[dev] Re: does anybody still use tcsh to build OOo?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, AFAIK tcsh doesn't work anymore anyway - using tcsh as the shell used *by* the build: yes. But the environment files are for the user's shell, and there it would still work. Months ago I worked on that but then got in serious merge conflicts as somebody else did some refactoring in configure.in. So I just abandoned that work. AFAIR the fix was quite annoying work as the generation of the scripts is scattered over the code. configure has nothing to do with it, as it is generated by set_soenv[.in] ciao Christian -- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
[dev] Re: Mac OS X Snow Leopard and 64bit...
Hi Pavel, *, 2011/4/4 Pavel Laštovička pavel.lastovi...@blue-point.cz: I think that using 10.4 SDK is required to build a working OO.o. Yes, but that is because it is enforced by the configure and buildscripts, not because of the actual sourcefiles. Those would surely work with a 10.6 SDK as well (well, maybe you get some foo is deprecated warnings). I cannot remember now, it has been a few months since I built on Mac (it was 3.2.1). I tried to build OO.o with 10.6 SDK and gcc 4.2.1 and OO.o then crashed during smoketest. You most likely didn't catch all occurrences that need to be adjusted (a few external modules have it set as well), and smoketest crashing is not something very reliable anyway (unless you're building the exact same milestone). Personally I'm still against relaxing this requirement though. Developers will almost everytime have more recent OS/Buildenvironment than 10.4, thus you will get 10.5/6'isms into the code that will break 10.4 compatibility. Thus when allowing to build with 10.6 as SDK, you're starting the countdown to remove 10.4 support. It is not that OOo would have tons of dedicated Mac programmers that can maintain different codepaths for 10.4 and 10.5 and even a third for 10.6. I mean even tha java awt one is still unfixed. It is hackarounded so that the OOo-supplied beanshell editor/debugger can now be launched, but external extensions are out of luck. The python-question remained without decision (system 2.3 and not being able to use pyuno from outside OOo or ship with interal python) - not even all patches have been applied, let alone taking a decision. But I put my personal focus on LibreOffice anyway (but still run the OOo-MacPPC tinderbox, thus I'll build OOo until it is no longer possible, but I'm no longer actively dealing with the now more-frequent-again build-issues on the milestones - if it breaks, it breaks. If I'm pointed to a patch, I'll apply it, but I won't hunt for the reasons myself anymore) Also telling enough that while the mac@porting list was initially addressed as well, the discussion only continues on dev@porting... The people want to save diskspace argument was written with a smiley, but be honest - when building a beast like OOo, and thus you have to dedicate 8GB for building anyway, you can spare that few megs for the 10.4u sdk, can't you?. As far as I know there is no separate XCode that doesn't include the 10.4u SDK, thus you just have to rerun the installer to install it. my 0,02€ ciao Christian -- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
[dev] Re: Mac OS X Snow Leopard and 64bit...
Hi Pavel, 2011/4/1 Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz: do we have a plan to support building OOo on Mac OS X Snow Leopard? It is suppoerted to build /on/ Snow Leopard. It has 64bit kernel, ie. platform is x86_64, by default doesn't come with 10.4u SDK (you have to install it, it is optional in Xcode optional install ;-), Yes, that's the crucial point. I put a rough hacks which I use to build 32bit OOo on Snow Leopard to Building 32bit version, but not targeting 10.4 is a waste of ressources IMHO. Why would you want to create builds that won't run on the baseline system? ciao Christian -- - To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
Re: [dev] Re: MacOSX: ScirptingFramework's Edit ...
Hi Jeff, *, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Jeff Harmon jhar...@colorhythm.com wrote: I am willing to help fund the Python on Mac effort, if that helps. Well, there is no funding needed - the patches are all there, you can grab them and build a copy that includes a complete python installation. It is about changing the default, about changing people's opinion At the time when I wrote the patches, I also asked about it on the mailinglist, with only little interest.. http://www.mail-archive.com/mac@porting.openoffice.org/msg03558.html - but as I'm neither using python nor the Mac that much, I myself didn't push it any further. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX: ScirptingFramework's Edit ...
Hi Rony, *, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX. [...] However choosing Edit does not work, nothing happens. Edit should invoke a JFrame editor which allows one to look over a macro, http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926 ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Python Version in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 PyUNO
Hi Jeff, *, On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Jeff Harmon jhar...@colorhythm.com wrote: What version of Python is expected by OpenOffice 3.3.0 for Mac OS X (Leopard/Intel)? (Specifically OOO330m20(Build 9567)). I'm getting: Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) but have no way of knowing which version of Python my OpenOffice was compiled for. You can only run python from within OOo on Mac, (only on 10.4 you would be able to use python from outside of OOo) see http://www.mail-archive.com/mac@porting.openoffice.org/msg03558.html for details. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Old Python extension fails to install since 3.3 beta
Hi Andreas, *,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
(com.sun.star.uno.RundtimeException){ { Message = bad root element
node in
[..]
The rejected Addons.xcu starts like this:
?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?
oor:node xmlns:oor=http://openoffice.org/2001/registry;
shouldn't that be oor:component-data?
ciao
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Cannot build 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 9.04
Hi Benson, *, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded OOO320_m19 and am trying to build it, for X86, on Ubuntu 9.04. Why an old version and not current codebase? I am using a very simple configuration ./configure --enable-symbols --enable-debug --disable-mozilla enable-debug surely is not a simple configuration. the build will be huge. /usr/include/sys/types.h:158:20: error: missing binary operator before token ( Don't try to build on a case-insensitive filesystem. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
Hi *, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Will http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/AquaBuild work for the 3.2.1 tarball? I never liked those instructions and they were outdated very early due to the way things are described. And it always lists way too many unnecessary configure flags. Looking at the page makes things overly complicated. It might have had some reason to exist during the transition phase from X11 to aqua based OOo, but now there actually is no reason to look at it anymore. Building on Mac actually is one of the easiest tasks compared to building on other systems. When you got XCode installed, you're ready to go (when using prebuilt mozilla or disable mozilla). Only when building mozilla from source you need additional packages installed. When building on 10.4 or 10.5, there should be no problem at all. regarding 10.6: the patches to build out-of the box have not been integrated in 3.2.1 codebase yet. Apply the corresponding patches from http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106059 / the corresponding cws. ./configure --disable-mozilla --disable-binfilter --disable-odk should get you going (the last two only to speed-up the build, since you want to debug java extensions and not document filters for old binary formats and don't intend to write new extensions on the Mac you don't need the SDK either, so you can disable that as well) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
Hi Benson, *; On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Christian, Another, even older, page, discusses svn.gnome.org and calls for a slew of 'macports' stuff. Is any of that relevant? No - macports (or fink) or stuff from direct sources is only necessary to build mozilla/seamonkey from source, you don't need it when using --disable-mozilla (or using prebuilt zips) you can get prebuilt mozilla zips from: http://tools.openoffice.org/moz_prebuild/OOo3.2/index.html (copy to moz/zipped and use --disable-build-mozilla instead --disable-mozilla) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
Hi Benson, *, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I seem to be short a perl module somehow. Hard to believe, as that is part of the OOo sources. Do you have a complete sourcetree? dmake copied to /Users/benson/x/OOO320_m19/solenv/unxmacxi/bin/dmake Can't locate SourceConfig.pm in @INC (@INC contains: SourceConfig.pm is in solenv/bin/modules/SourceConfig.pm What is configure's output? Make sure to run configure from a clean shell, without any previous build-environment set. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
Hi again, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Configure's output : http://pastebin.com/xwvpXj3K. Making: ../unxmacxi.pro/obj/cppsetup.obj gcc -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0 -malign-natural -c -g -O0 [...] -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk - -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 This won't work. As stated in the issue: compiling using the 10.4 SDK requires the use of gcc 4.0 compiler, not 4.2 you applied incomplete patch/not all patches and/or forgot to run autoconf to regenerate configure after patching configure.in configure should complain when using gcc 4.2.x ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Reunpacking the 3.2.1 core tarball, I still get the compile error in mkdepend failing to find things like stdio.h. maybe a dumb question: But did you actually install the 10.4u SDK when installing XCode? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] MacOSX build of 3.2.1
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: This won't work. As stated in the issue: compiling using the 10.4 SDK requires the use of gcc 4.0 compiler, not 4.2 you applied incomplete patch/not all patches and/or forgot to run autoconf to regenerate configure after patching configure.in configure should complain when using gcc 4.2.x I reran with CC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.0 to no effect on the result. All the pathnames changed to the gcc 4.0.x pathnames, but the error was the same. The issue had two patch files attached I thought the second obviated the first, it wasn't clear, I'll try applying both. No. Take your time and actually read what is written. Both in the issue as well as here. the second patch indeed obsoletes the first one. but */ don't forget to run autoconf /* Both the build output as well as configure's output show that neither of the patches is in effect. And wrt checking for the SDK: Check whether /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk actually exists and is non-empty ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Build broken on Fedora 13
Hi *, On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Santiago Bosio santiago.bo...@gmail.com wrote: I've switched my build box from Ubuntu to Fedora 13. When trying to build OOO330_m7, build breaks on av_media with the following error: .../solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/lib/libfreebl3.so: version 'NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3' not found (required by /lib/libcrypto.so.1) Further investigating I've found issue 105566 (http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105566), wich seems FIXED. This library (libfreebl3.so) is provided by the moz module. I'm not building it, but using prebuilt binaries from It should only come from moz when you disable building of the nss module. But, if you see the dates involved, the prebuilt binaries were uploaded on 2009/11/17, and the fix for the issue was provided on 2009/11/20, so I'm suspecting that these binaries don't have this correction. The patch to the issue fixes nss module, not moz, so patch to moz probably just was forgotten and compiling moz from source won't help. Regarding building mozilla from scratch: See http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Linux#create_prebuilt_mozilla on how to create prebuilt ones yourself. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] password
Hi Gregory, *, On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Gregory Brown ggbr...@q.com wrote: [...] Great. I looked around and found something called a stamp number from roaming if that means anything. 5C8C378AD1397C685A285738E8C56329 Not sure what you mean with roaming and stamp number. I tried seeing if it was ASCII, it's not. From what I remember it has the word Clarity in it but from there I'm stumped. When I look at the code on some program, can't remember that one either, there's a lot of PK on the beginning and end like they are the start of words. OpenDokument are Zip files that contain xml files. When saving with a password, not the zip container is protected, but the individual xml files. The algorithm used is blowfish, which is considered secure. No attacks apart from brute force known. Even when you use the same password to save two otherwise identical documents, the result will be different, as the actual key is initialized with a randomly generated initialization sequence (that is stored in the META-INF/manifest.xml file) - so trying to guess the password by looking at a different document with a similar (but known) password won't work either (won't work when the password was the same either). Only way to recover the document is trying every possible password (thus performing a brute-force attack). Success rate then depends on how much you still know from the password, how many different passwords have to be tried. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] building DEV300-m83 problem
Hi Michael, On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Michal Spisiak michal.spis...@gmail.com wrote: I have a problem building OOo DEV300-m83 on ubuntu 9.10. I downloaded the bundle, updated, ran configure with: $ ./configure --enable-cups --disable-crashdump --disable-fontconfig --with-epm=internal --disable-gtk --disable-gnome-vfs --with-system-curl --with-stlport=no --disable-build-mozilla --disable-binfilter --disable-odk --disable-vba --disable-mozilla --enable-crashdump=no --with-use-shell=bash --enable-presenter-extra-ui --without-junit --disable-graphite --disable-kde4 --disable-layout --enable-cairo to disable everything that might cause problems. Specifying random configure flags is /asking for problems/, not avoiding them. Unless you know what the flags do, don't specify them. alone that you have both --disable-build-mozilla and --disable-mozilla shows that you apparently copied random flags from some random webpage without thinking about the effect of those options. Similarily fo those where you specified the option despite being the default (and those that do not (longer) exist) configure with as few options as possible is the way to go. --disable-binfilter, --disable-odk being the exception as they completely disable *independent* parts and thus can accellerate the build without side-effects. Building vcl I got first error: Entering /home/miko/new_OOo/local_DEV300/vcl/unx/source/fontmanager Making: all_fontman.dpslo Compiling: vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontmanager.cxx Compiling: vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontcache.cxx Compiling: vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx /home/miko/new_OOo/local_DEV300/vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx:1236: error: prototype for 'rtl::OUString psp::PrintFontManager::Substitute(const rtl::OUString, rtl::OUString, const rtl::OString, psp::italic::type, psp::weight::type, psp::width::type, psp::pitch::type) const' does not match any in class 'psp::PrintFontManager' ../../../inc/vcl/fontmanager.hxx:735: error: candidate is: rtl::OUString psp::PrintFontManager::Substitute(const rtl::OUString, rtl::OUString, const rtl::OString, psp::italic::type, psp::weight::type, psp::width::type, psp::pitch::type) const dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/fontconfig.obj' here I just added references to the implementation of the method as they were in the header So you patched your code, apparently in an area that is sensitive to fontconfig (enabled/disabled), - so why not just try with fontconfig enabled? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Fwd: Is there a dictionary in the format of text file?
Hi *, On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:00 -0500, Peng Yu wrote: In theory, those there are bugs in it unfortunately, hunspell's unmunch is supposed to do this, i.e. unzip the dict-en.oxt (or whatever is its exact name) and use unmunch en.dic en.aff and it should stick the -ing, and -s etc onto all the stem words and expand the dictionary+aff files back into a text file containing all variants. Not related to bugs, but to the compound word feature in hunspell (and if the dictionary makes use of it), the flat list can easily grow many gigabytes, and of course not all of the compounds will make sense. I.e. you don't only get a list of valid words, but you also get a list of nonsense-words that nobody is going to write anyway. The dictionaries are there to check for mistakes, not check for correctness :-) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Prebuilt Mozilla DLLs on tools.openoffice.org differ from those in the installer
Hi Stephan, *, On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com wrote: On 06/30/10 17:05, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Actually generating those prebuilts is something of a black art (esp. on Windows), so it might be hard to trace back why the differences wrt msvcr versions exist. Cannot speak for windows build, but dmake zip in moz after compiling moz will create those zips. I'd not call that black art :-) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Issue 112592 - Calc does not open malformed XML.xls, competitor opens just fine.
Hi *, rant follows. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Kirill S. Palagin kpala...@phxint.ru wrote: Hello everybody, No, you don't mean everybody. if somebody has an inclination to improve OO compatibility by hacking OO XML parser, please see http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112592. Attach a public sample document, then your mail makes more sense (not that I'm into xml parsing, just your request just feels wrong) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Running headless on Mac
Hi *, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Jaroslav Snajdr jsna...@kerio.com wrote: OpenOffice.org has serious problems running in headless mode on Mac, documented in issue #91990. In short, a running WindowServer is required, and that makes running a daemon very unreliable if not impossible. Well, that's due to apple. you have to either run with WIndow Server running or as root. Complain at apple. Now I see that in 3.2, the --with-x option for the Mac build has been removed, probably because it was considered useless and because the removal allowed to cleanup some heavily #ifdef-ed code. But it certainly isn't useless in headless mode. You should consider setting up a linux VM and run OOo in that VM. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Openoffice build woes - Ubuntu
Hi *, my 0,02€ On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Aditya Manthramurthy aditya@gmail.com wrote: Man, your configure line is a monster ./configure --disable-binfilter --disable-crashdump --with-lang=en-US cs de nl ja en-US is always built, no need to specify it. And of course you need to quote the list --with-lang=cs de nl ja --with-use-shell=bash --without-gpc --without-agg -without-agg and later: --with-system-agg. Make up your mind. --disable-epm Don't want installsets in deb-format? Your choice. --with-openldap --with-build-version=3.2.0 --without-fonts --with-system-jpeg --with-system-libxml --with-system-mozilla --with-system-mozilla and later --with-system-mozilla=libxul redundant. Besides: All that --with-system switches: Why not use --with-system-libs and --with-system-headers instead? Wouls make it more readable. [...] --disable-fontooo obsolete, no such switch anymore anyway... Similar for others [...] --with-distro=Debian --with-additional-sections=CalcRowLimit,OOXMLExport No such switches in vanilla OOo. Similar with others. --disable-mono --without-java --with-system-agg --with-system-altlinuxhyph Why disable java? You won't be able to use xslt filters, free-search in Help won't work, etc. [...] ./bootstrap This worked though it took some time downloading binaries (http://hg.services.openoffice.org/binaries/). Only downloaded once, given that you won't rm -rf the ext_sources directory (If you want to store them in a different location, set TARFILE_LOCATION environment variable) Next: - source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh cd instsetoo_native/ build --all If you got a multiprocessor system: Take advantage of parallel build using -Pbuild# -- -Pdmake# [...] Actual problem was answered by Mathias already ciao Chrisitan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Adding Java based Indian Input Methods to Open Office
Hi *, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Harsha Ravnikar harsha...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello OpenOffice developers, I love your software and I use it regularly. Now I need to use OpenOffice to input Text in Indian languages. I have written Java based input methods for Indian languages and I have made them available as Open Source . I am updating them shortly and this time around I'd like to use them in OpenOffice applications too. For Linux it is easy if your input method can plug into gtk's input method framework or scim (or similar) or is an XIM I am seeking your advice on the right way to do it so that the patch is included in the next release thus saving time for my self and users who will like to to see this feature. No - the right way is not to plug it into OOo, but to plug it into the user's desktop-environment. No per-application solution, but one that works in every application using the framework. [list of requirements] No need to reinvent the wheel - hook it up into scim/another framework and you'll got all that. Below are my questions: 1. What is the recommended place from where we can enable Java based input method? Do you recommend it be enabled via Tools - Options- Languages or can we enable it from a Status bar popup menu? (I ask this so that I adhere to the coding practices and standards). Again: Don't do it in OOo/only for OOo. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] OOo's Toolbar Icons - Saving Space
Hi *, On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Mathias Bauer m...@openoffice.org wrote: 1) Get rid of old icon sets. Industrial and Classic are two good candidates IMO. Would save less than 10MB... 2) Run PNGOUT [2] on all icon sets to reduce the size of each PNG file. Small reductions across many files add up substantially. IMHO it doesn't make sense to save a little space in the installation set at the price of blowing up the size of the code repository. Besides the icons have already been processed like that. (e.g. cws aceart02,iconupdate300u1 and probably others, by Andrew Dent (ace_dent)) So I doubt trying to compress them further will save anything worth to mention. 4) Increase/decrease the compression of each icon set depending on the performance impact (i.e., we can reduce compression if it will make OOo load faster, or we can increase it if the extra memory use is inconsequential). See 2). Besides that I expect this effect to be unmeasurable. Yes, see above. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] RE: Passwords
Hi Stanislaus, *, On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Stanislaus Wojnowski bjwojnow...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot remember or find the password I used to secure my documents. Can you help me? No. The algorithm used by OOo/ODF is secure (blowfish). No known attacks other than brute force, i.e. trying lots of different passwords. You need to remember your password. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] New Buildbot: Mandriva 2010 (x86): supports building languagepacks
Hi *, I'm happy to announce the availability of a new buildbot. The bot Mandriva-2010 is a x86 bot with gcc 4.4.1, JDK 1.6.0_16 (Sun) Contrary to other bots, this one also respects the additional languages box on the force a build page. When requesting additional languages, languagepacks will be built, but only the en-US one will be built as full set. The en-US full set (along with extensions produced along during the build) will be packed in the zip that is available via the http://termite.services.openoffice.org/install_sets/ page (when the option install set was checked to request the upload). The built languagepacks will be available from http://buildbot.projects.ooodev.org - the naming scheme of the directories is nameoftree-changesetid (for example linuxaxp01-0b056a7d1510 contains those languagepacks that were created building the cws linuxaxp01 when it was at changeset 0b056a7d1510 - for milestones this will be DEV300_m75-DEV300_m75 since the changeset is referred to via the symbolic tag). To ease association with buildbot's build-numbers, files containing the mapping are also created. (textfiles because of links just because virtualbox doesn't support creation of links in shared folders) (note that the existing mappings won't match since the name of the bot was changed in the testing phase) For example 14 contains: build number 14 is cbosdo03-86aa97e80bd2 A link will be provided on tinderbox build-status pages, for example see http://tinderbox.go-oo.org/tinder.cgi?tree=cbosdo03start-time=1270812046display-hours=40 - on termite, you would have to look at the last line on the bundle stage, for example http://termite.services.openoffice.org/buildbot/builders/Mandriva-2010/builds/14/steps/shell_6/logs/stdio (the line TinderboxPrint: a href=http://buildbot.projects.ooodev.org/cbosdo03-86aa97e80bd2/; title=this build's languagepacks are thereLanguagepacks/a For suggestions/feedback/complaints please f'up2 the tinder...@tools.openoffice.org mailnglist ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Help ! how to get the source code for some really old OOo projects and build them ?
Hi Wei, *, On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Wei Zhang wei.w...@gmail.com wrote: (1) In the bug report http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44627 , it is said the version is 680m79, is this version the bug fixed version or the buggy version ? That is the version that the bug was found in - not necessarily the first one that did show the behaviour, but a known to be bad one. Because I need to study the bug, so I need to build a _buggy_ version, I am wondering how can I know which is the buggy version ? ( will version 680m78 do ?) m79 should do. Earlier versions should do as well, and also later versions until the milestone that the fix was integrated in. (2) After I have retrieved 680m79 from CVS, I found out that there is no configure script in the SRC_ROOT/config_office directory, I am wondering where should I find the configure script Hmm - there should be... but indeed - not in webinterface either - there is m78 (rev. 1.71), but the next one is m100 (rev 1.98) Seems like tags were lost. There are many revisions with the integration cws: foo comment, but no milestone-tag. To know when exactly it was fixed, you can use http://qa.openoffice.org/issuelinks.html to query EIS for the cws with the issue In this case, the cws was integrated into two codelines - SRC680_m157 and OOB680_m1 (the Milestone (integrated) column) -- quote --- [Java framework] Using bootstrap parameter UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_CLASSPATH and class path is: /s/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/rt.jar:.. [Java framework] Using Java runtime library: file:///afs/cs.wisc.edu/s/jdk1.4.2/i386_rh72/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so. osl_getsymbol: got Symbol JNI_CreateJavaVM VM option: -Djava.class.path=:/s/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/rt.jar:.:/afs/cs.wisc.edu/s/jdk1.4.2/i386_rh72/jre/lib/plugin.jar VM option: -Dorg.openoffice.native= Segmentation fault Hmm - a segfault - no idea how to diagnose that, sorry :-( I am wondering if there is any hint what should I do, it seems to me that it has already built various components. As the error was in module testtools, you can change to that directory and run build there, this will only try to build the module testtools I had problems with module testtools on the Mac, that were bypassed by just running build often enough, i.e. just trying again and again until it did succeed. Worth a try, but probably won't help. And the configure parameters I used is following : CC=gcc34 CXX=g++34 ./configure --prefix=/scratch/wei/usr/local/OOO_2.0.1/ prefix is ignored by OOo. --enable-symbols --enable-debug --disable-mozilla I'd try without the --enable-symbols, and without --enable-debug for the initial builds - can still be enabled later, but the debug-build stuff is less tested. Java and ant version should be OK. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Help ! how to get the source code for some really old OOo projects and build them ?
Hi again, On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Wei Zhang wei.w...@gmail.com wrote: [...] dmake: Error code 139, while making '../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' dmake: '../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' removed. '---* tg_merge.mk *---' ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /scratch/wei/sources/ooo/OOA680_m1/testtools/source/bridgetest maybe http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50625 is related. You might want to search issueZilla, or build a more recent version - like written before, the fix for your issue was integrated in m157, so from m79 to m157 that would make a lot of changes to track. (well, doesn't help with the java/regcomp problem, but maybe for other ones) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Help ! how to get the source code for some really old OOo projects and build them ?
Hi Wei, *; On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Wei Zhang wei.w...@gmail.com wrote: [...] It is said that the version is 680m79 and Target milestone:OOo 2.0.2. However, I am not sure how to get the source code of this or how to check it out from CVS or SVN. And it would be great if there is some document about how to build this very old OOo. Mathias already covered checking out the sources (old ones are in cvs) - though depending on what milesonte, you might not only need the modules from the OpenOffice2 alias, but also from the Extensions one And When I was trying to build the whole thing according to http://tools.openoffice.org/dev_docs/build_linux.html, I came across various issues with the JDK version and ANT version. After I googled around, I am using JDK 1.4.2 and ANT 1.6.2. There are still some other issues that I find pretty hard to resolve even after googling. As for build issues: It probably is easies to use a current at that time version of the distribution, as especially newer gcc versions can be very annoying until they're pleased. But of course if you tell the concrete issues you're facing (i.e. the relevant parts of the build output, giving advise is easier :-) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Java UNO Extensions broken in Mac OS X due to Apple AWT Java VM was loaded on first thread -- can't start AWT
Hi Fabio, *, On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Fabio A. Miranda fabio.a.mira...@gmail.com wrote: As I posted earlier, I have a complement that works perfectly in Linux and Windows but it is broken on Mac. In Mac OS X, OO 3.1.1 (ES), the menu extension added with the add-on appears disabled all the time, sometimes it throws an error: soffice [1981:903] Apple AWT Java VM was loaded on first thread -- can't start AWT According the above bug ( which is NOT closed nor fixed): http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926 The patch attached works for me on 10.4 If you have an idea on why the patch doesn't work for newer versions of Mac OS X (despite the jvm being created in the seperate thread, despite following Apple's example) please go ahead. What is the solution for this issue ? If OOO has no released a bug, can aynone provided a workaround at Java coding level ? for example, prevalidate that AWT is already loaded or something The patch does (to my best knowledge) what Apple recommends for starting Java, the patch closely follows Apple's sample code (SimpleJavaLauncher). ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] please help
Hi *, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 AM, tangjiqi...@redoffice.com wrote: When compailing openoffice on linux, what Parameters should I add to make Insert - movie and sound valid? My compile Parameters: bash ./configure --with-ant-home=/opt/apache-ant-1.7.0 --with-jdk-home=/usr/jave/jdk1.5.0_10. You need to install the Java Media Framework on the computer where OOo is installed to make it work. (i.e. install the jmf and add the corresponding jars to OOo's CLASSPATH settings in Tools|Options → Java Note that by default JMF only supports a limited amount of mediatypes, so you would need to install additonal plugins/wrappers for JMF. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] drop tcsh support?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com wrote: Any objections against dropping support for using tcsh as the shell invoked by dmake within the OOo code base? We had that discussion lately and the results were: No objections. At least nobody did complain/wanted to keep tcsh. In fact I already planned to do a related cws after the 3.2 release (but of course I won't object if somebody else wants to do it) [...] Two questions remain: For one, the to-be-sourced scripts currently ensure that USE_SHELL's path is in PATH, but I see no reason for that? Me neither. If the full path is given anyway... If at all: configure's job, not the one of the env-script. For another, are there any relevant configurations where bash is not at /bin/bash? I don't know any (but that doesn't count much I guess :-) Regarding POSIX: I already did bash-builds with the POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable - no problem at all. (so /bin/sh could be used as a fallback, possibly with an appropriate configure-warning-message) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] How to build OOo in Ubuntu 8.04
Hi *, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Michael He heyanpingli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have get the OpenOffice.org source, but I have some problem to build it. This link: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_OpenOffice.org is not enough for me. Would you give me a little bit more information about how to build OOo? It would help much more if you'd write at what step you're having problems. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Announcement: Migration to Mercurial
Hi Matthias, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Matthias B. mux2...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I've overlooked it but I haven't seen an equivalent to svn switch URL-of-CWS-or-tag With svn I had one checkout which I switched to whatever cws or tag I wanted to build and svn switch would only download the differences between my current checkout and the target. That was fast, saved bandwidth and hard drive space No, that wasn't really fast (IMHO). (believe it or not, I have to make do with an 80GB hard disk). With Mercurial it looks like I have to clone a complete repository whenever I want to build a CWS or a tag. If you want to have it in seperate directories: Yes, but you're cloning from your local repo anyway. And when you do it as described in the wiki-pages, mercurial will use hardlinks for the clone. This is /very/ fast and also needs virtually no additional space for the repo. Could someone give me the Mercurial equivalent to the following sequence of instructions: svn co http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/trunk/ hg clone -U http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300 OOo-repo cd trunk svn switch http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/cws/blabla hg clone -U OOo-repo workdir cd workdir hg pull -u http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/blabla Alternatively you can pull to your local-master # Now the current directory contains the OOo sources for CWS blabla svn switch http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/tags/OOO320_m2/ # Now the current directory contains the OOo sources for milestone OOO320_m2 # NOTE: The changes from CWS blabla are NOT merged. Unless they have been incorporated in m2 by # the OOo developers, they are gone now from my checkout. # This is an important point. I am NOT looking for a way to merge changes from different trees. just the same as above, although then you wouldn't need to pull since the milestones would be tagged in the main repo already. hg update -C (thorw away your local changes) -r OOO320_m2) svn switch http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/trunk/ # Now my repository is exactly as it was in the beginnig (assuming no commits happened in the mean time) As mentioned in the beginning, I'm interested in a way of doing this that is fast, bandwidth-efficient and diskspace-efficient. Mercurial is way, way faster than svn in this regard. If fact with mercurial, I wouldn't bother modifying the existing tree, but just create another local clone. Remember to always clone the full repo (no -r argument), otherwise mercurial cannot use hardlinks (would be slow and takes much diskspace) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Announcement: Migration to Mercurial
Hi Björn, *, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany bjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:58:53 +0100 Matthias B. mux2...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I've overlooked it but I haven't seen an equivalent to svn switch URL-of-CWS-or-tag This is certainly possible with hg. However, to use this functionality you would need multiple heads in one repository. Since this is _not_ currently supported by releng, Well, RE doesn't need to support it anyway. One needs to be aware of it, that's all. If you're consumer only, then you don't need to take care anyway, only if you are a developer and need to commit stuff, then you should remember that you're having multiple heads and that only the one you're working on is meant to be pushed. Pushing the other ones doesn't do any harm besides wasting bandwidth on a push. you are completely on your own when doing so. If you are a not yet too confident in using hg, just use multiple repositories: It uses a bit more disc space, but will likely have break-even by not breaking your repos once. It doesn't even take more diskspace. A hg workingdir: ~3.5GB - a subversion working dir: 4,4 GB A local clone doesn't take up noteworthy diskspace - only the actual sourcefiles matter (~2.1GB) But as you got the whole repo locally anyway, throwing away those 2.1 GB to make room for the other tree is cheap. No bandwidth needed, just a little I/O on your harddisk. Again: Cloning the local repo is fast. $ hg --time clone -U OOo-tip hgclone Time: real 2.140 secs (user 0.770+0.000 sys 1.130+0.000) $ cd hgclone/ $ hg --time update -r DEV300_m61 68960 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Time: real 59.220 secs (user 41.670+0.000 sys 7.580+0.000) $ cd .. $ time rm -rf hgclone/ real0m1.551s user0m0.100s sys 0m1.450s svn switch doesn't even come close to that. So: Don't try to force your working habits to mercurial, better try to adapt your workflow to use the benefits of mercurial. As shown, theres a way to do that. However, this local repository now contains multiple heads. Do NOT DARE to hg push --force these multiple heads to an outgoing repository or the wrath of RelEng will be upon you. You have been warned(*) ;-) ...instead just use hg push -r tip, to only push the head you're actually working on. That way no bandwidth is wasted pushing unrelated branches/heads and no confusion is caused by introducing another head in the cws. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Announcement: Migration to Mercurial
Hi *, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com wrote: Hi Bjoern, let's see if there are accidental new heads on the outgoing repository. No need to have a hook for something that never happens anyway. IMHO this is already guaranteed by mercurial itself. Forcing something is always a bad idea, so whoever forces a commit despite the warning surely doesn't do that by accident. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] build verbosity
Hi Frank, *, On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany frank.schoenh...@sun.com wrote: build --html --dontgraboutput that way the output will not be interleaved Hmm, never tried that, and admittedly somehow cannot believe that the output of the different processes is /not/ interleaved then, but even if so: You cannot specify this when you start a build on a build bot. The bots should use that - if not, complain at the admins of the corresponding bots. The ones I maintain make use of it. The slower ones also use --stoponerror If you need to use some magic environment variable to see why the build did broke, the default is wrong. My 0,02€. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] build verbosity
Hi Frank, *, 2009/10/21 Frank Schönheit frank.schoenh...@sun.com: [...] a build.pl-feature to prefix the output of all spawned sub processes with a unique (process-)ID would be much more helpful in finding errors in the build logs of multi-process builds.) build --html --dontgraboutput that way the output will not be interleaved ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Looking for DXF in the source
Hi Daniel, *, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Lidström daniel.lidst...@sbg.se wrote: I've read that OpenOffice supports DXF. So I would like to see this source. Where in the source archives can I find this source? http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:59145/source/search?path=*dxf* → goodies/source/filter.vcl/idxf ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Looking for DXF in the source
cc the poster On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Lidström daniel.lidst...@sbg.se wrote: I've read that OpenOffice supports DXF. So I would like to see this source. Where in the source archives can I find this source? Reading the answers that were already posted would help a lot. You're writing to a mailinglist, and answers go to the mailinglist. So either you should subscribe to the list or follow it via a mail2news gateway like gmane or manually check for answers in the archives. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?
Hi *, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com wrote: there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and should have bumped up the major version at that time. We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 support for quite some time now, but we refrained from officially obsoleting it because OS/2 and MACOSX 10.3 support still depend on gcc-3.3, Aqua-OOo is not supported on Mac OS X 10.3 - at least I don't know anyone who ever did an aqua build that would run on 10.3. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default
Hi *, because of 105003, own bad experience with tcsh (random build freezes, slow performance), encouraged by the kick4nt cws I'd like to go on and drop tcsh support at least for Mac OS X. dropping tcsh support means: changing configure's default to bash and issue a warning (or error) when tcsh is selected. The default login shell for Mac OS X is bash, so it definitely is available and it is proven to work without problems (Pavel builds with bash for years, so do I on all systems) So now to the reason why the d...@ooo list is adressed as well: Is somebody opposing chaning the default to bash for all systems? I.e. is there anybody who can give a reason why the default should stick with tcsh (be it for non-Mac or even all)? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default
Hi Björn, *, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote: Christian Lohmaier cloph at openoffice.org writes: dropping tcsh support means: changing configure's default to bash and issue a warning (or error) when tcsh is selected. I really hope for that in the long run we can make our build system depend only on a IEEE POSIX specification (IEEE Standard 1003.1) compatible shell. Oh, that didn't meant to support / endorse bashism - but rather to drop tcsh :-) Too bad that you wrote IEEE 1003.1, since if it was 1003.2, then one could set POSIXLY_CORRECT variable to switch bash to posix mode and test with that. Or is there no difference wrt shell behaviour? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [mac] Re: [dev] Re: [qa-dev] Looking for QA-Rep for cws cloph13 - create backwards compatible builds for Mac by using the developer-sdk during compilation
Hi Thorsten, *, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Thorsten Ziehmthorsten.zi...@sun.com wrote: what is the state of your CWS? Today I saw it in a query on EIS and do not see any progress documented in the CWS. Do you think it will be ready soon to get it integrated in OOo 3.2? From my part it is ready - but unfortunately only Thorsten did provide feedback (all OK so far) Release Engineering planned only one more build before the branch - m58 is in work now and m59 should be the version for the branch. So the CWS must be ready until this weekend, I think. As nobody did report any problems, and the cws doesn't touch any actual code, only the makefiles, I think it is OK to integrate. I myself didn't find any either (well, that doesn't count much I guess :-))... ciao Chrstian PS: The build breakers of the ubuntu and solaris bots in connectivity are unrelated to the cws - apparently they're using wrong mozilla zips (the ones needed for m53 and newer, but the cws is based on m52, so you'd need the old zips. /MNSInclude.hxx:77:35: error: nsIAbLDAPAttributeMap.h: No such file or directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [qa-dev] Looking for QA-Rep for cws cloph13 - create backwards compatible builds for Mac by using the developer-sdk during compilation
Hi Aaron, Thorsten, *, thanks for your kind offers :-) - see below On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Thorsten Behrenst...@openoffice.org wrote: Christian Lohmaier wrote: (i.e. if you have a MAC OSX 10.4 and can check the installset, or if you can verify the code changes by themselves,...) can test-drive the installset do the code review; likely no time though for a proper testtool or tcm qa though. Great - no worries, tinderbox did just finish building the Intel-installset: http://termite.go-oo.org/install_sets/MacIntel-3589-cloph13-install_set.zip Please give it a spin :-) As for code review: Feel free to directly comment in the corresponding issue or in EIS or ping me on IRC, write a mail (you get the idea :-)) Unfortunately no PPC build machine that runs with Leopard, only Tiger. While it can be used to check that no reqressions are introduced while building with Tiger, it isn't quite what the issue is about. So again the plead for help: @all:Got a PPC with Mac OSX 10.5? Can build OOo? Great - please give cws cloph13 a shot! (even if you cannot perform tests yourself, having a 10.5 built installset for PPC would help a lot) Nevertheless I'll build one on 10.4 and upload it tomorrow/later today. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Looking for QA-Rep for cws cloph13 - create backwards compatible builds for Mac by using the developer-sdk during compilation
Hi *, I'm looking for a qa-rep for cws cloph13 (mercurial based) http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300/cloph13 http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/cloph13/ http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_id=104566+104567+104568 citing from the cws' description: Mac OS X build environment comes with SDKs that enable the builder to create backwards compatible builds/define the baseline a build should be able to run. Currently OOo's build system doesn't make use of this (not in a sufficient manner that is) so that builds created on Leopard (10.5) cannot be run on Tiger (10.4). besides that, it also includes some minor janitorial fixup (remove duplicated OBJCXXFLAGS definitions) and support for ccache-skip for (-x objective-c++ that otherwise prevents caching of the result) While the last two can easily be qa'd by code review, the backwards-compatibility should be tested on the corresponding systems. It has been confirmed during issue 102735 that the modifications allow to create a backwards compatible build, only the most basic functionality has been tested. (It was also issue 102735 that made the problem apparent) I explicitly wrote should since please also raise your hand when you can only do part of the job. (i.e. if you have a MAC OSX 10.4 and can check the installset, or if you can verify the code changes by themselves,...) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Line-endings in source files
Hi *, it seems to me that lately a huge amount of lineend-changes did occur. Maybe it is just a bad impression because many of the cws I had a look at lately did cause so many unrelated changes, but still: *Please* take care of lineendings before you commit. especially: please don't create files with mixed lineendings. Thanks a lot ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Mercurial-Implementation: OOo domain developer public keys
Hi *, On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jan Holesovskyke...@suse.cz wrote: Suggestions for a coherent nomenclature are welcome! Well, I was thinking the git way once again, sorry :-( But anyway, 'trunk' or 'main repository' (for DEV300), 'feature repository' (for OOO300, OOO310, ...), and 'release repository' (for CWSes) sound best to me. Oh, that is the exact opposite of my understanding. OK with main for DEV300, but the OOO ones are the release ones, that's where the releases are based on after all. And new features won't be added on those. So calling OOO ones feature branches would be confusing at best. Similar for the cws - you won't buid a release based on a cws branch, so thats a misnomer as well. Honestly, I don't see a problem with just staying with cws branch. It might be a term only used by OOo, but well, OOo's development model just is different from just having a dev and release branch where everybody commits directly... ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx
Hi Björn, *, On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Bjoern Michaelsenbjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote: Kohei Yoshida kyoshida at novell.com writes: The bad news is that this file is not the only file with duplicated content. In the same directory, I've found several other headers with the same duplication problem. AccessibleStaticTextBase.hxx and acorrcfg.hxx are also affected, quite possibly others too. The duplicate you posted was introduced with CWS changefileheader. No, not true. it was added with os128 Maybe someone should take a look at the files changed by that cws? True, but of course for the correct cws. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: OpenGrok - now it's possible to sort results by path
Hi again, On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Christian Lohmaiercl...@openoffice.org wrote: (cc d...@ooo, but please f'up2 d...@tools.openoffice.org only) now it is possible to let opengrok sort the search results by path in addition to the relevancy and last modified date sortings. ..well, not yet on the official opengrok on svn.services, but on pumbaa: http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:59145/source/ As official opengrok on svn.services... still didn't adopt it, and I myself did miss it in the couple of days, I decided to setup opengrok again on pumbaa, but this time indexing the mercurial-repo (tip is indexed, but it also indexes the history) In this context: If somebody knows a way to have commit-times restored on hg update/checkout like the use-commit-times configuration value for subversion does it, I'd be interested. Apparently it only sets the times when using hg archive, but always uses current time when working in the repo... A tiny patch has been sent to upstream already in case you want to add it to your copy of opengrok: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7594 ( Unfortunately that patch, despite really tiny didn't receive any attention yet :-/ ) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Consolidating build instructions for the community
Hi Jürgen, *, On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Juergen Schmidtjuergen.schm...@sun.com wrote: i really don't understand what your problem is. My problem is that everyone is eager to start new projects, new efforts instead of improviing what is there already. My problem is that if you really feel the need of simplifying the build, then don't do it by adding instructions, but by actually making the build itself simpler. Maybe you missed the goal of Per's work, it is simply the consolidation of several different pages into one new place, Seems like my points didn't come through either. I'm all for removing duplication in the build instructions. I was against duplication in the past already. So full support on that item from my side. [...] And i think you look on it with the wrong glasses. You are very familiar with all this stuff and it's clear for you as well as for others. No. I did compile OOo myself for the first time in the past as well. At that time, I just did read the instructions and off it went. I did look for info. I didn't assume I know already. Great you can read configure but many others not. I didn't speak about reading configure itself, but reading the output of configure, i.e. what configure tells you to do when you run it. That's a big difference. If configure prints get file from URL or use mingw and people still complain about not being able to tell where to get file, that sepaks for itself. [...] The work Per is doing is not for the developers we already have it is probably more for new ones. Probably that's another part of the problem I have. This makes it sound like there wouldn't be any documenation for new builders at all. That's just not the case. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Consolidating build instructions for the community
Hi Per, *, On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Per Erikssonpereriks...@openoffice.org wrote: Having a building guide would simplify and make it easier for new developers to find articles and getting to the right pages faster by providing the navigation as in the developer guide. I beg to differ. You don't need a guide. The people who try to build OOo and fail are those who don't bother to read instructions. Even a step-by-step instruction explicitly written to match their system wouldn't help in that case. But that's another story. This work would be done by sorting, consolidating and editing the various wiki pages into a guide with a structure. I dislike the idea to have a huge guide. In this work various negative comments about building OpenOffice.org being impossible in the articles will be replaced by constructive tips for the developer. It never was complicated to build OOo on linux. Since aqua version is default, it is no longer complicated to build OOo on Mac OSX. The only problematic systems are Windows and other ports. The problem only arises because people are too lazy to read, always know better, don't even use the OOo build system / ignore warnings issued by configure / don't try a default build but in a I do fancy tricks with the buildsystem stuff way. The only noteworthy parts is * installing build requirements. (and there we're back at people being unable to read / unwilling to read configure output. See the many why does the build want mingw type of question. Configure states: Either get the prebuilt one from url or build using mingw. But people are unable to read and thus ask stupid questions on the IRC-channel. Or they disable the packaging component and then wonder why they don't get installable packages, but only files spread around in a directory. For linux (and also for the actual building part on Mac), the http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_OpenOffice.org IMHO is more than enough. (I dislike some of the recent edits though, like the swext Hint - that is more suitable for a What if something goes wrong page. In the build guide it just adds noise. Similar to other edits). So the new guide should focus on the OS-Specific parts. On Mac OSX that would be: Getting/installing XCode (and svn on 10.4), Where to obtain ccache. And: What do do if one doesn't want to use the prebuilt mozilla-zips, but build from scratch (the only case where one really needs to install third-party libs/packages) On Windows that would be: What compiler-version is suitable, and what to do when using the Personal edition, how to get cygwin running, what packages to install with cygwin, what other tools are needed. On Linux: Well, as mentioned above: The only thing you need are the (rather few) build-dependencies. Everyone who is attempting to build OOo should have at least compiled some other software anytime before. So they should be able to read configure output (i.e. tell from install cups devel package - don't nail me on the wording - that they need to install the corresponding packages their distribution provides libcups-devel cups-devel or whatever naming scheme the distro uses). There really aren't that many. The real guide then only is * run confiugre with appropriate options (with the suggestion to use --with-use-shell=bash) * point out prebuilt-mozilla/unowinreg.dll * source the environment file configure creates (again configure tells the user to do so, but users cannot read) * run dmake or build --all from instsetoo_native The rest is: How to make a parallel build How to reduce build time What do the configure options actually do (so what is the real effect of using that option on a high-level view) Getting the source-code and explanation of MWS/CWS probably should be on a seperate page so you can explain it in more detail without clobbering the build-instructions Probly this whole post can be summarized with: KISS ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Consolidating build instructions for the community
Hi Per, *, On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Per Erikssonpereriks...@openoffice.org wrote: Christian Lohmaier skrev: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Per Erikssonpereriks...@openoffice.org wrote: If a developer cannot find the building information it is probably because there they can't find the information, I still disagree. Basically /all/ of the questions asken on IRC about building OOo were because people are unable to read configure or because they don't use vanilla build system. Most of those didn't bother to read any instructions, didn't look for instructions. If you cannot find the Building OpenOffice.org wiki page, then I have no words to say. Those surely will not be able to find another wiki page. or that there are too many documents, including documents with wrong information. New documents are written because they cannot edit the CVS documents etc. And please, please don't base your argumentation pro/agains a new guide on the situation as it was three or four years ago. The Building OpenOffice.org page exists in the wiki since 2006. Of course this initiative includes: - Updating links to the new content - Provide redirects - Promoting this guide on all the places where content is currently placed. For this, you don't need to write a new book [...] What I have identified is that we have an enormous amount of documents on too many places. Yes. And now you're adding yet another place. In this work various negative comments about building OpenOffice.org being impossible in the articles will be replaced by constructive tips for the developer. It never was complicated to build OOo on linux. Since aqua version is default, it is no longer complicated to build OOo on Mac OSX. The only problematic systems are Windows and other ports. What I am referring to is actually problems in the current documents, where building is referred to as: Complicated Impossible Ooo-build is much easier Yes, go-oo is freer, faster, better.. Sure thing. Of course go-oo folks write such propaganda. And probably all those complains are not about building OOo itself, but getting the right sources. What makes OOo slighly more complicated is its development structure. While still in cvs, you needed to use the OpenOffice2 alias (or OpenOffice2 and Extensions). THAT was chaos and complicated. People with problems didn't bother to checkout a milestone, but tried trunk, or did use the wrong alias and were getting incomplete/wrong sources. And of course then the complaint is ah, this is all so complicated: But only complicated because the user didn't look for info before trying to build. Now with svn it is little easier, no aliases anymore, however still the Milestones. [...] ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Consolidating build instructions for the community
Hi Marcin, *, 2009/7/16 Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl: Christian Lohmaier pisze: I still disagree. Basically /all/ of the questions asken on IRC about building OOo were because people are unable to read configure or because they don't use vanilla build system. Most of those didn't bother to read any instructions, didn't look for instructions. I could reply that probably using IRC is eating their brains ;) as most questions asked at dev seem to be quite different. Those questions will not be answered by a building OOo for newbies guide. The one I remember fall into the not using vanilla OOo/not taking advice given category. The other ones were build breakers are introduced (already built successfully in the past, newer milestone breaks). System components change in a incompatible way. Nothing that could be covered in a simple guide. (but rather are bugs in the code) [...] Linux build was strangely broken). Those even less. To get this straight: I'm /not/ against consolidating the pages, au contraire, I support getting rid of old pages. But: I am against yet another place (instead of reusing the existing pages) I am against the structure as it appears now I doubt that the new documentation will cause less questions. I'm speaking for myself only, and of course don't tell anybody to stop with the efforts. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] cws rebase failed
Hi Maximilian, *, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Maximilian Odendahlmax.odend...@t-online.de wrote: [...] I can see them inside my rebase directory, but svn status gives a question mark. Shouldn't they all be added automatically to my cws during rebase? How can I fix this? Probably easiest (= quickest) way to fix is to checkout/upate your tree to a state prior to the resync-attempt (can use date as revision), create a patch against the master it was based on at that time and then use that patch on the new master. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Build problems with CWS odff06 rebased to m50
Hi *, On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Mathias Bauernospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: How to clear output trees? I'm a dummy concerning building. In cygwin, something like cd $SRC_ROOT find . -maxdepth 2 -name wntmsci12* | xargs rm -rf should do. nitpickthe * is not protected against expansion from the shell - but shouldn't matter since there is no soutput dir in $SRC_ROOT/nitpick In the OOo build environment rm -rf */wntmsci12 from the root directory of the source tree is sufficient as the solver is at the same level as the modules. Not on linux. $ ls solver/ 300/ $ ls solver/300/ unxlngi6.pro/ But I wonder why you don't simply suggest a dmake clean in toplevel. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Build problems with CWS odff06 rebased to m50
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany frank.schoenh...@sun.com wrote: nitpickthe * is not protected against expansion from the shell - but shouldn't matter since there is no soutput dir in $SRC_ROOT/nitpick Ehm - shouldn't the protect it? Yes, you're right, my fault, didn't look carefully enough. But I wonder why you don't simply suggest a dmake clean in toplevel. Because at least /me usually works in an environment where this doesn't work (no complete source tree) :) Doesn't dmake clean still work? I mean it doesn''t really do more than calling rm -rf */unxlngi6.pro and rm -rf solver/*/unxlngi6.pro (or whatever output-tree is used). The only thing it does in addition is to make clean in dmake. ciao Christian
[dev] OpenGrok - now it's possible to sort results by path
(cc d...@ooo, but please f'up2 d...@tools.openoffice.org only) Hi *, now it is possible to let opengrok sort the search results by path in addition to the relevancy and last modified date sortings. ..well, not yet on the official opengrok on svn.services, but on pumbaa: http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:59145/source/ (maybe some of you still have this in your bookmarks from the time before opengrok was made available on svn.services.ooo) A tiny patch has been sent to upstream already in case you want to add it to your copy of opengrok: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7594 ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release
Hi Thorsten, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Thorsten Ziehm thorsten.zi...@sun.com wrote: [...] But to check the issues in Master = verified - closed could be discussed. Here the numbers are really 99% I think. Nearly all issues which are fixed in CWS are fixed in Master too. Maybe in the cvs days. Now with svn there have been a couple of failed integrations, quite a number of changes that were reverted by other cws. So I don't have trust in that number. And this makes it really hard to check when your fix was integrated in mXX, but later gets reverted by integration of another cws in mXX+4. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] buildbot builds vs standard builds
Hi Mathias, *, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: Thorsten Ziehm wrote: I do not see the need to bring the build bots near to the build environment here in Hamburg. The request for build bots was (as I know) to have builds in different environments to find build issues in these different environment. When these environment will be nearly the same, then we miss to find these build breakers. No, you are mixing build bots and Tinderbox builds. But even if we used Build Bots in that way, I don't see any reason for either-or. Well, there's no sharp line between tinderbox and buildbots in general. Yes, tinderboxes are only for building (but that doesn't imply they don't generate perfectly suitable builds, just that their bandwidth just doesn't allow for uploading of installsets or wasting bandwidth for the steady connection to the buildbot master) On the other hand, buildbots are of course not only sources of installable builds - it would be a waste if the build-results would not be collected and taken into account.. Buildbots and tinderboxes *both* serve the purpose of checking whether a cws introduces build-breakers. tinderboxes do so exclusively, for buildbots it depends on the focus of the specific bot. Some can be seen as installset providers (and that is what requested here: Dedicated bots that provide installsets comparable to the ones provided as releases/snapshots) and others as tinderboxes that can be asked for an installset. I don't see black and white here. In the current situation, with Sun using a different toolchain (not only wrt. configure in OOo, but also the compiler, third-party libs OOo is compiled agains) Ideally there would be a sun environment buildbot in addition to the existing ones (one that doesn't build each and every cws, but provides installation-sets on request). So whether Sun switches to community build-env or not is not /that/ important to make the community-testers happy. (would of course be a good thing for various other reasons). The o3-iso was a little step in creating such an installset-provider-bot - but as it was not updated and incomplete, the bot cannot build any current tree and thus is offline. ciao Christian and for completion: Of course also tinderboxes can provide installsets [they can easily add a download-link to the log that is then shown in the build-result box) - there just is no request a build-webinterface - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Java extension works directly after installation, but not after Office restart - how to debug?
Hi Marcin, *, On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl wrote: Hi Christian, did you try using another JRE? Yes. also tried with 1.5.u17 - same result. Directly after Installation (without restart of OOo), I can fully use the extension, after restart → broken. Easiest Testcase: * Open Impress (doesn't matter whether new or existing document) * OpenCards|About * hover over the buttons, make sure they react accordingly * move about-dialog window directly after installation → everything is OK, buttons do still react on hover, dialog can be closed after restart of OOo → Window is dead, doesn't react anymore, cannot be dismissed (same for the LanguageTool | Configuration dialog) I haven't used 1.6u11 yet and there could be some regression in it. Sometimes also removing javasettings.xml in your user directory helps resolve some problems with Java in OOo. This doesn't help unfortunately, removing the user-profile completely doesn't help either. ciao Christia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true Java extension works directly after installation, but not after Office restart
Hi *, 2009/2/15 Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org: Directly after Installation (without restart of OOo), I can fully use the extension, after restart → broken. Easiest Testcase: * Open Impress (doesn't matter whether new or existing document) * OpenCards|About * hover over the buttons, make sure they react accordingly * move about-dialog window directly after installation → everything is OK, buttons do still react on hover, dialog can be closed after restart of OOo → Window is dead, doesn't react anymore, cannot be dismissed (same for the LanguageTool | Configuration dialog) I'm happy, since I found a workaround for my problem: exporting SAL_NO_XINITTHREADS=true solves the problem So now the question: What am I losing by setting that var? I found issue 90094 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90094 where stated that: Could also be helpful for java plugins running in process. and indeed it is :-)) and http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92121 So apparently my X11 version is too stupid - but the symptoms are quite different from the issues (OOo doesn't start at all).. Well, I can live with it, but I wonder whether OOo could check for it by itself whether that var is needed or not? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Yet another commit to a master that was annoucned long ago. When will we have pre-commit hooks that prevent this?
Hi *, cc releases@, dev@, so there's no excuse that they don't read the list. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: Christian Lohmaier wrote: the summary says it all. Again there has been a commit to a master that was announced long ago. This commit surely is unintended as were the other ones. So why is it so hard to setup a pre-commit hook that prevents commits to tags? It isn't hard, but it seems that those who had to do it refuse to do so. sigh/ It happend yet again. And worse: While reverting the changes that person did break the tree (m41) (and before, there were accidental commits to m40) So if the responsible persons don't want to fix it, would they at least explain their decision? PLEASE fix it. +1 This still holds.. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Detailed build deps
Hi Jeff, *, On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Jeff j...@kconline.com wrote: The best page I've found is http://tools.openoffice.org/build_env.html, but search for python and you see only --with-system-python. The questions are thus: - Is package truly required or is it optional? - If package can be left out what function would be missing? This kind of information enables system developers/integrators to make more informed choices. Well, the answer is simple: If you use one of the --enable-system-xy, you of course need the xy-stuff on your system. Apart from that the OOo build is very self-contained. You only need a shell, the compiler, a JDK (for all features), ant (when using java-dependant features), perl (and per's Zip::Archive module) and that's about it. configure will tell you when something is missing with your configure switches. If it does not, it is a bug. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Java extension works directly after installation, but not after Office restart - how to debug?
Hi Jürgen, *, On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Juergen Schmidt juergen.schm...@sun.com wrote: Christian Lohmaier wrote: Java extension on my machine works only when run out of the soffice, directly after installing it via Extension Manager. After restarting OOo, the extension/Java just hangs (no cpu usage, but also no progress whatsoever) I use OOo 3.0.1 (Sun-provided build) and JDK 1.6u11 (also Sun's version) The extension I'm trying to use is OpenCards 1.0.1 ( http://opencards.info http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/OpenCards ) The extension works fine with OOo 2.4, and apparently also works fine on other machines. Since it doesn't crash, and doesn't print anything to the console, I have no idea where to look for the cause of the problem. Could you give some hints? mmh, strange. I expect a problem inside the extension. But without knowing the code it's hard to say. It's opensource - you can get the source of the extension from the sourceforge page: (linked from both the opecards.info OpenSource link and the extensions.services page Browse the source Download http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=198974package_id=235842release_id=628793 Browse http://opencards.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opencards/ I would suggest that you contact the vendor of this extension. I am sure that there is no general problem because i use several Java extensions that worked well under 2.4 and 3.0.1 As I wrote, this problem couldn't be reproduced by another user I asked, so it must be something specific to my setup, but I have no idea what this co↓ld be. (of course rm -rf userdir, even created a completely new unix-user, but did not help) And not all java extensions are affected. I.e. the svg import works fine (apparently if they don't use java-UI, then it works, but that's just a guess) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Java extension works directly after installation, but not after Office restart - how to debug?
Hi *, Java extension on my machine works only when run out of the soffice, directly after installing it via Extension Manager. After restarting OOo, the extension/Java just hangs (no cpu usage, but also no progress whatsoever) I use OOo 3.0.1 (Sun-provided build) and JDK 1.6u11 (also Sun's version) The extension I'm trying to use is OpenCards 1.0.1 ( http://opencards.info http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/OpenCards ) The extension works fine with OOo 2.4, and apparently also works fine on other machines. Since it doesn't crash, and doesn't print anything to the console, I have no idea where to look for the cause of the problem. Could you give some hints? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Need help: build error on fedora 10
Hi Kami, *; On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, KAMI911 KAMI911 kami...@gmail.com wrote: What about to build using epm? With --enable-epm configure option? I am using a fairly old distro (Ubuntu 7.10) to maintain the compatibility. epm only creates a specfile and then calls the real rpm(build) so you wouldn't need to do anything, since Ubuntu doesn't even use rpms, but debs :-) As to old versions of rpm: they should support passing the vars on the commandline as well. in sysui this is done already (there the packages are built directly from specfiles, without epm in between) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Need help: build error on fedora 10
Hi Martin, *, On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Martin Mancuska b...@borg.sk wrote: I have next problem with compiling of OpenOffice under Fedora 10. In addition to what Kami said: Another problem → another thread please. Preferably with a more telling subject than build error And no Fullquotes please. To underline what Kami said: The exact wording of the error message is essential, the most important part of a build-related problem. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Incompletely integrated cws
Hi *, While looking at the warnings in tinderbox, I stumbled upon one for which I provided a trivial patch. That patch has been applied to a cws and was verified in the cws. To my surprise the master, for which the cws should have been integrated still showed that error, so I did have a deeper look. And what I found worries me quite a bit. From cws jl105, only 3 files have been integrated (alone in module desktop there have been modifications to more than 30 files). All the other changes that were done in the cws were *silently* discarded/lost! It wasn't one of the early svn milestones, but was integrated in m37! How many other changes were lost while integrating other cws? How could this have happened in the first place? I mean I did understand that there were problems with deleted/added files, but in that case existing files were modified. Does every cws have to be double-checked now? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Who can closes an issue[ was: Fwd: [l10n-dev] Spanish version : issue in OLH
Hi *, On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Caio Tiago Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nguyen Vu Hung, 12-11-2008 14:26: Sadly, we don't really have control over IssueZilla, so it's effectively impossible to change/enhance IZ's permission system. I have no idea about IssueZilla but is it an open source? If it is, Yes We Can Change. No, it is not. Well, not exactly true, but even if it was fully opensource and available, we would be able to change the sourcecode, but we won't be able to replace the issueZilla that runs on the site with our modified version. It's based on open source Bugzilla, but sadly it is not open source. http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18 ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Re: [marketing] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] Re: OpenOffice.org Community Mapping Project
Hi Nguyen, *, this is starting to get off-topic, but well... On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Nguyen Vu Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my very humble opinion, OpenOffice.org is not a truly open. It is. It is big and thus hard to get your hands on, but that doesn't depend on the openness of OOo. Main coders is a team working in German and they work locally. Language is not the problem but IMO this is what they want to do. This is not my experience (anymore, definitely was that way in the past, but not anymore). Developers hang out in IRC regularily (or if not, can be asked to join) and answer devel-related questions. They answer on the mailinglists as well. Of course if you don't ask at all, you don't get an answer. Of course if you ask on IRC where everyone in Europe is supposed to be sleeping, you'll probably not recieve any reply from one of the german developers. But that is again nothing related to the openness of the project, just people living in different parts of the world. OOo is a very big project( 9.8 MLOC) and it is quite hard to add a new feature, or fix a bug. If a local team( or a contributor) shows a bug and tags it WORK_FOR_ME( a stopper), Works for me means: Works fine, doesn't need a fix at all. So if you're waiting for a fix for an issue that was closed as works for me, then you're waiting in vain. It will not be fixed unless you either make the ones who closed it change their mind (usually by discussing the problem on the appropriate mailinglist of the affected project) or provide a fix yourself (but if it is a bigger change, you should get in contact with the project first, to avoid conflicting and in the end wasted work) Again not related to the openness of the project, just a matter of common sense and restricted ressources. You just cannot fix anything. And of course it doesn't make sense at all to follow every request. (again common sense) chances are they get fixed with very low probability. Due to the big size, new comers will find it very hard to get started with OOo. This is nothing to blame on the openness of the project. The main reason, IMO( again) is that, core coders of the OOo project is not willing to share the knowledge. No, that's not the case. Plese give some *recent* examples. In my case, I am trying to submit some bugs to OOo qa. Most of them are still there, marked as NEW and a questions pops up in in mind: How OOo treats contributors? How QA works in OOo? Again: How is that related to the openness of the project? *Because* OOo is an open project and *everyone* can submit issues, the number of issues is very high. And compared to the number of issues the number of people who could fix things is rather low. Again common sense: If there are more issues that you (the developers) can handle, there must be issues that will remain unfixed/unhandled. But *because* OOo is an open project, *you* (the individual) can make a difference: You can reduce the number of issues by reviewing them, by consolidating related ones and maybe write a spec/proposal that combines multiple issues to save some work. Of if you have programming experience, you can fix a problem yourself and attach a patch. Patch handling has been much improved (despite the wrong facts that are spread in blogs or articles which are all based on the situation back in 2000/2002). If you have a patch and it wasn't touched/processed/evaluated within two weeks, make noise on IRC or on the mailinglists to have someone have a look at it. The openness is heart of the Open Source developement model, an open file format and an open source csv are not enough. Please state what of your points is related to OOo not being open. Your points are all based on the fact that OOo is big, has a big userbase and rather few active developers for the amount of requests made by those users. This is much different than saying: OOo is not open. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] SVN Hooks for formatting
Hi *, On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On 10/06/08 09:57, Caolán McNamara wrote: And subversion (like cvs) has a precommit hook that can e.g. reject files with tabs in them. e.g. http://wordaligned.org/articles/a-subversion-pre-commit-hook +1 [...] Sounds good for me also. ..but don't forget to restrict that to actual source-code files... Think of localize.sdf loosing its tabs :-) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] OOo RC/beta mirrors in Japan?
Hi *, On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Nguyen Vu Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone knows if is there any mirrors for OOo RC and beta stuffs( not official releases) in Japan? All the extended mirrors are listed here: http://distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/#extmirrors ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] charter discussion ?
Hi *, On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Hollmichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] regarding the new draft of the charter (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Items/Charter_Proposal) there is a paragraph 4.1.1 Three Code Contributor Representatives [...] From my perspective with active code contributor a people described, who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, [including SCA, cws-process] Is this something we can agree on as being an active code contributor for OpenOffice.org ? +1 from my part ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Re: [tools-dev] Re: [council-esc] Re: [tools-dev] OOo SCM project
Hi Jörg, *, On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Jörg Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So are there objections against starting the migration directly after DEV300 m31 gets finished? I'd appreciate if I would get any answer on the two questions posted by me on this list: svnsync performance and svn client requirements for developers. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar
Hi *, On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:49 AM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The reason why I add some --disable-something is that I want to save compiling time. Oh, then you're missing the most-important-to-save-time switch: --disable-binfilter (and wrt --disable-mozilla: While it is right that building mozilla takes quite some time as well, you can build mozilla once and then create precompiled mozilla packages - that way you don't lose the features but still save compile time) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar
Hi *, On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: [...] I make the whole source tree viewable, as well as the env file. http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/ http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/LinuxX86Env.Set.sh [...] Though --with-use-shell=bash was set in ./configure, It was not specified according to config.log from the above tree: It was created by configure, which was generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61. Invocation command line was $ ./configure --prefix=/home/vuhung --with-jdk-home=/home/vuhung/opt/j2sdk1.4.2_18 --with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant --with-system-stdlibs --with-lang=en vi ja So it doesn't reflect what you thought it should be. And you did run configure in a shell that already had variables from a previous attempt set. (this is clrear fom e.g. the path-settings in the environment file). Always run configure in a new, clean shell without the build-environment variables set. java, python, uno are not my goals at the moment. I need a binary first. Might be, but java is used in a couple of places during the build nevertheless. Question: Why with --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file? Congratulations, you found a dependency bug. Where should I commit a bug? http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi What component does this bug belong to? as it fails in scripting, and scripting is part of framework, I'd assign it to framework. (well it doesn't actually fail in scripting, but it is in scripting where that jar should have been built) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Do the ./configure in the directory config_office with appropriate options on the new terminal emulator. 2. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh 3. cd $SRC_ROOT/scripting At this point, I've run build and everything was fine. So far so good, it may take a while until I get OOo binary compiled or next error :) 4. mv unxlngi6.pro unxlngi6.pro-failed Is it equivalent to dmake clean unxlngi6 folder is 6GB big and it takes a long time. It should't be that big. All unxlngi* folders together shouldn't be that big. You really shouldn't try a debug build at first attempt... How long does it take to compile OOo?( pen IV 3.2GB, 2GB Memory, SCSI 320 HDD) If ccache is filled, it should take about 5 hours or something like that. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar
Hi *, On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Hung Nguyen Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:50 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or 'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet, or the module has not been built at all. What should I do now? cd to the $SRC_ROOT/scripting directory and try to run build there export CC=ccache gcc export CXX=ccache g++ I don't know whether ccache works fine for building current OOo. It is recommended by OOo team :). For faster build time. Yes, and it definitely works. (although I prefer the symlink approach, not the environment variables, but that doesn't matter) The command 'dmake' works depending on its own dependency files. In my first try, cd DEV300_m29; dmake cannot be found, so I specify its full path. Ignore it. No, Don't ignore it. Since that clearly shows that something is wrong with your environment. Better work on fixing it before trying workarounds that break in even more obscure ways. If you cannot just run dmake after sourcing the environment file, then something is really wrong, and you should post your environment file. export CXXFLAGS=-Werror export CFLAGS=-Werror -fvisibility=hidden This doesn't work. And it is begging for build-problems. Only enable -Werror after you finished a build successfuly. Only fiddle with additional compiler flags once you succesfully finished a plain build. Furthermore these two are unneccessary anyway. configure checks for the visibility feature anyway, and if you want warnings=errors, pass --enable-werror to configure. ./configure --prefix=$HOME \ --disable-cups \ Don't want to print with your OOo on modern distros/make use of cups features? Hmm... --disable-pam \ --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07/ \ OK, but... --disable-mozilla \ --disable-qadevooo \ --without-system-stdlibs \ --disable-odk \ --with-use-shell=bash \ --with-vendor=Vietnamese Localization Build \ --disable-vba \ --with-use-shell=bash \ this is specified twice... --with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant/ \ --without-java \ and this is a problem. Looks too complicated. I cannot make any comments on that... I can.. I just tried to disable anything I don't need. --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07 and --without-java seems to be abnormal but I hope it is fine(?). No. apparently it is not. and jar sounds like it is java, isn't it? So when you tell OOo not to use java during the build, it cannot compile java stuff... Question: Why with --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file? Congratulations, you found a dependency bug. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] At the end of the OpenSolaris 2008.05 adventure tour...
Hi Ulf, On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ulf Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Those who missed a few mail: I did try on purpose to compile OOo 3.0 M28 on OpenSolaris 2008.05 although its not a supported/recommended development platform ) At the end of the OpenSolaris 2008.05 adventure tour is JDK 1.5. OpenOffice requires JDK 1.5. OpenSolaris 2008.05 comes with JDK 1.6. I tried compiling OpenOffice 3.0 M28 against JDK 1.6 . I was not too successfull. But hey, OOo does not promise to compile with JDK 1.6 - no deal! AFAIK only hsqldb module had problems with JDK 1.6 OpenSolaris 2008.05 does not offer JDK 1.5 packages. You may try to install a JDK using a download package from java.sun.com. However, the Solaris packages of JDK 1.5 are build against Motif 2.1. And there is no Motif package for OpenSolaris 2008.05. As far as I understood it, the lawyers are working to make the two worlds compatible :(. IIRC you can tell java not to use any motif stuff/operate in some kind of headless mode as well. -Djava.awt.headless=true might be worth a try. [...] ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Starting more than one OO instance parallel
Hi Bastian, On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Bastian Preindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a possibility to start more than one soffice.bin process at a time on both MacOS and Linux? At the moment a second soffice.bin process immediately quits after startup if an instance is already running. Start OOo with a dedicated user-configuration directory: soffice -env:UserInstallation=file://home/user/ooouserdirectory ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Compile error: external/common/apache-ant[...] not found @ OpenSolaris snv 95
Hi Ulf, *, On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Ulf Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any hints on this compile error ? This: --with-jdk-home=/usr/jdk/latest/ in combination with: --without-java Is pretty pointless, isn't it? --with-epm=internal --with-system-libxml --with-system-python [...] Building module hsqldb [...] /export/home/nixnutz/oo.org-m28/external/common/apache-ant-1.7.0/bin/ant: No such file or directory And? Does it exist/did it exist but not anymore? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Could not open include file jni.h. @ OOo 3.0 M28 @ OpenSolaris svn 95
Hi *, On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:05 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I recommend JDK 1.4.1_03 since it has been absolutely used by the release engineer of OpenOffice.org for years. No, use JDK 1.5, the baseline will be raised shortly. 1.4 will no longer work. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] build or packaging problem
Hi Michael, On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Michael Strobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason I can not install the RPM packages built under a RHEL4 on that system. The RPM package manager complains about some files missing in the packages, but they seem to be built properly, e.g. libvcl680li.so is missing according to the package manager, As OOo packages don't have auto-requirements or lib-requirements set, but only package-names, this means that your packages were not created the usual way. Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores the no-automatic requirements setting. but at least it exists under ../vcl/unxlngi6.pro/lib/ in my build. Any ideas why it is not in the packages? Sure that it really is not in the package? As opposed to being listed in requirements/requires. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] build or packaging problem
Hi Michael, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Michael Strobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores the no-automatic requirements setting. Which one is the correct version of epm? I got 4.1 from epmhome.org for the build. correct=patched as needed by OOo. At least the older versions of epm needed a patch to make the packages relocatable and to fix the dependency generation stuff. Not sure whether it is still required for 4.1 (probably not for making it relocatable, but maybe still for the requirements) - I always use the internal rpm that is included with the OOo sources. But if the info below is correct, this is not the cause of the problem. Sure that it really is not in the package? As opposed to being listed in requirements/requires. Quite sure. I installed the packages I got with rpm's --force switch, Using --force is almost always a bad idea. Better use only --nodeps if you want to ignore the dependencies. which results in complaints about the missing lib(s) when I try to start OOo. So OOo itself complains about the missing libvcl680li.so? And what other libs does it complain about? You didn't write what codeline/Milestone you work on, for but that lib should be in the core04 package. (for OOO300 without the 680, just libvclli.so, so I assume it is OOH680?) Did you check that the lib is in the solver? (and not only in vcl)? And sure that the successfull packaging process belongs to the OpenOffice.org product and not, for example to the SDK? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] m29_LinuxIntel snapshot has no RPMs
Hi Joe, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to install the latest snapshot on a Fedora Linux system. Normally, I can use rpm to install the packages in the LinuxIntel tarball. However the latest snapshot has no RPMs: [...] Any suggestions? It was planned to only provide cws-builds in that form, and keep with packages for the regular Milestone builds. m30 will have RPMs again. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Compiling OOo 3.0 m28 @ OpenSolaris snv_94
Hi Ulf, *,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Ulf Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/oo.org-m28/config_office$ cc -V
cc: Sun Ceres C 5.10 SunOS_i386 2008/04/04
usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details
But OpenOffice wants an older version:
I doubt that. (and if I'm wrong: The guy/gal who wrote the config
check should have added an appropriate comment in that case).
checking for cc... /opt/SunStudioExpress/bin//cc
checking the SunStudio C/C++ compiler version... configure: error: found
version 5.10, use version 5.5, 5.7, 5.8 or 5.9 of the SunStudio C/C++
compiler
The configure check is like that:
_sunstudio_minor=`echo $_sunstudio_version | $AWK -F. '{ if ($2 == 5)
print true; else if ($2 == 7) print true; else if ($2 == 8) print
true; else if ($2 == 9) print true; else print false }'
So from my understanding two-digit minor versions have just not taken
into account at all.
I'd suggest forcing that check to true and try with the 5.10 compiler.
[building with gnu cc also requires gnu ld]
OpenSolaris does ship with a GNU ld which I could use (in theory) but
configure will ignore it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/oo.org-m28/config_office$ /usr/gnu/bin/ld -v
GNU ld version 2.15
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/oo.org-m28/config_office$ CC=gcc LD=/usr/gnu/bin/ld
[...]
checking gcc linker... configure: error: failed (not GNU ld). Use GNU ld
instead of Sun ld on Solaris
Even if configure would be happy with that, the build would break
nevertheless, since it doesn't call $LD, but does as configure does:
running the compiler with the linker-mode flags.
Looks like an OpenSolaris matter to me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/oo.org-m28/config_office$ ls
/usr/X11/include/X11/Xaw
ls: cannot access /usr/X11/include/X11/Xaw: No such file or directory
Well - either that package is not installed, or the path just is wrong.
ciao
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] how to disable print option in openoffice document
Hi Ramesh, On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:13 PM, rameshkancherla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is Ramesh kancherla. I am doing in openoffice related project. I have to disable print option in open office document using programatically when user doesnt has print option on that document. if user has print permission in another document i have to show print. can any one please tell me how do i enable or disable print option through programatically. See http://api.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=devmsgNo=17877 HTH, ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Re: vanilla linux builds
Hi *, On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Fridrich Strba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [upstream build environment] So a vanilla Fedora 3, RHEL4 or CentOS4 is compiler-wise compatible with upstream, just needed to add a java 1.4.x and it is ready to go (1.5.0 should be ok for QA too). Java 1.4 will soon not work anymore... ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] vanilla linux builds
Hi *. On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have a buildbot or any other piece of infrastructure that is capable of providing an installset that uses or matches the buildsystem of the vanilla linux builds provided by www.openoffice.org i.e. i386, builds with the same compiler, builds with the vclplugs, provides rpms, installs cleanly on oldest qa-used platforms. Well - if the O3-Iso http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/O3-build would have the GTK stuff needed to build the vclplugs, the O3-bot would match those requirements. Until then you only get rpms that (should) run on the oldest systems, but without the vlcplugins/filepickers... ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Troubles building DEv300_m20: dictmgr.hxx is missing
Hi Giuseppe, On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Giuseppe Castagno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while building DEV300_m20 tag I came across this: ... lingucomponent/source/lingutil/lingutil.cxx:62:23: error: dictmgr.hxx: No such file or directory lingucomponent/source/lingutil/lingutil.cxx: In function '_STL::vectorSvtLinguConfigDictionaryEntry, _ST New module: hunspell ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] deliver's verbosity
Hi *, On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Pavel Janík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11.6.2008, at 20:49, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: just noticed that in m18, deliver isn't as gossipy as before: doing a deliver in a module just prints deliver -- version 1.127 Module 'module' delivered successfully. x files copied, y files unchanged. ... Is there an option I missed? If not, is there a possibility to introduce one? VERBOSE=TRUE sighWhy was it changed again?/sigh I could live with build --deliver as called during a build ist silent, but deliver called directly was verbose. What is the rationale behind making deliver itself silent? ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Interest in developing a native barcode generator based on BWIPP
Hi Terry, *, On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:58:09AM +0100, Terry Burton wrote: I would like to recommend my open source PostScript barcoding library, ^^ That is a big problem, as OOo doesn't support PostScript for display/exporting to PDF, only when printing to postscript printers the postscript code can be used effectively. [...] The most straightforward approach would be the creation of a dialog (say Insert - Object - Barcode...) that accepts the parameters for the barcode, creates the correponding EPS code (this is what BWIPP makes completely trivial) OOo can only display (and export to PDF) the preview part of an EPS (although it can use external programs to create a preview when the eps doesn't provide one) - So a postscript/eps based solution doesn't really fit. But that's just my POV. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Ubuntu Linux OO.o compile errors
Hi *, On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 07:34:58PM -0400, Chris Brown wrote: Thanks for the response. I downloaded cairo, made it, and installed it. It was a newer version, libcairo.so.2.17.15...the one that was erroring out was libcairo.so.2.17.3. Hopefully this will do it. Ill know in about 5 hours :) When building with cairo, you almost certainly need to specify --with-sytem-freetype, since the that is in OOo's sources just is too old. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] How to set the GUI language when building?
Hi *, On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:40:15PM +0800, Ma Zhenyu wrote: I builded the code from web, and got the installation of english version? So I want to ask one question is: how to build Ooo of other language version, such as japanese or chinese language, need I download other code? Or just change some setting? You need to run configure with the --with-lang=list of language-codes options. See configure --help for samples. if you want to create languagepacks, you can run dmake ooolanguagepack in instsetoo_native/util after you built the whole thing. ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] CWS upload area
Hi *, On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Be super neat if our build-bots could be tweaked to directly (if the person building asks for it) upload their output install sets to it. Why should the buildbots uplad to a different server? Can't the termite one handle the current request? I mean all the buildbots that do upload installsets, upload to the termite (buildbot) server... ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Installing OOo 2.4.0 and DEV300m5 in parallel on Ubuntu
Hi Michele, On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:21:09PM +0100, Michele wrote: I would like to install OOo2.4 with the DEV300m5 in parallel on my ubuntu box, but I don't know how. They are both called openoffice, so when i try to install dpkg *substitutes* one version with the other. I have found this command for RPMs in an old setup guide: rpm -ivh --install --dbpath /home/user1/office/.rpm --nodeps --prefix /home/user1/office/ openoffice*.rpm where /home/user1/office/.rpm is the directory where the second installation should be. No - that's where an alernative rpm's database is placed. The installation files of OOo itself would be placed to /home/user1/office/ But I wouldn't recommend this installation method to anybody (unless you want to check the dependencies and stuff, the installation itself, but the the nodeps is pointless (yes, otherwise you would have to install a dummy package that provides a shell, but there is a dummy rpm that does this). So unless you want to check the update procedure of the packages (then the -i would be pointless, instead you should use -U, btw one of -i or --install is enough): Don't use the above method. Is there an equivalent command for dpkg? is there an alternative method altogether? Just extract the rpms: for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i | cpio -idmv ; done (or use your favourite file-manager/archive manager) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] source code for extensions and CVS modules
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Martin Hollmichel wrote: I would like to reming every developer of extensions for OpenOffice.org to do a clear separation of the code getting into the actual extension and code that might be necessary to package with the Office installation set. To support our modularization effort, I will not add any extension module to the OpenOffice2 alias in CVS. I'm going to introduce a separate alias for extensions. So so much to no open build problems known :-/ (scext missing from the alias and breaking the build if not present) ciao Christian -- NP: Bush - Swim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] dmake fails to build pyuno module(regcomp failed)
Hi Stanley, *, On Dec 31, 2007 2:39 AM, Stanley Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a problem when compiling pyuno module on loongson 2E platform (mips64 arch). The following is the message, Would you please do me a favor to find the reason? Thx. [...} dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngmips.pro/lib/pyuno_services.rdb' ---* tg_merge.mk *--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/ooo/openoffice.org-2.3.0 /build/pyuno/source/loader$ Does running build in pyuno multiple times help to overcome the error? If yes, then it is the same problem I'm having on Mac (PPC) from time to time. Rebuilding cpputools with debug=true might help as well in that case. I have no clue as on why it fails, but if it is the same behaviour as on Mac, then expect similar breaks in testtools. see http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82955 and http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84730 ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Multilanguage documents
Hi *, On Nov 11, 2007 3:54 AM, jonathon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rony wrote: FWIW: MS Word has been having that ability for quite a few versions now. There one would use the Language tab on styles to define what language it is used for (on that dialog one is able to turn off grammar- and spell-checking). How is that different from implementing language specific styles in OOo? Please don't confuse KAMI's feature-request with the stuff described in this excerpt. Of course you can already assign different languages to different parts of your document and that language will be used for spell-checking, hyphenation and will affect things like autocorrect/autoformat (replacement of typographic quotes for example) - if you choose the language none, no spell-checking, hyphenation is performed. But this is something fundamentally different from displaying different content depending on what language the user uses. A french version of OpenOffice.org would display something different than an english version. This could be simulated by using different sections that are hidden or shown depending on the language the user uses, but this would be a macro-based solution (either by letting the user choose, or by assigning the macro to the open document action) - but this of course requires the user to have macros enabled All in all, I don't quite see the usefulness of a feature that displays different content depending on the language of the surrounding application, but maybe there is a need I just don't see. Also I don't see why a style should be language-dependent, but chances are good, that I just don't understand what is meant with that. (As I understand it, it would be the opposite compared to how OOo now works. The style determines the language that is assigned to the text and not the language of the text determines how it is formatted) ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
