On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 11 July 2013 21:47, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 11 July 2013 18:47, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question about the archived message
link to download slovenian dictionary is not working
hoh can i get this files or can you send to me
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/sl_SI.zip
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/hyph_sl_SI.zip
On 7/11/13 10:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/11/2013 05:41 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 7/11/13 9:32 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 7/10/13 10:48 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/10/2013 10:09 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 7/9/13 10:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/09/2013 10:39 AM, schrieb
Hi Marko,
first, you have send a mail to a mailing list and until you are not
subscribed you won't receive replies automatically. This time I have
cc'ed you directly. I recommend that you subscribe to the list that you
don't miss any replies.
Where did you get this links from? They are obsolete
On 10/07/2013 18:09, Rob Weir wrote:
I think we should plan on announcing the AOO 4.0 release availability
via a website page rather than a blog post. We had issues with the
3.4 and 3.4.1 releases as well, where the load from the announcement
(including press articles pointing to the blog post)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I am still asking why we need the sub directories under binaries? We
have the file unique already and the language code is part of the file
name. The SDK name is also unique.
They are still handy in case a user wants to browse all available
versions for a given language.
Hi,
I'm using the Eclipse IDE for development and I've svn checked out the
OpenOffice trunk files. Can anyone give me a quick guide or point me to a
link to building in Eclipse as its not mentioned here
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO?
Thanks,
Ajay
Hi,
the preparation of an OepnOffice 4.0 RC is nearly finished and the
upload is currently ongoing.
Mac and Windows are already available and the source release as well.
Linux upload is also ongoing but not yet finished.
Nevertheless the wiki page includes already links for the Linux
packages.
j...@apache.org has asked for 4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122709: Change default size of application windows on Linux
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122709
--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
yes, I changed it back to ?
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache
OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to
continue the success of OpenOffice.
This release candidate provides the
+1
Sylvain DENIS
Expert TIC, WEB FLOSS
Le 12/07/13 11:11, Jürgen Schmidt a écrit :
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache
OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key
On 12.07.2013 10:54, Ajay Bhat wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the Eclipse IDE for development and I've svn checked out the
OpenOffice trunk files. Can anyone give me a quick guide or point me to a
link to building in Eclipse as its not mentioned here
Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org has canceled 4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 121823: update serf to new version 1.2.1
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121823
--- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
(In reply to h...@apache.org from comment #17)
On 12 July 2013 08:47, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/07/2013 18:09, Rob Weir wrote:
I think we should plan on announcing the AOO 4.0 release availability
via a website page rather than a blog post. We had issues with the
3.4 and 3.4.1 releases as well, where the load from
Hi All,
We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week as well as
the defect verification, here is the weekly update (07/08 - 07/12):
*Test execution:*
1. Final Regression test
We have assigned 1804 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed
about 68% in execution
Hi at all
Moment Jürgen. Test a RC and final vote. within 72 houers is unserios.
Pleas give a a full week for this. Else i will vote -1 because there is
not enought time to make the final tests.
Greetings Raphael
Am 12.07.13 11:11, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote
Thanks Yu Zhen to drive the defect verification! It is very important to
ensure all release blocker defects are really fixed.
I noticed that there are 21 resolved release blockers are about
translations. So I forward to I10N mail list and suggest we contribute to
verify and close those items.
19
Rapheal,
I agree that the RC build should be tested.
But I think rather than the time, what we really care should be what is
tested. I'm looking forward Yu Zhen(our QA lead)'s RC test plan. If we get
a satisfiable plan and the test can be finished within 3 days, I will give
my +1 immediately.
Thanks for the report, Yu Zhen!
Juergen just annoucned the RC build. Let's call for volunteers and start
the RC build testing!
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2013/7/12 Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com
Hi All,
We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week as well as
the defect
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
Moment Jürgen. Test a RC and final vote. within 72 houers is unserios. Pleas
give a a full week for this. Else i will vote -1 because there is not
enought time to make the final tests.
The previous dev
please don't discuss in a vote thread
@Raphael, I disagree we do testing on snapshots since weeks.
Juergen
On 7/12/13 3:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
Moment Jürgen. Test a RC and final vote. within 72 houers is
Hi All,
The Release Candidate build is just announced, and we can start doing RC
acceptance test now. This is the call for volunteers on the final tests.
Any one who can contribute to the testing, please send me your TestLink ID
and preferred platforms, and I will assign test cases to you.
The
What is not serious that I plan a 72 hr vote that is normal at Apache?
We are not loner an incubator project and 72 hr are enough. The RC is
not so much different than the snapshot before.
You can vote -1 if you want but I hope that you take it serious and
don't vote simply and without any real
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the preparation of an OepnOffice 4.0 RC is nearly finished and the
upload is currently ongoing.
Mac and Windows are already available and the source release as well.
Linux upload is also ongoing but not yet
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
I tried building OpenOffice on the coming Fedora 19 to see how it worked
with a fairly recent set of build tools. As for STLport, I used the default
choice for 32-bit systems (this uses the STLPort package from the
I've been doing some extra testing of the AOO 4.0 install over OOo
3.3.0/AOO 3.4.0 and AOO 3.4.1. I also looked at the install over LO
4.0 to makes sure that is clean as well.
So far everything looks great.
One thing I wanted to verify was this directory:
C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 12.07.13 16:32, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
What is not serious that I plan a 72 hr vote that is normal at Apache?
We are not loner an incubator project and 72 hr are enough. The RC is
not so much different than the
Am 12.07.13 16:32, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
What is not serious that I plan a 72 hr vote that is normal at Apache?
We are not loner an incubator project and 72 hr are enough. The RC is
not so much different than the snapshot before.
The point is, who has desided to make a RC? I don't find a
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
The point is, who has desided to make a RC? I don't find a single
discoussion about it. A RC should be discused on the list. I know, there
where serios testings, but for my point of view not enoght. IA2 is
integrated
Does anyone have a script to verify signatures and hashes for a release?
In previous releases I'd download everything and do some ad-hoc
commands, but not as automated as it could be. Since we have a
regular directory structure it should be possible to have a script
that would verify everything
On Jul 12, 2013 5:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch
wrote:
The point is, who has desided to make a RC? I don't find a single
discoussion about it. A RC should be discused on the list. I know, there
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.07.2013 10:54, Ajay Bhat wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the Eclipse IDE for development and I've svn checked out the
OpenOffice trunk files. Can anyone give me a quick guide or point me to a
link to building in Eclipse as
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Does anyone have a script to verify signatures and hashes for a release?
In previous releases I'd download everything and do some ad-hoc
commands, but not as automated as it could be. Since we have a
regular directory
In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website. I'd like to challenge our thinking on
this.
Wouldn't it be useful to keep the release notes as a live document
on the wiki, so we can easily update it with additional information on
known issues
+1 -- buildbot nightlys have been solid for some time.
Still a number of resolved showstoppers ought to be verified, if anyone is
inclined to help knock a few out:
Hi List,
I have now played with a self-build pro AOO400 for two days, had no
crash ;-)
+1
Sincerely,
Armin
On 12.07.2013 11:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website. I'd like to challenge our thinking on
this.
Wouldn't it be useful to keep the release notes as a live document
on the wiki, so we
On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:18 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website. I'd like to challenge our thinking on
this.
Wouldn't it be useful to keep
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website. I'd like to challenge our thinking on
this.
Wouldn't it be useful to keep the release notes as a
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website. I'd like to challenge our
On 12 July 2013 22:44, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
In the past
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
In the
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:39 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 July 2013 22:44, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob
On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Does anyone have a script to verify signatures and hashes for a release?
In previous releases I'd download everything and do some ad-hoc
commands, but not as
2013/7/12 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate as
Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache
OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to
continue the success of
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese version? Thank you.
On 2013/07/12 21:52, Jürgen Schmidt said:
please don't discuss in a vote thread
@Raphael, I disagree we do testing on snapshots since weeks.
Juergen
On 7/12/13
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese version?
UI translation is not complete: https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/
Regards
2013/7/9 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/8 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
We are updating http://extensions.openoffice.org to tturn on all
enhancements previously made available at
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
64 bit packages are ready. 32 bit packages are still being uploaded.
All packages are ready now.
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
50 matches
Mail list logo
