Hagar Delest schreef op 03-09-2016 19:04:
Le 03/09/2016 à 18:47, Xen a écrit :
OpenOffice is unusable on Linux, you can't easily install it and once
installed you don't know how to fire it up; it is not in the path, it
is not in the menus, and you have to provide this on your own, if it
even w
Le 03/09/2016 à 18:47, Xen a écrit :
OpenOffice is unusable on Linux, you can't easily install it and once installed
you don't know how to fire it up; it is not in the path, it is not in the
menus, and you have to provide this on your own, if it even works.
Not at all. I use xubuntu since sev
Christoph Reg wrote:
Regardless of why or how,
when it comes to development, it's clear that LO has won. Hands down.
LO gets more commits in one or two days than AOO had since the
beginning of
the year.
Apparently, all devs have moved over and AOO development is dead.
Unless there is a lot of
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:38 PM, toki wrote:
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides
> what you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
>
> There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or E
On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides what
> you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or EO.
There are functions and capabilities in EO that are
> -Original Message-
> From: Απόστολος Συρόπουλος [mailto:asyropoulos...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: ΑΠ: Merge with LibreOffice?
>
>
> >> Greetings, dear AOO community.
> >>
> >> Please note first that this message is no
On 8/3/16, Christoph Reg wrote:
> Greetings, dear AOO community.
>
> Please note first that this message is not supposed to be flaimbait or
> trolling of any kind.
It is. Have a nice day.
FC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
On 03/08/2016 19:22, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> Personally I think it would be ideal if the two projects could/would freely
> share code, but due to the license conflict, AOO can't reuse code
> from LO unless the author(s) is/are willing to also license it
At this stage, there are enough difference
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Morris (aka Col Boogie)
> [mailto:howard_cary_mor...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 14:49
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge with LibreOffice?
>
> Hi all,
> From what I can tell
Then there is the usability issue
LO have been attempting to copy MS Office and have succeeded to the point
that in many ways it is as annoying as MS Office.
AOO, on the other hand, have maintained usability features that, in my
opinion, simply make it a better user experience.
They may have
Hi all,
From what I can tell, the 2 groups can (and are?) borrowing from each
other. I prefer its free and open concept. However, seeing some other recent
emails and some concerns of my own, I think we can make it easier for new
developers by doing the following:
1.. Copying all source cod
On Aug 3, 2016 10:00 AM, "Christoph Reg" wrote:
> Regardless of why or how,
> when it comes to development, it's clear that LO has won. Hands down.
> LO gets more commits in one or two days than AOO had since the
> beginning of the year.
The second part of the claim is probably true, but the fir
I think your question is valid.
The situation of Free Officesuites is worrying; not only for Apache
OpenOffice, but also for LibreOffice.
Apache OpenOffice has crossed a deep valley, but it goes slowly upwards
now from a very low level.
I don't want to talk about the situation at LO, but my impr
This isn't a competition to be "won" or "lost". AOO and LO aren't really
competing.
AOO is for people who want an awesome office suite that's licensed under
a permissive license. LO is for people who want the same under a copyleft
license. Two different audiences, two different projects.
Perso
I think OpenOffice has the larger install base even if LO has much of the Linux
desktop distro installs.
AOO is still attracting developers and other project members.
There may be a finite audience for office suites, but it is a very large
audience.
Wolf Halton
Mobile/Text 678-687-6104
--
Se
Hello,
> Regardless of why or how,
> when it comes to development, it's clear that LO has won.
LO is only a fork. OO is the original and will always be the original. That's
the fact.
> What are your views on this?
LO is the fork, not OpenOffice.
We should never forget how members of TDF hav
On Aug 3, 2016 10:00 AM, "Christoph Reg" wrote:
> Regardless of why or how,
> when it comes to development, it's clear that LO has won. Hands down.
> LO gets more commits in one or two days than AOO had since the beginning
of
> the year.
> Are there any reasons why [merging AOO and LO] is not fea
17 matches
Mail list logo