Re: [OSM-dev] OSMCoastline

2012-03-07 Thread Jochen Topf
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Peter Körner wrote: > Am 07.03.2012 15:57, schrieb Jochen Topf: > >Hi! > > > >I have been working on writing a substitution for the aging coastcheck > >program. > >It is not finished yet, but maybe somebody wants to play

[OSM-dev] OSMCoastline

2012-03-07 Thread Jochen Topf
er of magnitude faster than coastcheck does it. More info in my blog at http://blog.jochentopf.com/2012-03-07-osm-coastlines.html Code at https://github.com/joto/osmcoastline . Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-3

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM StreetDensityMap

2012-03-06 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:31:31PM +0100, npl wrote: > > > TagInfo-like systems (aggregating big data and creating statistics) > > > could de

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM StreetDensityMap

2012-03-06 Thread Jochen Topf
even more inefficient. Then to keep it going we invent more and more technology around it. Oh well, I liked Osmarender, spent quite a lot of time improving it and rendering maps with it. Sometimes its not about being efficient. :-) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jo

Re: [OSM-dev] Nested relations and generic implementation of geometry constructs - Was :osm2pgsql patch for nested relations

2012-03-03 Thread Jochen Topf
we should move towards a model where they can be expressed as proper areas and until then use type=multipolygon. There are different details on how public transport routes, hiking trails etc. are handled, but it all comes down to an ordered list of ways

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM – PostGIS – Mapnik problem!

2012-02-20 Thread Jochen Topf
which could damage your computer system: > you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the > University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > h

Re: [OSM-dev] osmjs - input file name available?

2012-02-07 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:33:56AM -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Is the input file name accessible within OSMJS? No. But extra arguments are in the global Javascript array "argv". Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +

Re: [Taginfo-dev] Suggestions for the new website

2012-02-06 Thread Jochen Topf
order to > show the tooltip. Yes. Unfortunately that would need more digging around other people's Javascript library code than I am willing to do at the moment. If somebody figures out a way to do that in a reasonably clean way, that would be great. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote

[OSM-dev] Hack Weekend Karlsruhe, Germany 25/26 Feb 2012

2012-01-19 Thread Jochen Topf
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Karlsruhe_Hack_Weekend_February_2012 Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Writing PBF

2011-12-13 Thread Jochen Topf
the PBF writer. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [Taginfo-dev] Error compliling tagstats

2011-12-13 Thread Jochen Topf
1.42.0.1ubuntu1 > libprotobuf-lite62.3.0-4ubuntu2 > protobuf-compiler2.3.0-4ubuntu2 > > I also tried updating to latest OSM-binary but I get the same error > compiling tagstats. > > Any suggestions? > > D > > _

[OSM-dev] Writing PBF

2011-12-13 Thread Jochen Topf
appen in practice. So if you see this problem, upgrade to a newer version of Osmium. And if you have implemented a PBF writer, you should probably check whether it suffers from the same or similar problem. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-3

Re: [OSM-dev] OSMJS - parse argv

2011-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
based on the input file. All extra arguments from the command line are available in the global Javascript array named "argv". Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium trouble

2011-11-21 Thread Jochen Topf
array that size, but I could imagine that its quite a bit. Jochen On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:16:25AM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:16:25 -0700 > From: Martijn van Exel > To: Jochen Topf > Cc: Hermann Peifer , ThomasB , > dev@openstreetmap.or

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium trouble

2011-11-21 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:33:40AM +0100, Hermann Peifer wrote: > On 21/11/2011 08:13, Jochen Topf wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:34:27PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote: > >>I also ran into trouble with files of around 40MB or larger. I still > >>get the same errors

Re: [OSM-dev] Memory-Leak in osmium

2011-11-21 Thread Jochen Topf
ms thats the same as the end of the program anyway.) So there is no leak, all memory is accounted for. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium trouble

2011-11-21 Thread Jochen Topf
he script you are using? Maybe we can find out if its doing something that triggers a bug. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium trouble

2011-11-20 Thread Jochen Topf
15 October, where osmjs still works fine. The changes in [2] are > causing the memory allocation trouble with larger .pbf files. > > Hermann > > [1] > https://github.com/joto/osmium/commit/61de862b54ffd879034c6f371df99182480fd613 > > [2] &

Re: [OSM-dev] osmjs says 'Killed'

2011-11-11 Thread Jochen Topf
gt; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:23:54 -0700 > From: Martijn van Exel > To: Jochen Topf > Cc: dev Openstreetmap > Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] osmjs says 'Killed' > > Jochen, > > I compiled with the GC flag and can confirm that osmjs's memory usage > is definitely

Re: [OSM-dev] Release of osmpbf version 1.2.1

2011-11-11 Thread Jochen Topf
e stringtable implementation and its not entirely clear that this refers to the Java reference implementation and others might do it differently etc.) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 __

Re: [OSM-dev] osmjs says 'Killed'

2011-11-09 Thread Jochen Topf
n a germany extract and sometimes others and don't have any problem like that. But it could be that the problem only shows up with, say very long ways, or objects with many tags or so. There could be something different about the US extract that triggers this. (Or maybe its ju

Re: [OSM-dev] Release of osmpbf version 1.2.1

2011-10-31 Thread Jochen Topf
the proto file that was missing to the wiki page. But I do agree that the documentation is not as good as it could be. Still far better than many other parts of OSM. :-) What I'd like to see at some point is a better distinction between the PBF format itself and the reference (and other) implem

[OSM-dev] Osmium updates

2011-10-31 Thread Jochen Topf
ts in PBF reader and writer. * Lots of other small fixes and cleanups here and there. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql, direction of a virtual way (based on a route)

2011-10-26 Thread Jochen Topf
e one used most often. So having always two relations is conceptually much easier. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium (osmjs) compile problem

2011-10-17 Thread Jochen Topf
Maybe Frederik can help a bit more. He builds the osmium/osmjs on Geofabrik machines using 10.04 for me. :-) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql and only-named multipolygons

2011-10-05 Thread Jochen Topf
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:20:10AM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Jochen Topf wrote: > > Thats sounds rather optimistic to me. As far as I know everybody who > > has thought about a proper area type has given up, because nobody > > could find a way how it was to be implem

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql and only-named multipolygons

2011-10-05 Thread Jochen Topf
up with a brilliant plan, because I also do think that we need an area type. Before we start this discussion here again. Please everybody have a look at the wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/The_Future_of_Areas) and read about all the things people have already proposed and thought about

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql and only-named multipolygons

2011-10-04 Thread Jochen Topf
ype should be pretty strict and solid, the *tags* is where we have the typical OSM flexibility. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql and only-named multipolygons

2011-10-04 Thread Jochen Topf
when doing this). You then have a multipolygon with a set of tags, handle it like you would for nodes and ways, ie. look at the tags and decide where and how to draw it. Discard any object that only has tags you don't understand. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium - "Corruption" when writing PBF

2011-10-02 Thread Jochen Topf
change? I am not sure any of those lead to the problem you describe, but you should fix them and we'll see how it look afterwards. Jochen On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:48:45AM -0400, Pris Matic wrote: > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:48:45 -0400 > From: Pris Matic > To: Jochen Topf >

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium - "Corruption" when writing PBF

2011-09-21 Thread Jochen Topf
> However, at some point in the process, they will turn 'random' and become > garbage. I've been stuck on this issue for awhile, and I'd appreciate any > advice. > > -Pris > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium - Writing Additional Tags to OSM Data

2011-09-01 Thread Jochen Topf
first few ways are > fine, then they go crazy: > http://pastebin.com/Hd2ywgn4 > > I'd appreciate any suggestions. If you post your code we can maybe see something. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium - Saving nodes to memory, so they are accessible when processing ways?

2011-08-30 Thread Jochen Topf
different ways of using the mmap handler for storing node locations: One uses RAM only (if you initialize it without a filename), the other uses the disk as backing store (if initialized with a filename). Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-7

Re: [OSM-dev] osmjs -- before_* and after_* are not called?

2011-08-29 Thread Jochen Topf
hould not make > a huge difference? Thats doesn't make a difference in this case. > BTW, is it already possible to use osmium for full history files? I'm > not even concerned about doing stuff with geometries, only gathering > staistics -- ie what have users contributed over

Re: [OSM-dev] osmium / osmjs -- node in way

2011-08-28 Thread Jochen Topf
ed 1 bit for each node. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Ways

2011-08-11 Thread Jochen Topf
Hi! Here you can see all cases with only a single node in a way or duplicate consecutive nodes: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-12.0&lat=25.0&zoom=3&overlays=single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http:

Re: [OSM-dev] Rendering Route Relations with Mapnik

2011-07-19 Thread Jochen Topf
robably with an image, and a description of how it can be solved. Configuration file snippets, SQL queries etc. can be added to show examples of the solutions for different kinds of software. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Merging Changes into Planet

2011-07-14 Thread Jochen Topf
uffer bufferCapacity=12000 --apply-change --buffer bufferCapacity=12000 --write-pbf $NEWPLANET This takes about an hour every day on a 800MHz machine. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mail

Re: [OSM-dev] Problem with tirex

2011-06-27 Thread Jochen Topf
tirex-master in > /etc/init.d : > $ /etc/init.d/tirex-master restart > > $ which tirex-master > /usr/bin/tirex-master > > > Anyone have a clue what might be the reason for "Cannot open master > UNIX domain socket: No such file or directory" ? > > Cheers, >

Re: [OSM-dev] Tirex Bucket Configuration

2011-06-15 Thread Jochen Topf
change settings accordingly. Look at the jobs.log logfile for rendering times and success rate. Experiment with different settings. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql for 64-bit IDs

2011-06-06 Thread Jochen Topf
you haven't even got a plan, just a vague idea? Please, if you think this is worth working on, then do so. Work on it. Study the problems, change some software, come up with a plan, try to implement it, find flaws, rework the plan. Do something. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql for 64-bit IDs

2011-05-24 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:18:05AM -0500, Scott Crosby wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > > If we use unsigned ints we have some more time. Problematic would only be > > a few cases where negative IDs are currently used (like in JOSM for d

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql for 64-bit IDs

2011-05-21 Thread Jochen Topf
e in JOSM for data thats not yet uploaded to the server). But it seems wasteful to me, to go to 64bit a year or so earlier than needed to accommodate this case. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___

Re: [OSM-dev] Filename extensions for OSM files

2011-05-11 Thread Jochen Topf
he tag that says that this is a history file. Just as we are currently discussing for the PBF version. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

[OSM-dev] Filename extensions for OSM files

2011-05-10 Thread Jochen Topf
n of .osm). I would be relatively straightforward to use .osc.pbf and .osh.pbf for the (still to be specified) PBF versions of those files. Or we could remove that strangeness and use some other scheme: .bosm, .bosc, .bosh (b for binary) ? .pbf, .pbfc, .pbfh ? Opinions? Ideas? Jochen

Re: [OSM-dev] PBF for History-Files (was: visible-Flag in PBF)

2011-05-10 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:21:40PM -0500, Scott Crosby wrote: > On May 8, 2011 5:21 AM, "Jochen Topf" wrote: > > Thinking about the inclusing of the invisible-Flag I think we have to step > > back a bit: > > > > There are two use-cases: One is reading an OSM

Re: [OSM-dev] Ordering OSM-Files (was: visible-Flag in PBF)

2011-05-10 Thread Jochen Topf
ity count. Marker blocks only work with sorted > data. Counts inflate the planet by 1mb and don't really solve the > problem. What makes 1MB or a marker block worth having 1MB is nothing compared to the size of the planet which grows about 1 GB every month or two. > I'm now le

Re: [OSM-dev] visible-Flag in PBF

2011-05-08 Thread Jochen Topf
eNodes? Also protobuf already supports some kind of introspection. I have never worked with it, because, as Scott says, it doesn't really give you enough information. But it is there. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___

Re: [OSM-dev] visible-Flag in PBF

2011-05-08 Thread Jochen Topf
y use case where you would need that, because there is no relationship between those IDs and anything you are interested in the real world. If you have a small list of IDs and want to read only those, it could make sense. But that list had to be very small. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org h

[OSM-dev] PBF for History-Files (was: visible-Flag in PBF)

2011-05-08 Thread Jochen Topf
red_feature" or something else. Its not really a feature. But it would make sense to use this mechanism. The PBF documentation would then explain that your are not supposed to set the visible flag on "current OSM" files and have to ignore its setting when reading those, but you have to

Re: [OSM-dev] visible-Flag in PBF

2011-05-08 Thread Jochen Topf
urrent disk sizes and b) will be eaten up in a few months of OSM growth. Time savings on the other hand are my biggest issue in most applications with OSM, because I want to work with data thats as current as possible. That being said I would not object to adding an lzma o

[OSM-dev] Ordering OSM-Files (was: visible-Flag in PBF)

2011-05-08 Thread Jochen Topf
object type). This would reduce the overhead on each block slightly for the price of having an additional block type. I am not sure which solution is best. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mail

Re: [OSM-dev] visible-Flag in PBF

2011-05-06 Thread Jochen Topf
le to add repeated fields. Just be sure not > to reuse any IDs. Ok, that makes sense. That leaves the problem with the wrong default. You can't set a default on a repeated field (I tried and the protobuf compiler complained). But the default for the visible flag should be "true" to

Re: [OSM-dev] visible-Flag in PBF

2011-05-06 Thread Jochen Topf
I only see the option of having the DenseInfoWithVisible message that supersedes the DenseInfo message and note it in the header that we need this capability. But I am hoping there is a better solution that doesn't lead to an incompatible change. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www

Re: [OSM-dev] Taginfo Developer Workshop

2011-05-01 Thread Jochen Topf
Hi! I have cancelled this workshop due to lack of interest. I'll be at the hack weekend in Essen, so if anybody is interested in Taginfo stuff, I suggest we do it there. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hack_Weekend_Essen_June_2011 Jochen On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:59:56AM +0200, Jochen

Re: [OSM-dev] XAPI and other solutions

2011-04-29 Thread Jochen Topf
ory-efficient than tree/DOM-based parsing. > > From my experience the expat-sax immplementation is faster then the > libxml sax-parser. I benchmarked it when developing Osmium and for OSM files expat was about 10% faster than libxml2. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://ww

Re: [OSM-dev] libosmpbf

2011-04-14 Thread Jochen Topf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:58:20PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote: > Am 14.04.2011 14:32, schrieb Jochen Topf: > >On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:21:58PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote: > >>As far as i understood there's still some logic needed to assemble > >>osm objects from the

Re: [OSM-dev] libosmpbf

2011-04-14 Thread Jochen Topf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote: > On 14.04.2011, at 12:10, Jochen Topf wrote: > > To make the PBF stuff from Scott easier to use from C++ I have added a > > Makefile > > and Debian config in my fork at https://github.com/joto/OSM-binary . Th

Re: [OSM-dev] libosmpbf

2011-04-14 Thread Jochen Topf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:21:58PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote: > Am 14.04.2011 12:10, schrieb Jochen Topf: > >To make the PBF stuff from Scott easier to use from C++ I have added a > >Makefile > >and Debian config in my fork at https://github.com/joto/OSM-binary . This >

[OSM-dev] libosmpbf

2011-04-14 Thread Jochen Topf
-dev package. I have sent Scott a pull request. We'll see how he likes it. :-) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/lis

Re: [OSM-dev] taginfo jsonp support

2011-04-13 Thread Jochen Topf
t possible? Or could I support you in developing this feature? > > Thanks a lot > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Implied Tags

2011-04-12 Thread Jochen Topf
ng all of that yet. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Searching home for new mailinglist

2011-04-11 Thread Jochen Topf
iling list. > Google Groups would be an option. Is there something else you could > recommend? Maybe becoming an OSGeo project is an option? http://www.osgeo.org/ Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 __

Re: [OSM-dev] tirex with custom tileschema

2011-04-11 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Steven M. Ottens wrote: > On 4/11/2011 2:01 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:24:38PM +0200, Steven M. Ottens wrote: > >>Does Tirex support different projections and tileschema's? I'm > >No. > &g

Re: [OSM-dev] tirex with custom tileschema

2011-04-11 Thread Jochen Topf
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:24:38PM +0200, Steven M. Ottens wrote: > Does Tirex support different projections and tileschema's? I'm No. The "Google" projection and tiling schema and the metatile schema used in OSM is very much hard-baked into Tirex. Jochen -- Jochen

[OSM-dev] history data

2011-04-10 Thread Jochen Topf
the node is deleted. But what happened before? Does the visible="false" on the first version mean it was deleted before it was re-created as version 2? For a deleted node, does the timestamp refer to the creation or the deletion? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http:

[OSM-dev] Taginfo Developer Workshop

2011-04-02 Thread Jochen Topf
/implement new features for Taginfo * Interface with similar systems such as Tagwatch, Tagstat, and OSMdoc More information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taginfo/Workshop2011 Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298

Re: [OSM-dev] perl and special utf-8 characters

2011-03-11 Thread Jochen Topf
regular expression") and I am 99% sure you will get the answer. > > > > cheers, > > Martin > > > > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

[OSM-dev] Tileserver for Tirex

2011-03-03 Thread Jochen Topf
timeout handling are missing. But its good enough to play around with. You'll find the code at http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/tirex/tileserver . Give it a try! Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-3

Re: [OSM-dev] imposm.parser - New Python library for OSM XML and PBF files

2011-02-22 Thread Jochen Topf
tation: http://dev.omniscale.net/imposm.parser/ > Source code: https://bitbucket.org/olt/imposm.parser/src > > As the name already suggests, imposm.parser is only a sub-package of a larger > project: Imposm. It is an importer for OSM data that we are going to release > in a couple of weeks. I

Re: [OSM-dev] Tirex - Rendering jobs stucked in the queue

2011-01-14 Thread Jochen Topf
ystem is to slow. I ahven't looked at your logs, but if this happens you should get a message in your log about the timeout. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium

2011-01-08 Thread Jochen Topf
ould be done and whether it would make sense. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Osmium

2011-01-07 Thread Jochen Topf
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:25:42PM +, Andrew Ayre wrote: > Jochen Topf wrote: > >Osmium is a C++ framework for handling OSM data read from XML or PBF files. > >The framework itself doesn't do much by itself, it just parses the data and > >gives you callbacks for

[OSM-dev] Osmium

2011-01-07 Thread Jochen Topf
e its statistics. More about Osmium is at http://blog.jochentopf.com/2011-01-05-osmium.html . Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetma

Re: [OSM-dev] Documentation about Tirex update strategies configuration

2011-01-02 Thread Jochen Topf
tat on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tirex/Commands and read the man pages. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] PBF HeaderBlock optional?

2010-12-21 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:41:05AM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:08:41AM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Scott Crosby wrote: > >> > Yes. That is an

Re: [OSM-dev] PBF HeaderBlock optional?

2010-12-21 Thread Jochen Topf
Maybe "OSMMeta" or "OSMMetaData" or so? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] PBF HeaderBlock optional?

2010-12-21 Thread Jochen Topf
e statistics for Taginfo (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de) runs in about 2.5 hours for the whole planet, thats less than half the time it needed when it was using the XML file format. PBF rocks! Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org

[OSM-dev] PBF HeaderBlock optional?

2010-12-20 Thread Jochen Topf
Hi! Is the HeaderBlock in PBF supposed to be optional? Osmosis only generates it if there is tag in the XML file. But thats not always the case. I would expect the HeaderBlock to be required because it contains important meta information. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http

Re: [OSM-dev] Source tag on each node

2010-12-19 Thread Jochen Topf
is that we'd actually save less than 1%. Thats not really worth any effort. And removing tags actually grows the database because there is now a new version to keep track of. So its even less worth. :-) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298

[OSM-dev] Protobuf lite for PBF?

2010-12-14 Thread Jochen Topf
Hi! There is a "lite" version of Google´s protobuf library that is considerably smaller than the full version. Anybody tried this for the OSM PBF format? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 _

Re: [OSM-dev] Storing way/relation start offset in PBF file

2010-12-01 Thread Jochen Topf
ill be flexible. I think its probably best we'll let this rest for the moment. We should give the PBF format some time to be implemented in more places and see where all the problems are and what ideas we have for improvements. Than later when we have more practical experience with the f

Re: [OSM-dev] Storing way/relation start offset in PBF file

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 05:07:26PM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > Sometimes it is useful to read ways before nodes or relations before way or > > nodes. With the XML format this is not really possible, but with the PBF > &g

[OSM-dev] Storing way/relation start offset in PBF file

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
mechanism? If not, its not a big deal, but we can note it down as possible extension in case we'll do a new version of the format someday. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing lis

Re: [OSM-dev] Block sizes in PBF Format

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:30:46AM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > The PBF_Format wiki page states: "The length of a Blob *should* be less > > than 16 > > megabytes and *must* be less than 32 megabytes." But fort

Re: [OSM-dev] Compression types in PBF Format

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:53:16AM -0600, Scott Crosby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > The PBF format supports three compression types: zlib, lzma, and bzip2. Do > > we have to support all of them? What is the currently existing software >

Re: [OSM-dev] Compression types in PBF Format

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
hats actually useful. But I do mind spending time on code that isn't. So lets get back to the subject: Is anybody writing PBF files with anything but zlib compression? Do we need more compression types? If yes, would that be an option to the writer program or is the writer

[OSM-dev] Block sizes in PBF Format

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
take up more than 32 megabytes? Thats 4k per entity, which could be reached with large relations. Well, we need quite a few of those large relations, but its good to know where the limits of the format are and they should be clearly documented. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://w

[OSM-dev] Compression types in PBF Format

2010-11-30 Thread Jochen Topf
-- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Translatewiki?

2010-11-14 Thread Jochen Topf
d the Translatewiki web pages high and low and couldn't find anything about that. :-( Jochen On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:11:58AM +0100, Mike Dupont wrote: > Siebrand and Gerard can advise you on this. > mike > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > >

[OSM-dev] Translatewiki?

2010-11-11 Thread Jochen Topf
into Translatewiki every time you change the source and re-import them after translation? Or does it somehow track the git repository of so? Would it make sense to add Taginfo as a subproject to the OSM project on Translatewiki? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/j

Re: [OSM-dev] changeset comment length limitation

2010-11-08 Thread Jochen Topf
iki page and just add a link to the changeset or something like it? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Relation member_roles from Osmosis import

2010-10-29 Thread Jochen Topf
, 2010 at 02:48:12PM +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:48:12 +0200 > From: Frank Broniewski > To: Jochen Topf > CC: dev@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Relation member_roles from Osmosis import > > Hello Jochen, > > thanks for your answ

Re: [OSM-dev] Relation member_roles from Osmosis import

2010-10-27 Thread Jochen Topf
stop_%n" > 207675;"forward_stop_%n" > > I think that numbering the member_role is not the intended way ;-) Thats a left-over from the time when relation members were not ordered. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-20 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:52:09AM +0100, Andy Allan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 16/10/10 19:44, Jochen Topf wrote: > >> > >>> I am currently fight

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-19 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 16/10/10 19:44, Jochen Topf wrote: > >> I am currently fighting some issues where tags with strange characters in >> them >> need to be represented in a URL for Taginfo. Lots of other websites probably >

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-19 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:57:33PM -0400, Anthony wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > Technically this would mean changing the API to check > > for those characters, removing any that are already in the database (can be > > done with normal manua

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-19 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:48:31AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Am 16.10.2010 20:44, schrieb Jochen Topf: >> Hi! >> >> I am currently fighting some issues where tags with strange characters in >> them >> need to be represented in a URL for Taginfo. Lots of oth

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-16 Thread Jochen Topf
. Thats different from the issue I have been talking about where there are real problems with some characters. Jochen > > Am 16.10.10 20:44, schrieb Jochen Topf: >> Hi! >> >> I am currently fighting some issues where tags with strange characters in >> them >>

Re: [OSM-dev] Disallowing certain characters in tag keys

2010-10-16 Thread Jochen Topf
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_tags>, I think thats a misguided use of tag keys probably invented by people who have never actually tried to write code that tries to interpret OSM tags. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@re

<    1   2   3   4   >