurpose component

would suggest to you that we do this in a well thought out and gradual process. My 2 cents Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Le 10/11/2015 05:54, slidingfilame...@gmail.com a écrit : > >> This topic was heavily dis

Re: buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk

Gd Ok so this means ofbiz is working correctly after fixing a regression which freezes the system. Now whoever commited something that breaks the system please fix it (has to do with invoices). Cheers, Taher Allhateeb On Jun 3, 2016 7:39 PM, wrote: > The Buildbot has

My experience with refactoring the framework

of my head, and maybe help trigger thoughts for other people. Cheers! Taher Alkhateeb

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

Hi Everyone, Thank you all for your support, JIRA created in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7254 I will start working on it and try to implement ASAP to get my focus back on refactoring. Cheers! Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Deepak Dixit <deepak

Re: My experience with refactoring the framework

iously and continue doing this for say 12 months or more, then the code would reach a level of clarity that ALLOWS YOU TO THINK of new ideas and ways to improve. You cannot think in a mess! I hope you can join and help out. Take a look at the wiki. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Divesh

RE: My experience with refactoring the framework

really unfortunate not to engage these individuals because of communication barriers. My 2 cents! Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Sharan-F [mailto:sharan.f...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 June 2016 10:57 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: My experience with refactoring the framework Hi

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

information: http://www.jamesshore.com/Blog/Red-Green-Refactor.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Divesh Dutta <divesh.du...@hotwaxsystems.com > wrote: > Hi Taher, > > What I understand from your

Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

you guys think? Ideas? Suggestions? Approvals and thumbs up? Regards, Taher Alkhateeb

Re: [DISCUSSION] Setting Up Mentoring

Great Initiative, I'm already signed up and I look forward to helping anyone interested. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sharan-F wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I've created a page on the wiki to try and organise the mentoring. We have > a > list of people who volunteered to

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

and running them. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Pranay Pandey < pranay.pan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > There is one thing that I want to confirm based my understanding, as long > as I know, we can run tests independently as well e.g.

Re: My experience with refactoring the framework

Hi Divesh, Fantastic! Thank you very much for joining. Feel free to contact me directly if you need anything. Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Divesh Dutta <divesh.du...@hotwaxsystems.com > wrote: > Thanks Taher for the links. Me , Mridul and Pranay have pi

Re: [DISCUSSION] Mentoring to Share Knowledge and Improve Code

(JIRA, ML, Wiki). We also need a little area (Wiki?) to coordinate team efforts, list links and Github repos if we use them. Etc ... Taher Alkhateeb On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All > > One of the things that came up in the Committers Sur

Re: Java default options in ant targets

. Essentially you have more overhead and slower startup time in -server to allow for better optimization of the application as a whole. I'm not sure how this relates to correctness? Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>

Re: Java default options in ant targets

Agreed, it shows you how scary threads are. I remember the first time I read it i went like ... damn i've been programming explosives and mine fields for years without even knowing it. On Jun 10, 2016 8:34 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016

Re: Taher Alkhateeb joins the OFBiz PMC

Thank you Jacopo and everyone. It's an honor to be part of such a wonderful group of people. I look forward to helping the project however I can. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Le 10/06/2016 08:05, Jacopo C

Re: Java default options in ant targets

d hardware as server to avoid the overhead. The only exception, again, is windows 32. Again not sure but I suspect we do not have a lot of new hardware Windows 32 servers running OFBiz, but I could be wrong of course. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux <

Re: Tests issues

this narrows it down to one of the commits in between. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Oops, I mean I hate to revert things :) > > Jacques > > > Le 02/06/2016 à 20:30, Jacques Le Roux a écri

Re: Tests issues

Hi Jacques, Nice work! so it's just the issue of HTML not rendering on failed tests. Ok, I'll jump in and try to see what's up. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > Took me a while to

Re: Deleting CommonsDaemonStart.java

interface. This is the main reason why I am now able to refactor so much after I eliminated those damn args that were jumping in my face everywhere I look. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Hi Taher, &g

Custom ClassLoader in OFBiz

an exception. I guess my question is: Why does ofbiz have a custom ClassLoader? Why bypassing the bootstrapping loader and even then, why not use one of the standard JDK implementations in the ClassLoader hierarchy. I really appreciate your insights on this. Taher Alkhateeb

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Thank you all for your support, JIRA created in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7254 > > I will start working on it and try to implem

Proposal to delete stale java files

/JasperReportsXmlViewHandler.java Regards, Taher Alkhateeb

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

Hi Jacopo, Does that mean we should keep them? Mind you some of them have incorrect code (not importing EntityQuery for example). I'm not sure we want to keep dead code in trunk, unless people are using it? Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

we must pay to keep the project running. You just cannot think in a mess. It's a human thing! My 2 cents, Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > As the majority of the referenced java files are related to 3rd party > solutions i

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

the directory tree. My 2 cents. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Mridul Pathak < mridul.pat...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > Sure, I’ll take care of deleting rest of the files as well. > > Also, we could name these specialpurpose component(

RE: Proposal to delete stale java files

a README file that says this component does not compile and it holds this stuff. This way it is easy to isolate that component from the build system. Thank you all again for your contributions. Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Mridul Pathak [mailto:mridul.pat...@hotwaxsystems.com

RE: Proposal to delete stale java files

component. -- Thanks & Regards, Mridul Pathak Senior Manager HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Mridul, > > How about reference/paymentext and reference/whatever-else-y

Re: proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

cobertura is the best coverage tool to use with ofbiz and I am definitely interested in reintroducing it in the future. I won't commit anything to give time for everyone to test and/or contribute more to this thread. Cheers Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Sharan-F <shara

Re: Custom ClassLoader in OFBiz

sual, I'll put the attachments in JIRA before committing to make sure everyone is aligned on this. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > as mentioned in previous posts by Jacques and you

RE: proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

hesitate to commit before I get one or two feedbacks. Thank you in advance for your help. Taher Alkhateeb From: Taher Alkhateeb [mailto:slidingfilame...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 May 2016 11:49 To: OFBIZ Development Mailing List Subject: Re: proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

Re: Framework & Code Re-Factoring: Maintaining Quality

activity and when you write beautiful clear code you are showing appreciation and respect to your fellow programmers. I don't know how to put that last part in the guidelines :) but this is definitely from the heart. Taher Alkhateeb On Thursday, 26 May 2016, Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com>

Re: proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

lace. I am trying as much as I can to "cut out" code until some one says no like your good self. I will fix the build.xml to ensure correct behavior in cobertura. Taher Alkhateeb On Thursday, 26 May 2016, Adam Heath <doo...@brainfood.com> wrote: > Let me restate, do not remov

Question on multiple starting ofbiz

: - Checking if a classloader is set or not - Applying locks on StartupLoaders to prevent multiple threads from altering them Is this code unnecessary? Should I assume that OFBiz never calls the startup sequence more than once? Regards, Taher Alkhateeb

RE: Question on multiple starting ofbiz

hings are very clear now. The start sequence only executes once per JVM. This makes locks and all kinds of elaborate checking unnecessary. I will start cleaning that up! Cheers Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Gareth Carter [mailto:gareth.car...@stannah.co.uk] Sent: 02 Jun

RE: Question on multiple starting ofbiz

, Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com] Sent: 02 June 2016 14:26 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on multiple starting ofbiz Hi Taher, Before going down in this, I believe there is something you need to work on first

Re: Tests issues

and instead dig out whatever the culprit is. There is too much work that went into the start component. I'll go full force in this direction for now. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Arun, > > As you ch

Re: proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

> > Jacques > > > Le 26/05/2016 à 19:24, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > >> Hi Adam >> >> Ok your objection is a good enough "no" for me to back off. I will try to >> think of a way to work on the integration as you suggested. >> >>

proposal to remove cobertura and sonar from ofbiz

would not use the existing code anyway, I would just wipe it all out and start fresh. I'm not sure whether we need to vote on this? Appreciate your feedback. Taher Alkhateeb

Re: OFBiz Committers Survey - Results

and efforts and allow us to understand the reason behind everyone's views on where we should going. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb Impressive work indeed, thanks Sharan! Jacques Le 01/06/2016 à 11:51, Ashish Vijaywargiya a écrit : > You prepared wonderful document Sharan. Thanks for all your work

Re: Custom ClassLoader in OFBiz

ased-OFBiz-framework-td1929599.html and https://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz-osgi/ But the implementation I'm thinking of is different in that each component is a bundle, not the whole framework. What do you think? Taher Alkhateeb On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacqu

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

consider dropping it for a while and jump along for help. I will post another email soon with the JIRA details and list of questions I need answer for. Again, thank you, you guys rock, I love OFBiz and this community! Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Nicolas Malin

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

will update you soon. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 22/06/2016 à 10:05, Julien NICOLAS a écrit : > >> >> >> On 22/06/2016 09:53, Julien NICOLAS wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 21/06

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

g the same thing but faster. Is this a typo by you or are you actually using this target? The reason I ask is because I actually wanted to delete the entire TestListContainer.java and related files in the future. But now of course I hesitate. Thanks in advance for your feedback. Regards, Taher

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

it and choose their own implementation strategies. Do you agree? Feedback? Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > I wonder though why this was introduced. If we have no feedback from any > member of the community I think we ca

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

the build scripts and classpath settings will be more complex. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Divesh Dutta < divesh.du...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Thanks Pierre and Jacques for your views. I agree with Jacques that we > should not create new repos

Re: We miss a QA team, we face too much regressions

org/wiki/Functional_testing So yeah we can add them, but I don't think we can do that to the raw unit-tests (at least in the context discussed in the other proposal thread) Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wro

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

, for example: ./gradlew 'ofbiz --load-data reader=seed, seed-initial, ext' instead of load-extseed. If you would like to add the other load data tasks, please specify which ones. Appreciate your early responses. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfil

Re: XML autocompletion issue

Hi Jacques, Since you mentioned regressions may I suggest that we slow down a little bit our work on trunk for a few days as we work on Gradle to avoid crossing wires. We can focus instead on work at the applications level or for anyone interested to work on gradle itself. Cheers! Taher

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

Hi Jacques, Thank you for the explanation. OK, between your feedback and the votes from other members, I'll keep them. Working on integration in gradle ... Cheers Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, &

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

look forward to your feedback. Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > Thank you for the explanation. OK, between your feedback and the votes > from other members, I'll keep them. Working on int

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

Hi Pierre Sharan and all, In reply to your question Pierre, I will create a JIRA to which people can contribute. Although I worked very hard on this feature, I really need help with thorough testing and feedback. I look forward to your help if you'd like to contribute. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

issues. With that being said, we will not make the switch before a thorough and full testing. That is why we ask everyone who is willing to please help us out to make this transition smooth by testing and providing feedback and comments. Taher Alkhateeb On Tuesday, 21 June 2016, Deepak Dixit

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

onally, I feel that most of these files may need to be upgraded and > needs code refactoring probably because they might usually be left out as > they do not compile by default with OFBiz. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Mridul Pathak > HotWax Systems > http://www.hotwax

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

and adding stuff to it, and you are not adding it to component-load.xml? Why is it that you cannot add it there? Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Mridul Pathak < mridul.pat...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Introducing new directory “reference” seems reasonable

Re: Proposal to delete stale java files

thak > HotWax Systems > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Mridul, > > > > Thank you for the detailed and well thought out feedback. > > > > I am

Re: Javascript clean up and improvements

automatically include best practices from what I consider the king of JavaScript: Douglas Crockford. my 2 cents Taher Alkhateeb On Friday, 24 June 2016, Amardeep Singh Jhajj < amardeep.jh...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Currently, OFBiz javascript code (except third

Re: Javascript clean up and improvements

and +1 for your recommendations On Friday, 24 June 2016, Amardeep Singh Jhajj < amardeep.jh...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Currently, OFBiz javascript code (except third party libraries) is not > written with the best practices which can cause following problems - > > 1.

Re: Important Changes to Trunk and Use of Ant & Gradle

if you type ps ax|grep java. This is because of the unfortunately large and complex classpath. I will clean that up slowly as we progress. I look forward to your help and feedback. Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com > wrote: >

Re: Javascript clean up and improvements

+1 on approach On Jun 28, 2016 8:53 AM, "Pranay Pandey" wrote: > +1 Amardeep, mentioned approach is looking reasonable to me. > > Best regards, > > Pranay Pandey > HotWax Systems > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Amardeep Singh

Re: OFBiz Increased Activity

Let's get even louder :) I hope many people can join the ApacheCon EU to even strengthen this community more. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Same feeling here, thanks to all the community :) > > Jacques > > > Le 28/06/2016 à 11:14,

Re: Track user for status change

Hi Nameet, I am assuming that you will not just change the entities but everything like the services and events where necessary to ensure updating this field. Am I correct in my understanding? Taher Alkhateeb On Saturday, 25 June 2016, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

Re: We miss a QA team, we face too much regressions

Hi Gil, For me it's a simple rule, lots of unit tests, less integration tests, even less functional tests (selenium). But I think all are useful if done in proper quantity I like this diagram in a way summarizes it -> http://i.stack.imgur.com/fjQvQ.png Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 a

Re: We miss a QA team, we face too much regressions

think the order logic is overly complex and should also be eventually simplified. I am drifting too much aren't I? Okay I will zip it :) Taher Alkhateeb On Jun 17, 2016 11:16 AM, "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Thanks Taher, > > The d

Re: Release 14.12.01 and Dedication for Adrian

+1 We miss you! On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:37 PM, gil portenseigne < gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > +1 > > On 04/02/2016 11:33, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > That's quite a good idea Sharan, the whole series would not be too much in > my opinion > > Jacques > > Le 04/02/2016 09:53, Sharan-F a

Re: Framework Cleanup Options - Tidy Up & Refactor?

, the current workflow is too bureaucratic - We need help from everyone - We need to expand the coding guidelines to introduce some design concepts, not just formatting. Those are my very long 2 cents. Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: cascading deletes in ofbiz

speaking, most modern systems that I know of avoid delete altogether, and instead just disable or make things "inactive" for reporting or operational reasons. That is always a safer and more auditable system. My 2 cents Taher Alkhateeb On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Jacqu

Re: Issue with in-validate secas executed twice when a service is invoked as async

triggers all ECAs, why did anyone go through the effort of putting that code in runAsync! BTW I'm not objecting to your proposal, merely commenting on the oddness of having that piece of code in there in the first place. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato

Re: Issue with in-validate secas executed twice when a service is invoked as async

This issue is exactly the reason why the refactoring thread issued by Sharan is important. Quite honestly looking at that code gave me sore eyes and the whole thing needs refactoring. Sorry to deviate. Anyway I think we all sort of agree on the solution. Taher Alkhateeb On Feb 23, 2016 2:02 PM

Re: Issue with in-validate secas executed twice when a service is invoked as async

Hi Jacopo, I'm trying to find where the logic described above is happening, am I in the right place at ServiceDispatcher on the runAsync method right next to the checking of pre-auth ECA rules? Taher Alkhateeb On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.capp

Re: Removing Javolution and resolving sax implementation - OFBIZ-5169

Hi Jacques, I'll issue a JIRA and start working on it as soon as I can. Right now I'm focusing on Start.java trying to clean that up a little bit. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > I think the

Re: Proposal for the "Tweets" and "News" sections of the main web page of the OFBiz site

+1 On Mar 9, 2016 1:38 PM, "Sharan-F" wrote: > Hi Jacopo > > +1 > > Yes it's a good idea. Our News section is a bit outdated now so keeping > everything current is good. (BTW we have around 250 twitter followers now). > > Also I do have a work in progress regarding a

Re: Framework & Code Re-Factoring: Maintaining Quality

they dislike in the framework to add to the list in the wiki page. I'm sure with the combined expertise of everyone we can speed up this project a lot. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb On Friday, 8 April 2016, Pranay Pandey <pranay.pan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 will be extra careful goin

RE: Draft Minutes from Skype Framework Re-Factor Call: 15th March 2016

Hi Sharan, Excellent write-up. The only thing I would add is that the complex refactoring would include design changes to the API signatures which might affect existing systems as was raised by Ron Wheeler. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Sharan-F [mailto:sharan.f

RE: [DISCUSSION] Refactor WorkEffort - Calendar(s)

oject, etc ...) In other words, change the world around the edges, not at the heart of the thing! This makes the code more resilient and not too specialized and component dependent. My 2 cents. Regards, Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Pierre Smits [mailto:pierre.sm...@gmail.com]

Re: Welcome to our new committer Gregory Draperi

Hi Gregory, Congratulations, and we look forward to working with you on the project. Welcome aboard. Taher Alkhateeb On Mar 8, 2016 7:27 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Gregory is a software security expert that has been "silen

Re: Skype Group Call Next Week re-Framework Re-Factoring

Hi Sharan My timezone is GMT+3. I will not be available from Tuesday 08/03/2016 up to Saturday 12/03/2016. Anytime before or after is fine. Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone > > We'd like to organise a

Re: Skype Group Call Next Week re-Framework Re-Factoring

Hi Sharan, I'm available 15:00 Kuwait time. Isn't Ron Wheeler joining too? I thought he's also interested. Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Taher / Kulwant > > How about tomorrow (Monday 7th March) at 13.00

Re: Framework Re-Factor: List of Areas that Need Work

rea, Issue a JIRA, perhaps ask for people to help you out in the mailing list. I for one would love to pitch in, because collaboration together brings new ideas and is more powerful than working solo. Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-soft

RE: Framework Re-Factor: List of Areas that Need Work

that was not passed into the constructor. It makes the declaration hidden and the dependency obscure. Please consider helping out! Regards, Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Sharan-F [mailto:sharan.f...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 March 2016 20:09 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Framework Re-F

Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml

yup, agreed and +1 On Wednesday, 30 March 2016, Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Tahar, our comments crossed on wire :) > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Taher Alk

RE: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml

which add no value to the developers Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml I

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.03

+1 On Mar 30, 2016 7:52 AM, "Deepak Dixit" wrote: > +1 > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:44 AM, gil portenseigne < > gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Gil > > > > On 29/03/2016 20:17,

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.06

+1 On Mar 30, 2016 7:52 AM, "Deepak Dixit" wrote: > +1 > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:44 AM, gil portenseigne < > gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Gil > > > > On 29/03/2016 20:26,

Refactoring Start.java

, the class is still ugly and messy, but this is a first step. Thank you in advance for your help! Taher Alkhateeb.

Re: svn commit: r1741151 - /ofbiz/trunk/.classpath

Sure Thing Nicolas, I would kindly ask all the committers to please update the .classpath on the spot whenever you are updating the libraries. For those of us who use an IDE we always get a crashing build. Cheers, Taher Alkhateeb On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas

Changing the core API design

Is anyone interested in working on this? already working on this? or think I'm going in the right direction? I'd love to hear some thoughts or even chat up on IRC or something. I appreciate hearing your thoughts. Taher Alkhateeb

Re: svn commit: r1744537 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/start/src/org/ofbiz/base/start/StartupCommandUtil.java

: StartupCommandUtil Taher Alkhateeb On May 19, 2016 3:48 PM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Taher, Shouldn't the '+6' element in the {code} HelpFormatter.DEFAULT_WIDTH {code} code change be something that users want to configure? Best regards, Pierre Smits

Re: OFBiz Committers Survey

Sharan the ranking for importance I assume 1 is highest importance. If not I need to retake the survey On May 19, 2016 7:46 PM, "Sharan-F" wrote: > Thanks guys for responding so quickly. > > It is only 10 questions so I think it's straightforward and very quick to > do. >

Re: OFBiz Committers Survey

Done here too On May 19, 2016 7:23 PM, "Nicolas Malin" wrote: > done, > > thks Sharan for this initiative > > Nicolas > > Le 19/05/2016 15:24, Sharan-F a écrit : > >> Hi Everyone >> >> I've sent out the survey today so all our committers (including emeritus >> and >>

RE: Deleting CommonsDaemonStart.java

on this would help though. Thank you for your help! Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: 17 May 2016 10:54 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Deleting CommonsDaemonStart.java I second this approach

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >