Re: Status on Migration of OpenOffice.org from the Apache CMS

Dave, your work in this migration is greatly, greatly, appreciated ! > On Nov 2, 2020, at 1:42 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > I am in the process of migrating content from SVN to Git. > > Staging is getting interesting @ https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org >

Re: 4.2.x and macOS 10.7

! Anything special in the setup? Are old Xcode pieces no longer > required? > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Nov 2, 2020, at 9:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Just a FYI that I test built HEAD of AOO42X on a macOS VM, with macOS 10.15 >> (Catalin

Re: Online accessible Mac Machine for AOO dev

I'd like an account please > On Nov 3, 2020, at 8:50 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all, > > > I want to inform you we have today received access of a Mac with Catalina > sponsored by MacStadium. > > The i5 with 8GB and a 250SSD can be used for development, building and > Testing of Apac

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

I will be closing the vote tomorrow, Nov 5th at ~7:30am ET. > On Nov 2, 2020, at 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8-RC3 as GA. > > These artifacts can be fo

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

Thx > On Nov 4, 2020, at 3:26 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 04.11.20 um 18:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I will be closing the vote tomorrow, Nov 5th at ~7:30am ET. > > to help you a bit I've already summarized and counted the votes - which were > cast

[POLLS CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.8-RC2 as GA

The vote is closed and AOO 4.1.8-RC3 was overwhelmingly approved for release. Both Matthias and I will start signing our respective binaries (Windows and macOS) > On Nov 5, 2020, at 7:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 04.11.20 um 18:45 schrieb Jim Jagie

Re: Pre-release commit messages

This is a restriction/limitation of 'svn'... you cannot move one dir to another between repos: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/308115/copy-folder-of-svn-repository-to-a-folder-in-another-repository > On Nov 5, 2020, at 3:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > A request to improve read

Re: Pre-release commit messages

> On Nov 5, 2020, at 3:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On the contrary, Windows commits are grouped 5 languages at a time and the > log is quite readable; but even 1 commit per language, as opposed to 1 commit > per file, would significantly improve readability. > apples and oranges. If

Re: Pre-release commit messages

etti wrote: > > On 05/11/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 05.11.20 um 22:55 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> This is a restriction/limitation of 'svn'... you cannot move one dir to >>> another between repos: >>> >>> https://unix.stackexchang

Re: Pre-release commit messages

> On Nov 7, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 07.11.20 um 14:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> If svn supports it someone just needs to let me know how to do it. I tried >> 'svn mv' both from WD to repo and between repos and

Re: Pre-release commit messages

> On Nov 7, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > But let me say one thing: This was (will be) a GREAT release! > > We have touched more files than ever, we had great support from Don > (FreeBSD), we had a PR from Akikazu (Android), we had a lot of new > people willing to test. I wa

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community builds is because we build them w/ gstreamer, and only CentOS7 has gstreamer1.0. If, instead, we decide to remove gstreamer from the expected options for community builds, then we could continue w/ CentOS5[1]. So the question

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

ategy we have communicated. > Am 10.11.20 um 04:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community >> builds is because we build them w/ gstreamer, and only CentOS7 has >> gstreamer1.0. If, instead, we decide to remove gstreamer f

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

> On Nov 10, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > Am 10.11.20 um 14:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I think you may be confused... we are just talking about community builds >> here, not anything regarding maintenance or modernizing AOO. > > I am not sure

[OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to gstreamer 1.0). Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the 32bit

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

> On Nov 10, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used > CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. > As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we > baselined Cent

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

> On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:23 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 10.11.20 um 18:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used >> CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. >> As of 4.2.x, this is no lo

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

CentOS7: glibc 2.17 Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19 Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the CentOS7 version will likely always be the older one. > On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> History: For pre

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

I posted a tweet from our official twitter account. > On Nov 11, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 10:51 AM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] A

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

n't mind the additional workload if it helps our community. > On Nov 10, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Cast your vote: >> [X] CentOS7 >> [ ] Ubuntu 14.04 >> [ ] Something else: > > CentOS 7 builds wil

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

++1! Onwards to 4.2.0 ;) > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Marcus, all, > > Am 11.11.20 um 10:49 schrieb Marcus: >> Also from my side a big thank you to all who are involved and have >> helped to make this release possible. :-) > > Yes, a big THANKS to "those who

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

what the best elegant way to fix this is. > > [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128413 > > Am 12.11.20 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> ++1! >> >> Onwards to 4.2.0 ;) >> >>> On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> w

trunk extension issue?

While trying to build HEAD of trunk, I get the following: downloading/updating 1 extension downloading to /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/ext_sources/dict-uk_ua.oxt.part failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/975/14/dict-uk_ua-5.1.1.oxt/download at /Users/jim/s

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Move to new Website Git Repositories

+1 > On Nov 15, 2020, at 12:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Unless there are objections I think we should move to the new CMS for > openoffice-project and openoffice-org this week in about 72 hours. > > Proposed schedule is Wednesday for both. > > Regards, > Dave > ---

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

AOO418-GA is tagged > On Nov 16, 2020, at 8:10 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 12.11.20 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> ++1! >> >> Onwards to 4.2.0 ;) > > Yes, 4.2.0 should really be our next step. > > Can you create a T

Re: Apache Dependency Updates/Upgrades?

That all makes sense to me... I would guess that #4 and #8 would be the easiest and low hanging fruit. > On Nov 17, 2020, at 2:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> (5) Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 (this is the final 5.5 release) upgrade to version >> 7 or 8(?) >> \servletapi\jsr154\dist\lib\servlet-api.jar

New EPM Maintainer... me!

AOO is pretty heavily dependent on EPM to create our community builds for Linux and macOS. Unfortunately, EPM has been, heretofore, only in maintenance mode. I contacted Michael R Sweet, the creator, and offered to "take over" development and maintenance, and he graciously agreed! We now have c

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

With this in mind, I will be adjusting AOO trunk and AOO42X to require this newer version. Once I release EPM v5.0.0, I will make those changes. > On Nov 19, 2020, at 7:06 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.11.20 um 17:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> AOO is pretty heavily dependent on EP

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

It worked on a Big Sur VM I spun up. > On Nov 20, 2020, at 5:33 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.11.20 um 17:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur? > > has somebody already installed the new version? And tested AOO on this? > >> In the german forum there is this questio

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

> On Nov 21, 2020, at 3:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 20.11.20 16:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> With this in mind, I will be adjusting AOO trunk and AOO42X to require this >> newer version. Once I release EPM v5.0.0, I will make those changes. > I am a

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

gt; > So I hope there is a better solution > > > Regards > > Mechtilde >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 21.11.20 um 14:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> >>>> On Nov 21, 2020, at 3:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >

Re: [Issue 128403] Mixing of perl backticks and system() in main/set_soenv.in

Actually, it looks like a valid bug and a valid fix. Is AOO BZ connected to the ASF's ldap? I can't recall my login > On Nov 24, 2020, at 2:56 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can someone please have a look at this issue? > > I don't like the idea of having a ticket closed only b

Re: [Issue 128403] Mixing of perl backticks and system() in main/set_soenv.in

I've gone ahead and fixed, so if someone wants to login and close this BZ that would be great PS: I've tried and it's not accepting my ASF LDAP creds. > On Nov 24, 2020, at 3:14 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 24.11.20 um 21:12 schrieb Jim

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

t; >> Am 23.11.20 um 21:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> The buildbot still fails: >>> >>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/41x/main/epm/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/epm.txt >>> >>> Matthias &g

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

r.gz > entering dmake-4.12.3 > ./bootstrap: line 121: cd: dmake-4.12.3: No such file or directory > > --- > > The directory created is: dmake-dmake-4.12.3 > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 25.11.20 um 17:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> FWIW, I'm a

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

I cannot recreate this on Catalina (10.15.7) > On Nov 26, 2020, at 9:54 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 26.11.20 um 15:49 schrieb Bidouille: >> Hello Mathias, >> >> I ask it to OP and wait. >> Once provided, I will open a report on Bugzilla > > Thanks! > > I think we have "macOS

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: New URL for dmake

ranch trunk >>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git >>> >>> >>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >>> new 6d55344 New URL for dmake >>> 6d55344 is described below >>>

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: New URL for dmake

Try w/ https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz > On Nov 27, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 27.11.20 um 21:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I don't think that patch is needed anymore... IIRC it removed >&g

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ > On Nov 28, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > >> Seems to be "Big Sur" only, see: >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128415 > > Think that not a regression because end users had old build and same issue. > Reproduced too with 4.1.3

Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors

it > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO42X by this push: > new 316716d Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 > over-agressive clang warning/errors > 316716d is described below > > commit 316716d6ea48f0328e1769bc4cf3de607b1c1491 > Aut

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors

> On Dec 1, 2020, at 11:05 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 01.12.20 um 16:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> As can be seen below, I've upgraded 4.2.x and later to use more recent >> versions of apr/apr-util. This was mostly done since the lates

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

fice.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >> new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and >> Linux. >> d73dd1d is described below >> >> commit d73dd1d32e12ca3b96b7bbfff854b7

Help w/ bt

So I've been working on some of the macOS bugz and am looking at the UNO bridge as a likely subject, hence the various changes to the macOS code there. I'm hoping someone can help me with this crash. I open up Extension Manager, hit check for updates and AOO immediately dies, with the following

Re: Help w/ bt

r whether or not doing so breaks on other platforms as well... anyone know before I spin up another VM and test? > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> So I've

macOS - oldest supported version

Up to now, we've held 10.7 as the oldest version of OS X AOO is supported on. Even with 4.2.x this is still the case. However, if we allow for 10.9 to be the "oldest", we can help include some capabilities that we can't right now. For example, our support of RTTI and _si_class_type_info is pret

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements.

> On Dec 3, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> index f27a04e..5f60f73 100644 >> --- a/main/soltools/mkdepend/parse.c >> +++ b/main/soltools/mkdepend/parse.c >> @@ -346,7 +346,11 @@ int deftype (line, filep, file_red, file, parse_it, >> symbols) >> /* >>* copy the definition

Re: Help w/ bt

possibly a buffer overflow because the absolute filesystem path to > AOO is too long, or other such. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:31 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> Building --enable-debug is causing a weird issue... >> >> ../unxmaccx

Re: Help w/ bt

Just an inline update: > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Can you drag-and-drop within AOO generally, eg. drag a file from your file > manager into Writer? Yeah, no problem. > > The code seems to be in > http://opengrok.openoffice.org/xref/trunk/main/vcl/aqua/source/dt

Java 1.6

The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone have the history and background on why we *require* that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: Java 1.6

> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone >> have the history and background on why we *require* that? > > Due to a bug in Java, J

Re: Java 1.6

Thx... > On Dec 6, 2020, at 2:39 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 06.12.20 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >>

Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. Any interest in looking into getting beanshell into some more stable situation... It looks like it's been majorly refactored. ---

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base > Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB > (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 (EPL1

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be the "better" path to take; plus it is relatively small while at the same time being quite powerful and compliant. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Kovacs [

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > With both databases, however, Java bothers me - or have we given up the > intention of making AOO less dependent on Java? > (yes, of course this is a very long-term question) But still a good one... personally, SQlite seems like a better,

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to know how you guys feel we should

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

Just a FYI that I've been hacking on https://github.com/jimjag/beanshell2 which is merge of 2.0b6 and beanshell2. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 8:06 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: >> Hello Jim >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schri

Re: Proposed changes to devtools/build-scripts on SVN

rigo, thanks for the great email.. I will be posting my comments/answers inline. > On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Dear List, > > while working on pull requests, I was wondering how to test the most > common build options for OpenOffice -- possibly the same used for > r

Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. For example, --with-dmake-path --with-dmake-url --with-epm --with-epm-url Why does dmake use dmake-path but EPM just use epm? Why 2 directives when they could

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Jim, > >> >> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >> >> --with-epm >> --with-dmake >> --with-beanshell > > I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate > version like in ext_sources. Can you provide an e

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit >> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. >&

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

FTR: For the changes I proposed, I'd do the work. I don't propose things unless I'm willing and able to roll up my sleeves and do 'em ;) > On Dec 9, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 9,

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Bidouille wrote: > >> Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ > > Any news? > TDF blog publish on this bug: https://tinyurl.com/y6zjvp2j > Bad advice :-( I love that group. They are like immature kids. Or bitter ex-boy/girl-friends. What's next? Sticking

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 7:27 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 11.12.20 12:47, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> On Dec 11, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Bidouille wrote: >>> >>>> Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ >>> Any news? >>> TDF bl

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

I'm building a dev version of 4.2.0 w/ lang fr as we speak > On Dec 11, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: > >> Who is running Big Sur? > We have end users on french forum. > Able (and motivated) to test it soon as possible :) > >

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

On Dec 11, 2020, at 9:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I'm building a dev version of 4.2.0 w/ lang fr as we speak > >> On Dec 11, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: >> >>> Who is running Big Sur? >> We have end users on french fo

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 12, 2020, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have been able to open docx with your version (en-US) on Big Sur. > However, I am not sure if this bug ever applied to 4.2.x. > > The Extension Manager is still broken. But similar behavior is to be > seen in 4.2.x on

Beanshell

Just a FYI: https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/1338840166828568576 TL;DR: I've forked beanshell and beanshell2 into something which maybe we can baseline for AOO - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: issue with dmake clean

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Carl, > > Am 13.12.20 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Carl, >>> >>> Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi all, Just ran into somethin

Re: Beanshell

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Just a FYI: > >https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/1338840166828568576 > > TL;DR: I've forked beanshell and beanshell2 into something which m

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Ahh. that's good info. There is something somewhere that still expects that COMID on macOS is s5abi or, at least, !=gcc3. That gives me some hint to what to look for. > On Dec 17, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) > wrote: > > On 14.12.2020 13:33, Jim Jagielski

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Can you try with: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Dec 18, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Ahh. that's good info. There is something somewhere that still expects that > COMID on macOS > is s5abi or, at least, !=gcc3. That gives me some hint

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 12, 2020, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have been able to open docx with your version (en-US) on Big Sur. > However, I am not sure if this bug ever applied to 4.2.x. > > The Extension Manager is still broken. But similar behavior is to be > seen in 4.2.x on

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

OK, thx. it seems that the switch from COMID s5abi to gcc3 is a LOT more fragile than it should be. > On Dec 19, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) > wrote: > > On 18.12.2020 16:25, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Can you try with: >> >>http://home.apache.

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113: Avoid "dmake clean" to wipe out the whole tree

merge away > On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:28 AM, GitBox wrote: > > > Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-749494181 > > > Is there any reason not to merge this PR? > > > --

Extension manager cores

So I've been able to grab some it's running AOO in the console related to the extension manager problems: % /Applications/OpenOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice 2020-12-22 11:08:56.613 soffice[52135:431101] WARNING: NSWindow drag regions should only be invalidated on the Main Thread! This will th

Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO?

Many years ago I worked at RedHat and asked that RedHat allow that all contributions be dual-licensed. All people then at RedHat involved in LO adamantly refused. Even the CTO at the time refused to get involved. > On Dec 23, 2020, at 5:37 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > Thanks Peter for this POV. > >

Re: Apple Dumping Intel.

Yes, all this is very similar when Apple moved from the PowerPC to Intel, many many moons ago. In fact, there was a time when you could have *3* versions: x86 32bit, PowerPC, and x86-64 64bit, all in 1 single bundle/binary. > On Dec 23, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Steve, >

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

It is more than likely that we may need to release a 4.1.9 just to accommodate BigSur. However, AOO is hardly unique in being an app that no longer works when someone upgrades to BigSur. The macOS community is replete w/ such apps. I'm not using that as an excuse, but that is what it is. > On

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

4.2.0-dev works fine under Big Sur. With that in mind, over the next week I may try building 4.1.8 but with various versions of Xcode and macOS SDKs... > On Dec 26, 2020, at 10:05 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>

Big Sur 4.1.x core dumps

I've confirmed that my 4.2.0 builds work fine on BigSur but the 4.1.8 builds, even using Xcode10 and the 10.13SDK still result in core on macOS11. Below you'll find the stack. My initial thoughts are that it is NOT a build issue, but rather a code one, so I'll start some investigation with that mi

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: > diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f 100644 > --- a/main/bridges/source/cpp_

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

;Farrell wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:43:06 +0100 > Matthias Seidel <mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>> wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seem

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

BUGZ seems to be a build issue, not a code one, but it still needs to be fixed and noted, likely with some autoconf checks that fakeroot exists. > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> So

AOO 4.1.9 Info

The AOO419 branch has been created. The version numbers, et.al. have been bumped. The Release Status page has been cloned: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@op

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article moot with the actual release? Maybe it is better to address the issue with the release announcement...? > On Dec 27, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

ter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog >> article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article >> moot with the actual release? > > Yes I think

Re: Proposed change for download page

https://www.openoffice.org/download/ also refers to OS X <=10.6 versions, which we do not provide. That should be removed as well, IMO. > On Dec 28, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > > there was currently in the forum the case of a user who believed AOO was also > available

Language subsets

It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for these but instead maybe just 3-5. How about: LANGS

Re: Language subsets

Works for me... Any other feedback? > On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might >> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platfor

Re: Language subsets

I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apa

Re: Test of AOO-dev 4.19

Hmmm. Scanning both trunk and AOO419 for 'GailWindow', I'm not seeing any code level diffs between the 2. I wonder if it's related to this: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2011-July/msg00596.html > On Dec 30, 2020, at 5:43 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > Starting 4.19 in a termi

Re: Test of AOO-dev 4.19

5674a7e9f73/main/solenv/inc/minor.mk#L23 > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 30.12.20 um 12:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Hmmm. Scanning both trunk and AOO419 for 'GailWindow', I'm not seeing any >> code level diffs between the 2. >> >> I w

Re: My last advance notice regarding Big Sur (was: What we should do now)

> On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:06 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > Although it was clear to everyone here that the issue needs a quick solution, > and although there were many discussion posts and a lot of hard work in > revising the blogpost, nothing relevant has happened yet. Are you crazy? Did yo

Re: Linux virtual machines for release builds

> On Jan 2, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Dear All, > > the wiki page "Step by step building guides for different platforms" > [1] mentions: > > - CentOS 5 for AOO 4.1.x > and lists the commands to prepare a x86_64 VM; > > - CentOS 7 for AOO 4.2.x > but it also states th

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: 'fakeroot' is no longer optional, but required, when making deb/dpkg so no need to worry about the old hack and seeing if we have fakeroot.

Followed up on the bugz ticket... > On Jan 3, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > One user has a problem with this commit, see: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128422 > > Could you have a look? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > --

Copyright updates

Just a reminder that as we update files within the AOO repo, we should also take the opportunity to update the copyright dates on said files to 2021... There is no need to wholesale update the copyright on *all* files in bulk, just as we modify them... Cheers, and Happy 2021!

Re: Linux virtual machines for release builds

Works for me... > On Jan 4, 2021, at 3:20 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Marcus, > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote: > >> Am 04.01.21 um 16:27 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:03:35PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >>> first of all,

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info

Should we try for a RC1 early next week? > On Dec 27, 2020, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The AOO419 branch has been created. > The version numbers, et.al. have been bumped. > The Release Status page has been cloned: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info

> On Jan 5, 2021, at 7:51 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 05.01.21 um 13:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Should we try for a RC1 early next week? > > I didn't hear any response regarding this issue yet: > > https://bz.apache

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >