.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC
> https://bowlerhat.dev/
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > Nice work, Josh!
> >
> > I just tried with
> > var test:Function = () => true;
> >
> > Is that supposed to be
Nice work, Josh!
I just tried with
var test:Function = () => true;
Is that supposed to be ():Boolean => true ?
fyi if it is, I did not see a warning (I don't think)
I assume you are simply outputting the same 'conversion' for swf in the js
output at the moment ?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 2:37
That is very clearly explained with those examples, and the feature sounds
amazing Josh, thank you so much for this work.
-Greg
On Thu, 29 May 2025, 12:01 am Josh Tynjala,
wrote:
> You may recall that I added some new options to Royale's compiler a couple
> of months ago. They allow you to add
Sorry for the late reply, but thanks (again) for your continued additions
and improvements, Josh. Very much appreciated!
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:44 AM Maria Jose Esteve wrote:
> This is great. Thanks so much Josh, you're great 😊
>
> Hiedra
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Andrew Wetmore
>
It might be something to do with what css properties are expected to use
calc in the compiler. Not sure...
But in situations like this, I often try to convert the 'value' to a string
which seems to get around some compiler limitations, it might be enough to
get it working for you for now. Maybe tr
That sounds really cool, Josh, thanks for doing that.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:15 AM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just wanted to highlight some new Royale compiler options that I added
> recently.
>
> -js-include-script+=path/to/script.js
> -js-include-css+=path/to/styles.css
> -js-in
consider that a separate task from the one that I'm working on
> right now.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 12:22 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > Nice, Josh. Did you also consider making th
Nice, Josh. Did you also consider making the leap to es2022 ?
Whatever concerns people have about browser support levels may not be
irrelevant, not just because they may not be in - for example - another 2
years or so, but because I believe GCC supports transpiling es2022 down to
es2015 or es6 for
Thanks Josh, that's all helpful to know.
iirc I think we are also currently blocked from updating our closure
compiler version because of some local subclasses or overrides where the
base classes or implementation was changed inside in a more recent GCC
version, but it's been some time since I tri
t;
> > I don't know that my change will affect any third party's application,
> > I am so sorry for that.
> > I will use a workaround for ParentApplication in my project.
> > I have reverted my change, next time I ask first before committing sorry
> > again,
&g
Hi Pashmina,
I agree with Harbs, here. This is quite a big change for a low level/base
class like UIBase.
The problem with this change is that because it is so low level it affects
everybody and will break a lot of established projects, and because UIBase
was not intended to have this included at
Yes, these are all very likely explicit decisions.
There is a compiler flag "warn-instance-of-changes" to ignore this warning.
I have definitely had it in the back of my mind to switch this on for more
of the build stuff in the past where it was adding to build noise. Perhaps
there is a difference
"I'm actually considering disabling this warning
by default, and developers can opt in if they like it."
That sounds good to me, Josh - I think it can be useful, but agree that at
the moment it is mostly 'noise' when I see it.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 6:52 AM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> No, [this] is
gic. I'll look at the "apply" code to understand it better.
>
> Thx, thx, thx 😝
>
>
>
> Hiedra
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Greg Dove mailto:greg.d...@gmail.com>>
> Enviado el: lunes, 2 de diciembre de 2024 3:21
> Para: dev@royale.apa
perhaps try :
itemFilter = imodel.itemFilterDefault.apply( imodel ,args); //
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:08 PM Maria Jose Esteve wrote:
> Ok, I know when the error occurs specifically, but I don't know if this
> implementation "should work" or if it is just not implemented well.
> "Exception occur
Not knowing exactly what the method signature for 'fn_hello' is makes it a
little uncertain to advise, but it seems like you might want this
super.fn_hello.apply(this,[index].concat(args))
instead of
super.fn_hello.apply(index,[this].concat(args))
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 7:00 AM Harbs wrote:
t js-swf.
> >
> > Using Maven artifacts my projects are building correctly.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> >
> >
> > śr., 20 lis 2024 o 09:30 Maria Jose Esteve
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Thanks Yishay, I've never checked thi
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.zip
Java 1.9
OS: Windows 11 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No un
Yes, thanks for making this happen, Yishay :)
I will try to find time in the next two days, otherwise it will be Saturday
at the latest.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Thanks Yishay! Good work! I will try to look into that tomorrow.
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
>
> On Tue, 19 N
I might be wrong, but I think from memory, there were some issues upgrading
because of the current state of support for runtime module loading, and
some changes in the GC classes that were subclassed in royale compiler
code. I think this was a blocker for easy upgrade in the past when I tried,
but
That is fast :)
I'm using an 18 month old well spec'd windows laptop, It takes me about 21
mins to do a full build of everything (with swf support) in maven followed
by ant (with tests), sequentially.
If I just build the framework in maven (which does not have the unit tests
support yet, in any c
Very cool!
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 8:50 AM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> Hi Royale community,
>
> As you may know, I'm a big fan of finding ways for Royale's AS3 to JS
> compiler to work with emulated Flash APIs. Today, I'm sharing a little
> project created by Fancy2209 that uses AS3/Royale to build a
Congratulations to Spain!
On Sun, 20 Aug 2023, 3:01 pm Maria Jose Esteve, wrote:
> Excuse me, but I wanted to share MY JOY
>
> Hiedra
>
I have a large amount of monkey patches to get into the mx emulation code
which I will try to get in earlier, but that realistically I might not get
to until September. iirc, I think there were some keyboard event related
improvements among them. Emulation already has the keyDown vs. keydown
varia
Sorry Team,
I was meaning to get to this, but have been crazy busy. I will do better
next time.
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 5:23 PM Yishay Weiss wrote:
> Good point. I had in my head 4 votes at least were necessary, but 3 is
> enough.
>
> From: Piotr Zarzycki
> S
Hi Hugo,
Well done for your persistence, and congratulations on your achievement.
I didn't look at your legacy AIR app yet, but I took a quick look at the
demo of your Royale version just now. It looks fantastic!
Best regards,
Greg
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:52 PM Hugo Ferreira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
eParser.java#L98-L100
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:21 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > @Josh:
> > That sounds good to me, and makes things easier compared to what I was
> > considering.
>
Josh, thanks for solving that.
I do recall that I wasn't happy with the workaround I added for that (some
time ago now), but at the time could not think of a better way.
I forget the details but I think it was a problem with sass (old version)
itself, Sounds like you have approached it in a much mo
oyale,
> there's no chance the SWF will be byte-for-byte the same. You have a
> better chance with an AS-only project, but I think there were different AST
> and output strategies in each compiler.
>
> Of course, I could be wrong,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/5/23, 7:21
F8 and the data includes Windows-encoded characters that
> reference
> > a file or something like that.
> >
> > IIRC, that's why I decided to live with JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS, so we don't
> > make a change that can't be overridden.
> >
> > -Alex
>
Nice find, Josh.
I was intending to look into some similar issue with resource*
.properties *files
as well.
We have definitely had the need to set utf8 file.encoding in
JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS to get that to work the same as flex compiler did for
royale compiler (JS in particular, but I will try to chec
Hey Hugo,
What exactly is the 'this' instance?
If it is a Royale class, then you do have the option of using the
Reflection lib.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 11:25 AM Hugo Ferreira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This works on debug build:
>
> for (var field:String in this)
> {
> if (Strings.endsWith(field,
Hi Hugo,
There was still a slight issue with that - iirc the sass compilation only
happens with the maven build. I am pushing a fix for maven - can you please
check that the defaults.css (which is generated from the sass compilation)
is what you want... thanks, Greg
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 6:17
Sorry Josh, Andrew,
I have not been able to give this (or many other topics) much attention
recently.
Josh: +1, definitely no objections, and thanks for your work on this.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:14 AM Andrew Wetmore wrote:
> +1 I just have to update the documentation and the Pelican tool
ect OR there IS a
targetProperty."
Do you have some test cases for this? I didn't quite 'get' this... if you
have test cases that define this please add them (with [Ignore] metadata if
they are failing) so I can address anything that is not working as it
should be.
On Tu
well.
I will try to get it in tomorrow before I start my normal work hours.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:49 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> I will look into it today.
>
> Unfortunately the instance level 'plus' method is not suitable for the
> general case, because an XMLList referen
if(isXM > //output lefthand.plus(righthand)
> > }else{
> > // output righthand.plus(lefthand)
> > }
> >
> >> On Jul 4, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the compiler should be using the “plus” XML method f
Yes the first one of those is the reason that it is tricky. An empty
XMLList does not equal an empty string (it does equal undefined), but it
seems it does concatenate as an empty string.
I will look at this tomorrow, we do have some client code that relies on
the undefined equality behavior and r
o result in an empty string. It
> now results in “undefined”.
> >>
> >> i.e.
> >>
> >> var xml:XML = ;
> >> '' + xml.Baz.text()
> >>
> >> I believe we used to get “”, and now we get “undefined”.
> >>
> >&
Sorry about that, Harbs.
"I’m guessing XML(_children[i]) really was meant to be: (_children[i] as
XML)..."
That was some time ago, but I also think you are correct with the guess.
I probably had a momentary lapse of thought and forgot that
XML(something) ]
does not get ignored by @royaleignoreco
I personally don't think that this should be anything that the user has to
make an conscious effort to enable (like choosing beads, which is our main
tangible expression of PAYG / 'code as you go'). The reason I think this is
simply because it is api emulation of native as3 language-level types as
Mark, would you mind sharing what version of SonarQube you are using?
Our experience is that a recent version (needed for java 17) does not seem
to work for actionscript files, so we'd be keen to hear what version you
are using.
Thanks,
Greg
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 8:18 AM Greg Dove
Please report that as an issue. For the first one, I assume it is
generating something like d1.setHours(d1.setMinutes(d1.setMillseconds(0)))
? That is going to cause problems, because each of those methods returns
the 'getTime()' value, and not the value that was set.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:1
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 9:51 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It's been a while since I used any code quality tools with Apache Royale.
> > I'm keen for some updated suggestions if you have any... to be clear:
> this
> > i
on code and
> rely on controllers/VO/utility in pure AS files to give you the most
> benefit from it.
>
> -Mark K
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Greg Dove
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 00:51
> To: us...@royale.apache.org
> Cc: Apache Royale Development
&g
Hi everyone,
It's been a while since I used any code quality tools with Apache Royale.
I'm keen for some updated suggestions if you have any... to be clear: this
is about the actionscript/css/mxml, not about the generated javascript.
I worked on a project some years ago (when it was still FlexJS)
do not implement the royale approach for event cloning.
This is only in js-debug builds.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:50 AM Brian Raymes
wrote:
> You are welcome, and thank you; a vacation sure does sound nice!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Dove
> Sent: Monday, Apri
s there a way I can assist you with these changes? Can you provide an
> example of what needs to be updated?
>
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Greg Dove
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 11:19 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] R
Sorry, free time is challenging right now, I didn't get this in yet, I will
find some time at the end of my day tomorrow
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:41 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> Yeah, that would be a symptom of this (getting just a plain Event)
> Looks like there are a whole bunch of
Event instead of the actual type declared.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Dove
> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 12:00 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with Release 0.9.9 and 0.9.10-SNAPSHOT
>
> Brian, I have an idea what it mi
Brian, I have an idea what it might be. There was a change for event
redispatching to align more with the way flash does it natively. It could
be incomplete or unimplemented event cloning support. I will look into this
over the weekend.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 5:51 am Brian Raymes, wrote:
> Hello al
12:43 PM Hugo Ferreira
wrote:
> You are absolutely right !
> It worked !
> Thank you very much.
>
> Where should I log this bug ?
>
> Greg Dove escreveu no dia terça, 29/03/2022 à(s)
> 00:36:
>
> > For:
> > modelType="{TestGridModel}"
> >
&
For:
modelType="{TestGridModel}"
it is not 'modelType' that needs to be [Bindable] in this case as it is the
destination of the binding, not the source of it.
Assuming other bindings are working in the enclosing mxml file (which
should be true with ContainerDataBinding), then perhaps there is an
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
-
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
download). And I assume now th
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.9-src.zip
Java 1.8
OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unap
, at 11:03 AM, Harbs wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I missed this email before, but I don’t think this will work with
> full minification.
> >
> >> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:37 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >>
> >> In the absence of anything suggesting otherwise, I
maintainability and
also still means that the EventDispatcher dispatchEvent method is behaving
differently to how it should behave.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:31 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> Sorry I sent that last message accidentally before finishing it...
>
> To achieve the same thing i
I don't know, but I will look into it today (local time) and see if I can
figure it out.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 8:19 AM Yishay Weiss wrote:
> ASDoc is failing which is blocking the build.
>
> Greg, I have found out commit 63c94366f533bc1384401cdd6ba1f20057b4d999
> breaks the ASDoc example, spec
ain/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as#L87
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:28 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> for any example that listens and re-dispatches an event in Royale, eg:
>
>
> public function collectionChangeHandler(event:CollectionEvent):void{
for any example that listens and re-dispatches an event in Royale, eg:
public function collectionChangeHandler(event:CollectionEvent):void{
... other code ...
else if (ce.kind == CollectionEventKind.RESET)
{
... other code ...
dispatchEvent(event)
It's helpful to think of 'id' as a public getter/setter definition (which
is essentially the same as a [Bindable] public var definition) on the class
represented by the containing mxml document. So it has to follow
actionscript rules for naming a getter/setter (or variable).
You cannot write code l
x things as needed.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:05 AM Harbs wrote:
> What needs fixing?
>
> > On Jan 17, 2022, at 5:20 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > Just a note that I do expect to add fixes to some aspects of XML/XMLlist
> > this week
>
>
Just a note that I do expect to add fixes to some aspects of XML/XMLlist
this week, and to add improvements to emulation classes.
Actually I expect we will probably have a number of improvements to
emulation classes this month. If there is not a pressing need to release
0.9.9, I'd suggest that the
ons of Java can no longer target Java 6 anyway. Some can still
> > target Java 7, but I've seen some that can only target Java 8 now. I say
> > Java 8 sounds good to me as a new minimum. That's what I've been using as
> > the minimum version for many projects over the last
PM Yishay Weiss wrote:
> Ignore this. I think I understand why.
>
> From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:57 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: jsUnsafeNativeInline
>
&
What is our official minimum JDK? I had thought we had discussed this in
the past and agreed it needed to be 8 now, but I could find no reference to
this discussion. Does anyone recall this?
At the moment the maven CI build is happy with using java 8 language
features, because it is using java 8 t
Just a quick note to let you know about a new feature. One you probably
don't want to use very often at all. It is a combination of latest compiler
updates and Language swc JS update.
I added it to avoid a low level use of eval inside Language.as, which was
there in the first place to do some very
WF SWCs be made smaller without the js/out folder? Yeah,
> probably. But you might need to keep js/out for the distribution that
> tries to mimic a Flash Builder compatible SDK.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 1/6/22, 2:06 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>
> We have swf-s
Jan 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Josh Tynjala
wrote:
> As I understand it, SWF-only .swc files should not contain any .js files.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 2:06 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > We have swf
We have swf-swcs and js-swcs. Maven puts them alongside eachother, ant puts
them in the two separate folders (swf in the original project folder, js
inside corresponding projectJS folder in the sibling file structure).
Question:
Why do the swf-swc builds have js out content inside them? I think th
Just a quick comment:
This thread was started in relation to the Maven ci Build. But I don't see
any lingering issues with that.
I think the lingering issues are with the ant build on the server that also
runs our royaleunit tests. And the issue there seems to be that the Google
closure lib is to
I would assume that goog.bind would be optimized by gcc if it can be
(perhaps it is inlined if it uses es5 function.protoype.bind internally- I
did not look inside it)
The function naming/caching in Language.closure is important, including
private naming conventions when they are needed for closur
Hi Maria,
Firstly, I think that option is only relevant when compiling an
'application' and not a 'swc' (using 'mxmlc' and not 'compc' ). That might
be the only reason it is happening, but I did not try these options yet, so
have not checked this.
If the above is not the reason, then it could als
two commit pulls to try to narrow down what
> changed:
>
> 1. Before spark-dynamic-layout-jan-2021 and greg-dove deferred changes
> (December 2021): c256c4342e1d2e16a938ab08ef9049c94489685c
>
> 2. Before ChildResize (October 2021):
> ad38c5ad7a1a3a627b1882e299d4d
gt; to figure out how to keep it from running (or maybe just run in
> certain
> > folders). IMO, the CPU usage of that indexer sometimes burns our
> Azure
> > credits just fast enough that we run out with about 24 to 48 hours
> before
> > the month ends.
>
FYI I just added some changes to emulation that support the following:
-layout optimization (layout is not being requested as often at startup)
-creationPolicy="none" in Container
*Some layout optimization*
Instead of layout being triggered on a parent by every child as it is added
to its parent
lly?
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:45 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> > btw I'm actually back a bit with FF 78.11.0esr (32-bit) which is pretty
> > much from around 1 year ago. I am a
btw I'm actually back a bit with FF 78.11.0esr (32-bit) which is pretty
much from around 1 year ago. I am actually reluctant to upgrade this one,
because it still runs the debug flash player in the browser, I think an
upgrade is a one way street.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:39 PM Greg Dove
re's nothing earlier that failed on yours?
>
>
> On 12/17/2021 1:50 AM, Greg Dove wrote:
> > Thanks again Edward, that was certainly much easier than last time I set
> up
> > for this (which was quite some time ago and required downgrading to an
> > older version
Thanks for the heads up, Alex!
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> I just got the email that the Jenkins server ran out of Azure credits and
> will be suspended for a while. Not exactly sure when the new credits are
> released.
>
> On 12/16/21, 11:49 PM, &qu
: Java returned: 1
thanks,
Greg
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> Thanks Edward, I will keep that in mind for the future. Meanwhile I made
> changes today that got it to pass.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:21 PM Edward Stangler
> wrote:
>
>>
>
just quickly, I can see examples:
1 is at [1]
2 is at [2]
1.
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75511afbb9f81c5e69cc55c4e2ae3148e8462fb5/frameworks/projects/Core/src/test/royale/flexUnitTests/language/LanguageTesterTestVector.as#L570
2.
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75511afbb9
ompare them to see if I see anything.
> I'm also going to try to delete the .m2 royale folder in case it "rings
> the bell" 😝.
>
> I'll tell you now.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Greg Dove
> Enviado el: jueves, 16 de diciembr
Hi Maria,
It's really difficult to say.
Maybe you did a full clean and removed some cached js files for library
swcs that have since changed.
If you have an archived version of the full js build that worked, you could
maybe do some sort of diff of the build fileset to look for major changes.
You
r: panelView.contentArea is undefined
>
>
>
> On 12/15/2021 2:03 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> > I will have to come back to that, it is something I consider to be not an
> > easy setup, so need to figure it out.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:48 AM Gre
I will have to come back to that, it is something I consider to be not an
easy setup, so need to figure it out.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:48 AM Greg Dove wrote:
>
> Ok, so I just did
> ant runmxtests
> and it ran the swf tests, they passed.
> So it looks like this is failing
t; the tests work the easier it will be to diagnose the next failure, but
> other than that there’s no urgency as far as I know.
>
> From: Greg Dove<mailto:greg.d...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 10:19 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.ap
Sounds like Panel related, so probably mine - I guess these are swf tests?.
Is it ok if I figure that out in about 9-10 hours
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 9:07 PM Yishay Weiss wrote:
> We’ve started getting this error:
>
>
> panelView.contentArea is undefined
>
> Since the following [1] changes. Amu
eep-code-with-metadata=Inject;
> > >>>> -show-binding-warnings=false;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -export-public-symbols=false
> > >>>> -prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
> >
t;
> The fact is that this is in the application, almost from the beginning and
> had not given me any errors previously when running the release version.
> Could you explain a bit more? Maybe for you it's obvious but I don't see
> it :P
>
> Thx.
> Hiedra
>
> ---
Hi Maria,
Do you use any XML in your app?
And/or what code is line 40 in your App.mxml ? Is it an event handler for a
service call?
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:11 AM Maria Jose Esteve wrote:
> As I mentioned in another post, my release version doesn't work either (a
> few months ago I did a t
in working project too but effectively in the TDJ it doesn't, and I
> don't know why, I will check it.
>
> I'm also going to try to find out why the ant and asconfigc builds are not
> copying (or generating) the images that are not shown in the TDJ :(
>
> Thx
>
> Hi
ewelTheme and, as you say, it has created a
> defaults.css file BUT it doesn't contain the modifications for the
> "indeterminate" state. I'll check it and let you know later.
>
> Thx Greg,
> Hiedra
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Greg Dove
> Envi
Hi Maria, for Jewel, the ant build requires that the defaults.css has
already been updated (via any maven sass build updates) and committed to
the repo, alongside the sass-related changes.
Do you have any uncommitted changes to various defaults.css inside your
themes folder, after running the them
t; It’s a bit of a stretch that it’s a concern because even where it’s
> used, the source is not typically going to be an outside source. I wouldn’t
> consider it an obstacle for “1.0”, but we should address it.
> >
> >> On Dec 7, 2021, at 10:11 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >>
>
should be fixed.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2021, at 9:36 PM, Greg Dove wrote:
> >
> > We discussed at one point the potential security risks associated with
> > using innerHTML in some code, for example and that other frameworks avoid
> > that (React requires that a dev use a method called
> dangerouslySetInnerHTML
> > or something like that).
>
>
%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cca220d20dc9a4198260108d9b9ac0b3e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637744971437180957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=7omox%2FoGgSIqZVuYtDTxjPs%2BXzF
Sounds good to me. I assume there is no reason that we cannot have 0.9.10,
0.9.11 if we need to before 1.0, but I don't know about the 'automatic'
setting to 1.0.
I'd also suggest that it might be easier to wait until January, because a
number of us will be affected in the coming weeks with holida
but I'll check it out.
> Can you point to the file that I need to change ?
>
>
> Greg Dove escreveu no dia domingo, 5/12/2021 à(s)
> 16:25:
>
> > Hi Hugo,
> >
> > You probably never saw it yet but Jewel style setup is a little different
> > and is structur
Hi Hugo,
You probably never saw it yet but Jewel style setup is a little different
and is structured in a sass build. So I think you don't normally make
changes in defaults.css directly, because it will likely get overwritten
next time the sass build gets run. I will check this later today and
con
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
