Am 29.05.20 um 17:52 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On May 29, 2020 3:55 PM Marcus wrote:
Is there an agreed new formulation of the sentence?
The agreed modification (proposed by Rory) is to change from
"reads all major competitors' files"
to
"reads most file types of major competitors"
thanks.
Hi Marcus
> On May 29, 2020 3:55 PM Marcus wrote:
> Is there an agreed new formulation of the sentence?
The agreed modification (proposed by Rory) is to change from
"reads all major competitors' files"
to
"reads most file types of major competitors"
Thanks!
Pedro
Am 28.05.20 um 20:34 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On May 28, 2020 7:03 PM Marcus wrote:
Am 28.05.20 um 16:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
What do I need to do to have edit permission on the Apache website?
That needs access to ASF infrastructure, so you would need to be a
committer.
You have asked me
Hi Marcus, Matthias, all
> On May 28, 2020 7:03 PM Marcus wrote:
> Am 28.05.20 um 16:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >> What do I need to do to have edit permission on the Apache website?
> >
> > That needs access to ASF infrastructure, so you would need to be a
> > committer.
You have asked me
Am 28.05.20 um 16:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.05.20 um 14:17 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Hi Matthias, all
Yes, this part of the webpage should really be rewritten.
But looking at how long it took us to discuss only a fraction of a
sentence that will take take a lng time.
That
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.05.20 um 14:17 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
>> Yes, this part of the webpage should really be rewritten.
>> But looking at how long it took us to discuss only a fraction of a
>> sentence that will take take a lng time.
>>
>> That said, I step back from doing
Hi Matthias, all
> Yes, this part of the webpage should really be rewritten.
> But looking at how long it took us to discuss only a fraction of a
> sentence that will take take a lng time.
>
> That said, I step back from doing anything in this specific matter.
> If someone wants to change
On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:08:47 +0200
Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave, all,
>
> Am 27.05.20 um 16:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> >
> >> On May 27, 2020, at 7:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Pedro;
> >> Comments in-line
> >>
> >> On 5/26/2020 5:18 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Plus your
Hi Dave, all,
Am 27.05.20 um 16:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
>> On May 27, 2020, at 7:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna
>> wrote:
>>
>> Pedro;
>> Comments in-line
>>
>> On 5/26/2020 5:18 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
Plus your your phrasing
leaves it wide open for people to complain about PDF files same
Regarding PDF's.
>> PDF is not an editable format and it is not from any of the "major
>> competitor" suites. In any case you can open PDF files in OpenOffice. Just
>> install the PDF Import extension.
>>
>
> Yes PDF is an editable format, you just need to have a PDF editor. The
> fact is that
Keith (comments in-line)
> > PDF is not an editable format and it is not from any of the "major
> > competitor" suites. In any case you can open PDF files in OpenOffice. Just
> > install the PDF Import extension.
> >
>
> Yes PDF is an editable format, you just need to have a PDF editor. The
>
> On May 27, 2020, at 7:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> Pedro;
> Comments in-line
>
> On 5/26/2020 5:18 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> Plus your your phrasing
>>> leaves it wide open for people to complain about PDF files same as they
>>> already do.
>>
>> PDF is not an editable
Pedro;
Comments in-line
On 5/26/2020 5:18 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> Plus your your phrasing
>> leaves it wide open for people to complain about PDF files same as they
>> already do.
>
> PDF is not an editable format and it is not from any of the "major
> competitor" suites. In any case you
> On May 27, 2020 12:26 AM Larry Gusaas < larry.gus...@gmail.com
> mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> Apache OpenOffice DOES NOT read Apple Pages, Keynote, or Numbers files.
>
Thank you for this piece of information. This certainly puts a nail on the all
vs most debate.
On Tue, 26 May 2020 17:26:55 -0600
Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2020-05-23 2:34 p.m., Czesław Wolański wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache OpenOffice Product Description, section "Why Apache OpenOffice?"
> >
> > https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
> >
> > Not being a native
On 2020-05-23 2:34 p.m., Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi,
Apache OpenOffice Product Description, section "Why Apache OpenOffice?"
https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
Not being a native English speaker I have some doubts about one part (2nd
bulleted list, 2nd item):
More emphasis should be placed on the fact that OO is a full feature suite
committed to the Open Document Format.
This OASIS standard is an important feature of all libre/open source/commons
suites going forward, and puts immense pressure on the older style (microsoft)
native formats, which is
Am 26.05.20 um 23:18 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Plus your your phrasing
leaves it wide open for people to complain about PDF files same as they
already do.
PDF is not an editable format and it is not from any of the "major competitor"
suites. In any case you can open PDF files in OpenOffice. Just
> Plus your your phrasing
> leaves it wide open for people to complain about PDF files same as they
> already do.
PDF is not an editable format and it is not from any of the "major competitor"
suites. In any case you can open PDF files in OpenOffice. Just install the PDF
Import extension.
>
Hi Rory, Matthias, all
> On May 26, 2020 7:36 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I am coming to the stage where I despair of ever educating the average
> computer user, usually two generations later than my own - they see the
> computer as a "Magic Box", and expect it to read their minds. Look even
On 5/26/2020 2:36 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:30:04 +0100 (WEST)
> Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> Hi Rory
>>
>>
I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced
it with
"the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:30:04 +0100 (WEST)
Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Rory
>
>
> > > I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you
> > > replaced it with
> > >
> > > "the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> >
> > My
OK, I will hold on until this (hopefully not endless) discussion is
finished... ;-)
Matthias
Am 26.05.20 um 20:30 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Rory
>
>
>>> I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced
>>> it with
>>>
>>> "the software reads all current file types of
Hi Rory
> > I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced
> > it with
> >
> > "the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
>
> My reasoning for the earlier wording which I suggested is that many users,
> becoming
On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:02:02 +0100 (WEST)
Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
> I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced it
> with
>
> "the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
My reasoning for the earlier
Hi Matthias, all
I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced it
with
"the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
Regards,
Pedro
> On May 26, 2020 5:42 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> If there are no further opinions I will
Hi,
> Can you wait for 300 million? ;-)
With outmost impatience. :'‑)
Regards,
Czesław
Am Di., 26. Mai 2020 um 19:39 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> Am 26.05.20 um 19:32 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Apparently German has no translation at all...
Am 26.05.20 um 19:32 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi,
>
>> Apparently German has no translation at all... ;-)
> Indeed. But it has "these nice baloons, ribbons and confetti" image with
> 290,000,000 Downloads... ;-)
You really want it, don't you?
Can you wait for 300 million? ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
Hi,
> Apparently German has no translation at all... ;-)
Indeed. But it has "these nice baloons, ribbons and confetti" image with
290,000,000 Downloads... ;-)
Regards,
Czesław
Am Di., 26. Mai 2020 um 19:21 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.05.20 um
Hi,
Am 26.05.20 um 19:03 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi,
>
> @Matthias
>
> Polish translation:
>
> "program odczytuje większość typów pliku swoich głównych konkurentów"
Thanks!
Apparently German has no translation at all... ;-)
Matthias
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Czesław
>
>
> Am Di., 26. Mai 2020 um
Hi,
@Matthias
Polish translation:
"program odczytuje większość typów pliku swoich głównych konkurentów"
Regards,
Czesław
Am Di., 26. Mai 2020 um 18:42 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> Hi all,
>
> If there are no further opinions I will change the text according
Hi all,
If there are no further opinions I will change the text according to
Rory's suggestion tomorrow:
...the software reads all major competitors' files -> ...the software
reads most file types of major competitors
This will be for the main page, the /xx template and I will adjust the
German
Hi Dean, all
>
> I think Microsoft does this on purpose.
>
> >"reads all current file types of major competitors."
>
> It may read it, but it does not always understand it.
Agreed, that is why I think the emphasys should be on file _types_.
The same can be said about Microsoft Office. Using
Microsoft does this on purpose.
>"reads all current file types of major competitors."
It may read it, but it does not always understand it.
Kind Regards,
Dean
From: Pedro Lino
Sent: Sunday, 24 May 2020 9:33 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re
Am 24.05.20 um 12:37 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
Everyone knows that. Me too.
But Peter talked about 'multiple ideas to fill the gap on OOXML'. *What are
these ideas?*
1) finish OOXML implementation we have
2) use Apache POI (Is in Java)
3) Port the LO version into an extension (The extension
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mechtilde [mailto:o...@mechtilde.de]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 12:17 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
&g
+1 to Rory's suggestion.
Since the discussion already went of topic, let's not forget to rephrase
that sentence... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.05.20 um 09:20 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
> Czesław Wolański wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apache OpenOffice Product
Hello,
Am 24.05.20 um 11:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:21 AM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wo
> -Original Message-
> From: Czesław Wolański [mailto:czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:31 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> Hi,
>
> On the said page i.e.
> http
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:21 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:10 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > It's not
Hi Rory, all
> On May 24, 2020 8:20 AM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> Best to rephrase: reads most file types of major competitors.
>
> I say "most" to allow for occasional inabilities to read some .docx and
> perhaps others not yet developed.
Since you are (and correctly so) referring to file
Hi,
On the said page i.e.
https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
there is a statement:
"With a fully open development process,
Apache OpenOffice has nothing to hide - the product stands or falls on its
reputation".
To take "one step at a time" and not to lose sight
Am 24.05.20 um 11:10 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
It's not that I think it would be good to use OOXML (I mean instead of ODF),
it's just that users need this feature.
Nobody thinks OOXML is an unimportant feature. I have not seen anyone
against it. We have already multiple Ideas how to close the
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 10:42 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 10:30:58 +0200
> Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
On Sun, 24 May 2020 10:30:58 +0200
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:20 AM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:20 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Product page - ambiguous wording?
>
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
> Czesław Wolański wrote:
&g
+1
Am 24.05.20 um 10:05 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Hi,
Thank you very much for explanation and far-sighted proposal. I hope others
will agree and I might finally enjoy peace of mind for...
"Roma locuta, causa finita" [1]. ;‑)
Kind regards,
Czesław
[1]
Hi,
Thank you very much for explanation and far-sighted proposal. I hope others
will agree and I might finally enjoy peace of mind for...
"Roma locuta, causa finita" [1]. ;‑)
Kind regards,
Czesław
[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Roma_locuta,_causa_finita
Am So., 24. Mai 2020 um 09:20
On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:34:03 +0200
Czesław Wolański wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache OpenOffice Product Description, section "Why Apache OpenOffice?"
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
>
> Not being a native English speaker I have some doubts about one part (2nd
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
