TL;DR: We’re updating how auto-generated email from Github will be
threaded on your mailing lists. If you want to keep the old defaults,
details are below.
We’re pleased to let you know that we’re tweaking the way that auto-
generated email from Github will appear on your mailing lists. This
will
On 10/01/2023 07:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 07/01/23 Dave wrote:
>> The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness. ...
>> I propose that, unless any member of the project can offer any clear and
>> fully justifiable reason for doing otherwise, w
On 07/01/23 Dave wrote:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness. ...
I propose that, unless any member of the project can offer any clear and
fully justifiable reason for doing otherwise, we shut down the "spam
bait" marketing list.
Yes, +1 for shutting
On 07/01/2023 16:31, Dave wrote:
> The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
> Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
> little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
> Year Posts
>
+1 in favor
Am 07.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Dave:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
Year Posts
Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 1/7/23 11:31 AM, Dave wrote:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the
project:
Hi Dave,
On 1/7/23 11:31 AM, Dave wrote:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
Year Posts
2014 211
Am 07.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Dave:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
Year Posts
2014 211
Hi Dave,
Am 07.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Dave:
> The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
> Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
> little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
> Year
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness.
Since 2014 there have been 330 posts, the majority of which had very
little to do with the "marketing" the software or promotion of the project:
Year Posts
2014 211
2015 40
2016 43
2017 21
> minimal activity and conversation can be started at any time (and of
> course new members can join by self-subscribing as usual).
>
> Note that I'm also writing this as moderator of a couple lists:
I agree with Andrea's point.
I moderate the virtualbox users community m
On 20/11/2020 Marcus wrote:
the last mail seems to be from June 2020 [1]. Do you really think that
deleting the mailing list is a disservice? ;-)
For me it's obvious that there is no longer a purpose.
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?general...@openoffice.apache.org:2020-6
This i
On 18.11.20 22:36, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 17/11/2020 Marcos Delgado wrote:
Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
Who are the other moderators of that list?
Would you be fine with converting it to a
hat reach the list audience is spam, then it's a
different issue.
the last mail seems to be from June 2020 [1]. Do you really think that
deleting the mailing list is a disservice? ;-)
For me it's obvious that there is no longer a purpose.
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?general.
On 17/11/2020 Marcos Delgado wrote:
Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
Who are the other moderators of that list?
Would you be fine with converting it to a "subscription required" list,
i.e., any tim
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 3:04 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 17.11.20 um 22:09 schrieb Marcos Delgado:
>> Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
>> emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
>
> +1 In this case I support the deletion.
+2
>
> Marcus
>
Am 17.11.20 um 22:09 schrieb Marcos Delgado:
Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
+1 In this case I support the deletion.
Marcus
-
T
Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
Greetings.
J. Marcos Delgado A.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Am 11.09.20 um 10:08 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
Is there a mailing list for general questions concerning all ASF projects?
maybe this is helpful for you:
https://community.apache.org/lists.html
Marcus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Hello,
Is there a mailing list for general questions concerning all ASF projects?
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 21/06/2017 Larry Leathers wrote:
May I start a mailing list for Vietnamese users?
There is forum at https://forum.openoffice.org/vi/forum/ but it is
currently closed. I think the issue is explained at
https://forum.openoffice.org/vi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1047
We can look
Hello,
May I start a mailing list for Vietnamese users?
Larry Revander Leathers Jr., Macroeconomist
https://knocku.co
Cell: (347) 439 7472
Hello,
Since a couple of weeks, I don't receive e-mail from bugzi...@apache.org
anymore.
Are you in this case?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.a
The recruitment@ mailing list has been created, accepts messages, and
appears in lists.apache.org.
If you are pushing the "OpenOffice needs developers" message, please add
a suggestion that anyone who wants to help can subscribe to
recruitm...@openoffice.apache.org by sending
[BCC to PMC]
The tabulation below provides the rate of mailing list usage for all of public
lists since Apache OpenOffice became a top-level project in November 2012.
The full, auditable compilation of the data can be found in the PDF at
<https://s.apache.org/OHfh>.
In the tabulation
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:37 PM, JZA wrote:
>
> > I wonder if there are any tools to get stats on the mailing list. I
> notice
> > markmail is no longer used and it used to provide a lot of stats on use
> and
> &
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:37 PM, JZA wrote:
> I wonder if there are any tools to get stats on the mailing list. I notice
> markmail is no longer used and it used to provide a lot of stats on use and
> participation.
>
We had a gap in service with MarkMail for a while (about 3
I wonder if there are any tools to get stats on the mailing list. I notice
markmail is no longer used and it used to provide a lot of stats on use and
participation.
Is there any other tools being used for similar stats?
--
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
9060 55AB FFD2 2F02
Lalitha Ramprasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I joined openoffice QA list a few months back. I was asked to subscribe to
> dev@openoffice.apache.org to get posts on issues. I'm new to QA and it
> would be helpful if you could add me into this group.
>
> Thankyou,
> Lalitha
>
Hi Lalitha;
To Subscribe to th
Hi,
I joined openoffice QA list a few months back. I was asked to subscribe to
dev@openoffice.apache.org to get posts on issues. I'm new to QA and it
would be helpful if you could add me into this group.
Thankyou,
Lalitha
eassurance that they are contacting admins through
a recognizable channel. This is my favorite solution since it won't modify any
existing workflow.
3) We simply drop the mailing list and we continue using the Gmail address.
The list is configured to let all messages through, so mode
On 6 May 2015 at 11:28, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I notice that appoximatly half of the mails to this development list are
> user queries.
>
> Rather than answer those user questions here can we maybe not answer them
> but redirect
> them to the correct mailing
Hi All,
I notice that appoximatly half of the mails to this development list are user
queries.
Rather than answer those user questions here can we maybe not answer them but
redirect
them to the correct mailing list ?
This will help stop the dilution of this list and eventually we’ll end up
gnizable channel. This is my favorite solution since it won't
> modify any existing workflow.
>
> 3) We simply drop the mailing list and we continue using the Gmail address.
>
> The list is configured to let all messages through, so
Am 05/03/2015 05:05 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 16:51:09 +0200
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 02/05/2015 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
Hagar (Admin on en-Forum) is away from home for about a week; I would
not wish to make this decision without consulting him.
Sure. Of course this is
On Sun, 03 May 2015 16:51:09 +0200
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > Hagar (Admin on en-Forum) is away from home for about a week; I would
> > not wish to make this decision without consulting him.
>
> Sure. Of course this is mainly a decision for forum administrat
On 02/05/2015 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
Hagar (Admin on en-Forum) is away from home for about a week; I would
not wish to make this decision without consulting him.
Sure. Of course this is mainly a decision for forum administrators to
make, since they will be the ones using (or not using) it. The
...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 02:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Forum administrators alias / mailing list
Our latest Board report contained an automatically generated section
with all available mailing lists. One of them, named forum-admin AT
openoffice.apache.org, is currently
t replacing the
> Gmail address.
>
> 2) We forward it to the Gmail address, thus keeping all current
> processes in place but giving users the reassurance that they are
> contacting admins through a recognizable channel. This is my favorite
> solution since it won't modify
> Gmail address.
>
> 2) We forward it to the Gmail address, thus keeping all current processes
> in place but giving users the reassurance that they are contacting admins
> through a recognizable channel. This is my favorite solution since it won't
> modify any existing workflo
s in place but giving users the reassurance that they are
contacting admins through a recognizable channel. This is my favorite
solution since it won't modify any existing workflow.
3) We simply drop the mailing list and we continue using the Gmail address.
The list is configured to let all m
11:04 PM, schrieb Marcus:
It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
Here we have no mails, so the archive is empty resp. not existing.
Apache Commons is using their notifications@ for buildbot SVN checkins
and production website checkins.
The question i
Thanks for your opinions. To respect the lazy consensus timeframe of 72h
I'll create a JIRA issue for Infra tomorrow evening (CET).
Marcus
Am 03/02/2015 11:04 PM, schrieb Marcus:
It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
Here we have no
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/2015 02:04 PM, Marcus wrote:
> > It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
> >
> > notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> > Here we have no mails, so the archive is empty resp.
On 03/02/2015 02:04 PM, Marcus wrote:
> It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
>
> notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
>
> Here we have no mails, so the archive is empty resp. not existing.
>
> Apache Commons is using their notifications@ for buildbot SVN chec
issues@ or
commits@ list and if we ever restructure repositories (like, separating
code and website) in a way that makes a notifications list useful, then
recreating a mailing list for notifications is a very small additional
overhead in that respect.
Regards,
Andrea
On Monday, March 2, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
>
> notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
>
> Here we have no mails, so the archive is empty resp. not existing.
>
> Apache Commons is using their notifications@ for buildbot SVN chec
It seems we have a mailing list that nobody uses:
notificati...@openoffice.apache.org
Here we have no mails, so the archive is empty resp. not existing.
Apache Commons is using their notifications@ for buildbot SVN checkins
and production website checkins.
The question is now, what do we
>Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has
>identified a problem with BZ sending mail.
>I assume it will be solved quickly.
Fixed for me
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice
- Dennis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: FR web forum [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 02:02
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Bugzilla on mailing list
>
> Hello list,
>
> Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notificat
mail rules you are using?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: FR web forum [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 02:02
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Bugzilla on mailing list
Hello list,
Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notifications in issues@ mailing list
Am 02/16/2015 11:02 AM, schrieb FR web forum:
Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notifications in issues@ mailing list.
But I don't receive any e-mails.
Did you have same problem?
at least no longer, I get the issues mails as always and cannot see a
delay or other problem.
M
Hello list,
Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notifications in issues@ mailing list.
But I don't receive any e-mails.
Did you have same problem?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For addit
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/11/14 20:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> jan i wrote:
>>> On 12 November 2014 15:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> It's sometimes very interesting and there are some more numbers
>>
>> Mailin
On 12/11/14 20:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>> On 12 November 2014 15:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> It's sometimes very interesting and there are some more numbers
>
> Mailing list numbers are very good. The announce list, if I recall
> correctly, us
jan i wrote:
On 12 November 2014 15:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It's sometimes very interesting and there are some more numbers
Mailing list numbers are very good. The announce list, if I recall
correctly, used to have ~8000 subscribers, so this would be a 40-50%
increment. Also, mailing
erate:
> >>>
> >>> announce 11,318
> >>> users 584
> >>> dev 499
> >>> qa 277
> >>> l10n 233
> >>> marketing 173
> >>> api 149
> >>>
> >>> (I'm not a moderator for the doc maili
t;> dev 499
>>> qa 277
>>> l10n 233
>>> marketing 173
>>> api 149
>>>
>>> (I'm not a moderator for the doc mailing list, so I can't retrieve that
>> number).
>>>
>>> We also have 3,522 Twitter followers, 13,000 Fac
ng 173
> > api 149
> >
> > (I'm not a moderator for the doc mailing list, so I can't retrieve that
> number).
> >
> > We also have 3,522 Twitter followers, 13,000 Facebook "likes" and
> > 7,368 Google+ followers.
> >
> > And we receiv
Rob Weir wrote:
> Here's the current total subscribers for the AOO mailing lists I moderate:
>
> announce 11,318
> users 584
> dev 499
> qa 277
> l10n 233
> marketing 173
> api 149
>
> (I'm not a moderator for the doc mailing list, so I can't r
Here's the current total subscribers for the AOO mailing lists I moderate:
announce 11,318
users 584
dev 499
qa 277
l10n 233
marketing 173
api 149
(I'm not a moderator for the doc mailing list, so I can't retrieve that number).
We also have 3,522 Twitter followers, 13,000 Faceb
Jessica Marley wrote:
> Thank you
Wearing my moderator hat, I have answered Jessica off-list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Thank you
On 11/12/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
The members of the German community would like to approach you with
our wish to install a second mailing list
(dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by Jörg, Raphael und Michael
(Stehmann).
List is now ready. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Joseph Schaefer
wrote:
> Unless we did something really unusual, we don’t
> apply quotas to any of our filesystems, so this
> is likely a configuration option within Roller.
>
That makes sense. And if it was filesystem level it would not give a
nicely formatted
Unless we did something really unusual, we don’t
apply quotas to any of our filesystems, so this
is likely a configuration option within Roller.
On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Schaefer
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Schaefer
> wrote:
>> We’d appreciate it if you filed an INFRA jira ticket
>> when you do have some free time.
>>
>
> Certainly. That would be the next step.
>
Before I forget, the message was "You canno
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Schaefer
wrote:
> We’d appreciate it if you filed an INFRA jira ticket
> when you do have some free time.
>
Certainly. That would be the next step.
-Rob
> Thanks.
>
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/1
We’d appreciate it if you filed an INFRA jira ticket
when you do have some free time.
Thanks.
On Dec 18, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/12/aoo-2013-mailing-list.html
>
> I did this on my personal blog because I was getting disk quota errors
> on our proje
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/12/aoo-2013-mailing-list.html
I did this on my personal blog because I was getting disk quota errors
on our project blog when trying to upload the images, and I don't have
time to deal with that right now.
Enjoy!
-Rob
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > _if_ the "de" disturbs, then we must also rename the
> "users-de", _if_ "users-de" is OK, so is also "dev-de" OK ...
> this is the point.
> >
>
> I've never said anything against the "de" part.
I wanted to insinuate anything, but I had no othe
dation as it is. That does
> not mean I will not work to the Foundation the changes her mind to it ( not
> now, but maybe in 5-10 years )
>
>
> Now please let's talk about the risk of confusion by the "de" talk:
>
> The argument was not logical, because the
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 1:32 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> effective working
>
> Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > By "de-team @"
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
By "de-team @" I agree, and maybe that's for Rob OK, (for he had the
word "team" is suggested), then there would currently consensus.
I think there was a misunderstanding here. A mailing list for
discussions in German must be named XYZ-de for a cer
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > local-de-team@
> >
> > or
> >
> > de-team@
> >
> > (which contains _your_ word "team")
> >
> >
> > Better?
>
> "team" is really better and to put "de" at first, mix-ups are
> eleminated.
>
> +1
Fine.
By "de-team @" I agree, and maybe tha
e fine.
> >
> > Yes, true, but how do we do that?
>
> Describe what the purpose is for the new mailing list.
That's easy:
the new list to receive all discussions relating to the project and be guided
in German.
Mostly the things will be affecting the local labor in German
roject" with "dev" confused.
Just make clear (e.g., here:
http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html or ) that it is used to
coordinate the work in German-speaking countries, then it
should be fine.
Yes, true, but how do we do that?
Describe what the purpose is for the new mailin
ow please let's talk about the risk of confusion by the "de" talk:
The argument was not logical, because the situation is already (and has been
for more than 2 years!) that _there is_ a mailing list
users...@openoffice.apache.org.
So if the "de" in the name of a mailing
On 15 December 2013 11:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>
> > > Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
> >
> > The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
> > the right
> > ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and the
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
>
> The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
> the right
> ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and then you
> get German
> mails into the international ML. Or
-10 years )
Now please let's talk about the risk of confusion by the "de" talk:
The argument was not logical, because the situation is already (and has been
for more than 2 years!) that _there is_ a mailing list
users...@openoffice.apache.org.
So if the "de" in the na
e "marketing project", etc.
If we want to avoid confusion, especially when talking to other parts
of Apache, we should think of a different term to use in these cases.
Something like team, mission, special interest group, subcommittee,
function, area, etc.
For example, I tend to speak
Am 12/13/2013 03:43 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
wish it could be
named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any sug
>
> > my vote is:
> >
> > project-de or projectwork-de: +0.5
> >
> > dev-de: +1
> >
>
> I think it is potentially confusing either way. There is no "German
> project".
You're absolutely right and I hope it will be able to change
the native language mailing
lists: http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html
I've just updated that page to make sure that progetto-it is clearly
described as the mailing list for project-related discussions in
Italian, which is what it is meant for ("Italian project mailing list&qu
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>
>> > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
>> wish it could be
>> > named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
>> > dev@openoffice.apache.org. Bu
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
> wish it could be
> > named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
> > dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any suggestions.
>
> hm yes, that's a go
Am 12/12/2013 11:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jörg Schmidtwrote:
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
effective
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> > effecti
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> effective working
>
> jan i wrote:
> > +1 from me, my only concern is
jan i wrote:
+1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important information is
not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints about how to compile
etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that this happens.
It depends on the focus, but from Joerg's initial descripti
> +1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important
> information is
> not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints about
> how to compile
> etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that
> this happens.
I do not understand the problem.
By de-community is nothing
near Bonn) and
> > T-Dose (Eindhoven) we participate.
> >
> > Regards
> > Michael (Stehmann)
> >
> > On 11.12.2013 09:22, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> The members of the German community would like to approach you with our
>
gt;
> Regards
> Michael (Stehmann)
>
> On 11.12.2013 09:22, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The members of the German community would like to approach you with our wish
>> to install a second mailing list (dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by
>>
rman community would like to approach you with our wish
> to install a second mailing list (dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by
> Jörg, Raphael und Michael (Stehmann).
>
> The purpose of this separate list would be to distinguish general user
> questions from specific
Hello,
The members of the German community would like to approach you with our wish to
install a second mailing list (dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by Jörg,
Raphael und Michael (Stehmann).
The purpose of this separate list would be to distinguish general user
questions from specific
---
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
On the mailing list page:
http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
only the "dev" list has information concerning amount of traffic --
"This is a
Hi,
On 17.09.2013 11:40, Akshika Akalanka wrote:
I would love to join the mailing list.How can I do it??
You should look at http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
Best regards, Oliver.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I would love to join the mailing list.How can I do it??
On the Wiki page which gives links to the mailing lists, I think there ought be
a prominent warning that certain lists are high traffic lists (many messages
per day) and that people should consider seriously whether they can cope with
this.
Perhaps the subscription process should require an ext
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
