Re: Wiki Publisher

Do we have the capability to do such migration? If the LO patches are under MPL, then we can't use them. > On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:19 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around the > wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use. >

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784 assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose with

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

test14 is ready for testing! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

ving > gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"". > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> And test11 is

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available. > On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on > > > https://github.com/apache

Re: test2 is ready to run

And test8 is now available... http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

In the meantime, please review main/writerfilter/source/doctok/resources.xsl on trunk and AOO42X > On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> OK... so $shift is a number then, or should be? But sometimes $shift >> is simply blank

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

so are YOU able to build HEAD of AOO418 on CentOS5 ?? > On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:09 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I don't have it, but that was around the end of Aug right? So right around >> the time when a bunch of stuff was included like up

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

M, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Should that fix be just: >> >> > > That would work, but it would produce a different output. It would > always put ">> $shift" in the output whenever $shift is nonblank. The > c

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

never mind this... it's not a matter of building. I can build fine. It just crashes on Ubuntu. no idea why. > On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > so are YOU able to build HEAD of AOO418 on CentOS5 ?? > > >> On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:09 PM, Don Lewis wr

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

21, 2020, at 2:43 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> never mind this... it's not a matter of building. I can build fine. It >> just crashes on Ubuntu. no idea why. > > Are you building on

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this one is bad before I kick off #13 > On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino > wrote: > > Hi Jim > > Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 > > Pedro > >> On 10/26/

Re: devtools repo - move to git

> On Aug 4, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move >> devtools

devtools repo - move to git

Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move devtools as well over there as well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

I have a handful of builds for macOS and Linux 32+64bit available for review/comment at http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.8-dev/ > On Aug 3, 2020, at 1:19 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Aug 3, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Am

macOS test builds of 4.1.8

... are underway - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: devtools repo - move to git

gt;> Good.send on. >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 5:09 PM Carl Marcum wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Considering th

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

Building as we speak... > On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi JIm, > > Am 01.07.20 um 15:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'll kick off a developer's build. Which specific language should I do? > > I have no personal preference.

Re: Build Issue with Hunspell on MacOSx

> On Jun 28, 2020, at 3:31 AM, Peter wrote: > > Hello all, > > does anyone have an Idea how this error can happen? > > hunspell.cxx:119:14: fatal error: '../../intl/libintl.h' file not found > #include <../../intl/libintl.h> > ^~ > 1 error generated. >

Re: configure on Mac OS X

, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hey Jim. > > My Mac Mini has MacOSX Catalina 10.15.5 and XCode 11.5 > > All the Best > > Peter > > Am 22.06.20 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> What version of macOS and Xcode? >> >>&g

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

> If so, I would work on graphics for the Language Pack and SDK, too. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 11.06.20 um 15:52 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I can't recreate that on any of the Macs I have access to. >> >>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Matthi

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

thub.com/apache/openoffice/commit/40d4a01ecacb607efe5dc313561c55b38d338734 > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 02.07.20 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Some builds are available at: >>

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

Some builds are available at: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-dev-50c544e5/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

I put a handful up on https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Jul 6, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 06.07.20 um 14:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm kicking off a new build... > Thanks! >> >>> On Jul 3, 2020

Re: configure on Mac OS X

You can force install them using /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/Packages/macOS_SDK_headers_for_macOS_10.14.pkg > On Jun 20, 2020, at 9:54 AM, Peter wrote: > > Jims Script does not work for me. And it sets a lot of stuff, which I am > unsure if they are the same on my System. > > Apple

Re: configure on Mac OS X

What version of macOS and Xcode? > On Jun 20, 2020, at 7:56 AM, Peter wrote: > > Hi, > > > When Running configure ion Mac OS X I get the error Message: > > checking whether we are cross compiling... configure: error: in > `workspace/AOO/gitbox/main': > configure: error: cannot run C

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

I can't recreate that on any of the Macs I have access to. > On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Any confirmations? I don't have a mac to test anymore... > > [2] is a mega release blocker. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 29.05.20 um 16:51 schrieb Matthias

Re: sdk configuration on macos

The behavior is intended for ASF community builds. You are certainly able to adjust the scripts to allow for a more personalized build > On Jul 16, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Hyeon Lee wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm building the office on macos 10.15. > I found out that the configure only supports

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

I'm up for it > On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:46 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Matthias > >> Personally I don't think a decent 4.2.0 release in 3 month is realistic. >> However we have a branch 4.1.8 at hand that is in good shape. > > So the plan is to release 4.1.8 for the Anniversary? > > Cheers,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removing these builds and will rebuild them. > On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate ava

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

ny problems... > What problems should have been detected? > > Regards, > Pedro > >> On 01/11/2021 1:50 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT >> a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

The macOS and Linux community builds have been re-verified and uploaded. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Language subsets

Works for me... Any other feedback? > On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might >> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms >>

Language subsets

It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for these but instead maybe just 3-5. How about:

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

is that 4.2.0-dev works fine under Big Sur. With that in mind, over the next week I may try building 4.1.8 but with various versions of Xcode and macOS SDKs... > On Dec 26, 2020, at 10:05 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>

Re: How should we proceed with BigSur? (was: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?)

It is more than likely that we may need to release a 4.1.9 just to accommodate BigSur. However, AOO is hardly unique in being an app that no longer works when someone upgrades to BigSur. The macOS community is replete w/ such apps. I'm not using that as an excuse, but that is what it is. > On

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

ell wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:43:06 +0100 > Matthias Seidel <mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>> wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it on

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

BUGZ seems to be a build issue, not a code one, but it still needs to be fixed and noted, likely with some autoconf checks that fakeroot exists. > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> So

Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over the weekend for testing by the start of next week, hopefully. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

I cannot recreate this on Catalina (10.15.7) > On Nov 26, 2020, at 9:54 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 26.11.20 um 15:49 schrieb Bidouille: >> Hello Mathias, >> >> I ask it to OP and wait. >> Once provided, I will open a report on Bugzilla > > Thanks! > > I think we have

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: New URL for dmake

Try w/ https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz > On Nov 27, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 27.11.20 um 21:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I don't think that patch is needed anymore... IIRC it removed >> cy

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: New URL for dmake

trunk >>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git >>> >>> >>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >>> new 6d55344 New URL for dmake >>> 6d55344 is described below >>> >

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

gt;> Am 23.11.20 um 21:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> The buildbot still fails: >>> >>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/41x/main/epm/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/epm.txt >>> >>> Matthias >>

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

It worked on a Big Sur VM I spun up. > On Nov 20, 2020, at 5:33 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.11.20 um 17:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur? > > has somebody already installed the new version? And tested AOO on this? > >> In the german forum there is this

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

> On Nov 21, 2020, at 3:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 20.11.20 16:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> With this in mind, I will be adjusting AOO trunk and AOO42X to require this >> newer version. Once I release EPM v5.0.0, I will make those changes. > I am a

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

fice.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >> new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and >> Linux. >> d73dd1d is described below >> >> commit d73dd1d32e12ca3b96b7bbfff854b7

macOS - oldest supported version

Up to now, we've held 10.7 as the oldest version of OS X AOO is supported on. Even with 4.2.x this is still the case. However, if we allow for 10.9 to be the "oldest", we can help include some capabilities that we can't right now. For example, our support of RTTI and _si_class_type_info is

Re: Java 1.6

> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone >> have the history and background on why we *require* that? > > Due to a bug in Java, J

Re: Java 1.6

Thx... > On Dec 6, 2020, at 2:39 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 06.12.20 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >>

Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. Any interest in looking into getting beanshell into some more stable situation... It looks like it's been majorly refactored.

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base > Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB > (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 (EPL1

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements.

> On Dec 3, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> index f27a04e..5f60f73 100644 >> --- a/main/soltools/mkdepend/parse.c >> +++ b/main/soltools/mkdepend/parse.c >> @@ -346,7 +346,11 @@ int deftype (line, filep, file_red, file, parse_it, >> symbols) >> /* >>* copy the

Re: Help w/ bt

bly a buffer overflow because the absolute filesystem path to > AOO is too long, or other such. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:31 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> Building --enable-debug is causing a weird issue... >> >> ../unxmaccx.pro/

Re: Help w/ bt

Just an inline update: > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Can you drag-and-drop within AOO generally, eg. drag a file from your file > manager into Writer? Yeah, no problem. > > The code seems to be in >

Java 1.6

The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone have the history and background on why we *require* that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to know how you guys feel we s

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

Just a FYI that I've been hacking on https://github.com/jimjag/beanshell2 which is merge of 2.0b6 and beanshell2. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 8:06 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: >> Hello Jim >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Ji

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be the "better" path to take; plus it is relatively small while at the same time being quite powerful and compliant. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Kovacs

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > With both databases, however, Java bothers me - or have we given up the > intention of making AOO less dependent on Java? > (yes, of course this is a very long-term question) But still a good one... personally, SQlite seems like a better,

Re: [Issue 128403] Mixing of perl backticks and system() in main/set_soenv.in

Actually, it looks like a valid bug and a valid fix. Is AOO BZ connected to the ASF's ldap? I can't recall my login > On Nov 24, 2020, at 2:56 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can someone please have a look at this issue? > > I don't like the idea of having a ticket closed only

Re: [Issue 128403] Mixing of perl backticks and system() in main/set_soenv.in

I've gone ahead and fixed, so if someone wants to login and close this BZ that would be great PS: I've tried and it's not accepting my ASF LDAP creds. > On Nov 24, 2020, at 3:14 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 24.11.20 um 21:12 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

hope there is a better solution > > > Regards > > Mechtilde >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 21.11.20 um 14:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> >>>> On Nov 21, 2020, at 3:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>>> &

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit >> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. >>

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Jim, > >> >> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >> >> --with-epm >> --with-dmake >> --with-beanshell > > I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate > version like in ext_sources. Can you provide an

Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. For example, --with-dmake-path --with-dmake-url --with-epm --with-epm-url Why does dmake use dmake-path but EPM just use epm? Why 2 directives when they could

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

FTR: For the changes I proposed, I'd do the work. I don't propose things unless I'm willing and able to roll up my sleeves and do 'em ;) > On Dec 9, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Me

Re: Proposed changes to devtools/build-scripts on SVN

rigo, thanks for the great email.. I will be posting my comments/answers inline. > On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Dear List, > > while working on pull requests, I was wondering how to test the most > common build options for OpenOffice -- possibly the same used for >

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

r.gz > entering dmake-4.12.3 > ./bootstrap: line 121: cd: dmake-4.12.3: No such file or directory > > --- > > The directory created is: dmake-dmake-4.12.3 > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 25.11.20 um 17:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> FWIW, I'm also w

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ > On Nov 28, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > >> Seems to be "Big Sur" only, see: >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128415 > > Think that not a regression because end users had old build and same issue. > Reproduced too with 4.1.3

Help w/ bt

So I've been working on some of the macOS bugz and am looking at the UNO bridge as a likely subject, hence the various changes to the macOS code there. I'm hoping someone can help me with this crash. I open up Extension Manager, hit check for updates and AOO immediately dies, with the

Re: Help w/ bt

breaks on other platforms as well... anyone know before I spin up another VM and test? > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> So I've been working on some of th

Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors

gt; > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO42X by this push: > new 316716d Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 > over-agressive clang warning/errors > 316716d is described below > > commit 316716d6ea48f0328e1769bc4cf3de607b1c1491 > Author: Jim J

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors

> On Dec 1, 2020, at 11:05 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 01.12.20 um 16:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> As can be seen below, I've upgraded 4.2.x and later to use more recent >> versions of apr/apr-util. This was mostly done since the latest Xco

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 12, 2020, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have been able to open docx with your version (en-US) on Big Sur. > However, I am not sure if this bug ever applied to 4.2.x. > > The Extension Manager is still broken. But similar behavior is to be > seen in 4.2.x

Beanshell

Just a FYI: https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/1338840166828568576 TL;DR: I've forked beanshell and beanshell2 into something which maybe we can baseline for AOO - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 7:27 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 11.12.20 12:47, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> On Dec 11, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Bidouille wrote: >>> >>>> Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ >>> Any news? >>> TDF bl

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Bidouille wrote: > >> Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ > > Any news? > TDF blog publish on this bug: https://tinyurl.com/y6zjvp2j > Bad advice :-( I love that group. They are like immature kids. Or bitter ex-boy/girl-friends. What's next? Sticking

Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO?

Many years ago I worked at RedHat and asked that RedHat allow that all contributions be dual-licensed. All people then at RedHat involved in LO adamantly refused. Even the CTO at the time refused to get involved. > On Dec 23, 2020, at 5:37 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > Thanks Peter for this POV. >

Re: Apple Dumping Intel.

Yes, all this is very similar when Apple moved from the PowerPC to Intel, many many moons ago. In fact, there was a time when you could have *3* versions: x86 32bit, PowerPC, and x86-64 64bit, all in 1 single bundle/binary. > On Dec 23, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Steve,

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

> On Dec 12, 2020, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have been able to open docx with your version (en-US) on Big Sur. > However, I am not sure if this bug ever applied to 4.2.x. > > The Extension Manager is still broken. But similar behavior is to be > seen in 4.2.x

Re: issue with dmake clean

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Carl, > > Am 13.12.20 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Carl, >>> >>> Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi all, Just ran into

Re: Beanshell

it. > On Dec 15, 2020, at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Just a FYI: > >https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/1338840166828568576 > > TL;DR: I've forked beanshell and beanshell2 into something which maybe we ca

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113: Avoid "dmake clean" to wipe out the whole tree

merge away > On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:28 AM, GitBox wrote: > > > Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-749494181 > > > Is there any reason not to merge this PR? > > >

Extension manager cores

So I've been able to grab some it's running AOO in the console related to the extension manager problems: % /Applications/OpenOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice 2020-12-22 11:08:56.613 soffice[52135:431101] WARNING: NSWindow drag regions should only be invalidated on the Main Thread! This will

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

I'm building a dev version of 4.2.0 w/ lang fr as we speak > On Dec 11, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: > >> Who is running Big Sur? > We have end users on french forum. > Able (and motivated) to test it soon as possible :) > >

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

On Dec 11, 2020, at 9:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I'm building a dev version of 4.2.0 w/ lang fr as we speak > >> On Dec 11, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: >> >>> Who is running Big Sur? >> We have end users on french forum.

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

OK, thx. it seems that the switch from COMID s5abi to gcc3 is a LOT more fragile than it should be. > On Dec 19, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) > wrote: > > On 18.12.2020 16:25, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Can you try with: >> >>http://home.apache.

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Can you try with: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Dec 18, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Ahh. that's good info. There is something somewhere that still expects that > COMID on macOS > is s5abi or, at least, !=gcc3. That gives me some hint

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

Ahh. that's good info. There is something somewhere that still expects that COMID on macOS is s5abi or, at least, !=gcc3. That gives me some hint to what to look for. > On Dec 17, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) > wrote: > > On 14.12.2020 13:33, Jim Jagielski wrote

Big Sur 4.1.x core dumps

I've confirmed that my 4.2.0 builds work fine on BigSur but the 4.1.8 builds, even using Xcode10 and the 10.13SDK still result in core on macOS11. Below you'll find the stack. My initial thoughts are that it is NOT a build issue, but rather a code one, so I'll start some investigation with that

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: > diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f 100644 > ---

AOO 4.1.9 Info

The AOO419 branch has been created. The version numbers, et.al. have been bumped. The Release Status page has been cloned: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Pre-release commit messages

> On Nov 7, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 07.11.20 um 14:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> If svn supports it someone just needs to let me know how to do it. I tried >> 'svn mv' both from WD to repo and between repos and svn err

Re: Pre-release commit messages

> On Nov 7, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > But let me say one thing: This was (will be) a GREAT release! > > We have touched more files than ever, we had great support from Don > (FreeBSD), we had a PR from Akikazu (Android), we had a lot of new > people willing to test. I

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community builds is because we build them w/ gstreamer, and only CentOS7 has gstreamer1.0. If, instead, we decide to remove gstreamer from the expected options for community builds, then we could continue w/ CentOS5[1]. So the

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

ave communicated. > Am 10.11.20 um 04:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community >> builds is because we build them w/ gstreamer, and only CentOS7 has >> gstreamer1.0. If, instead, we decide to remove gstreamer from the expecte

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

> On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:23 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 10.11.20 um 18:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used >> CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. >> As of 4.2.x, this is no lo

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

CentOS7: glibc 2.17 Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19 Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the CentOS7 version will likely always be the older one. > On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> History: For

[OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to gstreamer 1.0). Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

> On Nov 10, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > Am 10.11.20 um 14:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I think you may be confused... we are just talking about community builds >> here, not anything regarding maintenance or modernizing AOO. > > I am not sure

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >